scholarly journals Phosphorylation of PNKP mediated by CDKs promotes end-processing of Okazaki fragments during DNA replication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaima Tsukada ◽  
Rikiya Imamura ◽  
Kotaro Saikawa ◽  
Mizuki Saito ◽  
Naoya Kase ◽  
...  

Polynucleotide kinase phosphatase (PNKP) has enzymatic activities as 3′ phosphatase and 5′ kinase of DNA ends to promote DNA ligation. Here, we show that PNKP is involved in progression of DNA replication through end-processing of Okazaki fragments (OFs). Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) regulate phosphorylation on threonine 118 (T118) of PNKP, and which phosphorylation allows it to be recruited to OFs. Loss of PNKP and T118 phosphorylation significantly increased unligated OFs and high-speed DNA synthesis in replication forks, suggesting that PNKP T118 phosphorylation is required for OFs ligation for its maturation. Furthermore, phosphatase-dead PNKP also exhibited an accumulation of unligated OFs and high-speed DNA synthesis. Overall, our data suggested that CDK-mediated PNKP phosphorylation at T118 is important for its recruitment to OFs and PNKP subsequently promotes end-processing for OFs maturation for stable cell proliferation.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanhe Yu ◽  
Haiyun Gan ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang

AbstractThree DNA polymerases (Pol α, Pol δ, and Pol ε) are responsible for eukaryotic genome duplication. When DNA replication stress is encountered, DNA synthesis stalls until the stress is ameliorated. However, it is not known whether there is a difference in the association of each polymerase with active and stalled replication forks. Here, we show that each DNA polymerase has distinct patterns of association with active and stalled replication forks. Pol α is enriched at extending Okazaki fragments of active and stalled forks. In contrast, although Pol δ contacts the nascent lagging strands of active and stalled forks, it binds to only the matured (and not elongating) Okazaki fragments of stalled forks. Pol ε has a greater contact with the nascent ssDNA of leading strand on active forks compared with stalled forks. We propose that the configuration of DNA polymerases at stalled forks facilitate resumption of DNA synthesis after stress removal.


Author(s):  
Tzu-Yu Lee ◽  
Yi-Ching Li ◽  
Min-Guan Lin ◽  
Chwan-Deng Hsiao ◽  
Hung-Wen Li

DNA damages lead to stalled or collapsed replication forks. Replication restart primosomes re-initiate DNA synthesis at these stalled or collapsed DNA replication forks, which is important for bacterial survival. Primosomal...


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujan Devbhandari ◽  
Dirk Remus

ABSTRACTThe coordination of DNA unwinding and synthesis at replication forks promotes efficient and faithful replication of chromosomal DNA. Using the reconstituted budding yeast DNA replication system, we demonstrate that Pol ε variants harboring catalytic point mutations in the Pol2 polymerase domain, contrary to Pol2 polymerase domain deletions, inhibit DNA synthesis at replication forks by displacing Pol δ from PCNA/primer-template junctions, causing excessive DNA unwinding by the replicative DNA helicase, CMG, uncoupled from DNA synthesis. Mutations that suppress the inhibition of Pol δ by Pol ε restore viability in Pol2 polymerase point mutant cells. We also observe uninterrupted DNA unwinding at replication forks upon dNTP depletion or chemical inhibition of DNA polymerases, demonstrating that leading strand synthesis is not tightly coupled to DNA unwinding by CMG. Importantly, the Rad53 kinase controls excessive DNA unwinding at replication forks by limiting CMG helicase activity, suggesting a mechanism for fork-stabilization by the replication checkpoint.


2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 2107-2120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Schang ◽  
Amy Rosenberg ◽  
Priscilla A. Schaffer

