scholarly journals Rapid comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Denzler ◽  
Max L. Jacobs ◽  
Viktoria Witte ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Claudia M. Denkinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Analytical Sensitivities

Background: Currently, more than 500 different AgPOCTs for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics are on sale, for many of which no data about sensitivity other than self-acclaimed values by the manufacturers are available. In many cases these do not reflect real-life diagnostic sensitivities. Therefore, manufacturer-independent quality checks of available AgPOCTs are needed, given the potential implications of false-negative results. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a scalable approach for direct comparison of the analytical sensitivities of commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) in order to rapidly identify poor performing products. Methods: We present a methodology for quick assessment of the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow test stripes suitable for quality evaluation of many different products. We established reference samples with high, medium and low SARS-CoV-2 viral loads along with a SARS-CoV-2 negative control sample. Test samples were used to semi-quantitatively assess the analytical sensitivities of 32 different commercial AgPOCTs in a head-to-head comparison. Results: Among 32 SARS-CoV-2 AgPOCTs tested, we observe sensitivity differences across a broad range of viral loads (~7.0*10⁸ to ~1.7*10⁵ SARS-CoV-2 genome copies per ml). 23 AgPOCTs detected the Ct25 test sample (~1.4*10⁶ copies/ ml), while only five tests detected the Ct28 test sample (~1.7*10⁵ copies/ ml). In the low range of analytical sensitivity we found three saliva spit tests only delivering positive results for the Ct21 sample (~2.2*10⁷ copies/ ml). Comparison with published data support our AgPOCT ranking. Importantly, we identified an AgPOCT offered in many local drugstores and supermarkets, which did not reliably recognize the sample with highest viral load (Ct16 test sample with ~7.0*10⁸ copies/ ml) leading to serious doubts in its usefulness in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Conclusion: The rapid sensitivity assessment procedure presented here provides useful estimations on the analytical sensitivities of 32 AgPOCTs and identified a widely-spread AgPOCT with concerningly low sensitivity.

scholarly journals Cannabis Edibles: Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Evaluation of Oral Fluid Screening Devices for Predicting Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Oral Fluid following Cannabis Brownie Administration

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew N Newmeyer ◽  
Madeleine J Swortwood ◽  
Maria Andersson ◽  
Osama A Abulseoud ◽  
Karl B Scheidweiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Fluid ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Performance Evaluations ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Analytical Sensitivities

Abstract BACKGROUND Roadside oral fluid (OF) Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) detection indicates recent cannabis intake. OF and blood THC pharmacokinetic data are limited and there are no on-site OF screening performance evaluations after controlled edible cannabis. CONTENT We reviewed OF and blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and performance evaluations of the Draeger DrugTest®5000 (DT5000) and Alere™ DDS®2 (DDS2) on-site OF screening devices. We also present data from a controlled oral cannabis administration session. SUMMARY OF THC maximum concentrations (Cmax) were similar in frequent as compared to occasional smokers, while blood THC Cmax were higher in frequent [mean (range) 17.7 (8.0–36.1) μg/L] smokers compared to occasional [8.2 (3.2–14.3) μg/L] smokers. Minor cannabinoids Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin and cannabigerol were never detected in blood, and not in OF by 5 or 8 h, respectively, with 0.3 μg/L cutoffs. Recommended performance (analytical sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency) criteria for screening devices of ≥80% are difficult to meet when maximizing true positive (TP) results with confirmation cutoffs below the screening cutoff. TPs were greatest with OF confirmation cutoffs of THC ≥1 and ≥2 μg/L, but analytical sensitivities were <80% due to false negative tests arising from confirmation cutoffs below the DT5000 and DDS2 screening cutoffs; all criteria were >80% with an OF THC ≥5 μg/L cutoff. Performance criteria also were >80% with a blood THC ≥5 μg/L confirmation cutoff; however, positive OF screening results might not confirm due to the time required to collect blood after a crash or police stop. OF confirmation is recommended for roadside OF screening. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT02177513

scholarly journals Multiplex Solid-Phase RPA Coupled CRISPR-Based Visual Detection of SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochen Qin ◽  
Yuyuan Zhou ◽  
Ratul Paul ◽  
Yue Wu ◽  
Yaling Liu
Keyword(s):  
Solid Phase ◽  
Dna Detection ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Virus Detection ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
One Pot ◽  
Hpv Dna

