scholarly journals Evolutionary inferences about quantitative traits are affected by underlying genealogical discordance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio K. Mendes ◽  
Jesualdo A. Fuentes-González ◽  
Joshua G. Schraiber ◽  
Matthew W. Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Related Species ◽  
Quantitative Traits ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance ◽  
Discrete Traits

AbstractModern phylogenetic methods used to study how traits evolve often require a single species tree as input, and do not take underlying gene tree discordance into account. Such approaches may lead to errors in phylogenetic inference because of hemiplasy — the process by which single changes on discordant trees appear to be homoplastic when analyzed on a fixed species tree. Hemiplasy has been shown to affect inferences about discrete traits, but it is still unclear whether complications arise when quantitative traits are analyzed. In order to address this question and to characterize the effect of hemiplasy on traits controlled by a large number of loci, we present a multispecies coalescent model for quantitative traits evolving along a species tree. We demonstrate theoretically and through simulations that hemiplasy decreases the expected covariances in trait values between more closely related species relative to the covariances between more distantly related species. This effect leads to an overestimation of a trait’s evolutionary rate parameter, to a decrease of the trait’s phylogenetic signal, and to increased false positive rates in comparative methods such as the phylogenetic ANOVA. We also show that hemiplasy affects discrete, threshold traits that have an underlying continuous liability, leading to false inferences of convergent evolution. The number of loci controlling a quantitative trait appears to be irrelevant to the trends reported, for all analyses. Our results demonstrate that gene tree discordance and hemiplasy are a problem for all types of traits, across a wide range of methods. Our analyses also point to the conditions under which hemiplasy is most likely to be a factor, and suggest future approaches that may mitigate its effects.

scholarly journals Phylogenomics Reveals Ancient Gene Tree Discordance in the Amphibian Tree of Life

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Hime ◽  
Alan R Lemmon ◽  
Emily C Moriarty Lemmon ◽  
Elizabeth Prendini ◽  
Jeremy M Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tree Species ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Tree Of Life ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Sister Relationship ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance

Abstract Molecular phylogenies have yielded strong support for many parts of the amphibian Tree of Life, but poor support for the resolution of deeper nodes, including relationships among families and orders. To clarify these relationships, we provide a phylogenomic perspective on amphibian relationships by developing a taxon-specific Anchored Hybrid Enrichment protocol targeting hundreds of conserved exons which are effective across the class. After obtaining data from 220 loci for 286 species (representing 94% of the families and 44% of the genera), we estimate a phylogeny for extant amphibians and identify gene tree–species tree conflict across the deepest branches of the amphibian phylogeny. We perform locus-by-locus genealogical interrogation of alternative topological hypotheses for amphibian monophyly, focusing on interordinal relationships. We find that phylogenetic signal deep in the amphibian phylogeny varies greatly across loci in a manner that is consistent with incomplete lineage sorting in the ancestral lineage of extant amphibians. Our results overwhelmingly support amphibian monophyly and a sister relationship between frogs and salamanders, consistent with the Batrachia hypothesis. Species tree analyses converge on a small set of topological hypotheses for the relationships among extant amphibian families. These results clarify several contentious portions of the amphibian Tree of Life, which in conjunction with a set of vetted fossil calibrations, support a surprisingly younger timescale for crown and ordinal amphibian diversification than previously reported. More broadly, our study provides insight into the sources, magnitudes, and heterogeneity of support across loci in phylogenomic data sets.[AIC; Amphibia; Batrachia; Phylogeny; gene tree–species tree discordance; genomics; information theory.]

scholarly journals A multispecies coalescent model for quantitative traits

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio K Mendes ◽  
Jesualdo A Fuentes-González ◽  
Joshua G Schraiber ◽  
Matthew W Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Related Species ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Quantitative Traits ◽  
Evolutionary Rate ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Closely Related Species ◽  
Coalescent Model ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Trait Covariance

