scholarly journals Template strand deoxyuridine promoter recognition by a viral RNA polymerase

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alec Fraser ◽  
Maria L Sokolova ◽  
Arina V Drobysheva ◽  
Julia V Gordeeva ◽  
Sergei Borukhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Role ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
X Ray Crystallography ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
The Core ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Promoter Specificity ◽  
Functional Mechanisms

Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage AR9 employs two strategies for efficient host takeover control and host antiviral defense evasion - it encodes two unique DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RNAPs) that function at different stages of virus morphogenesis in the cell, and its double stranded (ds) DNA genome contains uracils instead of thymines throughout. Unlike any known RNAP, the AR9 non-virion RNAP (nvRNAP), which transcribes late phage genes, recognizes promoters in the template strand of dsDNA and efficiently differentiates obligatory uracils from thymines in its promoters3. Here, using structural data obtained by cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography on the AR9 nvRNAP core, holoenzyme, and a promoter complex, and a variety of in vitro transcription assays, we elucidate a unique mode of uracil-specific, template strand-dependent promoter recognition. It is achieved by a tripartite interaction between the promoter specificity subunit, the core enzyme, and DNA adopting a unique conformation. We also show that interaction with the non-template strand plays a critical role in the process of AR9 nvRNAP promoter recognition in dsDNA, and that the AR9 nvRNAP core and a part of its promoter specificity subunit that interacts with the core are structurally similar to their bacterial RNAP counterparts. Our work demonstrates the extent to which viruses can evolve new functional mechanisms to control acquired multisubunit cellular enzymes and make these enzymes serve their needs.

Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1266-1275
Author(s):  
W Q Xie ◽  
L I Rothblum
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Repeat Distance ◽  
Deletion Mutations ◽  
The Core ◽  
In Vivo Experiments

Efficient transcription from the rat rDNA promoter results from an undefined interaction between the core (CPE) and upstream (UPE) promoter elements or the protein complexes which form on them. These interactions were demonstrated by the behavior of promoters that contained either linker-scanning or deletion mutations of the UPE in combination with point mutations of the CPE (bidomain mutants). In vivo transcription experiments using point mutations within the CPE (G----A mutation at either -16 or -7) demonstrated that the CPE may in fact consist of two domains. Whereas both of these mutants were rescued by the addition of UBF to in vitro transcription reactions, the CPE mutant -7A/G was inactive in vivo. Experiments with these bidomain mutants demonstrated that the UPE was required for the rescue of the CPE mutants. We also examined the hypothesis that this interaction might require a stereospecific alignment of the promoter elements. Our results indicate that the promoter consists of several domains with differing responses to mutations that alter the distance between, or within, the promoter elements. For example, the insertion or deletion of half-multiples of the helical repeat distance between -167 and -147 had no significant effect on transcription. On the other hand, some sites were sensitive to deletions of any size but not to insertions of up to 20 bp. The analyses of two sites yielded results suggesting that they lay between domains of the promoter that must be on the same side of the DNA helix for promoter activity. The first of these sites mapped between -106 and -95.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vibrio harveyi RNA polymerase: purification and resolution from gyrase A

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elana Swartzman ◽  
Edward A. Meighen
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Vibrio Harveyi ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Gyrase A ◽  
A Subunit ◽  
Terminal Amino ◽  
Promoter Specificity

RNA polymerase was purified from Vibrio harveyi and found to contain polypeptides (β,β′, α, and σ) closely corresponding to those of the Escherichia coli enzyme. In vitro transcription studies using V. harveyi and E. coli RNA polymerase demonstrated that the purified V. harveyi RNA polymerase is functional and that the two enzymes have the same promoter specificity. Chromatography through a monoQ column was required to remove a 100-kilodalton protein that was present in large amounts and copurified with the RNA polymerase. N-terminal amino acid sequencing showed that the first 18 amino acids of the 100-kilodalton protein shares 78% sequence identity with the A subunit of gyrase or topoisomerase II. The abundance of the gyrase A protein is unprecedented and may be linked to bioluminescence.Key words: Vibrio harveyi, RNA polymerase, gyrase, bioluminescence.

scholarly journals p300 and PCAF Act Cooperatively To Mediate Transcriptional Activation from Chromatin Templates by Notch Intracellular Domains In Vitro

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 7812-7819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika E. Wallberg ◽  
Kia Pedersen ◽  
Urban Lendahl ◽  
Robert G. Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Notch Receptors ◽  
Intracellular Domains

