scholarly journals The Incidence and Cumulative Risk of Major Surgery in Older Persons in the United States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Becher ◽  
Brent Vander Wyk ◽  
Linda Leo-Summers ◽  
Mayur M. Desai ◽  
Thomas M. Gill
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Persons ◽  
Cumulative Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Living ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

ABSTRACTImportanceAs the population of the United States (US) ages, there is considerable interest in ensuring safe and high-quality surgical care for older persons. Yet, valid, generalizable data on the occurrence of major surgery in the geriatric population are sparse.ObjectiveTo estimate the incidence and cumulative risk of major surgery in older persons over a 5-year period and evaluate how these estimates differ according to demographic and geriatric characteristics.DesignProspective longitudinal study.SettingContinental US from 2011 to 2016.Participants5,571 community-living fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65+, from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).Main Outcomes and MeasuresMajor surgeries were identified through linkages with data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Data on frailty and dementia were obtained from the baseline NHATS assessment.ResultsThe nationally-representative incidence of major surgery per 100 person-years was 8.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-9.5), with estimates of 5.2 (95% CI, 4.7-5.7) and 3.7 (95% CI, 3.3-4.1) for elective and non-elective surgeries. The adjusted incidence of major surgery peaked at 10.8 (95% CI, 9.4-12.4) in persons 75-79 years, increased from 6.6 (95% CI, 5.8-7.5) in the non-frail group to 10.3 (95% CI, 8.9-11.9) in the frail group, and was similar by sex (males 8.6 [95% CI, 7.7-9.6]; females 8.3 [95% CI, 7.5-9.1]) and dementia (no 8.6 [95% CI, 7.9-9.3]; possible 7.8 [95% CI, 6.3-9.6]; probable 8.1 [95% CI, 6.7-9.9]). The 5-year cumulative risk of major surgery was 13.8% (95% CI, 12.2%-15.5%), representing nearly 5 million unique older persons (4,958,048 [95% CI, 4,345,342-5,570,755]), including 12.1% (95% CI, 9.5%-14.6%) in persons 85-89 years, 9.1% (95% CI, 7.2%-11.0%) in those ≥90 years, 12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%-14.4%) in those with frailty, and 12.4% (95% CI, 9.8%-15.0%) in those with probable dementia.Conclusions and RelevanceMajor surgery is a common event in the lives of community-living older persons, including high-risk vulnerable subgroups such as the oldest old, those with frailty or dementia, and those undergoing non-elective surgery. The burden of major surgery in older Americans will add to the challenges ahead for the US health care system in our aging society.KEY POINTSQuestionWhat is the incidence and cumulative risk of major surgery in older persons in the United States?FindingsIn this prospective longitudinal study, data from 5,571 community-living fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries were used to calculate nationally-representative estimates for the incidence and cumulative risk of major surgery over a 5-year period. Nearly 9 major surgeries were performed annually for every 100 older persons, and more than 1 in 7 Medicare beneficiaries underwent a major surgery over 5 years, representing nearly 5 million unique older persons.MeaningMajor surgery is a common event in the lives of community-living older persons.

scholarly journals The Incidence and Cumulative Risk of Major Surgery in Older Persons in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Becher ◽  
Brent Vander Wyk ◽  
Linda Leo-Summers ◽  
Mayur M. Desai ◽  
Thomas M. Gill
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Persons ◽  
Cumulative Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Major Surgery

