scholarly journals Kre28-Spc105 interaction is essential for their recruitment at the kinetochore

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babhrubahan Roy ◽  
Janice Sim ◽  
Simon J. Y. Han ◽  
Ajit P. Joglekar
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Protein Assemblies ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Exact Function ◽  
Interaction Interface ◽  
Macromolecular Protein ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Turn Over

Kinetochores are macromolecular protein assemblies that attach sister chromatids to spindle microtubules and mediate accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. The outer kinetochore consists of the KMN network, a protein super complex made of Knl1 (yeast Spc105), Mis12 (yeast Mtw1) and Ndc80 (yeast Ndc80), which harbors sites for microtubule binding. Within the KMN network, Spc105 acts as interaction hub of components involved in spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) signaling. It is known that Spc105 forms a complex with kinetochore component Kre28. However, where Kre28 physically localizes in the budding yeast kinetochore is not clear. The exact function of Kre28 at the kinetochore is also unknown. Here, we reveal how Spc105 and Kre28 interact and how they are organized within bioriented yeast kinetochores using genetics and cell biological experiments. We also identify the interaction interface between the two proteins and show that this interaction is important for Spc105 protein turn-over and essential for their mutual recruitment at the kinetochores. We created several truncation mutants of kre28 that do not localize at the kinetochores and so cannot mediate Spc105 loading at the kinetochores. When we over-expressed these mutants, they could sustain the cell viability even though failed to facilitate proper SAC activation and/or error correction. Thus, we inferred that Kre28 indirectly contributes to chromosome biorientation and high-fidelity segregation by regulating Spc105 localization at the kinetochores.

scholarly journals The ctf13-30/CTF13 Genomic Haploinsufficiency Modifier Screen Identifies the Yeast Chromatin Remodeling Complex RSC, Which Is Required for the Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1232-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin K. Baetz ◽  
Nevan J. Krogan ◽  
Andrew Emili ◽  
Jack Greenblatt ◽  
Philip Hieter
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Chromosome Transmission ◽  
New Genes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis

ABSTRACT The budding yeast centromere-kinetochore complex ensures high-fidelity chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis by mediating the attachment and movement of chromosomes along spindle microtubules. To identify new genes and pathways whose function impinges on chromosome transmission, we developed a genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen and used ctf13-30, encoding a mutant core kinetochore protein, as the reference point. We demonstrate through a series of secondary screens that the genomic modifier screen is a successful method for identifying genes that encode nonessential proteins required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation. One gene isolated in our screen was RSC2, a nonessential subunit of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex. rsc2 mutants have defects in both chromosome segregation and cohesion, but the localization of kinetochore proteins to centromeres is not affected. We determined that, in the absence of RSC2, cohesin could still associate with chromosomes but fails to achieve proper cohesion between sister chromatids, indicating that RSC has a role in the establishment of cohesion. In addition, numerous subunits of RSC were affinity purified and a new component of RSC, Rtt102, was identified. Our work indicates that only a subset of the nonessential RSC subunits function in maintaining chromosome transmission fidelity.

scholarly journals Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Stephens ◽  
Rachel A. Haggerty ◽  
Paula A. Vasquez ◽  
Leandra Vicci ◽  
Chloe E. Snider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Force Balance ◽  
Nonlinear Spring ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Restoring Forces ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Mean And Variance

The mechanisms by which sister chromatids maintain biorientation on the metaphase spindle are critical to the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Active force interplay exists between predominantly extensional microtubule-based spindle forces and restoring forces from chromatin. These forces regulate tension at the kinetochore that silences the spindle assembly checkpoint to ensure faithful chromosome segregation. Depletion of pericentric cohesin or condensin has been shown to increase the mean and variance of spindle length, which have been attributed to a softening of the linear chromatin spring. Models of the spindle apparatus with linear chromatin springs that match spindle dynamics fail to predict the behavior of pericentromeric chromatin in wild-type and mutant spindles. We demonstrate that a nonlinear spring with a threshold extension to switch between spring states predicts asymmetric chromatin stretching observed in vivo. The addition of cross-links between adjacent springs recapitulates coordination between pericentromeres of neighboring chromosomes.

