Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent, also has antiviral properties. Our aim was to assess whether ivermectin can shorten the viral shedding in patients at an early stage of COVID19 infection. Methods: The double blinded trial compared patients receiving ivermectin 0.2 mg/kg for 3 days vs. placebo in non-hospitalized COVID19 patients. RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab was obtained at recruitment and then every two days. Primary endpoint was reduction of viral-load on the 6th day (third day after termination of treatment) as reflected by Ct level>30 (non-infectious level). The primary outcome was supported by determination of viral culture viability. Results: Eighty nine patients were eligible (47 in ivermectin and 42 in placebo arm). Their median age was 35 years. Females accounted for 21.6%, and 16.8% were asymptomatic at recruitment. Median time from symptom onset was 4 days. There were no statistical differences in these parameters between the two groups. On day 6, 34 out of 47 (72%) patients in the ivermectin arm reached the endpoint, compared to 21/ 42 (50%) in the placebo arm (OR 2.62; 95% CI: 1.09 to 6.31). In a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of a negative test at day 6 was 2.62 time higher in the ivermectin group (95% CI: 1.06 to 6.45). Cultures at days 2 to 6 were positive in 3/23 (13.0%) of ivermectin samples vs. 14/29 (48.2%) in the placebo group (p=0.008). Conclusions: There were significantly lower viral loads and viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which could lead to shortening isolation time in these patients.

Download Full-text

Early use of nitazoxanide in mild Covid-19 disease: randomised, placebo-controlled trial

European Respiratory Journal ◽

10.1183/13993003.03725-2020 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 2003725

Author(s):

Patricia R. M. Rocco ◽

Pedro L. Silva ◽

Fernanda F. Cruz ◽

Marco Antonio C. M. Junior ◽

Paulo F. G. M. M. Tierno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Symptom Resolution ◽

Days Of Therapy ◽

Secondary Outcomes

Nitazoxanide is widely available and exerts broad-spectrum antiviral activity in vitro. However, there is no evidence of its impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients presenting up to 3 days after onset of Covid-19 symptoms (dry cough, fever, and/or fatigue) were enrolled. After confirmation of SARS-CoV2 infection by RT-PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab, patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either nitazoxanide (500 mg) or placebo, TID, for 5 days. The primary outcome was complete resolution of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were viral load, laboratory tests, serum biomarkers of inflammation, and hospitalisation rate. Adverse events were also assessed. From June 8 to August 20, 2020, 1575 patients were screened. Of these, 392 (198 placebo, 194 nitazoxanide) were analysed. Median time from symptom onset to first dose of study drug was 5 (4–5) days. At the 5-day study visit, symptom resolution did not differ between the nitazoxanide and placebo arms. Swabs collected were negative for SARS-CoV-2 in 29.9% of patients in the nitazoxanide arm versus 18.2% in the placebo arm (p=0.009). Viral load was also reduced after nitazoxanide compared to placebo (p=0.006). The percent viral load reduction from onset to end of therapy was higher with nitazoxanide (55%) than placebo (45%) (p=0.013). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different. No serious adverse events were observed. In patients with mild Covid-19, symptom resolution did not differ between nitazoxanide and placebo groups after 5 days of therapy. However, early nitazoxanide therapy was safe and reduced viral load significantly.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the monoclonal antibody MHAA4549A in patients with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab630 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jeremy J Lim ◽

Sadia Dar ◽

Dirk Venter ◽

Juan P Horcajada ◽

Priya Kulkarni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Viral Load ◽

Median Time ◽

Influenza A ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Viral Shedding

Abstract Background MHAA4549A, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the influenza A hemagglutinin stalk, neutralizes influenza A virus in animal and human volunteer challenge studies. We investigated MHAA4549A safety and tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in outpatients with acute, uncomplicated influenza A infection. Methods This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single intravenous (IV) doses of 3600 mg or 8400 mg MHAA4549A, or IV placebo in adult outpatients testing positive for influenza A. Patients were enrolled across 35 sites in 6 countries. Randomization and dosing occurred ≤ 72 hours of symptom onset; study duration was 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was the nature and frequency of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included median time to alleviation of all influenza symptoms, effects on nasopharyngeal viral load and duration of viral shedding, and MHAA4549A serum pharmacokinetics. Results Of 125 randomized patients, 124 received study treatment, with 99 confirmed positive for influenza A by central testing. Frequency of AEs between MHAA4549A and placebo groups was similar; nausea was most common (8 patients; 6.5%). MHAA4549A serum exposure was confirmed in all MHAA4549A-treated patients and was dose proportional. No hospitalizations or deaths occurred. Between MHAA4549A and placebo groups, no statistically significant differences occurred in median time to alleviation of all symptoms, nasopharyngeal viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Conclusions While MHAA4549A was safe and well-tolerated with confirmed exposure, the antibody did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection.