ABSTRACT Ligand activation of Notch receptors leads to release of the intracellular receptor domain (Notch IC), which translocates to the nucleus and interacts with the DNA-binding protein RBP-Jκ to control expression of specific target genes. A number of proteins have been shown to interact with Notch ICs and to modulate target gene activation, but the precise function of and interplay between these factors is not known. This report investigates the Notch IC-interacting proteins, p300, PCAF, and Mastermind-like 1 (MAML1), in an in vitro transcription system with purified factors and naked DNA or chromatin templates. MAML1, RBP-Jκ, and Notch IC are all required for optimal transcription from DNA, whereas transcription from chromatin requires, in addition, p300, which interacts with MAML1. The transcriptional activity of p300 requires acetyl coenzyme A, indicating that it functions as a histone acetyltransferase when mediating Notch IC function. PCAF is unable to promote transcription on its own but enhances Notch IC-mediated transcription from chromatin in conjunction with p300. These data define a critical role for p300 in the potentiation of Notch IC function by MAML1 and PCAF, provide the first evidence for cooperativity between PCAF and p300 in Notch IC function, and also indicate direct effects of RBP-Jκ, Notch IC, and MAML1 on the general transcription machinery.

scholarly journals An integrated model for termination of RNA polymerase III transcription

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Xie ◽  
Umberto Aiello ◽  
Yves Clement ◽  
Nouhou Haidara ◽  
Mathias Girbig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Fail Safe

RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) synthesizes essential and abundant non-coding RNAs such as tRNAs. Controlling RNAPIII span of activity by accurate and efficient termination is a challenging necessity to ensure robust gene expression and to prevent conflicts with other DNA-associated machineries. The mechanism of RNAPIII termination is believed to be simpler than that of other eukaryotic RNA polymerases, solely relying on the recognition of a T-tract in the non-template strand. Here we combine high-resolution genome-wide analyses and in vitro transcription termination assays to revisit the mechanism of RNAPIII transcription termination in budding yeast. We show that T-tracts are necessary but not always sufficient for termination and that secondary structures of the nascent RNAs are important auxiliary cis-acting elements. Moreover, we show that the helicase Sen1 plays a key role in a fail-safe termination pathway. Our results provide a comprehensive model illustrating how multiple mechanisms cooperate to ensure efficient RNAPIII transcription termination.

Purification and characterization of a transcription factor that confers promoter specificity to human RNA polymerase I

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1358-1369
Author(s):  
R M Learned ◽  
S Cordes ◽  
R Tjian
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Control Element ◽  
In Vitro Synthesis ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Polymerase I

A whole-cell HeLa extract was fractionated into two components required for accurate in vitro transcription of human rRNA. One fraction contained endogenous RNA polymerase I, and the second component contained a factor (SL1) that confers promoter selectivity to RNA polymerase I. Analysis of mutant templates suggests that the core control element of the rRNA promoter is required for activation of transcription by SL1. We purified SL1 approximately 100,000-fold by column chromatography and have shown that the addition of SL1 can reprogram the otherwise nonpermissive mouse transcription system to recognize and initiate accurate RNA synthesis from human rDNA. Antibodies raised against SL1 bind preferentially to a protein localized in the nucleolus of primate cells and specifically inhibit in vitro transcription initiating from the human rRNA promoter. By contrast, anti-SL1 does not react with the nucleolus of rodent cells and has no effect on the in vitro synthesis of mouse rRNA by a transcription system derived from mouse cells. These findings suggest that SL1 is a selectivity factor present in the nucleolus that imparts promoter recognition to RNA polymerase I and that can discriminate between rRNA promoters from different species.

scholarly journals In the Simian Virus 40 In Vitro Replication System, Start Site Selection by the Polymerase α-Primase Complex Is Not Significantly Altered by Changes in the Concentration of Ribonucleotides

2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (14) ◽  
pp. 6392-6401
Author(s):  
John D. Purviance ◽  
Andrea E. Prack ◽  
Brett Barbaro ◽  
Peter A. Bullock
Keyword(s):  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Nucleoside Triphosphate ◽  
Replication System ◽  
The Core ◽  
In Vitro Replication ◽  
Primase Complex

ABSTRACT The simian virus 40 (SV40) in vitro replication system was previously used to demonstrate that the human polymerase (Pol) α-primase complex preferentially initiates DNA synthesis at pyrimidine-rich trinucleotide sequences. However, it has been reported that under certain conditions, nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) concentrations play a critical role in determining where eukaryotic primase initiates synthesis. Therefore, we have examined whether increased NTP concentrations alter the template locations at which SV40 replication is initiated. Our studies demonstrate that elevated ribonucleotide concentrations do not significantly alter which template sequences serve as initiation sites. Of considerable interest, the sequences that serve as initiation sites in the SV40 system are similar to those that serve as initiation sites for prokaryotic primases. It is also demonstrated that regardless of the concentration of ribonucleotides present in the reactions, DNA synthesis initiated outside of the core origin. These studies provide additional evidence that the Pol α-primase complex can initiate DNA synthesis only after a considerable amount of single-stranded DNA is generated.

