Genomic environments scale the activities of diverse core promoters

A classical model of gene regulation is that enhancers provide specificity whereas core promoters provide a modular site for the assembly of the basal transcriptional machinery. However, examples of core promoter specificity have led to an alternate hypothesis in which specificity is achieved by core promoters with different sequence motifs that respond differently to genomic environments containing different enhancers and chromatin landscapes. To distinguish between these models, we measured the activities of hundreds of diverse core promoters in four different genomic locations and, in a complementary experiment, six different core promoters at thousands of locations across the genome. Although genomic locations had large effects on expression, the intrinsic activities of different classes of promoters were preserved across genomic locations, suggesting that core promoters are modular regulatory elements whose activities are independently scaled up or down by different genomic locations. This scaling of promoter activities is nonlinear and depends on the genomic location and the strength of the core promoter. Our results support the classical model of regulation in which diverse core promoter motifs set the intrinsic strengths of core promoters, which are then amplified or dampened by the activities of their genomic environments.

Template strand deoxyuridine promoter recognition by a viral RNA polymerase

Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage AR9 employs two strategies for efficient host takeover control and host antiviral defense evasion - it encodes two unique DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RNAPs) that function at different stages of virus morphogenesis in the cell, and its double stranded (ds) DNA genome contains uracils instead of thymines throughout. Unlike any known RNAP, the AR9 non-virion RNAP (nvRNAP), which transcribes late phage genes, recognizes promoters in the template strand of dsDNA and efficiently differentiates obligatory uracils from thymines in its promoters3. Here, using structural data obtained by cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography on the AR9 nvRNAP core, holoenzyme, and a promoter complex, and a variety of in vitro transcription assays, we elucidate a unique mode of uracil-specific, template strand-dependent promoter recognition. It is achieved by a tripartite interaction between the promoter specificity subunit, the core enzyme, and DNA adopting a unique conformation. We also show that interaction with the non-template strand plays a critical role in the process of AR9 nvRNAP promoter recognition in dsDNA, and that the AR9 nvRNAP core and a part of its promoter specificity subunit that interacts with the core are structurally similar to their bacterial RNAP counterparts. Our work demonstrates the extent to which viruses can evolve new functional mechanisms to control acquired multisubunit cellular enzymes and make these enzymes serve their needs.

An insulator blocks access to enhancers by an illegitimate promoter, preventing repression by transcriptional interference

Several distinct activities and functions have been described for chromatin insulators, which separate genes along chromosomes into functional units. Here, we describe a novel mechanism of functional separation whereby an insulator prevents gene repression. When thehomieinsulator is deleted from the end of a Drosophilaeven skipped(eve) locus, a flanking P-element promoter is activated in a partialevepattern, causing expression driven by enhancers in the 3’ region to be repressed. The mechanism involves transcriptional read-through from the flanking promoter. This conclusion is based on the following. Read-through driven by a heterologous enhancer is sufficient to repress, even whenhomieis in place. Furthermore, when the flanking promoter is turned around, repression is minimal. Transcriptional read-through that does not produce anti-sense RNA can still repress expression, ruling out RNAi as the mechanism in this case. Thus, transcriptional interference, caused by enhancer capture and read-through when the insulator is removed, repressesevepromoter-driven expression. We also show that enhancer-promoter specificity and processivity of transcription can have decisive effects on the consequences of insulator removal. First, a coreheat shock 70promoter that is not activated well byeveenhancers did not cause read-through sufficient to repress theevepromoter. Second, these transcripts are less processive than those initiated at the P-promoter, measured by how far they extend through theevelocus, and so are less disruptive. These results highlight the importance of considering transcriptional read-through when assessing the effects of insulators on gene expression.

Phospho-dependent Signaling during the General Stress Response by the Atypical Response Regulator and ClpXP Adaptor RssB

ABSTRACTIn the model organism Escherichia coli and related species, the general stress response relies on tight regulation of the intracellular levels of the promoter specificity subunit RpoS. RpoS turnover is exclusively dependent on RssB, a two-domain response regulator that functions as an adaptor that delivers RpoS to ClpXP for proteolysis. Here we report crystal structures of the receiver domain of RssB both in its unphosphorylated form and bound to the phosphomimic BeF3−. Surprisingly, we find only modest differences between these two structures, suggesting that truncating RssB may partially activate the receiver domain to a “meta-active” state. Our structural and sequence analysis points to RssB proteins not conforming to either the Y-T coupling scheme for signaling seen in prototypical response regulators, such as CheY, or to the signaling model of the less understood FATGUY proteins.

FUS-dependent loading of SUV39H1 to OCT4 pseudogene-lncRNA programs a silencing complex with OCT4 promoter specificity

The resurrection of pseudogenes during evolution produced lncRNAs with new biological function. Here we show that pseudogene-evolution created an Oct4 pseudogene lncRNA that is able to direct epigenetic silencing of the parental Oct4 gene via a 2-step, lncRNA dependent mechanism. The murine Oct4 pseudogene 4 (mOct4P4) lncRNA recruits the RNA binding protein FUS to allow the binding of the SUV39H1 HMTase to a defined mOct4P4 lncRNA sequence element. The mOct4P4-FUS-SUV39H1 silencing complex holds target site specificity for the parental Oct4 promoter and interference with individual components results in loss of Oct4 silencing. SUV39H1 and FUS do not bind parental Oct4 mRNA, confirming the acquisition of a new biological function by the mOct4P4 lncRNA. Importantly, all features of mOct4P4 function are recapitulated by the human hOCT4P3 pseudogene lncRNA, indicating evolutionary conservation. Our data highlight the biological relevance of rapidly evolving lncRNAs that infiltrate into central epigenetic regulatory circuits in vertebrate cells.