Download Full-text

The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with mild COVID-19: a pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

10.21203/rs.3.rs-116547/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Carlos Chaccour ◽

Aina Casellas ◽

Andres Blanco-Di Matteo ◽

Iñigo Pineda ◽

Alejandro Fernandez-Montero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Single Dose ◽

Viral Load ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Post Treatment ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Viral Loads

Abstract Ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro at concentrations not readily achievable with currently approved doses. There is limited evidence to support its clinical use in COVID-19 patients. We conducted a Pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy of a single dose of ivermectin to reduce the proportion of PCR positives, viral load at day 7 post treatment.Consecutive patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and mild COVID-19 (no pneumonia) and no risk factors for complicated disease attending the emergency room of the Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ivermectin, 400 mcg/kg, single dose (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA by PCR from nasopharyngeal swab at day 7 post-treatment. The primary outcome was supported by determination of the viral load and infectivity of each sample. The differences between ivermectin and placebo were calculated using Fisher’s exact test and presented as a relative risk ratio.All patients recruited completed the trial (median age, 26 [range, 18-54] years; 12 [50%] women; 100% had symptoms at recruitment, 70% reported headache, 62% reported fever, 50% reported general malaise and 25% reported cough). At day 7, there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positive patients (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.77-1.09, p = 1.0). The ivermectin group had lower median viral loads at days 4 and 7 post treatment as well as lower median IgG titers at day 21 post treatment. Hyposmia/anosmia (76 vs 158 patient-days) and cough (68 vs 97 patient-days) were less frequent in the ivermectin group.Among patients with mild COVID-19 and no risk factors for severe disease receiving a single 400 mcg/kg dose of ivermectin within 48 hours of fever or cough onset there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positives. There was however a marked reduction of anosmia/hyposmia, a reduction of cough and a tendency to lower viral loads and lower IgG titers which warrants assessment in larger trials.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04390022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04390022

Download Full-text

Early use of nitazoxanide in mild Covid-19 disease: randomized, placebo-controlled trial

10.1101/2020.10.21.20217208 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Patricia R. M. Rocco ◽

Pedro L. Silva ◽

Fernanda F. Cruz ◽

Marco Antonio C. M. Junior ◽

Paulo F. G. M. M. Tierno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Complete Resolution ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Symptom Resolution ◽

Days Of Therapy

AbstractThe antiparasitic drug nitazoxanide is widely available and exerts broad-spectrum antiviral activity in vitro. However, there is no evidence of its impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection.In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients who presented up to 3 days after onset of Covid-19 symptoms (dry cough, fever, and/or fatigue) were enrolled. After confirmation of SARS-CoV2 infection by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either nitazoxanide (500 mg) or placebo, TID, for 5 days. The primary outcome was complete resolution of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were viral load, general laboratory tests, serum biomarkers of inflammation, and hospitalization rate. Adverse events were also assessed.From June 8 to August 20, 2020, 1,575 patients were screened. Of these, 392 (198 placebo, 194 nitazoxanide) were analyzed. Median time from symptom onset to first dose of study drug was 5 (4-5) days. At the 5-day study visit, symptom resolution did not differ between the nitazoxanide and placebo arms. However, at the 1-week follow-up, 78% in the nitazoxanide arm and 57% in the placebo arm reported complete resolution of symptoms (p=0.048). Swabs collected were negative for SARS-CoV-2 in 29.9% of patients in the nitazoxanide arm versus 18.2% in the placebo arm (p=0.009). Viral load was also reduced after nitazoxanide compared to placebo (p=0.006). No serious adverse events were observed.In patients with mild Covid-19, symptom resolution did not differ between the nitazoxanide and placebo groups after 5 days of therapy. However, early nitazoxanide therapy was safe and reduced viral load significantly.Take home messageThis was the first study to evaluate the effect of early nitazoxanide therapy in mild Covid-19. Nitazoxanide did not accelerate symptom resolution after 5 days of therapy; however, reduced viral load significantly with no serious adverse events.

