Les causes du magnétisme terrestre prouvées

The author considers the elements of terrestrial magnetism to be, that the force with which the magnetic needle maintains its position is not everywhere the same, and that its declination and inclination vary from one region to another. These elements, he states, undergo very different modifications, which may be reduced to the following:― 1. Variations with reference to the position of the sun to the south or to the north of the equator; 2. diurnal variations in different regions of the earth; 3. disturbances which proceed from changes of weather, and from volcanic irruptions, and those which are observed during the appearance of the aurora borealis; 4. secular variations.

The author gives the results of a series of observations on the vibrations of the magnetic needle, which he undertook last summer, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the intensity of its directive force is affected by the changes in the earth’s distance from the sun, or by its declination with respect to the plane of its equator. He observed that the magnetic intensity is subject to frequent variations, which are sometimes sudden, and of short duration. These anomalies he has been unable to refer to any obvious cause, except when they were accompanied by the appearance of the aurora borealis, which evidently affected the needle on many occasions. He also thinks that the vibrations of the needle became less rapid with a moist atmosphere, and more so when it was very dry. Changes of the wind and snow storms appeared also to be attended with fluc­tuations in the intensity of the magnetism. He endeavoured to ascertain whether there existed any decided and constant difference in the directive force of each pole; conceiving that, on the hypothesis of a central magnetic force, the north pole of the magnet would, in these northern latitudes, be acted upon with much greater energy than the south pole. From his observing that the relative intensity of the two poles is not always the same, he infers the probability of the earth’s magnetism being derived from the agency of electric currents existing under its surface as well as above it, and that the rapid fluctuations in its intensity are owing to meteorological changes. The author is led to conclude that the aurora borealis is an elec­trical phenomenon, and that it usually moves during the night nearly from north to south, and in an opposite direction during the day ; that it is of the nature of positive electricity; and that its elevation above the earth is much greater than a thousand, and perhaps thou­sands of miles.


1831 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 199-207

In the annexed Table are given the results of a series of observations on the vibrations of the magnetic needle, which I undertook last summer, for the purpose of ascertaining whether its intensity is or is not affected by the changes in the earth’s distance from the sun, or by its declination with respect to the plane of his equator; for, if we refer the nodes of the planetary orbits to this plane, there appears to be so considerable a degree of coincidence in most of them, as would seem to imply the existence of a more definite law than we are ac­customed to attach to the abstract principle of gravitation. I am not at present prepared to say much respecting this part of my investigation; but I have obtained results, which appear to be interesting, relative to the variable force of the magnetic attraction, and the action of the aurora borealis on the direction and intensity of the needle.


It has long been known that the diurnal variation of the magnetic needle is in an opposite direction in the southern, to what it is in the northern hemisphere; and it was therefore proposed as a pro­blem by Arago, Humboldt and others, to determine whether there exists any intermediate line of stations on the earth where those diurnal variations disappear. The results recorded in the present paper are founded on observations made at St. Helena during the five consecutive years, from 1841 to 1845 inclusive; and also on similar observations made at Singapore, in the years 1841 and 1842; and show that at these stations, which are intermediate between the northern and southern magnetic hemispheres, the diurnal variations still take place; but those peculiar to each hemisphere prevail at opposite seasons of the year, apparently in accordance with the position of the sun with relation to the earth’s equator.


1863 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 503-516

1. In attempting to frame a theory which shall account for the relations which have been shown to exist between the variations of terrestrial magnetism and the position of the sun with respect to the place of observation on the earth’s surface, the following question presents itself for consideration at an early stage of the inquiry, “Are the magnetic effects produced on the earth such as could be explained by the simple supposition that the sun is a great magnet, or not ?” The solution of this question will, to a certain extent, limit the range of probable sources from which to seek the true cause of mag­netic variations, and is therefore worthy of attention. 2. In the first place, let us endeavour to find the law of the diurnal variations of the Declination, Horizontal Force, and Vertical Force at a given place on the earth’s surface, on the supposition that these variations arise from the varying relations, as to position, of the sun acting as a magnet upon the earth.


