scholarly journals Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Specific CD4(+) and CD8 (+) T Cell Responses Using MHC Class I and II Tetramers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Poluektov ◽  
Pirouz Daftarian ◽  
Marc C. Delcommenne

AbstractThe success of SARS-CoV-2 (CoV-2) vaccines is measured by their ability to mount immune memory responses that are long-lasting. To achieve this goal, it is important to identify surrogates of immune protection, namely, CoV-2 MHC Class I and II immunodominant pieces/epitopes and methodologies to measure them. Here, we present results of flow cytometry-based MHC Class I and II QuickSwitch™ platforms for assessing SARS-CoV-2 peptide binding affinities to various human alleles as well as the H-2 Kb mouse allele. Multiple SARS-CoV-2 potential MHC binders were screened and validated by QuickSwitch testing. While several predicted peptides with acceptable theoretical Kd showed poor MHC occupancies, fourteen MHC class II and a few MHC class I peptides showed promiscuity in that they bind with multiple MHC molecule types. With the peptide exchange generated MHC tetramers, scientists can assess CD4+ and CD8+ immune responses to these different MHC/peptide complexes. Results obtained with several SARS-CoV-2 MHC class I and II peptides are included and discussed.

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Meyer zu Hörste ◽  
Holger Heidenreich ◽  
Anne K. Mausberg ◽  
Helmar C. Lehmann ◽  
Anneloor L.M.A. ten Asbroek ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (23) ◽  
pp. 11982-11988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Kawana-Tachikawa ◽  
Mariko Tomizawa ◽  
Jun-ichi Nunoya ◽  
Tatsuo Shioda ◽  
Atsushi Kato ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We report a Sendai virus (SeV) vector system for expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I/peptide complexes. We cloned the extracellular domain of a human MHC class I heavy chain, HLA-A*2402, and human β-2 microglobulin (β2m) fused with HLA-A*2402-restricted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes (e-β2m) in separate SeV vectors. When we coinfected nonhuman mammalian cells with the SeVs, naturally folded human MHC class I/peptide complexes were secreted in the culture supernatants. Biotin binding peptide sequences on the C terminus of the heavy chain were used to tetramerize the complexes. These tetramers made in the SeV system recognized specific CD8-positive T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of HIV-1-positive patients with a specificity and sensitivity similar to those of MHC class I tetramers made in an Escherichia coli system. Solo infection of e-β2m/SeV produced soluble e-β2m in the culture supernatant, and cells pulsed with the soluble protein were recognized by specific CTLs. Furthermore, when cells were infected with e-β2m/SeV, these cells were recognized by the specific CTLs more efficiently than the protein pulse per se. SeV is nonpathogenic for humans, can transduce foreign genes into nondividing cells, and may be useful for immunotherapy to enhance antigen-specific immune responses. Our system can be used not only to detect but also to stimulate antigen-specific cellular immune responses.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Kumar Saini ◽  
Heiko Schuster ◽  
Venkat Raman Ramnarayan ◽  
Hans-Georg Rammensee ◽  
Stefan Stevanović ◽  
...  

Peptide ligand selection by MHC class I molecules, which occurs by iterative optimization, is the centerpiece of immunodominance in antiviral and antitumor immune responses. For its understanding, the molecular mechanisms of peptide binding and dissociation by class I molecules must be elucidated. To this end, we have investigated dipeptides that bind to the F pocket of class I molecules. We find that they accelerate the dissociation of prebound peptides of both low and high affinity, suggesting a mechanism of action for the peptide-exchange chaperone tapasin. Peptide exchange on class I molecules also has practical uses in epitope discovery and T-cell monitoring.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1344-1344
Author(s):  
Nobuharu Fujii ◽  
Kellie V Rosinski ◽  
Paulo V Campregher ◽  
Edus H Warren

