scholarly journals Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and nasal washes specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Calame ◽  
Lena Mazza ◽  
Adriana Renzoni ◽  
Laurent Kaiser ◽  
Manuel Schibler
Keyword(s):  
Culture Medium ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Sampling Device ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab

In the context of an unprecedented shortage of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) or sample transport media during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, alternative methods for sample collection are needed. To address this need, we validated a cell culture medium as a viral transport medium, and compared the analytical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR in nasal wash (NW), oropharyngeal swab (OPS) and NPS specimens. Both the clinical and analytical sensitivity were comparable in these three sample types. OPS and NW specimens may therefore represent suitable alternatives to NPS for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Calame ◽  
Léna Mazza ◽  
Adriana Renzoni ◽  
Laurent Kaiser ◽  
Manuel Schibler
Keyword(s):  
Culture Medium ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Sampling Device ◽  
Nasal Wash ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab

Abstract In the context of an unprecedented shortage of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) or sample transport media during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, alternative methods for sample collection are needed. To address this need, we validated a cell culture medium as a viral transport medium, and compared the analytical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in nasal wash (NW), oropharyngeal swab (OPS), and NPS specimens. Both the clinical and analytical sensitivity were comparable in these three sample types. OPS and NW specimens may therefore represent suitable alternatives to NPS for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

scholarly journals Study of vertical transmission of COVID-19 infection in COVID-19 positive obstetrical patients by comparing amniotic fluid and immediate neonatal COVID-19 RT-PCR

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3383
Author(s):  
Smita Tyagi ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Agarwal ◽  
Manish Agarwal ◽  
Manika Kapoor ◽  
Sakshi Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Vertical Transmission ◽  
Neonatal Death ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Normal Delivery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab ◽  
Medium Sample

Background: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of vertical transmission COVID-19 by RT-PCR.Methods: In this hospital based prospective study, all COVID-19 positive pregnant women admitted in COVID ward in Muzaffarnagar medical college and hospital from April 2020 to January 2021 were included. A detailed history and examination was done and all routine investigations were done as per protocol. Samples were taken from amniotic fluid during vaginal delivery or caesarean section and collected in viral transport medium. Sample were also collected as nasal and oropharyngeal swab from neonate immediately after birth and sent for COVID 19 RT-PCR.Results: Out of total 50 cases; 43 (86%) neonates were delivered via LSCS and 7 (14%) by normal delivery, out of these 41 (82%) neonates were normal; 4 (8%) were IUGR, 2 (4%) were IUD, 2 (4%) were pre-term and 1 (2%) neonatal death. All 50 amniotic fluid as well as nasal and oropharyngeal samples of all neonates were negative by RT-PCR.Conclusions: Low vertical transmission may be due to the fact that antibodies are produced by mother that crosses the placenta and saves the fetus or there are highly specific immunological mediators in the placenta that do not allow the infection to pass to the fetus.

Effective optimization of SARS-CoV-2 laboratory testing variables in an era of supply chain constraints

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (15) ◽  
pp. 1483-1487
Author(s):  
Nikhil S Sahajpal ◽  
Ashis K Mondal ◽  
Allan Njau ◽  
Sudha Ananth ◽  
Kimya Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Short Supply ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Bridging Studies

RT-PCR-based assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 have played an essential role in the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the sample collection and test reagents are in short supply, primarily due to supply chain issues. Thus, to eliminate testing constraints, we have optimized three key process variables: RNA extraction and RT-PCR reactions, different sample types and media to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 testing. By performing various validation and bridging studies, we have shown that various sample types such as nasopharyngeal swab, bronchioalveolar lavage and saliva, collected using conventional nasopharyngeal swabs, ESwab or 3D-printed swabs and, preserved in viral transport media, universal transport media, 0.9% sodium chloride or Amies media are compatible with RT-PCR assay for COVID-19. Besides, the reduction of PCR reagents by up to fourfold also produces reliable results.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 Infection by RT-PCR Using Specimens Other Than Naso- and Oropharyngeal Swabs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 363
Author(s):  
Vânia M. Moreira ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
João Botelho ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab ◽  
Nucleic Acid Assays

