scholarly journals Critical Ethics: How to Balance Patient Autonomy With Fairness When Patients Refuse Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e0326
Author(s):  
Piroska K. Kopar ◽  
Jessica B. Kramer ◽  
Douglas E. Brown ◽  
Grant V. Bochicchio
Keyword(s):  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Critical Ethics

Issues of Capacity and Decision-Making in the Context of Delirium

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Patterson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Cognitive Change ◽  
Treatment Team ◽  
Precipitating Factors ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Fundamental Consideration

Decision-making capacity is a fundamental consideration in working with patients in a clinical setting. One of the most common conditions affecting decision-making capacity in patients in the inpatient or long-term care setting is a form of acute, transient cognitive change known as delirium. A thorough understanding of delirium — how it can present, its predisposing and precipitating factors, and how it can be managed — will improve a speech-language pathologist's (SLPs) ability to make treatment recommendations, and to advise the treatment team on issues related to communication and patient autonomy.

Perceived Overprotection and Its Association With Quality of Life in Dementia

GeroPsych ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Mechthild Niemann-Mirmehdi ◽  
Andreas Häusler ◽  
Paul Gellert ◽  
Johanna Nordheim
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Negative Association ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Mental Well Being

Abstract. To date, few studies have focused on perceived overprotection from the perspective of people with dementia (PwD). In the present examination, the association of perceived overprotection in PwD is examined as an autonomy-restricting factor and thus negative for their mental well-being. Cross-sectional data from the prospective DYADEM study of 82 patient/partner dyads (mean age = 74.26) were used to investigate the association between overprotection, perceived stress, depression, and quality of life (QoL). The analyses show that an overprotective contact style with PwD has a significant positive association with stress and depression, and has a negative association with QoL. The results emphasize the importance of avoiding an overprotective care style and supporting patient autonomy.

Communication in medical genetics and patient autonomy

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
С.В. Шевченко ◽  
С.В. Лаврентьева
Keyword(s):  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Medical Genetics ◽  
Legal Problems

В свете коммуникативных особенностей медико-генетической консультации рассматривается два типа этико-правовых проблем, касающихся автономии пациента. Показана роль первичной консультации в их решении. In this paper we considered two types of ethical and legal problems regarding patient autonomy in perspective of the communicative features of the medical genetics. Also, this paper shows the role of the primary consultation in solution of this problems.

Patient Autonomy, Capacity, and Consent

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Berg ◽  
Emma Cave
Keyword(s):  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
The United States ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Medical Decisions ◽  
General Overview ◽  
Best Interests Standard

This chapter discusses patient autonomy, capacity, and consent involving children. It first provides a general overview of children’s rights with respect to making medical decisions in both the United States and Europe. The chapter then discusses the best interests standard (which is usually applied in cases of minors) and how to consider capacity in the context of children. In the discussions of European approaches, the chapter covers relevant international and regional human rights law. The jurisdiction of England and Wales are used as examples. The chapter also provides a general overview of US state approaches and federal law. The chapter concludes by noting some new areas of medical decision-making which challenge the traditional models.

scholarly journals Ethical challenges of the healthcare transition to adult antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics for adolescents and young people with HIV in Uganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda ◽  
Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka ◽  
Derrick Lusota Amooti ◽  
Eleanor Namusoke Magongo ◽  
Philippa Musoke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Successful Transition ◽  
Healthcare Transition ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Retention In Hiv Care

Abstract Background Whereas many adolescents and young people with HIV require the transfer of care from paediatric/adolescent clinics to adult ART clinics, this transition is beset with a multitude of factors that have the potential to hinder or facilitate the process, thereby raising ethical challenges of the transition process. Decisions made regarding therapy, such as when and how to transition to adult HIV care, should consider ethical benefits and risks. Understanding and addressing ethical challenges in the healthcare transition could ensure a smooth and successful transition. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ethical challenges of transitioning HIV care for adolescents into adult HIV clinics. Methods Data presented were derived from 191 adolescents attending nine different health facilities in Uganda, who constituted 18 focus group discussions. In the discussions, facilitators and barriers regarding adolescents transitioning to adult HIV clinics were explored. Guided by the Silences Framework for data interpretation, thematic data analysis was used to analyze the data. The principles of bioethics and the four-boxes ethics framework for clinical care (patient autonomy, medical indications, the context of care, and quality of life) were used to analyze the ethical issues surrounding the transition from adolescent to adult HIV care. Results The key emerging ethical issues were: reduced patient autonomy; increased risk of harm from stigma and loss of privacy and confidentiality; unfriendly adult clinics induce disengagement and disruption of the care continuum; patient preference to transition as a cohort, and contextual factors are critical to a successful transition. Conclusion The priority outcomes of the healthcare transition for adolescents should address ethical challenges of the healthcare transition such as loss of autonomy, stigma, loss of privacy, and discontinuity of care to ensure retention in HIV care, facilitate long-term self-care, offer ongoing all-inclusive healthcare, promote adolescent health and wellbeing and foster trust in the healthcare system. Identifying and addressing the ethical issues related to what hinders or facilitates successful transitions with targeted interventions for the transition process may ensure adolescents and young people with HIV infection remain healthy across the healthcare transition.