How subtle changes in 3D structure can create large changes in transcription

Animal genomes are organized into topologically associated domains (TADs), which exhibit more intra-domain than inter-domain contact. However, the absolute difference in contact is usually no more than twofold, even though disruptions to TAD boundaries can change gene expression by 8-10 fold. Existing models fail to explain this superlinear transcriptional response to changes in genomic contact. Here, we propose a futile cycle model where an enzyme stimulated by association with its products can exhibit bistability and hysteresis, allowing a small increase in enhancer-promoter contact to produce a large change in expression without obvious correlation between E-P contact and promoter activity. Through mathematical analysis and stochastic simulation, we show that this system can create an illusion of enhancer-promoter specificity and explain the importance of weak TAD boundaries. It also offers a mechanism to reconcile recent global cohesin loop disruption and TAD boundary deletion experiments. We discuss the model in the context of these recent controversial experiments. Together, these analyses advance our interpretation and understanding of cis-regulatory contacts in controlling gene expression, and suggest new experimental directions.

Evolution of the extracytoplasmic function σ factor protein family

Understanding transcription has been a central goal of the scientific community for decades. However, much is still unknown, especially concerning how it is regulated. In bacteria, a single DNA-directed RNA-polymerase performs the whole of transcription. It contains multiple subunits, among which the σ factor that confers promoter specificity. Besides the housekeeping σ factor, bacteria encode several alternative σ factors. The most abundant and diverse family of alternative σ factors, the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) family, regulates transcription of genes associated with stressful scenarios, making them key elements of adaptation to specific environmental changes. Despite this, the evolutionary history of ECF σ factors has never been investigated. Here, we report on our analysis of thousands of members of this family. We show that single events are in the origin of alternative modes of regulation of ECF σ factor activity that require partner proteins, but that multiple events resulted in acquisition of regulatory extensions. Moreover, in Bacteroidetes there is a recent duplication of an ecologically relevant gene cluster that includes an ECF σ factor, whereas in Planctomycetes duplication generates distinct C-terminal extensions after fortuitous insertion of the duplicated σ factor. At last, we also demonstrate horizontal transfer of ECF σ factors between soil bacteria.

Red Light/Green Light, a Dual Fluorescent Protein Reporter System To Study Enhancer-Promoter Specificity in Drosophila

Enhancers activate gene transcription in spatial and temporal patterns by interactions with gene promoters. These elements typically reside distal to their target promoter, with which they must interact selectively. Additional elements may contribute to enhancer-promoter specificity, including remote control element sequences within enhancers, tethering elements near promoters, and insulator/boundary elements that disrupt off-target interactions. However, few of these elements have been mapped, and as a result, the mechanisms by which these elements interact remain poorly understood. One impediment is their method of study, namely reporter transgenes in which enhancers are placed adjacent to a heterologous promoter, which may circumvent mechanisms controlling enhancer-promoter specificity and long-range interactions. Here, we report an optimized dual reporter transgene system in Drosophila melanogaster that allows the simultaneous comparison of an enhancer’s ability to activate proximal and distal fluorescent reporter genes. Testing a panel of fluorescent transgenes in vivo, we found a two-protein combination that allows simultaneous measurement with minimal detection interference. We note differences among four tested enhancers in their ability to regulate a distally placed reporter transgene. These results suggest that enhancers differ in their requirements for promoter interaction and raise important practical considerations when studying enhancer function.

Analysis of Orthologous SECONDARY WALL-ASSOCIATED NAC DOMAIN1 (SND1) Promotor Activity in Herbaceous and Woody Angiosperms

SECONDARY WALL-ASSOCIATED NAC DOMAIN1 (SND1) is a master regulator of fibre secondary wall deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis), with homologs in other angiosperms and gymnosperms. However, it is poorly understood to what extent the fibre-specific regulation of the SND1 promoter, and that of its orthologs, is conserved between diverged herbaceous and woody lineages. We performed a reciprocal reporter gene analysis of orthologous SND1 promoters from Arabidopsis (AthSND1), Eucalyptus grandis (EgrNAC61) and Populus alba × P. grandidentata (PagWND1A) relative to secondary cell wall-specific Cellulose Synthase4 (CesA4) and CesA7 promoters, in both a non-woody (Arabidopsis) and a woody (poplar) system. β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter analysis in Arabidopsis showed that the SND1 promoter was active in vascular tissues as previously reported and showed interfascicular and xylary fibre-specific expression in inflorescence stems, while reporter constructs of the woody plant-derived promoters were partial to the (pro)cambium-phloem and protoxylem. In transgenic P. tremula × P. alba plants, all three orthologous SND1 promoters expressed the GUS reporter similarly and preferentially in developing secondary xylem, ray parenchyma and cork cambium. Ours is the first study to reciprocally test orthologous SND1 promoter specificity in herbaceous and woody species, revealing diverged regulatory functions in the herbaceous system.