The rapid and accurate testing of SARS-CoV-2 infection is still crucial to mitigate, and eventually halt, the spread of this disease. Currently, nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and oropharyngeal swab (OPS) are the recommended standard sampling techniques, yet, these have some limitations such as the complexity of collection. Hence, several other types of specimens that are easier to obtain are being tested as alternatives to nasal/throat swabs in nucleic acid assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab (CS) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov and NIPH Clinical Trial) were searched up to the 30th of December, 2020. Case-control and cohort studies on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS 2). We identified 1560 entries, 33 of which (1.1%) met all required criteria and were included for the quantitative data analysis. Saliva presented the higher accuracy, 92.1% (95% CI: 70.0–98.3), with an estimated sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI: 77.4–88.8) and specificity of 96.4% (95% CI: 89.5–98.8). DTS/POS samples had an overall accuracy of 79.7% (95% CI: 43.3–95.3), with an estimated sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI: 83.3–96.9) and specificity of 63.1% (95% CI: 36.8–89.3). The remaining index specimens could not be adequately assessed given the lack of studies available. Our meta-analysis shows that saliva samples from the oral region provide a high sensitivity and specificity; therefore, these appear to be the best candidates for alternative specimens to NPS/OPS in SARS-CoV-2 detection, with suitable protocols for swab-free sample collection to be determined and validated in the future. The distinction between oral and extra-oral salivary samples will be crucial, since DTS/POS samples may induce a higher rate of false positives. Urine, feces, tears/CS and sputum seem unreliable for diagnosis. Saliva testing may increase testing capacity, ultimately promoting the implementation of truly deployable COVID-19 tests, which could either work at the point-of-care (e.g. hospitals, clinics) or at outbreak control spots (e.g., schools, airports, and nursing homes).

scholarly journals Wide application of minimally processed saliva on multiple RT-PCR kits for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Mahendra ◽  
Maria M. M. Kaisar ◽  
Suraj R. Vasandani ◽  
Sem Samuel Surja ◽  
Enty Tjoa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Human Saliva ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Sampling Device ◽  
Agreement Rate ◽  
Extraction Step ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab

Saliva as a sample matrix has been an attractive alternative for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. However, due to potential variability in collection and processing steps, it is recommended to evaluate a proposed workflow amongst the local population. Here, we aim to validate collection and treatment of human saliva as a direct specimen for RT-qPCR based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Indonesia. We demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 target genes were detected in saliva specimen and remained stable for five days refrigerated or room temperature storage. The method of processing saliva specimen described in this report is free from RNA-extraction step, thereby reduces cost, time, and manpower required for processing samples. The developed method was validated for use on three COVID-19 RT-PCR kits commercially available. Our developed method achieved 85% agreement rate when compared to paired nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens (NPOP). With the assistance of a specimen sampling device, QuickSpit(TM), collection was found to be more convenient for individuals and improved agreement rate to 90%.

scholarly journals Evaluation of sample collection and transport strategies to enhance yield, accessibility, and biosafety of COVID-19 RT-PCR testing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmapriya Banada ◽  
David Elson ◽  
Naranjargal Daivaa ◽  
Claire Park ◽  
Samuel Desind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Sampling Strategy ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Inactivation ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Nasal Swabs ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Transport Buffer

ABSTRACTSensitive, accessible, and biosafe sampling methods for COVID-19 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays are needed for frequent and widespread testing. We systematically evaluated diagnostic yield across different sample collection and transport workflows, including the incorporation of a viral inactivation buffer. We prospectively collected nasal swabs, oral swabs, and saliva, from 52 COVID-19 RT-PCR-confirmed patients, and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs from 37 patients. Nasal and oral swabs were placed in both viral transport media (VTM) and eNAT™, a sterilizing transport buffer, prior to testing with the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Xpert) test. The sensitivity of each sampling strategy was compared using a composite positive standard. Overall, swab specimens collected in eNAT showed superior sensitivity compared to swabs in VTM (70% vs 57%, P=0.0022). Direct saliva 90.5%, (95% CI: 82%, 95%), followed by NP swabs in VTM and saliva in eNAT, was significantly more sensitive than nasal swabs in VTM (50%, P<0.001) or eNAT (67.8%, P=0.0012) and oral swabs in VTM (50%, P<0.0001) or eNAT (56%, P<0.0001). Saliva and use of eNAT buffer each increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Xpert test; however, no single sample matrix identified all positive cases.