scholarly journals Cannabis Use and the Onset of Cigarette and E-cigarette Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study Among Youth in the United States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea H Weinberger ◽  
Jiaqi Zhu ◽  
Joun Lee ◽  
Shu Xu ◽  
Renee D Goodwin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Public Health Education ◽  
The United States ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Cannabis Use ◽  
Cigarette Use ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Abstract Introduction Cigarette use is declining among youth in the United States, whereas cannabis use and e-cigarette use are increasing. Cannabis use has been linked with increased uptake and persistence of cigarette smoking among adults. The goal of this study was to examine whether cannabis use is associated with the prevalence and incidence of cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual product use among U.S. youth. Methods Data included U.S. youth ages 12–17 from two waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (Wave 1 youth, n = 13 651; Wave 1 tobacco-naive youth, n = 10 081). Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine the association between Wave 1 cannabis use and (1) Wave 1 prevalence of cigarette/e-cigarette use among Wave 1 youth and (2) Wave 2 incidence of cigarette/e-cigarette use among Wave 1 tobacco-naive youth. Analyses were run unadjusted and adjusted for demographics and internalizing/externalizing problem symptoms. Results Wave 1 cigarette and e-cigarette use were significantly more common among youth who used versus did not use cannabis. Among Wave 1 tobacco-naive youth, Wave 1 cannabis use was associated with significantly increased incidence of cigarette and e-cigarette use by Wave 2. Conclusions Youth who use cannabis are more likely to report cigarette and e-cigarette use, and cannabis use is associated with increased risk of initiation of cigarette and e-cigarette use over 1 year. Continued success in tobacco control—specifically toward reducing smoking among adolescents—may require focusing on cannabis, e-cigarette, and cigarette use in public health education, outreach, and intervention efforts. Implications These data extend our knowledge of cigarette and e-cigarette use among youth by showing that cannabis use is associated with increased prevalence and incidence of cigarette and e-cigarette use among youth, relative to youth who do not use cannabis. The increasing popularity of cannabis use among youth and diminished perceptions of risk, coupled with the strong link between cannabis use and tobacco use, may have unintended consequences for cigarette control efforts among youth.

Abstract 236: Trends in Hospitalization for Digoxin Toxicity and Subsequent Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States, 1999-2011

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhakar V Nuti ◽  
Frederick A Masoudi ◽  
James V Freeman ◽  
Karthik Murugiah ◽  
Nihar R Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
The United States ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Digoxin Toxicity ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Annual Change ◽  
Hospital Discharge Diagnosis ◽  
Annual Decline

Objective: To characterize changes in rates of hospitalization for digoxin toxicity and trends in the associated mortality and readmission among older adults over a 12-year period in the United States. Methods: We studied 33,952,331 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older with a hospital discharge diagnosis of digoxin toxicity in the United States from 1999 to 2011. Outcome measures were rates of hospitalization for digoxin toxicity; in-hospital mortality; 30-day mortality; and 30-day readmission. Results: There were 20,957 hospitalizations for a principal or secondary diagnosis of digoxin toxicity between 1999 and 2011. The rate declined significantly from 15.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7-15.7) in 1999 to 2.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 1.9-2.3) in 2011 (p<0.001), representing an adjusted annual decline of 17.0% (95% CI: 16.2-17.0) (Figure 1). Between 1999 and 2011, the observed in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates associated with hospitalization for digoxin toxicity declined significantly, from 6.0% (95% CI: 5.2-6.8) to 3.3% (95% CI: 2.0-5.1) (p<0.01) and 14.0% (95% CI: 13.0-15.2) to 10.6% (95% CI: 8.2-13.4) (p<0.05), respectively, representing an annual decline for in-hospital mortality of 5.0% (95% CI: 3.7-7.2) and for 30-day mortality of 4.0% (95% CI: 3.1-5.7). The overall observed 30-day readmission rate declined significantly from 23.5% (95% CI: 22.1-24.9) in 1999 to 18.9% (95% CI: 15.6-22.3) in 2011 (p<0.05), but there was no significant decline in the adjusted annual change in 30-day readmission (1.0%, 95% CI: 0.0-1.7). Conclusions: In a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries, the rate of hospitalization for digoxin toxicity and subsequent mortality declined significantly between 1999 and 2011.

scholarly journals Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Mortality and Readmissions Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Pulmonary Embolism in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi K. Wadhera ◽  
Eric A. Secemsky ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Robert W. Yeh ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Advanced Therapies

