Use of a Standardized Algorithm to Decrease the Primary Cesarean Section Rate at a Major Tertiary Care Center [30B]

2017 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 27S-28S
Author(s):  
Aishwarya Reddy ◽  
Tara Vick ◽  
Michael S. Miller ◽  
William Anderson ◽  
Paul Marshburn ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Bhattarai ◽  
Rajiv Shah ◽  
Sita Dhakal ◽  
Pragya Malla ◽  
Srijana Sapkota

Background: General anesthesia for cesarean section is being less popular for cesarean section in present days but sometime general anesthesia is inevitable. The aim of the study is to assess the trends of general anesthesia, indications, clinical outcome in mother and fetus in high altitude setting of tertiary care center of Nepal. Methods: We conducted descriptive cross-sectional study all cases of cesarean section in Karnali Academy of health Sciences (KAHS) located at high altitude over three years period   in our institute. Data were retrieved from the hospital records during three fiscal year (Jan 1st 2017 to Jan Dec 31st 2019). The record of all the patients who underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia was reviewed for demographic details, indication of general anesthesia, trends for general and spinal anesthesia and maternal and neonatal outcome. Results: Out of total deliveries 2175, 309 (14.2%) cases account for cesarean section. Among them, 52 (17%) required general anesthesia . Eclampsia 19(36%) remain the major indication for General Anesthesia in cesarean section followed by failure of spinal anesthesia number 14 (26%) , cord prolapse six (12%), antepartam haemorrhage five (10%), spinal site infection four (8%), Khiphoscoliosis two(4%), Patients request  two (4%). Use for general anesthesia technique was consistent for three years with slow rise in use of spinal anesthesia . There was no any anesthesia related maternal mortality and nine intraoperative neonatal   Conclusions:  General anesthesia practices are consistently required in rural high-altitude setup. Eclampsia is the commonest indication followed by failure of spinal anesthesia and cord prolapse. Neonatal outcome is still not good.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1721-1726
Author(s):  
Meryl C. Hodge ◽  
Minxue Shen ◽  
Ri-hua Xie ◽  
Shi-Wu Wen ◽  
Mark Walker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (236) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhan Bahadur Shrestha ◽  
Ratna Khatri ◽  
Prakash Raj Oli ◽  
Rosy Malla ◽  
Cimona Shrestha ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cesarean section is a common obstetric procedure which is done to reduce complications in high risk pregnancies. The aim of study was to find out the prevalence of cesarean section in a maternity unit of a tertiary care center. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 497 pregnant women presenting in a maternity unit of a tertiary center of Kathmandu, Nepal over a period of six months from March to August 2017 after taking ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee (Ref. 24). In this study, the prevalence of cesarean section, perinatal outcome, maternal and neonatal complications if any were observed. Data and descriptive analysis were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and percentage for binary data. Results: The prevalence of cesarean section was 171 (34.4%) at 95% Confidence interval (30.2-38.7). Most common indication for cesarean section was fetal distress 53 (31%). The maternal complications developed in 11 (6.4%) among those who delivered via cesarean delivery; Surgical Site Infection being the most common maternal complication. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate among the newborns via cesarean section delivery was 48 (27.43%) and neonatal sepsis 14 (8%) was most common adverse neonatal outcome. Conclusions: The cesarean rate at the study center is higher than standard target rate of World Health Organization. Neonatal and maternal adverse outcome in current study were comparable with existing literatures.


Author(s):  
Prabha Agrawal ◽  
Rahul Agrawal ◽  
Ganshyam Jagathkar

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is spreading globally at an accelerated rate. A serious public health threat, it has caused a major impact on health care systems with a significantly high mortality and morbidity. Physiological changes and immuno-compromised state make pregnant women vulnerable during infectious disease outbreaks and hence need a more cautious approach. With this report we aim to share our experience regarding clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of 10 diagnosed COVID-19 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section at Medicover hospital, a tertiary-care center in Hyderabad, India between July to September 2020. All 10 pregnant women were referred in their third trimester with diagnosis of COVID-19. 2 out of 10 patients had severe COVID-19 and were managed in the ICU. All patients underwent emergency cesarean sections and none of the infants were infected with COVID-19. At discharge, all patients and the newborns were in a clinically stable condition. Effective management strategies incorporating integrated team approach, early cesarean section and low-threshold for mechanical ventilation has been shown to be associated with favorable outcomes for mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and their infants. Also, the present data does not support any evidence of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus in those manifesting during the third trimester of pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document