Download Full-text

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicentre, Controlled Trial Of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine In Patients With The Early Stage Of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis In Japan

10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2010.181.1_meetingabstracts.a3986 ◽

2010 ◽

Author(s):

Sakae A. Homma ◽

Arata Azuma ◽

Hiroyuki Taniguchi ◽

Takashi Ogura ◽

Yoshiro Mochizuki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽

Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽

Early Stage ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Double Blind

Download Full-text

Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19–a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

European Respiratory Journal ◽

10.1183/13993003.00752-2021 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 2100752

Author(s):

Pradeesh Sivapalan ◽

Charlotte Suppli Ulrik ◽

Therese Sophie Lapperre ◽

Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen ◽

Josefin Eklöf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Outcome ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Control Group ◽

Double Blind ◽

Safety Outcome ◽

Hospitalised Patients ◽

Double Blinded ◽

Combined Intervention

BackgroundCombining the antibiotic azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine induces airway immunomodulatory effects, with the latter also having in vitro antiviral properties. This may improve outcomes in patients hospitalised for COVID-19.MethodsPlacebo-controlled double-blind randomised multicentre trial. Patients ≥18 years, admitted to hospital for≤48 h (not intensive care) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, were recruited. The intervention was 500 mg daily azithromycin for 3 days followed by 250 mg daily azithromycin for 12 days combined with 200 mg twice daily hydroxychloroquine for all 15 days. The control group received placebo/placebo. The primary outcome was days alive and discharged from hospital within 14 days (DAOH14).ResultsAfter randomisation of 117 patients, at the first planned interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping enrolment due to futility, based on pre-specified criteria. Consequently, the trial was terminated on February 1, 2021. A total of 61 patients received the combined intervention and 56 patients received placebo. In the intervention group, patients had a median of 9.0 DAOH14 (IQR, 3–11) versus. 9.0 DAOH14 (IQR, 7–10) in the placebo group (p=0.90). The primary safety outcome, death from all causes on day 30, occurred for 1 patient in the intervention group versus. 2 patients receiving placebo (p=0.52), and readmittance or death within 30 days occurred for 9 patients in the intervention group versus. 6 patients receiving placebo (p=0.57).ConclusionsThe combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine did not improve survival or length of hospitalisation in patients with COVID-19.

Download Full-text

Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of PGT121, a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody against HIV-1: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

Nature Medicine ◽

10.1038/s41591-021-01509-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kathryn E. Stephenson ◽

Boris Julg ◽

C. Sabrina Tan ◽

Rebecca Zash ◽

Stephen R. Walsh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Antiviral Activity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Hiv 1

AbstractHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-specific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are currently under development to treat and prevent HIV-1 infection. We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled trial of a single administration of the HIV-1 V3-glycan-specific antibody PGT121 at 3, 10 and 30 mg kg–1 in HIV-uninfected adults and HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART), as well as a multicenter, open-label trial of one infusion of PGT121 at 30 mg kg–1 in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART (no. NCT02960581). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antiviral activity in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART. The secondary endpoints were changes in anti-PGT121 antibody titers and CD4+ T-cell count, and development of HIV-1 sequence variations associated with PGT121 resistance. Among 48 participants enrolled, no treatment-related serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases or Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. The most common reactions among PGT121 recipients were intravenous/injection site tenderness, pain and headache. Absolute and relative CD4+ T-cell counts did not change following PGT121 infusion in HIV-infected participants. Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were not elicited. PGT121 reduced plasma HIV RNA levels by a median of 1.77 log in viremic participants, with a viral load nadir at a median of 8.5 days. Two individuals with low baseline viral loads experienced ART-free viral suppression for ≥168 days following antibody infusion, and rebound viruses in these individuals demonstrated full or partial PGT121 sensitivity. The trial met the prespecified endpoints. These data suggest that further investigation of the potential of antibody-based therapeutic strategies for long-term suppression of HIV is warranted, including in individuals off ART and with low viral load.

