scholarly journals Custom Implants in TKA Provide No Substantial Benefit in Terms of Outcome Scores, Reoperation Risk, or Mean Alignment: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran Beit Ner ◽  
Saad Dosani ◽  
Leela C. Biant ◽  
Gwenllian Fflur Tawy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Substantial Benefit ◽  
Outcome Scores

scholarly journals Low-Energy Multiligament Knee Injuries Are Associated With Higher Postoperative Activity Scores Compared With High-Energy Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652096208
Author(s):  
Robert S. Dean ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
David H. Kahat ◽  
Nathan R. Graden ◽  
Christopher M. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Injury Mechanisms ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Multiligament Knee Injuries

Background: Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) can result from high-energy injury mechanisms such as motor vehicle accidents or low-energy injury mechanisms such as activities of daily living or sports. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to conduct a systematic review on postoperative patient-reported outcomes after MLKIs and to conduct a meta-analysis of comparable outcome variables based upon high- versus low-energy injury mechanisms. It was hypothesized that MLKIs with low-energy injury mechanisms would demonstrate significantly improved subjective clinical outcome scores compared with high-energy injuries. Study design: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed with the inclusion criteria of postoperative MLKI outcomes based upon high-versus low-energy mechanisms of injury with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcome scores included were the Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. High-energy mechanisms included motor vehicle accidents or falls from a height >5 feet; low-energy mechanisms included sports-related injuries, activities of daily living, or falls from <5 feet. A meta-analysis was performed comparing the outcome scores of high- versus low-energy mechanisms of MLKIs. Results: Overall, 1214 studies were identified, 15 of which were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen studies included surgical reconstructions of all injured ligaments. A total of 641 patients with 275 high-energy and 366 low-energy injuries were grouped for comparison in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in Lysholm scale (78.6 vs 78.0) or IKDC scores (69.0 vs 68.4) were found between high- and low-energy groups at a minimum of 2 years (range, 2-10 years) postoperatively ( P > .05). The low-energy injury group demonstrated significantly higher Tegner activity scale scores (5.0 vs 3.9; P = .03). There was no significant difference in failure rates between groups (3.5% vs 2.0%; P = .23). Conclusion: We found in this systematic review and meta-analysis that patients with low-energy mechanisms of MLKI surgery had improved postoperative Tegner activity scores compared with those patients with high-energy mechanisms after MLKI surgery. However, there were no differences in Lysholm score, IKDC score, or failure rates between high- and low-energy MLKI patients at an average of 5.3 years postoperatively.

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis in the Treatment of Arthrofibrosis: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan S. Cohen ◽  
Alex Gu ◽  
Nisha Kapani ◽  
Paul A. Asadourian ◽  
Seth Stake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Manipulation Under Anesthesia ◽  
Medical Databases ◽  
Arthroscopic Arthrolysis ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractStiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a clinical challenge for health care professionals. Historically, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a treatment modality that has been reserved for patients that have failed other conservative modalities, including manipulation under anesthesia. However, a systematic review of the literature evaluating the clinical efficacy and complications of arthroscopic arthrolysis for stiffness after TKA has not been performed. A systematic review of medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) was undertaken for articles published from January 1980 to October 2018. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed. From 1,326 studies, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 160 patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis following TKA were included for analysis. The quality of the evidence for the included studies ranged between moderate and high. Overall, patients had significant increased range of motion and flexion by 32.5 and 26.7 degrees, respectively following arthroscopic arthrolysis. Functional outcome scores also significantly improved for patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis after TKA. Arthroscopic arthrolysis is an efficacious modality for treatment of stiffness following TKA. The greatest benefit is seen among patients that present with significant loss of flexion. Arthroscopic arthrolysis should be reserved for patients that have previously failed more conservative modalities.

