scholarly journals The sequences near Chi sites allow the RecBCD pathway to avoid genomic rearrangements

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chastity Li ◽  
Claudia Danilowicz ◽  
Tommy F. Tashjian ◽  
Veronica G. Godoy ◽  
Chantal Prévost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Repeated Sequence ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Genomic Rearrangements ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Exchange Product ◽  
Product Forms

AbstractBacterial recombinational repair is initiated by RecBCD, which creates a 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tail on each side of a double strand break (DSB). Each tail terminates in a Chi site sequence that is usually distant from the break. Once an ssDNA-RecA filament forms on a tail, the tail searches for homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to use as template for DSB repair. Here we show that the nucleoprotein filaments rarely trigger sufficient synthesis to form an irreversible repair unless a long strand exchange product forms at the 3′ end of the filament. Our experimental data and modeling suggest that terminating both filaments with Chi sites allows recombinational repair to strongly suppress fatal genomic rearrangements resulting from mistakenly joining different copies of a repeated sequence after a DSB has occurred within a repeat. Taken together our evidence highlights cellular safe fail mechanisms that bacteria use to avoid potentially lethal situations.

scholarly journals Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 4189-4198 ◽  
Author(s):  
G T Milne ◽  
S Jin ◽  
K B Shannon ◽  
D T Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Homologous Recombinational Repair

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells is dependent on the Ku DNA binding protein complex. However, the mechanism of Ku-mediated repair is not understood. We discovered a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene (KU80) that is structurally similar to the 80-kDa mammalian Ku subunit. Ku8O associates with the product of the HDF1 gene, forming the major DNA end-binding complex of yeast cells. DNA end binding was absent in ku80delta, hdf1delta, or ku80delta hdf1delta strains. Antisera specific for epitope tags on Ku80 and Hdf1 were used in supershift and immunodepletion experiments to show that both proteins are directly involved in DNA end binding. In vivo, the efficiency of two DNA end-joining processes were reduced >10-fold in ku8Odelta, hdfldelta, or ku80delta hdf1delta strains: repair of linear plasmid DNA and repair of an HO endonuclease-induced chromosomal DSB. These DNA-joining defects correlated with DNA damage sensitivity, because ku80delta and hdf1delta strains were also sensitive to methylmethane sulfonate (MMS). Ku-dependent repair is distinct from homologous recombination, because deletion of KU80 and HDF1 increased the MMS sensitivity of rad52delta. Interestingly, rad5Odelta, also shown here to be defective in end joining, was epistatic with Ku mutations for MMS repair and end joining. Therefore, Ku and Rad50 participate in an end-joining pathway that is distinct from homologous recombinational repair. Yeast DNA end joining is functionally analogous to DSB repair and V(D)J recombination in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Fidelity of Mitotic Double-Strand-Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Role for SAE2/COM1

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison J Rattray ◽  
Carolyn B McGill ◽  
Brenda K Shafer ◽  
Jeffrey N Strathern
Keyword(s):  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Chromosome Rearrangement ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Physical Analysis ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair

Abstract Errors associated with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) include point mutations caused by misincorporation during repair DNA synthesis or novel junctions made by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We previously demonstrated that DNA synthesis is ∼100-fold more error prone when associated with DSB repair. Here we describe a genetic screen for mutants that affect the fidelity of DSB repair. The substrate consists of inverted repeats of the trp1 and CAN1 genes. Recombinational repair of a site-specific DSB within the repeat yields TRP1 recombinants. Errors in the repair process can be detected by the production of canavanine-resistant (can1) mutants among the TRP1 recombinants. In wild-type cells the recombinational repair process is efficient and fairly accurate. Errors resulting in can1 mutations occur in <1% of the TRP1 recombinants and most appear to be point mutations. We isolated several mutant strains with altered fidelity of recombination. Here we characterize one of these mutants that revealed an ∼10-fold elevation in the frequency of can1 mutants among TRP1 recombinants. The gene was cloned by complementation of a coincident sporulation defect and proved to be an allele of SAE2/COM1. Physical analysis of the can1 mutants from sae2/com1 strains revealed that many were a novel class of chromosome rearrangement that could reflect break-induced replication (BIR) and NHEJ. Strains with either the mre11s-H125N or rad50s-K81I alleles had phenotypes in this assay that are similar to that of the sae2/com1Δ strain. Our data suggest that Sae2p/Com1p plays a role in ensuring that both ends of a DSB participate in a recombination event, thus avoiding BIR, possibly by regulating the nuclease activity of the Mre11p/Rad50p/Xrs2p complex.