scholarly journals Rapid Isothermal Amplification and Portable Detection System for SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ganguli ◽  
A. Mostafa ◽  
J. Berger ◽  
M. Aydin ◽  
F. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Clinical Diagnostics ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Point Of Use ◽  
Viral Transport Medium

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic provides an urgent example where a gap exists between availability of state-of-the-art diagnostics and current needs. As assay details and primer sequences become widely known, many laboratories could perform diagnostic tests using methods such as RT-PCR or isothermal RT-LAMP amplification. A key advantage of RT-LAMP based approaches compared to RT-PCR is that RT-LAMP is known to be robust in detecting targets from unprocessed samples. In addition, RT-LAMP assays are performed at a constant temperature enabling speed, simplicity, and point-of-use testing. Here, we provide the details of an RT-LAMP isothermal assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus with performance comparable to currently approved tests using RT-PCR. We characterize the assay by introducing swabs in virus spiked synthetic nasal fluids, moving the swab to viral transport medium (VTM), and using a volume of that VTM for performing the amplification without an RNA extraction kit. The assay has a Limit-of-Detection (LOD) of 50 RNA copies/μL in the VTM solution within 20 minutes, and LOD of 5000 RNA copies/μL in the nasal solution. Additionally, we show the utility of this assay for real-time point-of-use testing by demonstrating detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in less than 40 minutes using an additively manufactured cartridge and a smartphone-based reader. Finally, we explore the speed and cost advantages by comparing the required resources and workflows with RT-PCR. This work could accelerate the development and availability of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics by proving alternatives to conventional laboratory benchtop tests.Significance StatementAn important limitation of the current assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 stem from their reliance on time- and labor-intensive and laboratory-based protocols for viral isolation, lysis, and removal of inhibiting materials. While RT-PCR remains the gold standard for performing clinical diagnostics to amplify the RNA sequences, there is an urgent need for alternative portable platforms that can provide rapid and accurate diagnosis, potentially at the point-of-use. Here, we present the details of an isothermal amplification-based detection of SARS-CoV-2, including the demonstration of a smartphone-based point-of-care device that can be used at the point of sample collection.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 detection in setting of viral swab scarcity: are MRSA swabs and viral swabs equivalent?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Federman ◽  
Shaili Gupta ◽  
Gary Stack ◽  
Sheldon M. Campbell ◽  
David R. Peaper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Swab ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Transport Medium ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Nasal Swabs ◽  
Viral Media

AbstractBackgroundThe global pandemic of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) has resulted in unprecedented challenges for healthcare systems. One barrier to widespread testing has been a paucity of traditional respiratory viral swab collection kits relative to the demand. Whether other sample collection kits, such as widely available MRSA nasal swabs can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 is unknown.MethodsWe compared simultaneous nasal MRSA swabs (COPAN ESwabs ® 480C flocked nasal swab in 1mL of liquid Amies medium) and virals wabs (BD H192(07) flexible mini-tip flocked nasopharyngeal swabs in 3mL Universal Transport Medium) for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing using Simplexa COVID-19 Direct assay on patients over a 4-day period. When the results were discordant, the viral swab sample was run again on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress ® SARS-CoV-2 assay.ResultsOf the 81 included samples, there were 19 positives and 62 negatives in viral media and 18 positives and 63 negative in the MRSA swabs. Amongst all included samples, there was concordance between the COPAN ESwabs ® 480C and the viral swabs in 78 (96.3%).ConclusionWe found a high rate of concordance in test results between COPAN ESwabs ® 480C in Amies solution and BD H192(07) nasopharyngeal swabs in in 3 mL of Universal Viral Transport medium viral media. Clinicians and laboratories should feel better informed and assured using COPAN ESwabs ® 480C to help in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