COVID-19 has challenged the world's public health and led to over 4.5 million deaths. A rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective point-of-care virus detection device is crucial to the control and surveillance of the contagious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Here we demonstrate a solid phase isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification coupled CRISPR-based (spRPA-CRISPR) assay for on-chip multiplexed, sensitive, and visual COVID-19 DNA detection. By targeting the SARS-CoV-2 structure protein encoded genomes, two specific genes were simultaneously detected with the control sample without cross-interaction with other sequences. The endpoint signal can be directly visualized for rapid detection of COVID-19. The amplified target sequences were immobilized on the one-pot device surface and detected using the mixed Cas12a-crRNA collateral cleavage of reporter released fluorescent signal when specific genes were recognized. The system was tested with samples of a broad range of concentrations (20 to 2x105 copies) and showed analytical sensitivity down to 20 copies per reaction. Furthermore, a low-cost LED UV flashlight (~$12) was used to provide a visible SARS-CoV-2 detection signal of the spRPA-CRISPR assay which could be purchased online easily. Thus, our platform provides a sensitive and easy-to-read multiplexed gene detection method with the capacity to specifically identify low concentration genes. Similar CRISPR biosensor chips can support a broad range of applications such as HPV DNA detection, influenza SARS-CoV-2 multiplex detection, and other infectious disease testing assays.

scholarly journals Performance Characteristics of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card for Screening Asymptomatic Individuals in a University Setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nkemakonam C Okoye ◽  
Adam P Barker ◽  
Kenneth Curtis ◽  
Richard R Orlandi ◽  
Emily A Snavely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
University Of Utah ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals ◽  
Positive Agreement

We compared the performance of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card to a standard RT-PCR assay (ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 2,645 asymptomatic students presenting for screening at the University of Utah. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 1.7% of the study participants by RT-PCR. BinaxNOW identified 24 infections but missed 21 infections that were detected by RT-PCR. The analytical sensitivity (positive agreement) and analytical specificity (negative agreement) for the BinaxNOW was 53.3% and 100%, respectively when compared against the RT-PCR assay. The median cycle threshold (Ct) value in the specimens that had concordant positive BinaxNOW antigen result was significantly lower compared to those that were discordant (Ct 17.6 vs. 29.6; p < 0.001). In individuals with presumably high viral loads (Ct < 23.0), a 95.8% positive agreement was observed between the RT-PCR assay and BinaxNOW. Due to the possibility of false negative results, caution must be taken when utilizing rapid antigen testing for screening asymptomatic individuals.

scholarly journals PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF A FRET-BASED IMMUNOASSAY FOR QUANTITATION OF INFLIXIMAB ON A POINT-OF-CARE INSTRUMENT SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S57-S57
Author(s):  
Edgar Ong ◽  
Ruo Huang ◽  
Richard Kirkland ◽  
Michael Hale ◽  
Larry Mimms
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Quantitative Detection ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Sample Type ◽  
Hook Effect ◽  
Limit Of Quantitation ◽  
Assay Precision

Abstract Introduction A fast (&lt;5 min), time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based immunoassay was developed for the quantitative detection of infliximab (IFX) and biosimilars for use in therapeutic drug monitoring using only 20 µL of fingerstick whole blood or serum at the point-of-care. The Procise IFX assay and ProciseDx analyzer are CE-marked. Studies were performed to characterize analytical performance of the Procise IFX assay on the ProciseDx analyzer. Methods Analytical testing was performed by spiking known amounts of IFX into negative serum and whole blood specimens. Analytical sensitivity was determined using limiting concentrations of IFX. Linearity was determined by testing IFX across the assay range. Hook effect was assessed at IFX concentrations beyond levels expected to be found within a patient. Testing of assay precision, cross-reactivity and potential interfering substances, and biosimilars was performed. The Procise IFX assay was also compared head-to-head with another CE-marked assay: LISA-TRACKER infliximab ELISA test (Theradiag, France). The accuracy of the Procise IFX assay is established through calibrators and controls traceable to the WHO 1st International Standard for Infliximab (NIBSC code: 16/170). Results The Procise IFX assay shows a Limit of Blank, Limit of Detection, and Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLoQ) of 0.1, 0.2, and 1.1 µg/mL in serum and 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 µg/mL in whole blood, respectively. The linear assay range was determined to be 1.7 to 77.2 µg/mL in serum and whole blood. No hook effect was observed at an IFX concentration of 200 µg/mL as the value reported as “&gt;ULoQ”. Assay precision testing across 20 days with multiple runs and reagent lots showed an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.7%, an inter-assay CV of &lt;2%, and a total CV of 3.4%. The presence of potentially interfering/cross-reacting substances showed minimal impact on assay specificity with %bias within ±8% of control. Testing of biosimilars (infliximab-dyyb and infliximab-abda) showed good recovery. A good correlation to the Theradiag infliximab ELISA was obtained for both serum (slope=1.01; r=0.99) and whole blood (slope=1.01; r=0.98) samples (Figure 1). Conclusion Results indicate that the Procise IFX assay is sensitive, specific, and precise yielding results within 5 minutes from both whole blood and serum without the operator needing to specify sample type. Additionally, it shows very good correlation to a comparator assay that takes several hours and sample manipulation to yield results. This makes the Procise IFX assay ideal for obtaining fast and accurate IFX quantitation, thus allowing for immediate drug level dosing decisions to be made by the physician during patient treatment.