Informed Consent and the Elusive Dichotomy Between Standard and Experimental Therapy

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-408
Author(s):  
Lars Noah
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
College Campuses ◽  
Human Experimentation ◽  
Experimental Therapy ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Medical Experimentation ◽  
Disclosure Rules ◽  
Near Unanimity

A rich academic literature exists about issues of informed consent in medical care, and, to a lesser extent, about a variety of issues posed by human experimentation. Most commentators regard patient autonomy as a desirable— though in practice often unattainable—goal, and near unanimity exists about the necessity for even fuller disclosure before experimenting on subjects. Although this Article intentionally side-steps the broader debate about informed consent, it challenges the conventional wisdom that special disclosure rules should apply in the experimental context.Clinical trials have become big business. Estimates suggest that as many as twenty million Americans have enrolled in formal biomedical studies, though, as a measure of the full scope of medical experimentation on humans, that figure may represent only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Historically, sponsors of clinical trials recruited subjects informally, counting on word of mouth among physicians and also perhaps posting flyers around college campuses.

scholarly journals Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Manuel Durán ◽  
Karin Rolanda Jongsma
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Medical Informatics ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Epistemic Reasons ◽  
Potential Bias ◽  
Ethical Concerns ◽  
Normative Issues ◽  
Ethical Basis ◽  
Computational Processes

The use of black box algorithms in medicine has raised scholarly concerns due to their opaqueness and lack of trustworthiness. Concerns about potential bias, accountability and responsibility, patient autonomy and compromised trust transpire with black box algorithms. These worries connect epistemic concerns with normative issues. In this paper, we outline that black box algorithms are less problematic for epistemic reasons than many scholars seem to believe. By outlining that more transparency in algorithms is not always necessary, and by explaining that computational processes are indeed methodologically opaque to humans, we argue that the reliability of algorithms provides reasons for trusting the outcomes of medical artificial intelligence (AI). To this end, we explain how computational reliabilism, which does not require transparency and supports the reliability of algorithms, justifies the belief that results of medical AI are to be trusted. We also argue that several ethical concerns remain with black box algorithms, even when the results are trustworthy. Having justified knowledge from reliable indicators is, therefore, necessary but not sufficient for normatively justifying physicians to act. This means that deliberation about the results of reliable algorithms is required to find out what is a desirable action. Thus understood, we argue that such challenges should not dismiss the use of black box algorithms altogether but should inform the way in which these algorithms are designed and implemented. When physicians are trained to acquire the necessary skills and expertise, and collaborate with medical informatics and data scientists, black box algorithms can contribute to improving medical care.

Prudence in Shared Decision-Making: The Missing Link between the “Technically Correct” and the “Morally Good” in Medical Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Muleli Kioko ◽  
Pablo Requena Meana
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Intellectual Ability ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Physician Patient Relationship ◽  
Good Healing ◽  
The Right ◽  
Physician Patient

Abstract Shared Decision-Making is a widely accepted model of the physician–patient relationship providing an ethical environment in which physician beneficence and patient autonomy are respected. It acknowledges the moral responsibility of physician and patient by promoting a deliberative collaboration in which their individual expertise—complementary in nature, equal in importance—is emphasized, and personal values and preferences respected. Its goal coincides with Pellegrino and Thomasma’s proximate end of medicine, that is, a technically correct and morally good healing decision for and with a particular patient. We argue that by perfecting the intellectual ability to apprehend the complexity of clinical situations, and through a perfection of the application of the first principles of practical reason, prudence is able to point toward the right and good shared medical decision. A prudent shared medical decision is therefore always in keeping with the kind of person the physician and the patient have chosen to be.

Diminished autonomy and justice in liver transplantation – The price of scarcity?

2021 ◽  
pp. 147775092110162
Author(s):  
Philip Berry ◽  
Sreelakshmi Kotha
Keyword(s):  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Organ Allocation ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Medical Assessment ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Allocation Criteria ◽  
Qualitative Nature

Patient autonomy and distributive justice are fundamental ethical principles that may be at risk in liver transplant units where decisions are dictated by the need to maximise the utility of scarce donor organs. The processes of patient selection, organ allocation and prioritisation on the wait list have evolved in a constrained environment, leading to high levels of complexity and low transparency. Regarding paternalism, opaque listing and allocation criteria, patient factors such as passivity, guilt, chronic illness and sub-clinical encephalopathy are cited as factors that may inhibit patient engagement. Regarding justice, established regional, gender and race based inequities are described. The paradox whereby hepatologists both advocate for individual patients and discharge their duty of stewardship to apportion organs according to larger utilitarian principles is explored. Competing subjective factors such as physicians’ perception of moral responsibility, the qualitative nature of expert medical assessment and institutional or personal loyalty to re-transplantation candidates are described. Realistic limits of self-determination and justice are discussed, and possible future directions in terms of patient involvement proposed.

Is respect for patient autonomy declining?

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (16) ◽  
pp. 847-847
Author(s):  
George Castledine
Keyword(s):  
Patient Autonomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document