The Chromosome Bias of Misincorporations During Double-Strand Break Repair Is Not Altered in Mismatch Repair–Defective Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1525-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn B McGill ◽  
Susan L Holbeck ◽  
Jeffrey N Strathern
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Initial Sequence ◽  
Dna Break ◽  
A Site

AbstractRecombinational repair of a site-specific, double-strand DNA break (DSB) results in increased reversion frequency for nearby mutations. Although some models for DSB repair predict that newly synthesized DNA will be inherited equally by both the originally broken chromosome and the chromosome that served as a template, the DNA synthesis errors are almost exclusively found on the chromosome that had the original DSB (introduced by the HO endonuclease). To determine whether mismatch repair acts on the template chromosome in a directed fashion to restore mismatches to the initial sequence, these experiments were repeated in mismatch repair-defective (pms1, mlh1, and msh2) backgrounds. The results suggest that mismatch repair is not responsible for the observed bias.

scholarly journals Replication Fork Breakage and Restart inEscherichia coli

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Michel ◽  
Anurag K. Sinha ◽  
David R. F. Leach
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Replication Restart

SUMMARYIn all organisms, replication impairments are an important source of genome rearrangements, mainly because of the formation of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends at inactivated replication forks. Three reactions for the formation of dsDNA ends at replication forks were originally described forEscherichia coliand became seminal models for all organisms: the encounter of replication forks with preexisting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) interruptions, replication fork reversal, and head-to-tail collisions of successive replication rounds. Here, we first review the experimental evidence that now allows us to know when, where, and how these three different reactions occur inE. coli. Next, we recall our recent studies showing that in wild-typeE. coli, spontaneous replication fork breakage occurs in 18% of cells at each generation. We propose that it results from the replication of preexisting nicks or gaps, since it does not involve replication fork reversal or head-to-tail fork collisions. In therecBmutant, deficient for double-strand break (DSB) repair, fork breakage triggers DSBs in the chromosome terminus during cell division, a reaction that is heritable for several generations. Finally, we recapitulate several observations suggesting that restart from intact inactivated replication forks and restart from recombination intermediates require different sets of enzymatic activities. The finding that 18% of cells suffer replication fork breakage suggests that DNA remains intact at most inactivated forks. Similarly, only 18% of cells need the helicase loader for replication restart, which leads us to speculate that the replicative helicase remains on DNA at intact inactivated replication forks and is reactivated by the replication restart proteins.

scholarly journals Rad51-Independent Interchromosomal Double-Strand Break Repair by Gene Conversion Requires Rad52 but Not Rad55, Rad57, or Dmc1

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 897-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Pohl ◽  
Jac A. Nickoloff
Keyword(s):  
Gene Conversion ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Homology Search ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Homologous recombination (HR) is critical for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and genome stabilization. In yeast, HR is catalyzed by the Rad51 strand transferase and its “mediators,” including the Rad52 single-strand DNA-annealing protein, two Rad51 paralogs (Rad55 and Rad57), and Rad54. A Rad51 homolog, Dmc1, is important for meiotic HR. In wild-type cells, most DSB repair results in gene conversion, a conservative HR outcome. Because Rad51 plays a central role in the homology search and strand invasion steps, DSBs either are not repaired or are repaired by nonconservative single-strand annealing or break-induced replication mechanisms in rad51Δ mutants. Although DSB repair by gene conversion in the absence of Rad51 has been reported for ectopic HR events (e.g., inverted repeats or between plasmids), Rad51 has been thought to be essential for DSB repair by conservative interchromosomal (allelic) gene conversion. Here, we demonstrate that DSBs stimulate gene conversion between homologous chromosomes (allelic conversion) by >30-fold in a rad51Δ mutant. We show that Rad51-independent allelic conversion and break-induced replication occur independently of Rad55, Rad57, and Dmc1 but require Rad52. Unlike DSB-induced events, spontaneous allelic conversion was detected in both rad51Δ and rad52Δ mutants, but not in a rad51Δ rad52Δ double mutant. The frequencies of crossovers associated with DSB-induced gene conversion were similar in the wild type and the rad51Δ mutant, but discontinuous conversion tracts were fivefold more frequent and tract lengths were more widely distributed in the rad51Δ mutant, indicating that heteroduplex DNA has an altered structure, or is processed differently, in the absence of Rad51.

