scholarly journals O09 Safety profile of baricitinib for the treatment of RA up to 8.4 years: an updated integrated safety analysis

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin L Winthrop ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Gerd Burmester ◽  
Walter Deberdt ◽  
Douglas Schlichting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background/Aims  Baricitinib (BARI) is an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1/2, approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe- rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults. Here, we update the drug’s safety profile with data up to 8.4 years of treatment. Methods  Long-term safety of BARI was assessed from 9 completed randomized trials(5 Ph3, 3 Ph2, 1 Ph 1b) and 1 ongoing long-term extension(LTE) study. Incidence rates(IRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) were calculated for all RA patients treated with ≥1 dose of BARI through 1-Sep-2019(All-BARI-RA set). IRs for deep vein thrombosis(DVT), pulmonary embolism(PE), and DVT and/or PE(DVT/PE) were also calculated for groups of patients while receiving BARI 2mg/4mg within All-BARI-RA. Major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) were adjudicated in 5 Ph3 studies and the LTE. Results  3770 pts received BARI for 13,148 PY, with median and maximum exposure: 4.2 and 8.4 years, respectively. Overall IRs per 100 PY were: for any treatment-emergent adverse event (AE)(25.8); serious AE (including death)(7.2); temporary interruption due to AE (9.5); permanent discontinuation due to AE (4.8); death (0.52); serious infection (2.7); opportunistic infection (0.46)(excluding tuberculosis [TB], including multidermatomal herpes zoster [HZ]); TB (0.15); HZ (3.0); MACE (0.50); DVT (0.31); PE (0.24); DVT/PE (0.46); malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)(0.91); NMSC (0.33); lymphoma (0.07); and gastrointestinal perforation (0.04). (IRs)[95% confidence intervals] for patients while receiving BARI 2mg (N = 1077) and BARI 4mg (N = 3400) were DVT 2mg (0.38)[0.18, 0.73] and 4mg (0.30)[0.21, 0.43]; PE 2mg (0.26)[0.09, 0.56] and 4mg (0.25)[0.16, 0.36]; and DVT/PE 2mg (0.47)[0.23, 0.84] and 4mg (0.46)[0.34, 0.61]. IRs for death tended to increase in later time intervals (beyond 192 weeks). No particular cause of death contributed to this increase. For all other safety topics of interest, across 48-week treatment intervals, IRs remained stable over time. Across safety topics, IRs were consistent with previous analyses. Conclusion  In this update, with 3021 additional PY of exposure, BARI maintained a safety profile similar to that previously reported, with no increase of IRs across safety topics through exposures up to 8.4 years. Disclosure  K.L. Winthrop: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. T. Takeuchi: Consultancies; AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Medical, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Pfizer Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Taiho Toyama Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and UCB Japan. G. Burmester: Consultancies; Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company. W. Deberdt: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. D. Schlichting: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. D. Mo: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. C. Walls: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. J.S. Smolen: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, ILTOO Pharma, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche.

Atrial fibrillation associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (01) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Cheng Wang ◽  
Cheng-Li Lin ◽  
Guei-Jane Wang ◽  
Chiz-Tzung Chang ◽  
Fung-Chang Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryWhether atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial. From Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000), we identified 11,458 patients newly diagnosed with AF. The comparison group comprised 45,637 patients without AF. Both cohorts were followed up to measure the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Univariable and multivariable competing-risks regression model and Kaplan-Meier analyses with the use of Aelon-Johansen estimator were used to measure the differences of cumulative incidences of DVT and PE, respectively. The overall incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) of DVT and PE between the AF group and non-AF groups were 2.69 vs 1.12 (crude hazard ratio [HR] = 1.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.54-2.39), 1.55 vs 0.46 (crude HR = 2.68; 95 % CI = 1.97-3.64), respectively. The baseline demographics indicated that the members of the AF group demonstrated a significantly older age and higher proportions of comorbidities than non-AF group. After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities, the risks of DVT and PE remained significantly elevated in the AF group compared with the non-AF group (adjusted HR = 1.74; 95 %CI = 1.36-2.24, adjusted HR = 2.18; 95 %CI = 1.51-3.15, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier curve with the use of Aelon-Johansen estimator indicated that the cumulative incidences of DVT and PE were both more significantly elevated in the AF group than in the non-AF group after a long-term follow-up period (p<0.01). In conclusion, the presence of AF is associated with increased risk of VTE after a long-term follow-up period.