scholarly journals Essential properties and pitfalls of colorimetric Reverse Transcription Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification as a point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna de Oliveira Coelho ◽  
Heloisa Bruna Soligo Sanchuki ◽  
Dalila Luciola Zanette ◽  
Jeanine Marie Nardin ◽  
Hugo Manuel Paz Morales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Colorimetric Detection ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) colorimetric detection is a sensitive and specific point-of-care molecular biology technique used to detect the virus in only 30 min. In this manuscript we have described a few nuances of the technique still not properly described in the literature: the presence of three colors clusters; the correlation of the viral load with the color change; and the importance of using an internal control to avoid false-negative results. Methods To achieve these findings, we performed colorimetric RT-LAMP assays of 466 SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR validated clinical samples, with color quantification measured at 434 nm and 560 nm. Results First we determinate a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 90.4%. In addition to the pink (negative) and yellow (positive) produced colors, we report for the first time the presence of an orange color cluster that may lead to wrong diagnosis. We also demonstrated using RT-qPCR and RT-LAMP that low viral loads are related to Ct values > 30, resulting in orange colors. We also demonstrated that the diagnosis of COVID-19 by colorimetric RT-LAMP is efficient until the fifth symptoms day when the viral load is still relatively high. Conclusion This study reports properties and indications for colorimetric RT-LAMP as point-of-care for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic, reducing false results, interpretations and optimizing molecular diagnostics tests application.

scholarly journals Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Osterman ◽  
Maximilian Iglhaut ◽  
Andreas Lehner ◽  
Patricia Späth ◽  
Marcel Stern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Amino Acid Mutations ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Roche Diagnostics ◽  
Analytical Sensitivities

AbstractA versatile portfolio of diagnostic tests is essential for the containment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Besides nucleic acid-based test systems and point-of-care (POCT) antigen (Ag) tests, quantitative, laboratory-based nucleocapsid Ag tests for SARS-CoV-2 have recently been launched. Here, we evaluated four commercial Ag tests on automated platforms and one POCT to detect SARS-CoV-2. We evaluated PCR-positive (n = 107) and PCR-negative (n = 303) respiratory swabs from asymptomatic and symptomatic patients at the end of the second pandemic wave in Germany (February–March 2021) as well as clinical isolates EU1 (B.1.117), variant of concern (VOC) Alpha (B.1.1.7) or Beta (B.1.351), which had been expanded in a biosafety level 3 laboratory. The specificities of automated SARS-CoV-2 Ag tests ranged between 97.0 and 99.7% (Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Fujirebio): 97.03%, Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Roche Diagnostics): 97.69%; LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Diasorin) and SARS-CoV-2 Ag ELISA (Euroimmun): 99.67%). In this study cohort of hospitalized patients, the clinical sensitivities of tests were low, ranging from 17.76 to 52.34%, and analytical sensitivities ranged from 420,000 to 25,000,000 Geq/ml. In comparison, the detection limit of the Roche Rapid Ag Test (RAT) was 9,300,000 Geq/ml, detecting 23.58% of respiratory samples. Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROCs) and Youden’s index analyses were performed to further characterize the assays’ overall performance and determine optimal assay cutoffs for sensitivity and specificity. VOCs carrying up to four amino acid mutations in nucleocapsid were detected by all five assays with characteristics comparable to non-VOCs. In summary, automated, quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Ag tests show variable performance and are not necessarily superior to a standard POCT. The efficacy of any alternative testing strategies to complement nucleic acid-based assays must be carefully evaluated by independent laboratories prior to widespread implementation.

