scholarly journals Quality-adjusted life expectancy norms for the English population

Author(s):  
Paul Peter Schneider ◽  
Simon McNamara ◽  
James Love-Koh ◽  
Tim Doran ◽  
Nils Gutacker

Objective The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England has proposed severity-of-disease modifiers that give greater weight to health benefits accruing to patients who experience a larger shortfall in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) under current standard of care compared to healthy individuals. This requires an estimate of quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) of the general population by age and sex. Previous QALE population norms are based on nearly 30-year old assessments of HRQoL in the general population. This study provides updated QALE estimates for the English population by age and sex. Methods EQ-5D-5L data for 14,412 participants from the Health Survey for England (waves 2017 and 2018) were pooled and HRQoL population norms were calculated. These norms were combined with official life tables from the Office for National Statistics for 2017-2019 using the Sullivan method to derive QALE estimates by age and sex. Values were discounted using 0%, 1.5% and 3.5% discount rates. Results QALE at birth is 68.04 QALYs for men and 68.48 QALYs for women. These values are lower than previously published QALE population norms based on older HRQoL data. Additional data tables and figures are made available through an interactive web application: https://r4scharr.shinyapps.io/shortfall/. Conclusions This study provides new QALE population norms for England that serve to establish absolute and relative QALY shortfalls for the purpose of health technology assessments.

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1S) ◽  
pp. 15-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Pradelli ◽  
Mario Calandriello ◽  
Roberto Di Virgilio ◽  
Marco Bellone ◽  
Marco Tubaro

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost‑effectiveness of apixaban in the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non‑valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) relatively to standard of care (warfarin or aspirin) from the Italian National Health System (SSN) perspective.METHODS: A previously published lifetime Markov model was adapted for Italian context. Clinical effectiveness data were acquired from head‑to‑head randomized trials (ARISTOTLE and AVERROES); main events considered in the model were ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, bleeds (both major and clinically relevant minor) and cardiovascular hospitalizations, besides treatment discontinuations. Expected survival was projected beyond trial duration using national mortality data adjusted for individual clinical risks and adjusted by utility weights for health states acquired from literature. Unit costs were collected from published Italian sources and actualized to 2013. Costs and health gains accruing after the first year were discounted at an annual 3.5% rate. The primary outcome measure of the economic evaluation was the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), where effectiveness is measured in terms of life‑years and quality adjusted life‑years gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to assess the effect of input uncertainty.RESULTS: Apixaban is expected to reduce the incidence of ischemic events relative to aspirin and to improve bleeding safety profile when compared to warfarin. Incremental LYs (0.31/0.19), QALYs (0.28/0.20), and costs (1,932/1,104) are predicted with the use of apixaban relative to aspirin and warfarin, respectively. The ICERs of apixaban were € 6,794 and € 5,607 per QALY gained, respectively. In PSA, the probability of apixaban being cost effective relative to aspirin and warfarin was 95% and 93%, respectively, for a WTP threshold of € 20,000 per QALY gained. Univariate analyses indicate that results were most sensitive to variations of the absolute risk reduction for cardiovascular events with apixaban.CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban is expected to increase life expectancy and quality‑adjusted life expectancy, but also costs dedicated to Italian NVAF patients, as compared to standard of care. The resulting ICERs have high probabilities of being below the conventional thresholds of WTP for health benefits of the SSN, indicating efficient allocation of health care resources.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5865-5865
Author(s):  
David Marks ◽  
Wendy Gidman ◽  
Heather M Wieffer ◽  
Lirong Zhang ◽  
Ze Cong ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The presence of MRD in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL in first complete remission (CR1) is an important negative prognostic factor. Evidence suggests that long term survival can be achieved among patients with MRD. However, what constitutes 'cure' is unclear; in addition, the definition of cure could be disease and stage specific. This study aimed to better understand the concept of cure in this patient population through a Delphi consensus panel approach, considering the definition of cure, the place of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in the treatment pathway, and long-term mortality risk and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in those patients who achieve cure. Methods Following ethical approval a two phase Delphi panel was conducted with five hematologists / hemato-oncologists from the UK with expertise in treating adults with ALL. Participants initially completed a questionnaire, which gathered data on participants' background and experience in ALL, as well as information on ALL treatments and outcomes using semi-structured and open-ended questions. Responses to the questionnaire were then presented and discussed by all participants in a web-based meeting. Participant "poll" questions were used to establish where consensus (defined here as 80% agreement among participants) was achieved on specific statements. Results Participants had a median 16 years' experience in treating adults with ALL, and had treated a median of 12 patients with Ph- BCP-ALL in the previous 12 months. For patients with Ph− BCP-ALL who have achieved CR1 and are MRD+, participants agreed that some patients can achieve cure with current standard of care treatment. Cure was agreed to be best defined using the measure of relapse-free survival (RFS) as opposed to persistent MRD- status and overall survival. Participants reached consensus that they would begin to consider cure at 3 years' RFS in this patient population, and that cure is considered highly probable if a patient is still relapse-free at 5 years. The proportion of patients who achieve cure was agreed to be up to 30% with current standard of care treatments and HSCT, but the likelihood of cure was considered to be lower among patients who are not eligible for HSCT. Although considered part of the standard of care, participants agreed that HSCT cannot be conducted in all patients, and long-term survival has been shown to be possible with the current standard of care in a minority of patients who are MRD+ at CR1 who do not undergo HSCT. Participants agreed that, in the "cured" population, the mortality risk would be higher than in the general population. Specifically, participants reached a consensus that the mortality rate among patients who achieved cure, and who had received HSCT, was 3-4 times higher compared with the age- and sex-matched general population in UK due to the long term effects of HCST and chemotherapy. Furthermore, the after effects of chemotherapy and HSCT, were described to have an impact on the HRQL of patients who achieve cure. Consensus was reached that, on average, the HRQL of these "cured" patients would be higher than the average HRQL of patients who have just achieved MRD- status after further treatment and closer to the age- and sex-matched general population. Conclusions This study provides evidence via clinical consensus on the concept of cure in patient with BCP-ALL with MRD at CR1 in UK and confirms that cure could be achieved in this population. The implications of this research are that therapies that effectively eradicate MRD, and induce long term RFS, may potentially increase the chance of cure. Disclosures Marks: Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Cong:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Amgen, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Fonseca Santos ◽  
Sónia Pereira ◽  
Euan McLeod ◽  
Anne-Laure Guillermin ◽  
Ismini Chatzitheofilou