Download Full-text

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Human Challenge Study of the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of RV521, an Inhibitor of the RSV-F Protein

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.01884-19 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 64 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

John DeVincenzo ◽

Dereck Tait ◽

John Efthimiou ◽

Julie Mori ◽

Young-In Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

Respiratory Syncytial Virus ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Severity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Double Blind ◽

Challenge Virus ◽

F Protein ◽

Syncytial Virus

ABSTRACT Effective treatments for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection are lacking. Here, we report a human proof-of-concept study for RV521, a small-molecule antiviral inhibitor of the RSV-F protein. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy adults were challenged with RSV-A Memphis-37b. After infection was confirmed (or 5 days after challenge virus inoculation), subjects received RV521 (350 mg or 200 mg) or placebo orally every 12 h for 5 days. The primary endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) for viral load, as assessed by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) of nasal wash samples. The primary efficacy analysis set included subjects successfully infected with RSV who received ≥1 dose of study drug. A total of 66 subjects were enrolled (n = 22 per group); 53 were included in the primary analysis set (RV521 350 mg: n = 16; 200 mg: n = 18; placebo: n = 19). The mean AUC of RT-qPCR-assessed RSV viral load (log10 PFU equivalents [PFUe]/ml · h) was significantly lower with RV521 350 mg (185.26; standard error [SE], 31.17; P = 0.002) and 200 mg (224.35; SE, 37.60; P = 0.007) versus placebo (501.39; SE, 86.57). Disease severity improved with RV521 350 mg and 200 mg versus placebo (P = 0.002 and P = 0.009, respectively, for AUC total symptom score [score × hours]). Daily nasal mucus weight was significantly reduced (P = 0.010 and P = 0.038 for RV521 350 mg and 200 mg, respectively, versus placebo). All treatment-emergent adverse events were grade 1 or 2. No subjects discontinued due to adverse events. There was no evidence of clinically significant viral resistance, and only three variants were detected. RV521 effectively reduced RSV viral load and disease severity in humans and was well tolerated. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03258502.)

Download Full-text

Preliminary results of RTOG 0831, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil in the prevention of erectile dysfunction in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.9525 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9525-9525

Author(s):

Deborah Bruner ◽

Stephanie L. Pugh ◽

Thomas Michael Pisansky ◽

Richard Evan Greenberg ◽

Nadeem Pervez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Erectile Function ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

First Year ◽

Additional Time ◽

Double Blind ◽

Exact Test ◽

Intent To Treat ◽

Double Blinded ◽

Penile Bulb

9525 Background: Determine if prophylactic tadalafil maintains spontaneous (off-drug) erectile function (EF) compared to placebo in patients (pts) treated with radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. Methods: Double-blind 1:1 randomization to tadalafil 5mg daily for 6 mos vs placebo starting with RT. Primary outcomes measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Eligibility included pre-RT IIEF Question [Q] 1 response “sometimes/most times/always” able to get an erection. Ps treated with hormones were excluded. Primary outcome was response to IIEF Q1 at 30 wks (6 wks off drug). Pts were stratified by RT modality (external vs. brachytherapy) and age (≤65 vs. >65 years). 182 pts were needed in an intent-to-treat analysis to show a difference from 20% responders with placebo to 40% with tadalafil based on a 2-sided Fishers exact test with α=0.05 and 80% power. Results: We report on 155/222 analyzable/eligible pts. Median age was 63 years, white (73%), and external RT (63%). Mean total dose for external RT was 77.23 Gy and 136.74 Gy for brachytherapy with penile bulb D50 of 24.46 Gy and 31.24 Gy respectively. Most pts completed treatment per protocol (84% tadalafil, 70% placebo). Spontaneous EF at 30 wks from drug start was not different (p=0.99) between arms based on IIEF Q1 response, total IIEF score (52.5 drug vs 52.8 placebo), or score change from baseline (-8.0 drug vs -8.8 placebo). No difference in these outcomes was noted at 1 year. Non-responders at 30 wks were likely to be older (age≥65; p=0.432), but there were no significant predictors at 1 year. About 80% of pts maintained spontaneous EF in both arms. Conclusions: Low-dose daily tadalafil did not preserve EF within the first year of RT for prostate cancer. If tadalafil positively influences delayed RT-induced vasogenic injury, additional time may be needed to observe a benefit to tadalafil as a preventive agent. Alternatively, tadalafil dose modification or altered dosing schedules may be needed to demonstrate a protective effect of this agent when used with RT. Clinical trial information: NCT00951184.

Download Full-text