scholarly journals RNA Polymerases from Bacillus subtilisand Escherichia coli Differ in Recognition of Regulatory Signals In Vitro

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (21) ◽  
pp. 6027-6035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Artsimovitch ◽  
Vladimir Svetlov ◽  
Larry Anthony ◽  
Richard R. Burgess ◽  
Robert Landick
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Species Specific

ABSTRACT Adaptation of bacterial cells to diverse habitats relies on the ability of RNA polymerase to respond to various regulatory signals. Some of these signals are conserved throughout evolution, whereas others are species specific. In this study we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of RNA polymerases from two distantly related bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, using a panel of in vitro transcription assays. We found substantial species-specific differences in the ability of these enzymes to escape from the promoter and to recognize certain types of elongation signals. Both enzymes responded similarly to other pause and termination signals and to the general E. coli elongation factors NusA and GreA. We also demonstrate that, although promoter recognition depends largely on the ς subunit, promoter discrimination exhibited in species-specific fashion by both RNA polymerases resides in the core enzyme. We hypothesize that differences in signal recognition are due to the changes in contacts made between the β and β′ subunits and the downstream DNA duplex.

scholarly journals Selective Promoter Recognition by Chlamydial σ28 Holoenzyme

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (21) ◽  
pp. 7364-7377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Shen ◽  
Xiaogeng Feng ◽  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Xudong Luo ◽  
Thomas P. Hatch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Core Promoter ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
E Coli ◽  
The Core ◽  
Recognition Specificity ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

ABSTRACT The σ transcription factor confers the promoter recognition specificity of RNA polymerase (RNAP) in eubacteria. Chlamydia trachomatis has three known sigma factors, σ66, σ54, and σ28. We developed two methods to facilitate the characterization of promoter sequences recognized by C. trachomatis σ28 (σ28 Ct). One involved the arabinose-induced expression of plasmid-encoded σ28 Ct in a strain of Escherichia coli defective in the σ28 structural gene, fliA. The second was an analysis of transcription in vitro with a hybrid holoenzyme reconstituted with E. coli RNAP core and recombinant σ28 Ct. These approaches were used to investigate the interactions of σ28 Ct with the σ28 Ct-dependent hctB promoter and selected E. coli σ28 (σ28 Ec)-dependent promoters, in parallel, compared with the promoter recognition properties of σ28 EC. Our results indicate that RNAP containing σ28 Ct has at least three characteristics: (i) it is capable of recognizing some but not all σ28 EC-dependent promoters; (ii) it can distinguish different promoter structures, preferentially activating promoters with upstream AT-rich sequences; and (iii) it possesses a greater flexibility than σ28 EC in recognizing variants with different spacing lengths separating the −35 and −10 elements of the core promoter.

scholarly journals Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1266-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Q Xie ◽  
L I Rothblum
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Repeat Distance ◽  
Deletion Mutations ◽  
The Core ◽  
In Vivo Experiments

Efficient transcription from the rat rDNA promoter results from an undefined interaction between the core (CPE) and upstream (UPE) promoter elements or the protein complexes which form on them. These interactions were demonstrated by the behavior of promoters that contained either linker-scanning or deletion mutations of the UPE in combination with point mutations of the CPE (bidomain mutants). In vivo transcription experiments using point mutations within the CPE (G----A mutation at either -16 or -7) demonstrated that the CPE may in fact consist of two domains. Whereas both of these mutants were rescued by the addition of UBF to in vitro transcription reactions, the CPE mutant -7A/G was inactive in vivo. Experiments with these bidomain mutants demonstrated that the UPE was required for the rescue of the CPE mutants. We also examined the hypothesis that this interaction might require a stereospecific alignment of the promoter elements. Our results indicate that the promoter consists of several domains with differing responses to mutations that alter the distance between, or within, the promoter elements. For example, the insertion or deletion of half-multiples of the helical repeat distance between -167 and -147 had no significant effect on transcription. On the other hand, some sites were sensitive to deletions of any size but not to insertions of up to 20 bp. The analyses of two sites yielded results suggesting that they lay between domains of the promoter that must be on the same side of the DNA helix for promoter activity. The first of these sites mapped between -106 and -95.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document