scholarly journals Does Humeral Component Version Affect Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5745
Author(s):  
Shivan S. Jassim ◽  
Lukas Ernstbrunner ◽  
Eugene T. Ek
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background: Prosthesis selection, design, and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) affect post-operative results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of the humeral stem version and prosthesis design (inlay vs. onlay) on shoulder function following RTSA. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on post-operative range of motion (ROM) and functional scores following RTSA with specifically known humeral stem implantations was performed using MEDLINE, Pubmed, and Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library. Functional scores included were Constant scores (CSs) and/or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. The patients were organised into three separate groups based on the implanted version of their humeral stem: (1) less than 20° of retroversion, (2) 20° of retroversion, and (3) greater than 20° of retroversion. Results: Data from 14 studies and a total of 1221 shoulders were eligible for analysis. Patients with a humeral stem implanted at 20° of retroversion had similar post-operative mean ASES (75.8 points) and absolute CS (68.1 points) compared to the group with humeral stems implanted at less than 20° of retroversion (76 points and 62.5 points; p = 0.956 and p = 0.153) and those implanted at more than 20° of retroversion (73.3 points; p = 0.682). Subjects with humeral stem retroversion at greater than 20° tended towards greater active forward elevation and external rotation compared with the group at 20° of retroversion (p = 0.462) and those with less than 20° of retroversion (p = 0.192). Patients with an onlay-type RTSA showed statistically significantly higher mean post-operative internal rotation compared to patients with inlay-type RTSA designs (p = 0.048). Other functional scores and forward elevation results favoured the onlay-types, but greater external rotation was seen in inlay-type RTSA designs (p = 0.382). Conclusions: Humeral stem implantation in RTSA at 20° of retroversion and greater appears to be associated with higher post-operative outcome scores and a greater range of motion when compared with a retroversion of less than 20°. Within these studies, onlay-type RTSA designs were associated with greater forward elevation but less external rotation when compared to inlay-type designs. However, none of the differences in outcome scores and range of motion between the humeral version groups were statistically significant.

1343 Post-Operative Outcomes of Circular External Fixation in The Treatment of Tibial Plafond Fractures: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Legg ◽  
Y Ibrahim ◽  
K Malik-Tabassum
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Tibial Plafond ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Tibial Plafond Fractures ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Introduction Tibial plafond fractures (TPF) are uncommon but potentially devastating injuries to the ankle. Meticulous care of the associated soft tissue injury is imperative in managing these fractures. The reported benefits of circular external fixation (CEF) include the ability to affect fracture reduction and create stable fixation, while limiting further soft tissue insult. This article provides the systematic review of the clinical and functional outcomes of TPF treated definitively with CEF. Method A literature search from inception to 13th November 2020 was performed. Quality and risk of bias was assessed using standardised scoring tools. Results 16 studies were included. 303 patients were analysed. Mean follow-up was 35 months. The mean time in CEF was 18 weeks and mean time to union was 21 weeks. Non-union and malunion occurred in 3.2% and 12.4% respectively. The overall complication rate was 12.3%. The rate of deep infection was 4.8%. No amputations were reported. Minor soft tissue infection (including pin site infections) accounted for 56.7% of complications. Almost two-thirds achieved good-to-anatomic reduction radiologically. Mean range of motion assessments were 11.8 and 24.8 degrees in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, respectively. Approximately one-third reported excellent functional outcome scores. Quality of the studies was deemed satisfactory. A moderate risk of bias was acknowledged. Conclusions This systematic review provides an evidence-based summary, which highlights CEF as an acceptable treatment option with comparable complication rate and outcome scores to that of internal fixation. However, we acknowledge that high quality evidence is still lacking.

scholarly journals Weightbearing Protocols After Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712098827
Author(s):  
Brandon L. Morris ◽  
Tanner Poppe ◽  
Kenneth Kim ◽  
Brandon Barnds ◽  
Paul Schroeppel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Knee Reconstruction ◽  
Rehabilitation Programs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Posterolateral Corner Injury