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Venous thromboembolism is a burden on healthcare systems. The aim of this analysis was to project the long-term costs and outcomes for rivaroxaban compared to standard of care (enoxaparin/warfarin) in Portugal for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A Markov model was developed using event rates extracted from the EINSTEIN trials supplemented with literature-based estimates of longer-term outcomes. Core outcomes included per patient costs and quality-adjusted life years reported separately per treatment arm and incrementally, as well as cost per quality-adjusted life years gained. The deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism indications were analysed separately. The analyses were conducted from the Portuguese societal perspective and over a 5-year time horizon. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Several scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the impact on results of varying key modeling assumptions.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Rivaroxaban treatment was associated with cost-savings for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and was both cost-saving and more effective for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, compared with enoxaparin/warfarin.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> The results of the sensitivity and scenario analyses further supported that rivaroxaban is a cost-effective alternative to standard of care treatment. The use of an expert panel to derive some input values and the lack of Portuguese specific utilities were the main limitations.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Rivaroxaban represents an efficient alternative to using enoxaparin/warfarin in Portugal, as it’s associated with lower costs (for both indications) and greater quality adjusted life years (for the pulmonary embolism indication).</p><p><br /><strong>Keywords: </strong>Venous Thrombosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism.</p>


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 592-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Smith ◽  
Jacques Cornuz ◽  
Mark Roberts ◽  
Drahomir Aujesky

SummaryAlthough extended secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin was recently shown to be more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism, its cost-effectiveness compared to traditional prophylaxis with warfarin is uncertain. We built a decision analytic model to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of a 6-month course of low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin therapy in 65-year-old patients with cancer-related venous thromboembolism. We used probability estimates and utilities reported in the literature and published cost data. Using a US societal perspective, we compared strategies based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with warfarin was $149, 865/QALY. Low-molecular-weight heparin yielded a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 1.097 QALYs at the cost of $15, 329. Overall, 46% ($7108) of the total costs associated with low-molecular-weight heparin were attributable to pharmacy costs. Although the low-molecular-weigh heparin strategy achieved a higher incremental quality-adjusted life expectancy than the warfarin strategy (difference of 0.051 QALYs), this clinical benefit was offset by a substantial cost increment of $7,609. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to variation of the early mortality risks associated with low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin and the pharmacy costs for low-molecular-weight heparin. Based on the best available evidence, secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism. However, because of the substantial pharmacy costs of extended low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis in the US, this treatment is relatively expensive compared with warfarin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1083-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul H. C. Stirling ◽  
Nicholas D. Clement ◽  
Paul J. Jenkins ◽  
Andrew D. Duckworth ◽  
Jane E. McEachan

The United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence considers a procedure to be cost-effective if the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained falls below a threshold of £20,000–£30,000 (€22,600–33,900; US$24,600–$36,900). This study used cost per quality-adjusted life year methodology to determine the cost-utility ratio of A1 pulley release. Pre- and postoperative EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Likert scores were collected prospectively over 6 years from 192 patients. The median pre- and postoperative indices derived from the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Likert scores were significantly different at 0.77 and 0.80. The mean life expectancy was 21 years. The mean number of quality-adjusted life years gained was 1 per patient. The mean cost-utility ratio per patient was £32,308 (€36,508; US$39,730) and £16,154 (€18,254; US$19,869) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Provided the benefit of surgery was maintained over the remaining life expectancy, the cost-utility ratio decreased to £1537 (€1737; US$1891) per patient. A1 pulley release is cost-effective provided the benefit is maintained for 2 years. The procedure is also associated with a statistically significant improvement in quality of life. Level of evidence: III


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-641
Author(s):  
Michele Palazzuolo ◽  
Alexander Antoniadis ◽  
Jaad Mahlouly ◽  
Julien Wegrzyn

Abstract Purpose Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage osteoarthritis though its risk-benefit ratio in elderly patients remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome, rates of complication and mortality, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in patients who exceeded their estimated life expectancy. Methods Ninety-seven TKA implanted in 86 patients who exceeded their estimated life expectancy at the time of TKA were prospectively included in our institutional joint registry and retrospectively analyzed. At latest follow-up, the functional outcome with the Knee Society Score (KSS), rates of complication and mortality, and QALY with utility value of EuroQol-5D score were evaluated. Results At a mean follow-up of three ± one years, the pre- to post-operative KSS improved significantly (p < 0.01). The rates of surgical and major medical complications related to TKA were 3% and 10%, respectively. The re-operation rate with readmission was 3% while no TKA was revised. The 30-day and one year mortality was 1% and 3%, respectively. The pre- to one year post-operative QALY improved significantly (p < 0.01). The cumulative QALY five years after TKA was four years. Assuming that these patients did not undergo TKA, their cumulative QALY at five years would have been only two years. Conclusion TKA is an effective procedure for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis in patients who exceeded their estimated life expectancy. TKA provided significant improvement in function and quality of life without adversely affecting overall morbidity and mortality. Therefore, TKA should not be contra-indicated in elderly patients based on their advanced age alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document