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that two inhibitors specific for cellular cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), Roscovitine (Rosco) and Olomoucine (Olo), block the replication of herpes simplex virus (HSV). Based on these results, we demonstrated that HSV replication requires cellular cdks that are sensitive to these drugs (L. M. Schang, J. Phillips, and P. A. Schaffer. J. Virol. 72:5626–5637, 1998). We further established that at least two distinct steps in the viral replication cycle require cdks: transcription of immediate-early (IE) genes and transcription of early (E) genes (L. M. Schang, A. Rosenberg, and P. A. Schaffer, J. Virol. 73:2161–2172, 1999). Since Rosco inhibits HSV replication efficiently even when added to infected cells at 6 h postinfection, we postulated that cdks may also be required for viral functions that occur after E gene expression. In the study presented herein, we tested this hypothesis directly by measuring the efficiency of viral replication, viral DNA synthesis, and expression of several viral genes during infections in which Rosco was added after E proteins had already been synthesized. Rosco inhibited HSV replication, and specifically viral DNA synthesis, when the drug was added at the time of release from a 12-h phosphonoacetic acid (PAA)-induced block in viral DNA synthesis. Inhibition of DNA synthesis was not a consequence of inhibition of expression of IE or E genes in that Rosco had no effect on steady-state levels of two E transcripts under the same conditions in which it inhibited viral DNA synthesis. Moreover, viral DNA synthesis was inhibited by Rosco even in the absence of protein synthesis. In a second series of experiments, the replication of four HSV mutants harboring temperature-sensitive mutations in genes essential for viral DNA replication was inhibited when Rosco was added at the time of shift-down from the nonpermissive to the permissive temperature. Viral DNA synthesis was inhibited by Rosco under these conditions, whereas expression of viral E genes was not affected. We conclude that cellular Rosco-sensitive cdks are required for replication of viral DNA in the presence of viral E proteins. This requirement may indicate that HSV DNA synthesis is functionally linked to transcription, which requires cdks, or that both viral transcription and DNA replication, independently, require viral or cellular factors activated by Rosco-sensitive cdks.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Ann Mun Yee Choo ◽  
Denise Schlösser ◽  
Valentina Manzini ◽  
Anna Magerhans ◽  
Matthias Dobbelstein

ABSTRACTThe integrated stress response (ISR) allows cells to rapidly shut down most of their protein synthesis in response to protein misfolding, amino acid deficiency, or virus infection. These stresses trigger the phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2alpha, which prevents the initiation of translation. Here we show that triggering the ISR drastically reduces the progression of DNA replication forks within one hour, thus flanking the shutdown of protein synthesis with immediate inhibition of DNA synthesis. DNA replication is restored by compounds that inhibit eIF2alpha kinases or re-activate eIF2alpha. Mechanistically, the translational shutdown blocks histone synthesis, promoting the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops) which interfere with DNA replication. Histone depletion alone induces R-loops and compromises DNA replication. Conversely, histone overexpression or R-loop removal by RNaseH1 each restores DNA replication in the context of ISR and histone depletion. In conclusion, the ISR rapidly stalls DNA synthesis through histone deficiency and R-loop formation. We propose that this shutdown mechanism prevents potentially detrimental DNA replication in the face of cellular stresses.SIGNIFICANCEThe integrated stress response has long been explored regarding its immediate impact on protein synthesis. Translational shutdown represents an indispensable mechanism to prevent the toxicity of misfolded proteins and virus infections. Our results indicate that the shutdown mechanisms reach far beyond translation and immediately interfere with DNA synthesis as well. ISR depletes cells of new histones which induce accumulation of DNA:RNA hybrids. The impairment of DNA replication in this context supports cell survival during stress.Our work provides a link between the ISR and another subject of active research, i. e. the regulatory network of DNA replication forks.Graphical Abstract


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanhe Yu ◽  
Haiyun Gan ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang

ABSTRACT Three DNA polymerases, polymerases α, δ, and ε (Pol α, Pol δ, and Pol ε), are responsible for eukaryotic genome duplication. When DNA replication stress is encountered, DNA synthesis stalls until the stress is ameliorated. However, it is not known whether there is a difference in the association of each polymerase with active and stalled replication forks. Here, we show that each DNA polymerase has a distinct pattern of association with active and stalled replication forks. Pol α is enriched at extending Okazaki fragments of active and stalled forks. In contrast, although Pol δ contacts the nascent lagging strands of active and stalled forks, it binds to only the matured (and not elongating) Okazaki fragments of stalled forks. Pol ε has greater contact with the nascent single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) of the leading strand on active forks than on stalled forks. We propose that the configuration of DNA polymerases at stalled forks facilitates the resumption of DNA synthesis after stress removal.