scholarly journals Safety of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 4.6 and up to 9.3 years of treatment: final results from long-term extension study and integrated database

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-221276
Author(s):  
Peter C Taylor ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Gerd R Burmester ◽  
Patrick Durez ◽  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Serious Infections

ObjectiveTo report long-term safety from the completed extension trial of baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsTreatment-emergent adverse events are summarised from an integrated database (9 phase III/II/Ib and 1 long-term extension) of patients who received any baricitinib dose (All-bari-RA). Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) for malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) and standardised mortality ratio (SMR) were estimated. Additional analysis was done in a subset of patients who had ever taken 2 mg or 4 mg baricitinib.Results3770 patients received baricitinib (14 744 patient-years of exposure (PYE)). All-bari-RA incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years at risk were 2.6, 3.0 and 0.5 for serious infections, herpes zoster and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), respectively. In patients aged ≥50 with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, the IR for MACE was 0.77 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.04). The IR for malignancy (excluding NMSC) during the first 48 weeks was 0.6 and remained stable thereafter (IR 1.0). The SIR for malignancies excluding NMSC was 1.07 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.26) and the SMR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.92). All-bari-RA IRs for deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE), DVT and PE were 0.5 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.61), 0.4 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.45) and 0.3 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.35), respectively. No clear dose differences were noted for exposure-adjusted IRs (per 100 PYE) for deaths, serious infections, DVT/PE and MACE.ConclusionsIn this integrated analysis including long-term data of baricitinib from 3770 patients (median 4.6 years, up to 9.3 years) with active RA, baricitinib maintained a similar safety profile to earlier analyses. No new safety signals were identified.Trial registration numberNCT01185353, NCT00902486, NCT01469013, NCT01710358, NCT02265705, NCT01721044, NCT01721057, NCT01711359 and NCT01885078.

scholarly journals P220 An updated safety profile of baricitinib for the treatment of RA up to 7 years

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Ilias Kouris ◽  
Thorsten Holzkämper ◽  
Marco W Wu ◽  
Ricardo Xavier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Baricitinib (BARI) is a selective inhibitor of janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2, approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults in over 50 countries. Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety of BARI in patients with RA with a specific focus on malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious infections and herpes zoster (HZ) events. Methods Data from nine completed studies (5 Phase 3, 3 Phase 2, 1 Phase 1b) and 1 long term extension (LTE) study were pooled for this analysis (data cut-off date: 13-Feb-2018). The all BARI data set included all patients exposed to any BARI dose. Results A total of 3,770 patients with RA were treated with BARI (10,127 patient years [PY]) with a maximum exposure of 7 years. Of these, 2,938 (78%) and 1,754 (47%) were on concomitant methotrexate or corticosteroids (CS; mean dose 6.2 mg/day), respectively. The incidence rates (IR) of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were 0.8 (2-mg) and 1.0 (4-mg; as-randomized analysis) in the LTE. The IRs for MACE were similar between the all BARI and PBO group; however, the IR for DVT/PE were numerically higher in the BARI 4mg group during the PBO-controlled period. IRs for MACE remain stable over time. The IR of serious infections were numerically higher in the PBO group; the IR of tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections were similar between the all BARI and PBO group. During the PBO-controlled period, HZ IR was significantly higher for BARI 4-mg versus PBO (4.4 vs 1.1) (Table 1). Amongst 323 HZ patients, 11 (4%) had received prior HZ vaccination. Twenty-six [8%] cases were multidermatomal, and no visceral disease was reported. Multivariate analyses showed that older age and some geographical regions (Asia, especially Japan, Taiwan and South Korea) were associated with a higher risk of HZ. Conclusion This integrated analysis in patients with active RA exposed to BARI for up to 7 years shows that the safety profile of BARI is like that reported previously. The IRs of malignancies, MACE (including DVT/PE), serious infection, and HZ did not increase over time. Disclosures D. Walker: Honoraria; Lilly, Pfizer, Giliad, Novartis, Roche. Member of speakers’ bureau; Lilly, Pfizer, Roche. I. Kouris: Other; Lilly employee. T. Holzkämper: Shareholder/stock ownership; Lilly. Other; Lilly employee. M.W. Wu: Other; Lilly employee. R. Xavier: None. J. Smolen: Consultancies; Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Astro, BMS. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB. P. Durez: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly. Y. Chen: None. J. Zhong: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly Contractor. R. Liao: Other; Lilly employee. M.C. Genovese: Consultancies; Eli Lilly. K. Winthrop: Consultancies; Pfizer, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Abbvie, Roche, BMS.