scholarly journals Actin-Related Protein 6 (Arp6) Influences Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-238
Author(s):  
Mohsen Hooshyar ◽  
Daniel Burnside ◽  
Maryam Hajikarimlou ◽  
Katayoun Omidi ◽  
Alexander Jesso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Repair Efficiency ◽  
Chromosomal Breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious form of DNA damage and are repaired through non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). Repair initiation, regulation and communication with signaling pathways require several histone-modifying and chromatin-remodeling complexes. In budding yeast, this involves three primary complexes: INO80-C, which is primarily associated with HR, SWR1-C, which promotes NHEJ, and RSC-C, which is involved in both pathways as well as the general DNA damage response. Here we identify ARP6 as a factor involved in DSB repair through an RSC-C-related pathway. The loss of ARP6 significantly reduces the NHEJ repair efficiency of linearized plasmids with cohesive ends, impairs the repair of chromosomal breaks, and sensitizes cells to DNA-damaging agents. Genetic interaction analysis indicates that ARP6, MRE11 and RSC-C function within the same pathway, and the overexpression of ARP6 rescues rsc2∆ and mre11∆ sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Double mutants of ARP6, and members of the INO80 and SWR1 complexes, cause a significant reduction in repair efficiency, suggesting that ARP6 functions independently of SWR1-C and INO80-C. These findings support a novel role for ARP6 in DSB repair that is independent of the SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex, through an apparent RSC-C and MRE11-associated DNA repair pathway.

scholarly journals Watching a double strand break repair polymerase insert a pro-mutagenic oxidized nucleotide

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonas A. Jamsen ◽  
Akira Sassa ◽  
David D. Shock ◽  
William A. Beard ◽  
Samuel H. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
X Ray Crystallography ◽  
Polymerase Fidelity ◽  
Break Repair

AbstractOxidized dGTP (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2´-deoxyguanosine triphosphate, 8-oxodGTP) insertion by DNA polymerases strongly promotes cancer and human disease. How DNA polymerases discriminate against oxidized and undamaged nucleotides, especially in error-prone double strand break (DSB) repair, is poorly understood. High-resolution time-lapse X-ray crystallography snapshots of DSB repair polymerase μ undergoing DNA synthesis reveal that a third active site metal promotes insertion of oxidized and undamaged dGTP in the canonical anti-conformation opposite template cytosine. The product metal bridged O8 with product oxygens, and was not observed in the syn-conformation opposite template adenine (At). Rotation of At into the syn-conformation enabled undamaged dGTP misinsertion. Exploiting metal and substrate dynamics in a rigid active site allows 8-oxodGTP to circumvent polymerase fidelity safeguards to promote pro-mutagenic double strand break repair.

scholarly journals Regulatory and Functional Involvement of Long Non-Coding RNAs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1506
Author(s):  
Angelos Papaspyropoulos ◽  
Nefeli Lagopati ◽  
Ioanna Mourkioti ◽  
Andriani Angelopoulou ◽  
Spyridon Kyriazis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Living Organisms

Protection of genome integrity is vital for all living organisms, particularly when DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur. Eukaryotes have developed two main pathways, namely Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous Recombination (HR), to repair DSBs. While most of the current research is focused on the role of key protein players in the functional regulation of DSB repair pathways, accumulating evidence has uncovered a novel class of regulating factors termed non-coding RNAs. Non-coding RNAs have been found to hold a pivotal role in the activation of DSB repair mechanisms, thereby safeguarding genomic stability. In particular, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have begun to emerge as new players with vast therapeutic potential. This review summarizes important advances in the field of lncRNAs, including characterization of recently identified lncRNAs, and their implication in DSB repair pathways in the context of tumorigenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document