We present a multispecies coalescent model for quantitative traits that allows for evolutionary inferences at micro- and macroevolutionary scales. A major advantage of this model is its ability to incorporate genealogical discordance underlying a quantitative trait. We show that discordance causes a decrease in the expected trait covariance between more closely related species relative to more distantly related species. If unaccounted for, this outcome can lead to an overestimation of a trait’s evolutionary rate, to a decrease in its phylogenetic signal, and to errors when examining shifts in mean trait values. The number of loci controlling a quantitative trait appears to be irrelevant to all trends reported, and discordance also affected discrete, threshold traits. Our model and analyses point to the conditions under which different methods should fare better or worse, in addition to indicating current and future approaches that can mitigate the effects of discordance.

scholarly journals How to Tackle Phylogenetic Discordance in Recent and Rapidly Radiating Groups? Developing a Workflow Using Loricaria (Asteraceae) as an Example

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Kandziora ◽  
Petr Sklenář ◽  
Filip Kolář ◽  
Roswitha Schmickl
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Secondary Contact ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Phylogenetic Discordance ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance ◽  
High Degree

A major challenge in phylogenetics and -genomics is to resolve young rapidly radiating groups. The fast succession of species increases the probability of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), and different topologies of the gene trees are expected, leading to gene tree discordance, i.e., not all gene trees represent the species tree. Phylogenetic discordance is common in phylogenomic datasets, and apart from ILS, additional sources include hybridization, whole-genome duplication, and methodological artifacts. Despite a high degree of gene tree discordance, species trees are often well supported and the sources of discordance are not further addressed in phylogenomic studies, which can eventually lead to incorrect phylogenetic hypotheses, especially in rapidly radiating groups. We chose the high-Andean Asteraceae genus Loricaria to shed light on the potential sources of phylogenetic discordance and generated a phylogenetic hypothesis. By accounting for paralogy during gene tree inference, we generated a species tree based on hundreds of nuclear loci, using Hyb-Seq, and a plastome phylogeny obtained from off-target reads during target enrichment. We observed a high degree of gene tree discordance, which we found implausible at first sight, because the genus did not show evidence of hybridization in previous studies. We used various phylogenomic analyses (trees and networks) as well as the D-statistics to test for ILS and hybridization, which we developed into a workflow on how to tackle phylogenetic discordance in recent radiations. We found strong evidence for ILS and hybridization within the genus Loricaria. Low genetic differentiation was evident between species located in different Andean cordilleras, which could be indicative of substantial introgression between populations, promoted during Pleistocene glaciations, when alpine habitats shifted creating opportunities for secondary contact and hybridization.

scholarly journals Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Data Sets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego F Morales-Briones ◽  
Gudrun Kadereit ◽  
Delphine T Tefarikis ◽  
Michael J Moore ◽  
Stephen A Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Network Inference ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Phylogenetic Network ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance

Abstract Gene tree discordance in large genomic data sets can be caused by evolutionary processes such as incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization, as well as model violation, and errors in data processing, orthology inference, and gene tree estimation. Species tree methods that identify and accommodate all sources of conflict are not available, but a combination of multiple approaches can help tease apart alternative sources of conflict. Here, using a phylotranscriptomic analysis in combination with reference genomes, we test a hypothesis of ancient hybridization events within the plant family Amaranthaceae s.l. that was previously supported by morphological, ecological, and Sanger-based molecular data. The data set included seven genomes and 88 transcriptomes, 17 generated for this study. We examined gene-tree discordance using coalescent-based species trees and network inference, gene tree discordance analyses, site pattern tests of introgression, topology tests, synteny analyses, and simulations. We found that a combination of processes might have generated the high levels of gene tree discordance in the backbone of Amaranthaceae s.l. Furthermore, we found evidence that three consecutive short internal branches produce anomalous trees contributing to the discordance. Overall, our results suggest that Amaranthaceae s.l. might be a product of an ancient and rapid lineage diversification, and remains, and probably will remain, unresolved. This work highlights the potential problems of identifiability associated with the sources of gene tree discordance including, in particular, phylogenetic network methods. Our results also demonstrate the importance of thoroughly testing for multiple sources of conflict in phylogenomic analyses, especially in the context of ancient, rapid radiations. We provide several recommendations for exploring conflicting signals in such situations. [Amaranthaceae; gene tree discordance; hybridization; incomplete lineage sorting; phylogenomics; species network; species tree; transcriptomics.]