Author(s):  
Sunarto Sunarto

Etymologically fasting is "al-imsak" (restraint). As for the terminology, fasting is: "To refrain from something that can cancel the fasting starting from the dawn until the sun sets with aim." This is the definition of Fuqaha "in understanding the time limit of fasting according to QS. al-Baqarah: 187. In reality, when we apply the definition of fasting, there is a significant difference between one region and another. For example, the area around the equator, relatively stability between daytime and night. However, there is a contrast difference to the regions around the pole (north-south). If the area far from the equator the more contrast the time difference occurs. This means that the farther the area from the equator, the longer the time of daytime or night. Besides the influence of the above factors, there is also the current position of the sun. It determines whether the sun is in the north or the south of the earth? The implication that when the fast of Ramadan coincides with the summer, from March to September is in the north. The climax of June 21, the sun has a maximum declination (d = 23 '30'), then the regions in the north have experience a longer noon inversely proportional to the regions in the south. If the regions are closer to the pole, the more extreme the daytime and night difference occurs, that is called the area/circumpolar region. To apply the fasting law (circumpolar) fasting area, by following the International Fatwah Majlis, that is in two ways: first, following the fasting period of the Hijaz (Makkah-Madinah), second, following the nearest region/country that has a daytime or night limit.


By disposing magnets so as partly to counteract the influence of the earth’s polarity on a magnetic needle, the author suspected that its daily variation might possibly exhibit itself in a very increased degree; and in experimentally prosecuting the idea, he found it to be the case to a very considerable extent in regard to the horizontal needle; and to take place also, though less satisfactorily, with the dipping-needle. In the former experiment a finely suspended horizontal needle was used, the directive power of which was reduced by two magnets, properly placed for the purpose; a deviation of 3° 15' was thus obtained at 11 a . m., which decreased to a late hour in the evening. The needle was kept in the same position for three days, with some change of directive power, with similar general results. After adverting to a difference in the direction of the variation in and out of doors, Mr. Barlow details the results of several experiments, which lead him to the following conclusions :—that while the north end of the needle is directed to any point from the S. to N. N. W., its motion during the forenoon advances towards the N .; and while directed towards any point between the N. and S. S. E. its motion is still to some point between the N. and N. N. W., so that there ought to be some direction between those limits in which the daily motion is a minimum: but whether this is a fixed direction during the year, or whether it has any vibratory motion as the sun changes its declination, is a question requiring further experiments to determine. Another conclusion which the author draws is, that the daily change is not produced by a general deflection of the directive power of the earth, but by an increase and decrease of attraction of some point between the N. and N. N. E., or between the S. and S. S. E.


In the year 1839 Gauss published his celebrated Memoir on Terrestrial Magnetism, in which the potential on the Earth’s surface was calculated to 26 terms of a series of surface harmonics. It was proved in this Memoir that, if the horizontal components of magnetic force were known all over the Earth, the surface potential could be derived without the help of the vertical forces, and it is well known now how these latter can be used to separate the terms of the potential which depend on internal from those which depend on external sources. Nevertheless Gauss made use of the vertical forces in his calculations of the surface potential in order to ensure a greater degree of accuracy. He assumed for this purpose that magnetic matter was distributed through the interior of the Earth, and mentions the fair agreement between calculated and observed facts as a justification of his assumption. In the latter part of the Memoir it was suggested that the same method should be employed in the investiga­tion of the regular and secular variations. The use of harmonic analysis to separate internal from external causes has never been put to a practical test, but it seems to me to be especially well adapted to enquiries on the causes of the periodic oscillations of the magnetic needle.


By disposing magnets so as partly to counteract the influence of the earth’s polarity on a magnetic needle, the author suspected that its daily variation might possibly exhibit itself in a very increased degree; and in experimentally prosecuting the idea, he found it to be the case to a very considerable extent in regard to the horizontal needle; and to take place also, though less satisfactorily, with the dipping-needle. In the former experiment a finely suspended horizontal needle was used, the directive power of which was reduced by two magnets, properly placed for the purpose; a deviation of 3° 15' was thus obtained at 11 a. m., which decreased to a late hour in the evening. The needle was kept in the same position for three days, with some change of directive power, with similar general results. After adverting to a difference in the direction of the variation in and out of doors, Mr. Barlow details the results of several experiments, which lead him to the following conclusions:—that while the north end of the needle is directed to any point from the S. to N. N. W., its motion during the forenoon advances towards the N.; and while directed towards any point between the N. and S. S. E. its motion is still to some point between the N. and N. N. W., so that there ought to be some direction between those limits in which the daily motion is a minimum: but whether this is a fixed direction during the year, or whether it has any vibratory motion as the sun changes its declination, is a question requiring further experiments to determine. Another conclusion which the author draws is, that the daily change is not produced by a general deflection of the directive power of the earth, but by an increase and decrease of attraction of some point between the N. and N. N. E., or between the S. and S. S. E.