Abstract Abstract 1344 Poster Board I-366 Male recipients of female hematopoietic cell grafts, when compared with all other donor/recipient gender combinations, have an increased risk for both acute and chronic GVHD, but also have a significantly decreased risk of posttransplant relapse. F→M HCT is also characterized at the cellular level by donor (female) T cell responses against male-specific minor histocompatibility (H-Y) antigens, which can contribute to both graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity. SMCY is a Y-chromosome gene that has previously been shown to encode at least two distinct MHC class I-restricted H-Y antigens presented by HLA-A*0201 and HLA-B*0702, respectively. Also, association between CD8+ T cell responses specific for the SMCY311-319 FIDSYICQV epitope and GVHD or GVL has been reported. A CD8+ FIDSYICQV-specific T cell clone was also reported to induce histological signs of GVHD reaction in an in vitro skin-explant assay. To date, however, only two MHC class I-restricted, and no MHC class II-restricted, H-Y antigens encoded by SMCY have been characterized. Given the large size of the SMCY and the homologous SMCX proteins and the fact that they are only 85% identical at the amino acid sequence level, we hypothesized that SMCY encodes other MHC class I- and class II-restricted H-Y antigens, and that T cell responses against these epitopes may likewise contribute to GVHD and GVL activity after F→M HCT. Arrays of pentadecapeptides with eleven-residue overlap were designed to tile regions of the SMCY protein that are non-identical to the corresponding regions of its X chromosome-encoded homologue SMCX, and then used to generate SMCY-specific T cell lines recognizing novel SMCY-encoded MHC class I- and class II-restricted H-Y antigens. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained on posttransplant day +126 from a 46 year-old male patient with monosomy 7 AML who had received a hematopoietic cell graft from his MHC-identical sister, and were stimulated in vitro with dendritic cells derived from his pretransplant PBMC that had been pulsed with the SMCY pentadecapeptides. After three stimulations, a SMCY peptide-specific CD4+ T cell line as well as a SMCY311-319 (FIDSYICQV)-specific CD8+ T cell line were obtained. After cloning by limiting dilution, we further characterized the SMCY-specific CD4+ T cell clone, 13H3. The 13H3 T cell clone recognizes the SMCY232-246 15-mer peptide, ELKKLQIYGPGPKMM, presented by HLA-DRB1*1501, and has a CD3+, CD4+, CD8−, CD45RA−, CD45RO+ surface phenotype. The cytokine release profile of this clone when assessed with SMCY232-246-loaded donor-derived EBV-LCL, as measured by the Luminex assay, is characterized mainly by Th1 cytokines (IFN-g and IL-2), but the clone also produced low to moderate levels of the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β. A minigene encoding SMCY232-246 was recognized by the 13H3 clone in a HLA-DRB1*1501-dependent fashion when transfected into COS-7 cells, but a minigene encoding the homologous SMCX-derived ELKKLQIYGAGPKMM peptide was not recognized, demonstrating that the clone is SMCY-specific. The 13H3 clone recognized 3 of 5 HLA-DRB1*1501+ male primary leukemia cells, but did not recognize either of 2 HLA-DRB1*1501− male or either of 2 HLA-DRB1*1501+ female primary leukemia cells. These results suggest that CD4+ T cell responses against the SMCY232-246 epitope could potentially contribute to GVL activity after F→M HCT. A SMCY232-246/HLA-DRB1*1501 tetramer has been constructed which specifically marks the 13H3 T cell clone, and future studies will use this reagent to determine whether CD4+ T cells specific for this epitope can be detected directly ex vivo in posttransplant blood samples from HLA-DRB1*1501+ F→M HCT recipients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. Constantin ◽  
Elizabeth E. Bonney ◽  
John D. Altman ◽  
Ora L. Strickland

Single-cell assays are currently favored to quantitate T-cell responses. Staining antigen-specific T-cells with fluorescently labeled tetrameric major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/peptide complexes has greatly enhanced the ability to assess the cellular dynamics of an immune response at the single-cell level.This article reviews MHC tetramer technology, defining it, discussing how MHC tetramers are made, outlining the benefits of this technology, comparing and contrasting it to other methods for evaluating immune responses, and describing current applications.


2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (16) ◽  
pp. 7942-7948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin E. Peterson ◽  
Ingunn Stromnes ◽  
Ron Messer ◽  
Kim Hasenkrug ◽  
Bruce Chesebro

ABSTRACT CD4+ Th1 responses to virus infections are often necessary for the development and maintenance of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. However, in the present study with Friend murine retrovirus (FV), the reverse was also found to be true. In the absence of a responder H-2b allele at major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II loci, a single H-2Db MHC class I allele was sufficient for the development of a CD4+ Th1 response to FV. This effect of H-2Db on CD4+ T-cell responses was dependent on CD8+ T cells, as demonstrated by depletion studies. A direct effect of CD8+ T-cell help in the development of CD4+ Th1 responses to FV was also shown in vaccine studies. Vaccination of nonresponder H-2a/a mice induced FV-specific responses of H-2Dd -restricted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Adoptive transfer of vaccine-primed CD8+ T cells to naive H-2a/a mice prior to infection resulted in the generation of FV-specific CD4+ Th1 responses. This novel helper effect of CD8+ T cells could be an important mechanism in the development of CD4+ Th1 responses following vaccinations that induce CD8+ CTL responses. The ability of MHC class I genes to facilitate CD4+ Th1 development could also be considerable evolutionary advantage by allowing a wider variety of MHC genotypes to generate protective immune responses against intracellular pathogens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-156
Author(s):  
Şule KARATAŞ ◽  
Fatma SAVRAN OĞUZ

Introduction: Peptides obtained by processing intracellular and extracellular antigens are presented to T cells to stimulate the immune response. This presentation is made by peptide receptors called major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The regulation mechanisms of MHC molecules, which have similar roles in the immune response, especially at the gene level, have significant differences according to their class. Objective: Class I and class II MHC molecules encoded by MHC genes on the short arm of the sixth chromosome are peptide receptors that stimulate T cell response. These peptides, which will enable the recognition of the antigen from which they originate, are loaded into MHC molecules and presented to T cells. Although the principles of loading and delivering peptides are similar for both molecules, the peptide sources and peptide loading mechanisms are different. In addition, class I molecules are expressed in all nucleated cells while class II molecules are expressed only in Antigen Presentation Cells (APC). These differences; It shows that MHC class I is not expressed by exactly the same transcriptional mechanisms as MHC class II. In our article, we aimed to compare the gene expressions of both classes and reveal their similarities and differences. Discussion and Conclusion: A better understanding of the transcriptional mechanisms of MHC molecules will reveal the role of these molecules in diseases more clearly. In our review, we discussed MHC gene regulation mechanisms with presence of existing informations, which is specific to the MHC class, for contribute to future research. Keywords: MHC class I, MHC class II, MHC gene regulation, promoter, SXY module, transcription