scholarly journals Phylogenetic conflicts, combinability, and deep phylogenomics in plants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Smith ◽  
Nathanael Walker-Hale ◽  
Joseph F. Walker ◽  
Joseph W. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Data Filtering ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
Inference Methods ◽  
Species Tree Inference

AbstractStudies have demonstrated that pervasive gene tree conflict underlies several important phylogenetic relationships where different species tree methods produce conflicting results. Here, we present a means of dissecting the phylogenetic signal for alternative resolutions within a dataset in order to resolve recalcitrant relationships and, importantly, identify what the dataset is unable to resolve. These procedures extend upon methods for isolating conflict and concordance involving specific candidate relationships and can be used to identify systematic error and disambiguate sources of conflict among species tree inference methods. We demonstrate these on a large phylogenomic plant dataset. Our results support the placement of Amborella as sister to the remaining extant angiosperms, Gnetales as sister to pines, and the monophyly of extant gymnosperms. Several other contentious relationships, including the resolution of relationships within the bryophytes and the eudicots, remain uncertain given the low number of supporting gene trees. To address whether concatenation of filtered genes amplified phylogenetic signal for relationships, we implemented a combinatorial heuristic to test combinability of genes. We found that nested conflicts limited the ability of data filtering methods to fully ameliorate conflicting signal amongst gene trees. These analyses confirmed that the underlying conflicting signal does not support broad concatenation of genes. Our approach provides a means of dissecting a specific dataset to address deep phylogenetic relationships while also identifying the inferential boundaries of the dataset.

Dissecting incongruence between concatenation- and quartet-based approaches in phylogenomic data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing-Xing Shen ◽  
Jacob L Steenwyk ◽  
Antonis Rokas
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Data Matrix ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Likelihood Score ◽  
Log Likelihood ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance

Abstract Topological conflict or incongruence is widespread in phylogenomic data. Concatenation- and coalescent-based approaches often result in incongruent topologies, but the causes of this conflict can be difficult to characterize. We examined incongruence stemming from conflict between likelihood-based signal (quantified by the difference in gene-wise log likelihood score or ΔGLS) and quartet-based topological signal (quantified by the difference in gene-wise quartet score or ΔGQS) for every gene in three phylogenomic studies in animals, fungi, and plants, which were chosen because their concatenation-based IQ-TREE (T1) and quartet-based ASTRAL (T2) phylogenies are known to produce eight conflicting internal branches (bipartitions). By comparing the types of phylogenetic signal for all genes in these three data matrices, we found that 30% - 36% of genes in each data matrix are inconsistent, that is, each of these genes has higher log likelihood score for T1 versus T2 (i.e., ΔGLS >0) whereas its T1 topology has lower quartet score than its T2 topology (i.e., ΔGQS <0) or vice versa. Comparison of inconsistent and consistent genes using a variety of metrics (e.g., evolutionary rate, gene tree topology, distribution of branch lengths, hidden paralogy, and gene tree discordance) showed that inconsistent genes are more likely to recover neither T1 nor T2 and have higher levels of gene tree discordance than consistent genes. Simulation analyses demonstrate that removal of inconsistent genes from datasets with low levels of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and low and medium levels of gene tree estimation error (GTEE) reduced incongruence and increased accuracy. In contrast, removal of inconsistent genes from datasets with medium and high ILS levels and high GTEE levels eliminated or extensively reduced incongruence, but the resulting congruent species phylogenies were not always topologically identical to the true species trees.