The author observes that opinions differ as to the elevation of the Aurora Borealis above the surface of the earth, and that this is a point which can be determined only by a series of concurring observations. The appearance of a phenomenon of this kind on the 29th of March, 1826, assuming the form of a regular arch at right angles to the magnetic meridian, and marked by peculiar features, continuing for above an hour in the same position, afforded a most favourable opportunity for obtaining the data requisite for the solution of this problem; and the author accordingly took great pains to collect as many authentic accounts as possible of the apparent position of this luminous arch with reference to the stars, when seen from various places where it had been observed in England and in Scotland. It appears to have been actually seen in places 170 miles distant from one another, in a north and south direction, and 45 miles distant from east to west, thus comprising an area of 7000 or 8000 square miles; but it must have been visible over a much greater extent. Accounts were received of its having been seen as far north as Edinburgh, and as far south as Manchester and Doncaster, and at most of the intermediate towns; and from the exact; correspondence of the descriptions from all these places, it was impossible to doubt that they referred to the same luminous appearance. In proceeding from north to south, the apparent altitude of the arch continually increased, still keeping to the south of the zenith till we come to Kendal, at which place it very nearly crossed the zenith; at Warrington, which is further south, the culminating point of the arch was north of the zenith. Wherever seen, the arch always seemed to terminate nearly in the magnetic, east and west, at two opposite points of the horizon. The observations, in which the author places the greatest confidence for determining the height of this aurora, were those made at Whitehaven and at Warrington, places which are distant 83 miles from one another, and situated nearly on the same magnetic meridian. Calculating from the data they afford, he finds the height of the arch very nearly 100 miles above the surface of the earth, and immediately over the towns of Kendal and of Kirkby-Stephen. This conclusion is corroborated by observations at Jedburgh; but if the former be compared with those at Edinburgh, the height will come out to be 150 or 160 miles, and the position vertical about Carlisle: but he thinks the former result more entitled to confidence. Assuming the height to be 100 miles, it will follow that the breadth of the arch would be 8 or 9 miles, and its visible length in an east and west direction from any one place would be about 550 miles. The author then proceeds to take a comparative view of the results of inquiries on the height and position of other auroræ which have at different times appeared, and are recorded in the Philosophical Transactions and other scientific journals. He also gives an account of a luminous arch seen both at Kendal and at Manchester on the 27th of December last, which appeared in the zenith at the former place, and was elevated 53° from the north at the latter place; whence its height is deduced to be 100 miles. From the general agreement of this series of observations, the author infers that these luminous arches of the aurora, which are occasionally seen stretching from east to west, are all nearly of the same height; namely, about 100 miles. Observations are still wanting for the determination of the length of beams parallel to the dipping-needle, which constitute the more ordinary forms of the aurora borealis; neither can it be determined whether these beams arise above the arches, as from a base, or whether they descend below, as if appended to the arches. It is remarkable that the arches and beams are rarely, if ever, seen connected together, or in juxta-position; but always in parts of the heavens at a considerable distance from each other.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1217-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. McKibben ◽  
J. J. Connell ◽  
C. Lopate ◽  
M. Zhang ◽  
J. D. Anglin ◽  
...  

Abstract. In 2000–2001 Ulysses passed from the south to the north polar regions of the Sun in the inner heliosphere, providing a snapshot of the latitudinal structure of cosmic ray modulation and solar energetic particle populations during a period near solar maximum.  Observations from the COSPIN suite of energetic charged particle telescopes show that latitude variations in the cosmic ray intensity in the inner heliosphere are nearly non-existent near solar maximum, whereas small but clear latitude gradients were observed during the similar phase of Ulysses’ orbit near the 1994–95 solar minimum. At proton energies above ~10 MeV and extending up to >70 MeV, the intensities are often dominated by Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) accelerated near the Sun in association with intense solar flares and large Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). At lower energies the particle intensities are almost constantly enhanced above background, most likely as a result of a mix of SEPs and particles accelerated by interplanetary shocks. Simultaneous high-latitude Ulysses and near-Earth observations show that most events that produce large flux increases near Earth also produce flux increases at Ulysses, even at the highest latitudes attained. Particle anisotropies during particle onsets at Ulysses are typically directed outwards from the Sun, suggesting either acceleration extending to high latitudes or efficient cross-field propagation somewhere inside the orbit of Ulysses. Both cosmic ray and SEP observations are consistent with highly efficient transport of energetic charged particles between the equatorial and polar regions and across the mean interplanetary magnetic fields in the inner heliosphere.Key words. Interplanetary physics (cosmic rays) – Solar physics, astrophysics and astronomy (energetic particles; flares and mass ejections)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document