2005 ◽  
Vol 289 (4) ◽  
pp. R1196-R1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørund Sollid ◽  
Aina Kjernsli ◽  
Paula M. De Angelis ◽  
Åsmund K. Røhr ◽  
Göran E. Nilsson

Is DNA replication/cell proliferation in vertebrates possible during anoxia? The oxygen dependence of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) could lead to a stop in DNA synthesis, thereby making anoxic DNA replication impossible. We have studied this question in an anoxia-tolerant vertebrate, the crucian carp ( Carassius carassius), by examining 5′-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine incorporation and proliferating cell nuclear antigen levels in the gills, intestinal crypts, and liver. We exposed crucian carp to 1 and 7 days of anoxia followed by 7 days of reoxygenation. There was a reduced incidence of S-phase cells (from 12.2 to 5.0%) in gills during anoxia, which coincided with a concomitant increase of G0 cells. Anoxia also decreased the number of S-phase cells in intestine (from 8.1 to 1.8%). No change in the fraction of S-phase cells (∼1%) in liver was found. Thus new S-phase cells after 7 days of anoxia were present in all tissues, revealing a considerable rate of DNA synthesis. Subsequently, the oxygen-dependent subunit of crucian carp RNR (RNRR2) was cloned. We found no differences in amino acids involved in radical generation and availability of the iron center compared with mouse, which could have explained reduced oxygen dependence. Furthermore, the amount of RNRR2 mRNA in gills did not decrease throughout anoxia exposure. These results indicate that crucian carp is able to sustain some cell proliferation in anoxia, possibly because RNRR2 retains its tyrosyl radical in anoxia, and that the replication machinery is still maintained. Although hypoxia triggers a 7.5-fold increase of respiratory surface area in crucian carp, this response was not triggered in anoxia.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R. Gill ◽  
Siti Norain Harun ◽  
Swagata Halder ◽  
Ramon A. Boghozian ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan ◽  
...  

Abstract Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes can intercalate DNA with high affinity and prevent cell proliferation; however, the direct impact of ruthenium-based intercalation on cellular DNA replication remains unknown. Here we show the multi-intercalator [Ru(dppz)2(PIP)]2+ (dppz = dipyridophenazine, PIP = 2-(phenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) immediately stalls replication fork progression in HeLa human cervical cancer cells. In response to this replication blockade, the DNA damage response (DDR) cell signalling network is activated, with checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) activation indicating prolonged replication-associated DNA damage, and cell proliferation is inhibited by G1-S cell-cycle arrest. Co-incubation with a Chk1 inhibitor achieves synergistic apoptosis in cancer cells, with a significant increase in phospho(Ser139) histone H2AX (γ-H2AX) levels and foci indicating increased conversion of stalled replication forks to double-strand breaks (DSBs). Normal human epithelial cells remain unaffected by this concurrent treatment. Furthermore, pre-treatment of HeLa cells with [Ru(dppz)2(PIP)]2+ before external beam ionising radiation results in a supra-additive decrease in cell survival accompanied by increased γ-H2AX expression, indicating the compound functions as a radiosensitizer. Together, these results indicate ruthenium-based intercalation can block replication fork progression and demonstrate how these DNA-binding agents may be combined with DDR inhibitors or ionising radiation to achieve more efficient cancer cell killing.


1989 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.D. Mills ◽  
J.J. Blow ◽  
J.G. White ◽  
W.B. Amos ◽  
D. Wilcock ◽  
...  

Demembranated Xenopus sperm nuclei were induced to replicate synchronously in a low-speed supernatant (LSS) of Xenopus eggs by preincubation in a high-speed supernatant (HSS). DNA replication was observed by incorporation of [alpha-32P]dATP, BrdUTP or biotin-dUTP. Biotin-dUTP incorporation, visualised with fluorescent streptavidin, reveals a striking pattern of replication foci throughout replicating nuclei. We show that this represents a precursor to the bright uniform fluorescence seen later. Confocal microscopic analysis of nuclei fixed early in replication reveals that these foci of DNA replication number about 100–300 for each nucleus and probably represent the replicon clusters already described for tissue culture cells. Foci are evenly distributed throughout the nuclei and are not concentrated at or near the nuclear envelope. Complete replication of each nucleus occurs in an average time of only one hour in this system. Hence we calculate that there must be at least 300–1000 replication forks together in each cluster. Furthermore, pulse labelling at later times in the period of replication reveals a similar pattern of foci indicating that replication forks remain tightly clustered in groups of at least 300 throughout the period of DNA replication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document