The Multispecies Coalescent in Space and Time

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick F. McKenzie ◽  
Deren A. R. Eaton
Keyword(s):  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Effective Population ◽  
Sliding Windows ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Rate Of Decay ◽  
Coalescent Time

AbstractA key distinction between species tree inference under the multi-species coalescent model (MSC), and the inference of gene trees in sliding windows along a genome, is in the effect of genetic linkage. Whereas the MSC explicitly assumes genealogies to be unlinked, i.e., statistically independent, genealogies located close together on genomes are spatially auto-correlated. Here we use tree sequence simulations with recombination to explore the effects of species tree parameters on spatial patterns of linkage among genealogies. We decompose coalescent time units to demonstrate differential effects of generation time and effective population size on spatial coalescent patterns, and we define a new metric, “phylogenetic linkage,” for measuring the rate of decay of phylogenetic similarity by comparison to distances among unlinked genealogies. Finally, we provide a simple example where accounting for phylogenetic linkage in sliding window analyses improves local gene tree inference.

scholarly journals Complexity of the simplest species tree problem

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianqi Zhu ◽  
Ziheng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Ancestral Population ◽  
Statistical Efficiency ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Full Likelihood ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
Tree Estimation

Abstract The multispecies coalescent (MSC) model provides a natural framework for species tree estimation accounting for gene-tree conflicts. While a number of species tree methods under the MSC have been suggested and evaluated using simulation, their statistical properties remain poorly understood. Here we use mathematical analysis aided by computer simulation to examine the identifiability, consistency, and efficiency of different species tree methods in the case of three species and three sequences under the molecular clock. We consider four major species-tree methods including concatenation, two-step, independent-sites maximum likelihood (ISML) and maximum likelihood (ML). We develop approximations that predict that the probit transform of the species tree estimation error decreases linearly with the square root of the number of loci. Even in this simplest case major differences exist among the methods. Fulllikelihood methods are considerably more efficient than summary methods such as concatenation and two-step. They also provide estimates of important parameters such as species divergence times and ancestral population sizes while these parameters are not identifiable by summary methods. Our results highlight the need to improve the statistical efficiency of summary methods and the computational efficiency of full likelihood methods of species tree estimation.

scholarly journals PRANC: ML species tree estimation from the ranked gene trees under coalescence

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (18) ◽  
pp. 4819-4821
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Kim ◽  
James H Degnan
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Supplementary Data ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Branch Lengths ◽  
Tree Topologies ◽  
Tree Estimation

Abstract Summary PRANC computes the Probabilities of RANked gene tree topologies under the multispecies coalescent. A ranked gene tree is a gene tree accounting for the temporal ordering of internal nodes. PRANC can also estimate the maximum likelihood (ML) species tree from a sample of ranked or unranked gene tree topologies. It estimates the ML tree with estimated branch lengths in coalescent units. Availability and implementation PRANC is written in C++ and freely available at github.com/anastasiiakim/PRANC. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Probabilities of Unranked and Ranked Anomaly Zones under Birth–Death Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1480-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Kim ◽  
Noah A Rosenberg ◽  
James H Degnan
Keyword(s):  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Tree Topology ◽  
Death Process ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Speciation Rates ◽  
Tree Topologies ◽  
Birth Death

Abstract A labeled gene tree topology that is more probable than the labeled gene tree topology matching a species tree is called “anomalous.” Species trees that can generate such anomalous gene trees are said to be in the “anomaly zone.” Here, probabilities of “unranked” and “ranked” gene tree topologies under the multispecies coalescent are considered. A ranked tree depicts not only the topological relationship among gene lineages, as an unranked tree does, but also the sequence in which the lineages coalesce. In this article, we study how the parameters of a species tree simulated under a constant-rate birth–death process can affect the probability that the species tree lies in the anomaly zone. We find that with more than five taxa, it is possible for species trees to have both anomalous unranked and ranked gene trees. The probability of being in either type of anomaly zone increases with more taxa. The probability of anomalous gene trees also increases with higher speciation rates. We observe that the probabilities of unranked anomaly zones are higher and grow much faster than those of ranked anomaly zones as the speciation rate increases. Our simulation shows that the most probable ranked gene tree is likely to have the same unranked topology as the species tree. We design the software PRANC, which computes probabilities of ranked gene tree topologies given a species tree under the coalescent model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document