scholarly journals ConnectingGCN5’s centromeric SAGA to the mitotic tension-sensing checkpoint

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2201-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Petty ◽  
Masha Evpak ◽  
Lorraine Pillus
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Centromere Histone H3 ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Multiple interdependent mechanisms ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Among these, the spindle assembly checkpoint monitors attachment of spindle microtubules to the centromere of each chromosome, whereas the tension-sensing checkpoint monitors the opposing forces between sister chromatid centromeres for proper biorientation. We report here a new function for the deeply conserved Gcn5 acetyltransferase in the centromeric localization of Rts1, a key player in the tension-sensing checkpoint. Rts1 is a regulatory component of protein phopshatase 2A, a near universal phosphatase complex, which is recruited to centromeres by the Shugoshin (Sgo) checkpoint component under low-tension conditions to maintain sister chromatid cohesion. We report that loss of Gcn5 disrupts centromeric localization of Rts1. Increased RTS1 dosage robustly suppresses gcn5∆ cell cycle and chromosome segregation defects, including restoration of Rts1 to centromeres. Sgo1’s Rts1-binding function also plays a key role in RTS1 dosage suppression of gcn5∆ phenotypes. Notably, we have identified residues of the centromere histone H3 variant Cse4 that function in these chromosome segregation-related roles of RTS1. Together, these findings expand the understanding of the mechanistic roles of Gcn5 and Cse4 in chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1473-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Storchová ◽  
Justin S. Becker ◽  
Nicolas Talarek ◽  
Sandra Kögelsberger ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The conserved mitotic kinase Bub1 performs multiple functions that are only partially characterized. Besides its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosome alignment, Bub1 is crucial for the kinetochore recruitment of multiple proteins, among them Sgo1. Both Bub1 and Sgo1 are dispensable for growth of haploid and diploid budding yeast, but they become essential in cells with higher ploidy. We find that overexpression of SGO1 partially corrects the chromosome segregation defect of bub1Δ haploid cells and restores viability to bub1Δ tetraploid cells. Using an unbiased high-copy suppressor screen, we identified two members of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), BIR1 (survivin) and SLI15 (INCENP, inner centromere protein), as suppressors of the growth defect of both bub1Δ and sgo1Δ tetraploids, suggesting that these mutants die due to defects in chromosome biorientation. Overexpression of BIR1 or SLI15 also complements the benomyl sensitivity of haploid bub1Δ and sgo1Δ cells. Mutants lacking SGO1 fail to biorient sister chromatids attached to the same spindle pole (syntelic attachment) after nocodazole treatment. Moreover, the sgo1Δ cells accumulate syntelic attachments in unperturbed mitoses, a defect that is partially corrected by BIR1 or SLI15 overexpression. We show that in budding yeast neither Bub1 nor Sgo1 is required for CPC localization or affects Aurora B activity. Instead we identify Sgo1 as a possible partner of Mps1, a mitotic kinase suggested to have an Aurora B–independent function in establishment of biorientation. We found that Sgo1 overexpression rescues defects caused by metaphase inactivation of Mps1 and that Mps1 is required for Sgo1 localization to the kinetochore. We propose that Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 facilitate chromosome biorientation independently of the Aurora B–mediated pathway at the budding yeast kinetochore and that both pathways are required for the efficient turnover of syntelic attachments.