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A644-A644
Author(s):  
John Flickinger ◽  
Jagmohan Singh ◽  
Yanki Yarman ◽  
Robert Carlson ◽  
Scott Waldman ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe Gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) is a promising vector for cancer immunotherapy due to its ability to directly infect antigen-presenting cells, induce potent CD8+ T-cell immunity, and remodel immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments.1 Recent clinical trials have demonstrated safety and immunogenicity of Lm-based cancer vaccines in lung, cervical, pancreatic, and other cancers. In colorectal cancer, the transmembrane receptor guanylyl cyclase C (GUCY2C) is an emerging target for immunotherapy.2 Here, we examined the immunogenicity of a recombinant strain of Listeria monocytogenes secreting GUCY2C (Lm-GUCY2C). Surprisingly, Lm-GUCY2C vaccination induced robust Lm-specific CD8+ T-cell immunity but failed to prime GUCY2C-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. These studies explore the hypothesis that immunodominant Lm antigens suppress primary immunity to subdominant GUCY2C epitopes in Lm-GUCY2CMethodsLm-GUCY2C expresses the extracellular domain of mouse GUCY2C23-429 downstream of an ActA promoter integrated into the genome of the live, attenuated delta actA delta inlB Lm strain. Altered peptide ligands were designed based on NetMHCpan 4.0 peptide-MHC binding algorithms and similarly cloned into Lm. Peptide-MHC class I complex stability was quantified by FACS-based surface peptide-MHC dissociation on the TAP-deficient cell line, RMA-S H-2Kd.3In vivo efficacy studies employed IFNγ-ELISpot quantification of T-cell responses and tumor challenge studies with the CT26 colorectal cancer cell line. Adenovirus expressing GUCY2C was used as a positive control.2 4ResultsLm-GUCY2C vaccination of BALB/c mice generated Lm-specific CD8+ T-cell responses but an absence of GUCY2C-specific immunity. Peptide-MHC stability studies revealed poor stability of the dominant GUCY2C254-262 epitope complexed with H-2Kd compared to H-2Kd-restricted Lm epitopes derived from the LLO and p60 Lm antigens. Mutation of the GUCY2C254-262 peptide at critical anchoring residues for binding H-2Kd revealed that the altered peptide ligand with an F255Y mutation significantly improved the stability of the GUCY2C254-262-H-2Kd complex. Similarly, vaccination of mice with recombinant Lm-GUCY2C expressing the altered peptide ligand (Lm-GUCY2CF255Y) restored GUCY2C immunogenicity and antitumor immunity.ConclusionsImmunodominant Lm antigens may interfere with immune responses directed to the vaccine target antigen GUCY2C by competing with GUCY2C epitope for MHC class I binding and presentation. Moreover, use of a substituted GUCY2C -peptide ligand with enhanced peptide-MHC class I stability restored GUCY2C-specific immunity in the context of Lm-GUCY2C, an approach that can be translated to patients. Importantly, these studies also suggest that ongoing Lm-based vaccine development programs targeting a variety of antigens in other cancer types may be similarly limited by the immunodominance of Lm epitopes.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Dr. Peter Lauer for providing the pPL2 integration vector used in cloning Lm-GUCY2C and Dr. Sean Murphy for providing the RMA-S H-2Kd cell line.Ethics ApprovalStudies were approved by the Thomas Jefferson University IACUC (Protocol # 01956).ReferencesFlickinger JC, Rodeck U, Snook AE. Listeria monocytogenes as a Vector for Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Understanding and Progress. Vaccines (Basel) 2018;6. doi:10.3390/vaccines6030048.Snook AE, Baybutt TR, Xiang B, Abraham TS, Flickinger JC, Hyslop T, et al. Split tolerance permits safe Ad5-GUCY2C-PADRE vaccine-induced T-cell responses in colon cancer patients. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:104. doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0576-2.Müllbacher A, Lobigs M, Kos FJ, Langman R. Alloreactive cytotoxic T-cell function, peptide nonspecific. Scand J Immunol 1999;49:563–9.Flickinger J. JC, Singh J, Carlson R, Leong E, Baybutt T, Barton J, et al. Chimeric Ad5.F35 vector evades anti-adenovirus serotype 5 neutralization opposing GUCY2C-targeted antitumor immunity. J Immunother Cancer 2020.


Immunology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjun Wang ◽  
Sheila T. Tang ◽  
Anette Stryhn ◽  
Sune Justesen ◽  
Mette V. Larsen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 823-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Neefjes ◽  
Marlieke L. M. Jongsma ◽  
Petra Paul ◽  
Oddmund Bakke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document