scholarly journals Mechanism of NanR gene repression and allosteric induction of bacterial sialic acid metabolism

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Horne ◽  
Hariprasad Venugopal ◽  
Santosh Panjikar ◽  
Amy Henrickson ◽  
Emre Brookes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sialic Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Acid Metabolism ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Crystal Structure Data ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Nutrient Source ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Close Proximity

AbstractBacteria respond to environmental changes by inducing transcription of some genes and repressing others. Sialic acids, which coat human cell surfaces, are a nutrient source for pathogenic and commensal bacteria. The Escherichia coli GntR-type transcriptional repressor, NanR, regulates sialic acid metabolism, but the mechanism is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that three NanR dimers bind a (GGTATA)3-repeat operator cooperatively and with high affinity. Truncation of an N-terminal extension abolishes cooperative binding. The effector, N-acetylneuraminate, binds NanR and attenuates DNA binding. Crystal structure data show that N-acetylneuraminate binding to NanR causes a domain rearrangement that locks the protein in a conformation that prevents DNA binding. Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of NanR bound to DNA reveal the DNA binding domain is reorganized to engage DNA, while the three dimers assemble in close proximity across the (GGTATA)3-repeat operator allowing protein-protein interactions to form via the N-terminal extensions. Our data provides a molecular basis for the regulation of bacterial sialic acid metabolism.

scholarly journals Mechanism of NanR gene repression and allosteric induction of bacterial sialic acid metabolism

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Horne ◽  
Hariprasad Venugopal ◽  
Santosh Panjikar ◽  
David M. Wood ◽  
Amy Henrickson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sialic Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Acid Metabolism ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Dna Interaction ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Nutrient Source ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Close Proximity

AbstractBacteria respond to environmental changes by inducing transcription of some genes and repressing others. Sialic acids, which coat human cell surfaces, are a nutrient source for pathogenic and commensal bacteria. The Escherichia coli GntR-type transcriptional repressor, NanR, regulates sialic acid metabolism, but the mechanism is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that three NanR dimers bind a (GGTATA)3-repeat operator cooperatively and with high affinity. Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures reveal the DNA-binding domain is reorganized to engage DNA, while three dimers assemble in close proximity across the (GGTATA)3-repeat operator. Such an interaction allows cooperative protein-protein interactions between NanR dimers via their N-terminal extensions. The effector, N-acetylneuraminate, binds NanR and attenuates the NanR-DNA interaction. The crystal structure of NanR in complex with N-acetylneuraminate reveals a domain rearrangement upon N-acetylneuraminate binding to lock NanR in a conformation that weakens DNA binding. Our data provide a molecular basis for the regulation of bacterial sialic acid metabolism.

scholarly journals Transactivation Functions of the N-Terminal Domains of Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Protein Folding and Coactivator Interactions

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj Kumar ◽  
E. Brad Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Hormone Receptor ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
And Function ◽  
Terminal Domains

Abstract The N-terminal domains (NTDs) of many members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) family contain potent transcription-activating functions (AFs). Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of the NTD AFs has lagged, compared with that concerning other important domains of the NHRs. In part, this is because the NTD AFs appear to be unfolded when expressed as recombinant proteins. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the structure and function of the NTD AFs. Recombinant NTD AFs can be made to fold by application of certain osmolytes or when expressed in conjunction with a DNA-binding domain by binding that DNA-binding domain to a DNA response element. The sequence of the DNA binding site may affect the functional state of the AFs domain. If properly folded, NTD AFs can bind certain cofactors and primary transcription factors. Through these, and/or by direct interactions, the NTD AFs may interact with the AF2 domain in the ligand binding, carboxy-terminal portion of the NHRs. We propose models for the folding of the NTD AFs and their protein-protein interactions.

scholarly journals POT1-TPP1 differentially regulates telomerase via POT1 His266 and as a function of single-stranded telomere DNA length

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (47) ◽  
pp. 23527-23533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyuan Xu ◽  
Janna Kiselar ◽  
Tawna L. Whited ◽  
Wilnelly Hernandez-Sanchez ◽  
Derek J. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Environment ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
Linear Chromosomes ◽  
Hydroxyl Radical Footprinting ◽  
Regulate Telomere Length

Telomeres cap the ends of linear chromosomes and terminate in a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang recognized by POT1-TPP1 heterodimers to help regulate telomere length homeostasis. Here hydroxyl radical footprinting coupled with mass spectrometry was employed to probe protein–protein interactions and conformational changes involved in the assembly of telomere ssDNA substrates of differing lengths bound by POT1-TPP1 heterodimers. Our data identified environmental changes surrounding residue histidine 266 of POT1 that were dependent on telomere ssDNA substrate length. We further determined that the chronic lymphocytic leukemia-associated H266L substitution significantly reduced POT1-TPP1 binding to short ssDNA substrates; however, it only moderately impaired the heterodimer binding to long ssDNA substrates containing multiple protein binding sites. Additionally, we identified a telomerase inhibitory role when several native POT1-TPP1 proteins coat physiologically relevant lengths of telomere ssDNA. This POT1-TPP1 complex-mediated inhibition of telomerase is abrogated in the context of the POT1 H266L mutation, which leads to telomere overextension in a malignant cellular environment.

scholarly journals In Vivo Quantitative Estimation of DNA-Dependent Interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 Using BirA-Catalyzed Site-Specific Biotinylation