scholarly journals In-House Viral Transport Medium (VTM) Manufacture in the Time of Shortage, Supply and Crisis of COVID-19 at Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S161-S162
Author(s):  
J M Petersen ◽  
S Dalal ◽  
D Jhala
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Phenol Red ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Gentamicin Sulfate ◽  
Viral Transport ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Fetal Bovine ◽  
National Emergency ◽  
Negative Controls

Abstract Introduction/Objective With the outbreak of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2, there have been challenges in the maintenance of adequate supplies both in terms of PPE and for testing. The shortage of commercial VTM for the transport of specimens for PCR testing has created a situation in which laboratories would need to manufacture their own in-house VTM as commonly used commercial VTM is unavailable. However, there is sparse literature on the emergency manufacture of VTM. Here, we describe the VAMC experience in manufacturing/quality control on its own VTM. Results VTM was manufactured by pathology and laboratory medicine using strict aseptic technique with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) 500 ml bottle with phenol red, sterile heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) gentamicin sulfate (50 mg/mL) and amphotericin B (250 ug/ml). First, 50 ml of amphotericin B and 50 ml of gentamicin sulfate were mixed. Then 10 ml of FBS was mixed with the HBSS bottle and then 2 ml of the gentamicin/amphotericin B mixture was also mixed into the HBSS bottle. 3 ml aliquots were made from this mixture to constitute individual tubes of VTM for clinical use. Sterility for each batch (after 24-hour incubation at 37o C in the CO2 incubator) was assessed visually and by culture on a blood agar, chocolate agar, and thioglycolate mediums. An efficacy check was performed for each batch by spiking positive and negative controls into the VTM aliquots; RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was executed to verify the medium did not degrade viral RNA and produced expected results for room temperature, refrigerated, and frozen samples. Previously manufactured VTM without phenol red also underwent sterility and efficacy checks. Results VTM was successfully manufactured in-house, allowing testing to continue despite the shortage. Sterility and efficacy checks on all lots and bottles from which the VTM aliquots were made passed with no growth detected and efficacy passing with all expected positives and negatives resulting as expected. Conclusion To the author’s knowledge, this represents the first published abstract on VTM manufacture in this most unprecedented crisis involving COVID-19. In this national emergency with corresponding shortage of testing supplies including commercial VTM, the in-house manufacture of VTM is both feasible and prudent to ensure continuity of testing and quality patient/laboratory care.

scholarly journals Fast Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Directly from Respiratory Samples Using a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Test

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 801
Author(s):  
Olympia E. Anastasiou ◽  
Caroline Holtkamp ◽  
Miriam Schäfer ◽  
Frieda Schön ◽  
Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Rapid Tests ◽  
Sous Vide ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Isothermal Assay

The availability of simple SARS-CoV-2 detection methods is crucial to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined whether a commercial LAMP assay can reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 genomes directly in respiratory samples without having to extract nucleic acids (NA) beforehand. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS, n = 220) were tested by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and with the LAMP assay. For RT-PCR, NA were investigated. For LAMP, NA from 26 NPS in viral transport medium (VTM) were tested. The other 194 NPS were analyzed directly without prior NA extraction (140 samples in VTM; 54 dry swab samples stirred in phosphate buffered saline). Ten NPS were tested directly by LAMP using a sous-vide cooking unit. The isothermal assay demonstrated excellent specificity (100%) but moderate sensitivity (68.8%), with a positive predictive value of 1 and a negative predictive value of 0.65 for direct testing of NPS in VTM. The use of dry swabs, even without NA extraction, improved the analytical sensitivity; up to 6% of samples showed signs of inhibition. LAMP could be performed successfully with a sous-vide cooking unit. This technique is very fast, requires little laboratory resources, and can replace rapid antigen tests or verify reactive rapid tests on-site.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document