scholarly journals Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment over a median of 1.6 years

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-221051
Author(s):  
Kevin L Winthrop ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Franziska Matzkies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Active Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Serious Infection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Adjusted Incidence

ObjectiveTo characterise safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsData were integrated from seven trials (NCT01668641, NCT01894516, NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT02065700, NCT03025308). Results are from placebo (PBO)-controlled (through week (W)12) and long-term, as-treated (all available data for patients receiving ≥1 dose filgotinib 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily) datasets. We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs)/100 patient-years filgotinib exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Results3691 patients received filgotinib for 6080.7 PYE (median 1.6, maximum 5.6 years). During the PBO-controlled period, TEAEs, including those of grade ≥3, occurred at comparable rates with filgotinib or PBO; long-term EAIRs of TEAEs grade ≥3 were 6.4 and 7.6/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for deaths were 0.6/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 0.5 and 0.3/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for serious infection were 3.9, 3.3 and 2.4/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 1.6 and 3.1/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for herpes zoster were 0.6, 1.1, and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 1.8 and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for major adverse cardiovascular events were 0, 1.7 and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 0.4 and 0.6/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. No venous thromboembolism occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term EAIRs were 0.2 and 0/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100.ConclusionsOver a median of 1.6 and maximum of 5.6 years of exposure, safety/tolerability of FIL200 and FIL100 were similar, with a lower incidence of infections with FIL200 among the long-term, as-treated dataset.

scholarly journals DOP61 Tofacitinib, an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Analysis of an open-label, long-term extension study with up to 5.9 years of treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S100-S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
G R Lichtenstein ◽  
E V Loftus ◽  
S C Wei ◽  
A O Damião ◽  
D Judd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib were demonstrated in patients with moderate to severe UC in 3 Phase 3 studies.1 Here, we present data from an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study.2 Methods We present updated safety and efficacy data from the OLE study (OCTAVE Open, NCT01470612; as of May 2019, database not locked). Eligible patients included non-responders (Week 8 data) in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (NCT01465763; NCT01458951) and completers (Week 52 data) or treatment failures (early-termination data) in OCTAVE Sustain (NCT01458574). Patients in remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no individual subscore &gt;1, rectal bleeding [RB] subscore 0) at Week 52 of OCTAVE Sustain (central read) received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID); all others received 10 mg BID. Induction non-responders without clinical response (≥3-point and ≥30% decrease from induction study baseline total Mayo score, plus ≥1-point RB subscore decrease or absolute RB subscore ≤1) at Month 2 of the OLE study were withdrawn. Incidence rates (IRs) for adverse events (AEs) of special interest were calculated (no. of unique patients with events per 100 patient-years). Efficacy endpoints were derived from Mayo score (local read) with non-responder and last observation carried forward imputation (NRI-LOCF) [a]. Results Of 944 patients who received ≥1 dose of tofacitinib, 769 (81.5%) received 10 mg BID (median duration [range]: 5 mg BID 1170 [36–2066]; 10 mg BID 668 [1–2159] days). In total, 338 (35.8%) and 93 (9.9%) patients discontinued due to insufficient clinical response and AEs (excl. worsening UC), respectively. IRs (95% confidence interval) in the Tofacitinib. All group were: deaths 0.18 (0.05, 0.47); serious infections 1.57 (1.08, 2.19); herpes zoster (non-serious and serious) 3.27 (2.54, 4.14); major adverse cardiovascular events 0.14 (0.03, 0.40); malignancies excl. non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0.92 (0.56, 1.42); NMSC 0.74 (0.43, 1.21); deep vein thrombosis 0.05 (0.00, 0.25); pulmonary embolism 0.18 (0.05, 0.47) (Table). At Month 36 (NRI-LOCF), 58.9% (n = 103) and 33.5% (n = 257) were in remission, 64.6% (n = 113) and 37.0% (n = 284) had mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1) [b] and 66.9% (n = 117) and 40.2% (n = 309) showed clinical response, in the 5 and 10 mg BID groups, respectively. Conclusion Incidence of AEs remained generally consistent in patients with moderate to severe UC in the OLE study compared with a previous analysis.2 Data continue to support long-term efficacy with tofacitinib up to 36 months beyond Week 52 of OCTAVE Sustain. References