scholarly journals Development of robust isothermal RNA amplification assay for lab-free testing of RNA viruses

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Radhika Biyani ◽  
Kirti Sharma ◽  
Kenji Kojima ◽  
Madhu Biyani ◽  
Vishnu Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Virus ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Human Saliva ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Potential Game ◽  
One Pot ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Copy Numbers ◽  
Amplification Assay ◽  
Primary Focus

AbstractSimple tests of infectiousness that return results in minutes and directly from samples even with low viral loads could be a potential game-changer in the fight against COVID-19. Here, we describe an improved isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay, termed the RICCA (RNA Isothermal Co-assisted and Coupled Amplification) reaction, that consists of a simple one-pot format of ‘sample-in and result-out’ with a primary focus on the detection of low copy numbers of RNA virus directly from saliva without the need for laboratory processing. We demonstrate our assay by detecting 16S rRNA directly from E. coli cells with a sensitivity as low as 8 CFU/μL and RNA fragments from a synthetic template of SARS-CoV-2 with a sensitivity as low as 1740 copies/μL. We further demonstrate the applicability of our assay for real-time testing at the point of care by designing a closed format for paper-based lateral flow assay and detecting heat-inactivated SARS-COV-2 virus in human saliva at concentrations ranging from 28,000 to 2.8 copies/μL with a total assay time of 15–30 min.

Validation of the Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Technique in Head and Neck Cancers of the Oral Cavity

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (12) ◽  
pp. 1295-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pejman Radkani ◽  
Thomas W. Mesko ◽  
Juan C. Paramo
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Published Data

The purpose of this study was to present our experience and validate the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in patients with head and neck cancers. A retrospective review of a pro-spectively collected database of patients with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck from 2008 to 2011 was done. The group consisted of a total of 20 patients. The first node(s) highlighted with blue, or identified as radioactive by Tc99-sulfur radioactive colloid, was (were) identified as the SLNs. In the first seven patients, formal modified neck dissection was performed. In the remaining 13 patients, only a SLN biopsy procedure was done. At least one SLN was identified in all 20 patients (100%). Only one patient (5%) had positive nodes. In this case, the SLN was also positive. In the remaining 19 cases, all lymph nodes were negative. After an average of 24 months of follow-up, there have been three local recurrences (15%) but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. SLN mapping in head and neck cancers is a feasible technique with a high identification rate and a low false-negative rate. Although the detection rate of regional metastatic disease compares favorably with published data as well as the disease-free and overall survival, further studies are warranted before considering this technique to be the “gold standard” in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and a negative neck by clinical examination and imaging studies.

scholarly journals Decreased Sensitivity of the Serological Detection of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Potentially Due to Imported Genetic Variants

Viruses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Frankenfeld ◽  
Theres Meili ◽  
Marina Meli ◽  
Barbara Riond ◽  
A. Helfer-Hungerbuehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infection ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Screening Assays ◽  
Diagnostic Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care Tests

Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) is a lentivirus of domestic cats worldwide. Diagnosis usually relies on antibody screening by point-of-care tests (POCT), e.g., by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and confirmation using Western blot (WB). We increasingly observed ELISA-negative, WB-positive samples and aimed to substantiate these observations using 1194 serum/plasma samples collected from 1998 to 2019 primarily from FIV-suspect cats. While 441 samples tested positive and 375 tested negative by ELISA and WB, 81 samples had discordant results: 70 were false ELISA-negative (WB-positive) and 11 were false ELISA-positive (WB-negative); 297 ambiguous results were not analyzed further. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA (82% and 91%, respectively) were lower than those reported in 1995 (98% and 97%, respectively). The diagnostic efficiency was reduced from 97% to 86%. False ELISA-negative samples originated mainly (54%) from Switzerland (1995: 0%). Sixty-four false ELISA-negative samples were available for POCT (SNAPTM/WITNESSR): five were POCT-positive. FIV RT-PCR was positive for two of these samples and was weakly positive for two ELISA- and POCT-negative samples. Low viral loads prohibited sequencing. Our results suggest that FIV diagnosis has become more challenging, probably due to increasing travel by cats and the introduction of new FIV isolates not recognized by screening assays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document