Background: Multiligamentous knee injuries with a posterolateral corner injury represent a devastating insult to the knee. Purpose: To evaluate multiligamentous knee reconstruction rehabilitation programs and recommend a rehabilitation program based on a review of published outcomes studies. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, and Embase database search was conducted using the terms “posterolateral corner” and “rehabilitation.” All articles obtained were examined to confirm their rehabilitation programs for multiligamentous knee injuries. These injuries included a posterolateral corner injury plus an isolated anterior or posterior cruciate ligament injury or a combined cruciate injury. Results: Ten publications representing 245 patients with multiligamentous knee reconstruction were analyzed. Rehabilitation protocols were divided by weightbearing (WB) status: in 2 studies, patients were non-WB until postoperative 4 weeks (delayed WB; n = 61); 5 studies permitted progressive WB until postoperative 6 weeks (progressive WB; n = 123); and 3 studies allowed WB immediately after surgery (immediate WB; n = 61). No significant difference in outcome scores among the 3 WB groups was found. Arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia was the most common complication (11%) in the delayed WB group, followed by the immediate WB group (3%) and the progressive WB group (0%; P < .01). Overall complication rates were highest in the delayed WB group (44%), followed by the immediate and progressive WB groups (25% and 3%, respectively; P < .00001). The delayed WB group was permitted to return to sport at a mean of 10.5 months from the index procedure; the progressive WB group, at 6.0 months; and the immediate WB group, at 9.0 months ( P < .05). Conclusion: This review revealed no significant difference in outcome scores when comparing immediate, progressive, and delayed WB protocols. Time to permitted return to sport was not significantly different among the groups, but there existed a trend toward earlier return in the progressive WB group. Patients in the delayed and immediate WB groups experienced a higher overall complication rate. Progressive WB postoperative protocols may decrease the risk of complications without compromising outcomes; however, more research is needed to identify the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol, given the significant data heterogeneity currently available in the literature.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1946-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Harmen D. Vermeijden ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice ◽  
Arthur van Noort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose To assess the outcomes of the various techniques of primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the recent literature using a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears using primary repair, repair with static (suture) augmentation and dynamic augmentation between January 2014 and July 2019 in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were identified and included. Primary outcomes were failure rates and reoperation rates, and secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores. Results A total of 13 studies and 1,101 patients (mean age 31 years, mean follow-up 2.1 years, 60% male) were included. Nearly all studies were retrospective studies without a control group and only one randomized study was identified. Grade of recommendation for primary repair was weak. There were 9 out of 74 failures following primary repair (10%), 6 out of 69 following repair with static augmentation (7%) and 106 out of 958 following dynamic augmentation (11%). Repair with dynamic augmentation had more reoperations (99; 10%), and more hardware removal (255; 29%) compared to the other procedures. All functional outcome scores were > 85% of maximum scores. Conclusions This systematic review with meta-analysis found that the different techniques of primary repair are safe with failure rates of 7–11%, no complications and functional outcome scores of > 85% of maximum scores. There was a high risk of bias and follow-up was short with 2.1 years. Prospective studies comparing the outcomes to ACL reconstruction with sufficient follow-up are needed prior to widespread implementation. Level of evidence IV.

Rehabilitation Protocols After Isolated Meniscal Repair: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1687-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin O’Donnell ◽  
Kevin B. Freedman ◽  
Fotios P. Tjoumakaris
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Significant Variation ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Ideal

Background: Current postoperative rehabilitation protocols after isolated meniscal repair vary widely. No consensus exists with regard to the optimal amount of weightbearing, range of motion, or speed at which the patient progresses through the rehabilitation phases. Confounding factors including concomitant ligamentous or cartilaginous injuries have made studying isolated meniscal tears problematic. Purpose: To systematically review and evaluate the influence of range of motion and weightbearing status during the postoperative rehabilitation period after isolated meniscal repair on clinical efficacy and outcome scores. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. The selection criteria for inclusion were English-language in vivo clinical studies reporting on isolated meniscal repairs utilizing an arthroscopically assisted technique that outlined the postoperative rehabilitation protocol and included at least a 2-year follow-up. Titles, abstracts, and articles were reviewed, and data concerning patient demographics, tear type, repair technique, postoperative protocol details, clinical failures, and outcome scores were extracted from the eligible studies. Rehabilitation protocols were divided into “accelerated,” “motion restricted,” “weight restricted,” and “dual restricted” according to the limitations placed on the treatment groups. Results: Fifteen studies, containing 17 different treatment groups, met the inclusion criteria. The 2 accelerated groups, 2 motion-restricted groups, 4 weight-restricted groups, and 9 dual-restricted groups showed similar efficacy in terms of clinical success and postoperative outcome scores. Early range of motion and weightbearing status showed no influence over clinical outcomes. Of the 17 groups, 13 reported a greater than 70% clinical success rate with significant variation in the tear type, fixation technique, and postoperative restrictions. Conclusion: Early range of motion and immediate postoperative weightbearing appear to have no detrimental effect on the chances for clinical success after isolated meniscal repair. Significant variation exists between postoperative protocols, with no current consensus on the ideal parameters for weightbearing and range of motion. Studies reporting outcomes regarding isolated meniscal repair are limited. Future research should include determining the ideal combination of weightbearing and range of motion for specific tear types.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document