Evidence that the spindle assembly checkpoint does not regulate APCFzy activity in Drosophila female meiosis

Genome ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamah Batiha ◽  
Andrew Swan
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Female Meiosis ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Made In

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) plays an important role in mitotic cells to sense improper chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules and to inhibit APCFzy-dependent destruction of cyclin B and Securin; consequent initiation of anaphase until correct attachments are made. In Drosophila , SAC genes have been found to play a role in ensuring proper chromosome segregation in meiosis, possibly reflecting a similar role for the SAC in APCFzy inhibition during meiosis. We found that loss of function mutations in SAC genes, Mad2, zwilch, and mps1, do not lead to the predicted rise in APCFzy-dependent degradation of cyclin B either globally throughout the egg or locally on the meiotic spindle. Further, the SAC is not responsible for the inability of APCFzy to target cyclin B and promote anaphase in metaphase II arrested eggs from cort mutant females. Our findings support the argument that SAC proteins play checkpoint independent roles in Drosophila female meiosis and that other mechanisms must function to control APC activity.

scholarly journals Intermediates in the assembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes and their role in the regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Kaisari ◽  
Danielle Sitry-Shevah ◽  
Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov ◽  
Avram Hershko
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Unknown Species ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The mitotic (or spindle assembly) checkpoint system prevents premature separation of sister chromatids in mitosis and thus ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Kinetochores that are not attached properly to the mitotic spindle produce an inhibitory signal that prevents progression into anaphase. The checkpoint system acts on the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase, which targets for degradation inhibitors of anaphase initiation. APC/C is inhibited by the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC), which assembles when the checkpoint is activated. MCC is composed of the checkpoint proteins BubR1, Bub3, and Mad2, associated with the APC/C coactivator Cdc20. The intermediary processes in the assembly of MCC are not sufficiently understood. It is also not clear whether or not some subcomplexes of MCC inhibit the APC/C and whether Mad2 is required only for MCC assembly and not for its action on the APC/C. We used purified subcomplexes of mitotic checkpoint proteins to examine these problems. Our results do not support a model in which Mad2 catalytically generates a Mad2-free APC/C inhibitor. We also found that the release of Mad2 from MCC caused a marked (although not complete) decrease in inhibitory action, suggesting a role of Mad2 in MCC for APC/C inhibition. A previously unknown species of MCC, which consists of Mad2, BubR1, and two molecules of Cdc20, contributes to the inhibition of APC/C by the mitotic checkpoint system.

Driving chromosome segregation: lessons from the human and Drosophila centromere–kinetochore machinery

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1667-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Orr ◽  
Olga Afonso ◽  
Tália Feijão ◽  
Claudio E. Sunkel
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Chromosomal Locus ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
And Function ◽  
Drosophila Cells

The kinetochore is a complex molecular machine that serves as the interface between sister chromatids and the mitotic spindle. The kinetochore assembles at a particular chromosomal locus, the centromere, which is essential to maintain genomic stability during cell division. The kinetochore is a macromolecular puzzle of subcomplexes assembled in a hierarchical manner and fulfils three main functions: microtubule attachment, chromosome and sister chromatid movement, and regulation of mitotic progression though the spindle assembly checkpoint. In the present paper we compare recent results on the assembly, organization and function of the kinetochore in human and Drosophila cells and conclude that, although essential functions are highly conserved, there are important differences that might help define what is a minimal chromosome segregation machinery.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of CENP-C by Aurora B facilitates kinetochore attachment error correction in mitosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (50) ◽  
pp. E10667-E10676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Zhou ◽  
Fan Zheng ◽  
Chengliang Wang ◽  
Minhao Wu ◽  
Xiaozhen Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Regulatory Mechanism ◽  
Dynamic Interaction ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Important Pathway ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Kinetochores are superprotein complexes that orchestrate chromosome segregation via a dynamic interaction with spindle microtubules. A physical connection between CENP-C and the Mis12–Ndc80–Knl1 (KMN) protein network is an important pathway that is used to assemble kinetochores on CENP-A nucleosomes. Multiple outer kinetochore components are phosphorylated by Aurora B kinase to activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. However, it is unknown whether Aurora B can phosphorylate inner kinetochore components to facilitate proper mitotic chromosome segregation. Here, we reported the structure of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mis12–Nnf1 complex and showed that N-terminal residues 26–50 in Cnp3 (the CENP-C homolog of S. pombe) are responsible for interacting with the Mis12 complex. Interestingly, Thr28 of Cnp3 is a substrate of Ark1 (the Aurora B homolog of S. pombe), and phosphorylation impairs the interaction between the Cnp3 and Mis12 complex. The expression of a phosphorylation-mimicking Cnp3 mutant results in defective chromosome segregation due to improper kinetochore assembly. These results establish a previously uncharacterized regulatory mechanism involved in CENP-C–Mis12-facilitated kinetochore attachment error correction to ensure accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis.