Background In the United States, hospitalizations for pulmonary embolism (PE) are increasing among older adults insured by Medicare. Although efforts to reduce health disparities have intensified, it remains unclear whether clinical outcomes differ between socioeconomically disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with PE. Methods and Results In this study, there were 53 386 Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries age ≥65 years hospitalized for PE between October 2015 and January 2017. Of these, 5494 (10.3%) were socioeconomically disadvantaged and 47 892 (89.7%) were nondisadvantaged. Socioeconomically disadvantaged adults were of similar age as nondisadvantaged adults (77.1 versus 77.0), more likely to be female (68.5% versus 54.2%), and less likely to receive advanced therapies (11.0% versus 12.1%). After adjustment for demographics, 90‐day all‐cause mortality rates were similar between disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged adults. In contrast, 1‐year mortality rates were higher among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10–1.22), although these differences were partially attenuated after additional adjustments for comorbidities and PE severity (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02–1.16). Risk‐adjusted 30‐day and 90‐day all‐cause readmission rates were substantially higher among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (30‐day HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06–1.22]; 90‐day HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12–1.25]). In addition, 90‐day readmissions attributed to PE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or bleeding were higher among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02–1.32). Conclusions Socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults hospitalized with PE have higher 1‐year mortality rates compared with their nondisadvantaged counterparts. Nearly 1 in 3 socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults was readmitted within 90 days of a hospitalization for PE. Targeted strategies are needed to improve transitional and ambulatory care for this vulnerable population.

scholarly journals Geographic and Demographic Variability in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Dispersion in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael N. Young ◽  
Stephen Kearing ◽  
David Malenka ◽  
Philip P. Goodney ◽  
Jonathan Skinner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Disruptive Technology ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the management of aortic valve stenosis. However, little national data are available characterizing the geographic and demographic dispersion of this disruptive technology relative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods and Results In this US claims‐based study, we analyzed a 100% sample of fee‐for‐service Medicare beneficiaries from 2012 to 2017 and examined national rates of TAVR versus SAVR. Procedure rates were compared across years as a function of age, sex, race, and geography for TAVR and SAVR beneficiaries. There was significant growth in TAVR from 15.4 beneficiaries/100 000 enrollees in 2012 to 90.6 in 2017 ( P <0.001). SAVR rates declined from 92.8 beneficiaries/100 000 enrollees in 2012 to 63.5 in 2017 ( P <0.001). The growth of TAVR varied as a function of age ( P <0.0001). While TAVR was the dominant strategy among beneficiaries ≥85 and 75 to 84 years old, SAVR was more common among beneficiaries 65 to 74 years old. TAVR was also used more frequently than SAVR among women ( P <0.001). While TAVR increased among all races, it was less commonly used among non‐White beneficiaries ( P <0.001). Contemporary use of TAVR relative to SAVR varied significantly by geographic location, with a TAVR:SAVR ratio in 2017 of 1.24 in the Midwest and 1.68 in the Northeast ( P <0.001). Conclusions In 2017, the number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving TAVR exceeded SAVR for the first time in the United States. There is significant variation, however, in the geographic expansion of TAVR and in patient demographics relative to SAVR.

scholarly journals Stroke Hospitalizations Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanhe Yang ◽  
Xin Tong ◽  
Sallyann Coleman King ◽  
Benjamin S. Olivari ◽  
Robert K. Merritt
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Percent Reduction ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
National Emergency

Background and Purpose: Emergency department visits and hospitalizations for stroke declined significantly following declaration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a national emergency on March 13, 2020, in the United States. This study examined trends in hospitalizations for stroke among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years and compared characteristics of stroke patients during COVID-19 pandemic to comparable weeks in the preceding year (2019). Methods: For trend analysis, we examined stroke hospitalizations from week 1 in 2019 through week 44 in 2020. For comparison of patient characteristics, we estimated percent reduction in weekly stroke hospitalizations from 2019 to 2020 during weeks 10 through 23 and during weeks 24 through 44 by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and state. Results: Compared to weekly numbers of hospitalizations for stroke reported during 2019, stroke hospitalizations in 2020 decreased sharply during weeks 10 through 15 (March 1–April 11), began increasing during weeks 16 through 23, and remained at a level lower than the same weeks in 2019 from weeks 24 through 44 (June 7–October 31). During weeks 10 through 23, stroke hospitalizations decreased by 22.3% (95% CI, 21.4%–23.1%) in 2020 compared with same period in 2019; during weeks 24 through 44, they decreased by 12.1% (95% CI, 11.2%–12.9%). The magnitude of reduction increased with age but similar between men and women and among different race/ethnicity groups. Reductions in stroke hospitalizations between weeks 10 through 23 varied by state ranging from 0.0% (95% CI, −16.0%–1.7%) in New Hampshire to 36.2% (95% CI, 24.8%–46.7%) in Montana. Conclusions: One-in-5 fewer stroke hospitalizations among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries occurred during initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1–June 6) and weekly stroke hospitalizations remained at a lower than expected level from June 7 to October 31 in 2020 compared with 2019. Changes in stroke hospitalizations varied substantially by state.