scholarly journals Predictors of long-term post-thrombotic syndrome following high proximal deep vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Engeseth ◽  
Tone Enden ◽  
Per Morten Sandset ◽  
Hilde Skuterud Wik
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent chronic complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb, but predictors of PTS are not well established. We aimed to examine predictors of PTS in patients with long-term PTS following proximal DVT. Methods During 2006–09, 209 patients with a first time acute upper femoral or iliofemoral DVT were randomized to receive either additional catheter-directed thrombolysis or conventional therapy alone. In 2017, the 170 still-living participants were invited to participate in a cross-sectional follow-up study. In the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test, PTS was defined in line with clinical practice by four mandatory, predefined clinical criteria: 1. An objectively verified DVT; 2. Chronic complaints (> 1 month) in the DVT leg; 3. Complaints appeared after the DVT; and 4. An alternative diagnosis was unlikely. Possible predictors of PTS were identified with multivariate logistic regression. Results Eighty-eight patients (52%) were included 8–10 years following the index DVT, and 44 patients (50%) were diagnosed with PTS by the predefined clinical criteria. Younger age and higher baseline Villalta score were found to be independent predictors of PTS, i.e., OR 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99), and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02–1.49), respectively. Lack of iliofemoral patency at six months follow-up was significant in the bivariate analysis, but did not prove to be significant after the multivariate adjustments. Conclusions In long-term follow up after high proximal DVT, younger age and higher Villalta score at DVT diagnosis were independent predictors of PTS.