scholarly journals A novel mechanism for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion by the ECO1 acetyltransferase

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Guacci ◽  
Jeremiah Stricklin ◽  
Michelle S. Bloom ◽  
Xuánzōng Guō ◽  
Meghna Bhatter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Current Model ◽  
S Phase ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
In Vivo Assays ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Subunit ◽  
Mutant Cells

Cohesin complex mediates cohesion between sister chromatids, which promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation. Eco1p acetylates the cohesin subunit Smc3p during S phase to establish cohesion. The current model posits that this Eco1p-mediated acetylation promotes establishment by abrogating the ability of Wpl1p to destabilize cohesin binding to chromosomes. Here we present data from budding yeast that is incompatible with this Wpl1p-centric model. Two independent in vivo assays show that a wpl1∆ fails to suppress cohesion defects of eco1∆ cells. Moreover, a wpl1∆ also fails to suppress cohesion defects engendered by blocking just the essential Eco1p acetylation sites on Smc3p (K112, K113). Thus removing WPL1 inhibition is insufficient for generating cohesion without ECO1 activity. To elucidate how ECO1 promotes cohesion, we conducted a genetic screen and identified a cohesion activator mutation in the SMC3 head domain (D1189H). Smc3-D1189H partially restores cohesion in eco1∆ wpl1∆ or eco1 mutant cells but robustly restores cohesion in cells blocked for Smc3p K112 K113 acetylation. These data support two important conclusions. First, acetylation of the K112 K113 region by Eco1p promotes cohesion establishment by altering Smc3p head function independent of its ability to antagonize Wpl1p. Second, Eco1p targets other than Smc3p K112 K113 are necessary for efficient establishment.

scholarly journals Kinetochores respond to subtle changes in the stability of microtubule attachments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica D. Warren ◽  
Sarah Y. Valles ◽  
Duane A. Compton
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Regulatory Enzymes ◽  
Summary Statement ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Induced Changes

AbstractProper attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores is necessary to satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint and ensure faithful chromosome segregation. Microtubules detach from kinetochores to correct improperly oriented attachments, and overall kinetochore-microtubule (k-MT) attachment stability is determined in response to regulatory enzymes and the activities of kinetochore-associated microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing proteins. However, it is unknown whether regulatory enzyme activity or kinetochore-associated protein localization respond to subtle changes in k-MT attachment stability. To test for this feedback response, we monitored Aurora B kinase activity and the localization of select kinetochore proteins in metaphase cells following treatments that subtly stabilize or destabilize k-MT attachments using low dose Taxol or UMK57 (an MCAK agonist), respectively. Increasing k-MT stability induced changes in the abundance of some kinetochore proteins. In contrast, reducing k-MT stability induced both increases in Aurora B kinase signaling and changes in the abundance of some kinetochore proteins. Thus, kinetochores dynamically respond to changes in the stability of their attached microtubules. This feedback control contributes to tuning k-MT attachment stability required for efficient error correction to facilitate faithful chromosome segregation.Summary StatementLive cell imaging demonstrates that kinetochore signaling responds to feedback from attached microtubules to tune their stability to ensure faithful chromosome segregation during cell division.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document