Abstract P636: Social Determinants of Stroke Hospitalization and Mortality in the United States

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Randhir Sagar Yadav ◽  
Durgesh Chaudhary ◽  
Shima Shahjouei ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
Vida Abedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
County Level ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Control And Prevention

Introduction: Stroke hospitalization and mortality are influenced by various social determinants. This ecological study aimed to determine the associations between social determinants and stroke hospitalization and outcome at county-level in the United States. Methods: County-level data were recorded from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as of January 7, 2020. We considered four outcomes: all-age (1) Ischemic and (2) Hemorrhagic stroke Death rates per 100,000 individuals (ID and HD respectively), and (3) Ischemic and (4) Hemorrhagic stroke Hospitalization rate per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries (IH and HH respectively). Results: Data of 3,225 counties showed IH (12.5 ± 3.4) and ID (22.2 ± 5.1) were more frequent than HH (2.0 ± 0.4) and HD (9.8 ± 2.1). Income inequality as expressed by Gini Index was found to be 44.6% ± 3.6% and unemployment rate was 4.3% ± 1.5%. Only 29.8% of the counties had at least one hospital with neurological services. The uninsured rate was 11.0% ± 4.7% and people living within half a mile of a park was only 18.7% ± 17.6%. Age-adjusted obesity rate was 32.0% ± 4.5%. In regression models, age-adjusted obesity (OR for IH: 1.11; HH: 1.04) and number of hospitals with neurological services (IH: 1.40; HH: 1.50) showed an association with IH and HH. Age-adjusted obesity (ID: 1.16; HD: 1.11), unemployment (ID: 1.21; HD: 1.18) and income inequality (ID: 1.09; HD: 1.11) showed an association with ID and HD. Park access showed inverse associations with all four outcomes. Additionally, population per primary-care physician was associated with HH while number of pharmacy and uninsured rate were associated with ID. All associations and OR had p ≤0.04. Conclusion: Unemployment and income inequality are significantly associated with increased stroke mortality rates.

scholarly journals Utilization of rehabilitation therapy services in Parkinson disease in the United States

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1162-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Fullard ◽  
Dylan P. Thibault ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
Joellyn Fox ◽  
Danish E. Bhatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Rehabilitation Therapy ◽  
Provider Supply

Objective:To examine rehabilitation therapy utilization for Parkinson disease (PD).Methods:We identified 174,643 Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of PD in 2007 and followed them through 2009. The main outcome measures were annual receipt of physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), or speech therapy (ST).Results:Outpatient rehabilitation fee-for-service use was low. In 2007, only 14.2% of individuals with PD had claims for PT or OT, and 14.6% for ST. Asian Americans were the highest users of PT/OT (18.4%) and ST (18.4%), followed by Caucasians (PT/OT 14.4%, ST 14.8%). African Americans had the lowest utilization (PT/OT 7.8%, ST 8.2%). Using logistic regression models that accounted for repeated measures, we found that African American patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.63 for PT/OT, AOR 0.63 for ST) and Hispanic patients (AOR 0.97 for PT/OT, AOR 0.91 for ST) were less likely to have received therapies compared to Caucasian patients. Patients with PD with at least one neurologist visit per year were 43% more likely to have a claim for PT evaluation as compared to patients without neurologist care (AOR 1.43, 1.30–1.48), and this relationship was similar for OT evaluation, PT/OT treatment, and ST. Geographically, Western states had the greatest use of rehabilitation therapies, but provider supply did not correlate with utilization.Conclusions:This claims-based analysis suggests that rehabilitation therapy utilization among older patients with PD in the United States is lower than reported for countries with comparable health care infrastructure. Neurologist care is associated with rehabilitation therapy use; provider supply is not.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document