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Kulyyassov ◽  
Vasily Ogryzko
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Quantitative Estimation ◽  
Multiple Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Protein–protein interactions of core pluripotency transcription factors play an important role during cell reprogramming. Cell identity is controlled by a trio of transcription factors: Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog. Thus, methods that help to quantify protein–protein interactions may be useful for understanding the mechanisms of pluripotency at the molecular level. Here, a detailed protocol for the detection and quantitative analysis of in vivo protein–protein proximity of Sox2 and Oct4 using the proximity-utilizing biotinylation (PUB) method is described. The method is based on the coexpression of two proteins of interest fused to a biotin acceptor peptide (BAP)in one case and a biotin ligase enzyme (BirA) in the other. The proximity between the two proteins leads to more efficient biotinylation of the BAP, which can be either detected by Western blotting or quantified using proteomics approaches, such as a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis. Coexpression of the fusion proteins BAP-X and BirA-Y revealed strong biotinylation of the target proteins when X and Y were, alternatively, the pluripotency transcription factors Sox2 and Oct4, compared with the negative control where X or Y was green fluorescent protein (GFP), which strongly suggests that Sox2 and Oct4 come in close proximity to each other and interact.

scholarly journals Network-Based Gene Expression Biomarkers for Cold and Heat Patterns of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Traditional Chinese Medicine

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Lu ◽  
Xuyan Niu ◽  
Cheng Xiao ◽  
Gao Chen ◽  
Qinglin Zha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Acid Metabolism ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Significant Gene ◽  
Heat Pattern

In Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) can be classified into two main patterns: cold-pattern and heat-pattern. This paper identified the network-based gene expression biomarkers for both cold- and heat-patterns of RA. Gene expression profilings of CD4+ T cells from cold-pattern RA patients, heat-pattern RA patients, and healthy volunteers were obtained using microarray. The differentially expressed genes and related networks were explored using DAVID, GeneSpring software, and the protein-protein interactions (PPI) method. EIF4A2, CCNT1, and IL7R, which were related to the up-regulation of cell proliferation and the Jak-STAT cascade, were significant gene biomarkers of the TCM cold pattern of RA. PRKAA1, HSPA8, and LSM6, which were related to fatty acid metabolism and the I-κB kinase/NF-κB cascade, were significant biomarkers of the TCM heat-pattern of RA. The network-based gene expression biomarkers for the TCM cold- and heat-patterns may be helpful for the further stratification of RA patients when deciding on interventions or clinical trials.

scholarly journals Domain swapping reveals the modular nature of Fos, Jun, and CREB proteins.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 4565-4573 ◽  
Author(s):  
L J Ransone ◽  
P Wamsley ◽  
K L Morley ◽  
I M Verma
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Domain Swapping ◽  
Amino Terminus ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Basic Region

The products of the Jun and Fos proto-oncogenes form a heterodimer that binds to and activates transcription from 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-responsive promoter elements (TGACTCA) and AP-1-binding sites (TGACATCA). These two proteins belong to a family of related transcription factors which contain similar domains required for protein dimerization and DNA binding but display different protein and DNA binding specificities. The basic region, required for DNA binding, is followed by a leucine zipper structure, a domain that mediates protein-protein interactions. To assess the role of these two domains in three related proteins, Fos, Jun, and CREB, we carried out extensive domain-swapping analysis. We found that (i) dimers formed by two Jun leucine zipper-containing proteins were unable to bind DNA as efficiently as a Fos-Jun combination, regardless of the source of the basic region; (ii) the Fos leucine zipper was unable to form either homo- or heterodimers with a chimeric protein containing a Fos leucine zipper; (iii) the Fos basic region was capable of binding to an AP-1 site; (iv) replacement of the Jun amino terminus with that of CREB had little effect on dimerization, whereas replacement with the amino terminus of Fos disrupted both protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions; (v) changes in relative affinities of the Fos and Jun basic regions for the AP-1 element were dependent on the secondary contributions of amino-terminal residues; and (vi) the Fos-Jun chimeric constructs cooperated in transcriptional transactivation of the Jun promoter in NIH 3T3 cells.

scholarly journals Evidence for two modes of cooperative DNA binding in vivo that do not involve direct protein–protein interactions

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Vashee ◽  
Karsten Melcher ◽  
W.Vivianne Ding ◽  
Stephen Albert Johnston ◽  
Thomas Kodadek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions

scholarly journals Structure of PDE3A–SLFN12 complex and structure-based design for a potent apoptosis inducer of tumor cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Chen ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Yinpin Huang ◽  
Yuanxun Wang ◽  
Yuxing Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Hydrophobic Interactions ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Apoptosis Inducer

AbstractMolecular glues are a class of small molecular drugs that mediate protein-protein interactions, that induce either the degradation or stabilization of target protein. A structurally diverse group of chemicals, including 17-β-estradiol (E2), anagrelide, nauclefine, and DNMDP, induces apoptosis by forming complexes with phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A) and Schlafen 12 protein (SLFN12). They do so by binding to the PDE3A enzymatic pocket that allows the compound-bound PDE3A to recruit and stabilize SLFN12, which in turn blocks protein translation, leading to apoptosis. In this work, we report the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of PDE3A-SLFN12 complexes isolated from cultured HeLa cells pre-treated with either anagrelide, or nauclefine, or DNMDP. The PDE3A-SLFN12 complexes exhibit a butterfly-like shape, forming a heterotetramer with these small molecules, which are packed in a shallow pocket in the catalytic domain of PDE3A. The resulting small molecule-modified interface binds to the short helix (E552-I558) of SLFN12 through hydrophobic interactions, thus “gluing” the two proteins together. Based on the complex structure, we designed and synthesized analogs of anagrelide, a known drug used for the treatment of thrombocytosis, to enhance their interactions with SLFN12, and achieved superior efficacy in inducing apoptosis in cultured cells as well as in tumor xenografts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document