P6461The long-term clinical comparisons of symptomatic patients of pulmonary embolism with and those without deep vein thrombosis: from the COMMAND VTE Registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Murata ◽  
Y Yamashita ◽  
T Morimoto ◽  
H Amano ◽  
T Takase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Severe Clinical Presentation ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), has significant morbidity and mortality. Acute PE, in particular, is fatal if we miss it, and symptomatic patients of PE sometimes have concomitant DVT. Purpose This study compared the risk of mortality in symptomatic patients of PE with and those without DVT in the long term. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry is a multicenter registry enrolling consecutive 3027 patients with acute symptomatic VTE objectively confirmed by imaging examination or by autopsy among 29 centers in Japan between January 2010 and August 2014. Patients with both PE and DVT (N=1334) were regarded as PE patients, and the current study population consisted of 1715 PE patients and 1312 DVT patients. Results There were 1203 symptomatic patients of PE, including 381 without and 822 with DVT. In our cohort, the mean age was 67.9±14.9 years, 63% was female, 44% had hypertension, 12% diabetes mellitus, 5% history of VTE. There were 20% of active cancer. Baseline characteristics were well matched except for dyslipidemia (18% vs. 23%, p=0.021) and atrial fibrillation (8% vs. 5%, p=0.045). Patients without DVT had a more severe clinical presentation compared to those with DVT, including hypoxemia, shock and arrest. Moreover, Initial parenteral anticoagulation therapy in the acute phase was administered less frequently in patients without DVT (89% vs. 96%, P=0.0001). Two groups received thrombolysis (20% vs. 26%, P=0.18) and mechanical supports (Ventilator 14% vs. 5%, p<0.001, PCPS 5% vs. 3%, p<0.001, respectively). During follow-up, 93 (8%) patients experienced recurrent VTE events and 98 (8%) major bleeding events, and 323 (27%) patients died. The most frequent cause of death was cancer (11%). There were a significant differences in the cumulative incidences of all-cause death between the groups (32% vs. 24%, P=0.006), whereas there was significant difference in VTE-related death (13% vs. 4%, p<0.001). Estimated freedom rates from death for patients of PE without and those with DVT were as follows: 88% vs 99% at 10-day, 86% vs 95% at 1-month, 75% vs 83% at 1-year, and 64% vs 71% at 5-year, respectively. Landmark analysis Conclusions In symptomatic patients of PE, there was a difference in mortality between groups, but no difference in recurrent VTE. Patients without DVT had a more severe clinical presentation compared to those with DVT, and many VTE-related deaths in the acute phase. The one-month mortality rate differed statistically between groups, but there was no significant difference in long-term survival beyond one month. Most of deaths were due to underlying diseases, mainly cancer, and less commonly due to VTE in the long term. Acknowledgement/Funding Research Institute for Production Development, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation

scholarly journals Economic Analysis of Rivaroxaban for the Treatment and Long-Term Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Portugal

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Fonseca Santos ◽  
Sónia Pereira ◽  
Euan McLeod ◽  
Anne-Laure Guillermin ◽  
Ismini Chatzitheofilou
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Scenario Analyses ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Venous thromboembolism is a burden on healthcare systems. The aim of this analysis was to project the long-term costs and outcomes for rivaroxaban compared to standard of care (enoxaparin/warfarin) in Portugal for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A Markov model was developed using event rates extracted from the EINSTEIN trials supplemented with literature-based estimates of longer-term outcomes. Core outcomes included per patient costs and quality-adjusted life years reported separately per treatment arm and incrementally, as well as cost per quality-adjusted life years gained. The deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism indications were analysed separately. The analyses were conducted from the Portuguese societal perspective and over a 5-year time horizon. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Several scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the impact on results of varying key modeling assumptions.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Rivaroxaban treatment was associated with cost-savings for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and was both cost-saving and more effective for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, compared with enoxaparin/warfarin.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> The results of the sensitivity and scenario analyses further supported that rivaroxaban is a cost-effective alternative to standard of care treatment. The use of an expert panel to derive some input values and the lack of Portuguese specific utilities were the main limitations.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Rivaroxaban represents an efficient alternative to using enoxaparin/warfarin in Portugal, as it’s associated with lower costs (for both indications) and greater quality adjusted life years (for the pulmonary embolism indication).</p><p><br /><strong>Keywords: </strong>Venous Thrombosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism.</p>

scholarly journals Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Tofacitinib

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ni ◽  
Soe Moe ◽  
Kay Thi Myint ◽  
Aung Htet
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Janus Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Immune Modulators ◽  
Serious Infections

Since the introduction of immune modulators in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there has been hope that orally effective biologic agents would be developed. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has become the first oral biologic to receive approval for use in active RA patients. This paper reviews the efficacy and safety profile of Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily. Remarkable improvement in terms of ACR 20 response and HAQ-DI score was noted at month 3 and month 6. DAS 28-4 ESR < 2.6 achievement was noticeably obvious at month 6 for both dosages. No significant serious adverse events, serious infections, neutropenia, or anaemia were observed compared to placebo. In fact, Tofacitinib 5 mg was even found to have significant protective effect of anaemia in the meta-analysis (P=0.004). Tofacitinib has a noticeable efficacy in controlling disease activity in RA with a manageable safety profile. However, longer studies are needed for its long-term safety profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document