Worldwide occurrence records reflect a global decline in bee species richness

AbstractWild and managed bees are key pollinators, providing ecosystem services to a large fraction of the world’s flowering plants, including ∼85% of all cultivated crops. Recent reports of wild bee decline and its potential consequences are thus worrisome. However, evidence is mostly based on local or regional studies; global status of bee decline has not been assessed yet. To fill this gap, we analyzed publicly available worldwide occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility spanning more than a century of specimen collection. We found that after the 1980’s the number of collected bee species declines steeply, and approximately 25% fewer species were reported between 2006 and 2015 relative to the number of species counted before the 1990’s. These trends are alarming and encourage swift action to avoid further decline of these key pollinators.

Download Full-text

Contribution to a reference library of DNA barcodes for Colombian freshwater fishes

10.3897/arphapreprints.e68554 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Manuela Mejía Estrada ◽

Luz Fernanda Jiménez-Segura ◽

Iván Soto Calderón

Keyword(s):

Dna Sequences ◽

Freshwater Fishes ◽

Dna Barcodes ◽

Reference Library ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

The World ◽

Poecilia Sphenops ◽

Key Indicators ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

The Barcoding was proposed motivated by the mismatch between the low number of taxonomists that contrasts with the large number of species, the method requires the construction of reference collections of DNA sequences that represent existing biodiversity. Freshwater fishes are key indicators for understanding biogeography around the world. Colombia with 1610 species of freshwater fishes is the second richest country in the world in this group. However, genetic information of the species continues to be limited, the contribution to a reference library of DNA barcodes for Colombian freshwater fishes highlights the importance of biological collections and seeks to strengthen inventories and taxonomy of such collections in future studies. This dataset contributes to the knowledge on the DNA barcodes and occurrence records of 96 species of Freshwater fishes from Colombia. The species represented in this dataset correspond to an addition to BOLD public databases of 39 species. Forty-nine specimens were collected in Atrato bassin and 708 in Magdalena-Cauca bassin during the period of 2010 to 2020, two species (Loricariichthys brunneus and Poecilia sphenops) are considered exotic to the Atrato, Cauca and Magdalena basins and four species (Oncorhynchu mykiss, Oreochromis niloticus, Parachromis friedrichsthalii and Xiphophorus helleri) are exotic to Colombian hydrogeographic regions. All specimens are deposited in the CIUA collection at University of Antioquia and have their DNA barcodes made publicly available in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) online database and the distribution dataset can be freely accessed through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).

Download Full-text

Mobilizing Data from Taxonomic Literature for an Iconic Species (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Tyrannosaurus rex)

Biodiversity Information Science and Standards ◽

10.3897/biss.3.37078 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 ◽

Author(s):

Jeremy Miller ◽

Yanell Braumuller ◽

Puneet Kishor ◽

David Shorthouse ◽

Mariya Dimitrova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Museum Exhibits ◽

The Public ◽

The Past ◽

Biodiversity Knowledge ◽

Informatics Infrastructure ◽

The Subject ◽

The Impact ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

A vast amount of biodiversity data is reported in the primary taxonomic literature. In the past, we have demonstrated the use of semantic enhancement to extract data from taxonomic literature and make it available to a network of databases (Miller et al. 2015). For technical reasons, semantic enhancement of taxonomic literature is most efficient when customized according to the format of a particular journal. This journal-based approach captures and disseminates data on whatever taxa happen to be published therein. But if we want to extract all treatments on a particular taxon of interest, these are likely to be spread across multiple journals. Fortunately, the GoldenGATE Imagine document editor (Sautter 2019) is flexible enough to parse most taxonomic literature. Tyrannosaurus rex is an iconic dinosaur with broad public appeal, as well as the subject of more than a century of scholarship. The Naturalis Biodiversity Center recently acquired a specimen that has become a major attraction in the public exhibit space. For most species on earth, the primary taxonomic literature contains nearly everything that is known about it. Every described species on earth is the subject of one or more taxonomic treatments. A taxon-based approach to semantic enhancement can mobilize all this knowledge using the network of databases and resources that comprise the modern biodiversity informatics infrastructure. When a particular species is of special interest, a taxon-based approach to semantic enhancement can be a powerful tool for scholarship and communication. In light of this, we resolved to semantically enhance all taxonomic treatments on T. rex. Our objective was to make these treatments and associated data available for the broad range of stakeholders who might have an interest in this animal, including professional paleontologists, the curious public, and museum exhibits and public communications personnel. Among the routine parsing and data sharing activities in the Plazi workflow (Agosti and Egloff 2009), taxonomic treatments, as well as cited figures, are deposited in the Biodiversity Literature Repository (BLR), and occurrence records are shared with the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Treatment citations were enhanced with hyperlinks to the cited treatment on TreatmentBank, and specimen citations were linked to their entries on public facing collections databases. We used the OpenBiodiv biodiversity knowledge graph (Senderov et al. 2017) to discover other taxa mentioned together with T. rex, and to create a timeline of T. rex research to evaluate the impact of individual researchers and specimen repositories to T. rex research. We contributed treatment links to WikiData, and queried WikiData to discover identifiers to different platforms holding data about T. rex. We used bloodhound-tracker.net to disambiguate human agents, like collectors, identifiers, and authors. We evaluate the adequacy of the fields currently available to extract data from taxonomic treatments, and make recommendations for future standards.

Download Full-text

An audit of some processing effects in aggregated occurrence records

ZooKeys ◽

10.3897/zookeys.751.24791 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 751 ◽

pp. 129-146 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Robert Mesibov

Keyword(s):

Data Loss ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Australian Museum ◽

Darwin Core ◽

Species Groups ◽

Processing Effects ◽

Global Biodiversity ◽

Name Changes ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

A total of ca 800,000 occurrence records from the Australian Museum (AM), Museums Victoria (MV) and the New Zealand Arthropod Collection (NZAC) were audited for changes in selected Darwin Core fields after processing by the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA; for AM and MV records) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; for AM, MV and NZAC records). Formal taxon names in the genus- and species-groups were changed in 13–21% of AM and MV records, depending on dataset and aggregator. There was little agreement between the two aggregators on processed names, with names changed in two to three times as many records by one aggregator alone compared to records with names changed by both aggregators. The type status of specimen records did not change with name changes, resulting in confusion as to the name with which a type was associated. Data losses of up to 100% were found after processing in some fields, apparently due to programming errors. The taxonomic usefulness of occurrence records could be improved if aggregators included both original and the processed taxonomic data items for each record. It is recommended that end-users check original and processed records for data loss and name replacements after processing by aggregators.

Download Full-text

Implementing GBIF Pipelines in the Atlas of Living Australia: The first step towards alignment and further collaboration

Biodiversity Information Science and Standards ◽

10.3897/biss.5.74335 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 ◽

Author(s):

Javier Molina ◽

Peggy Newman ◽

David Martin ◽

Vicente Ruiz Jurado

Keyword(s):

Management Systems ◽

Records Management ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Operation Costs ◽

Operational Costs ◽

Development Teams ◽

Infrastructure Project ◽

Data Ingestion ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) are two leading infrastructures serving the biodiversity community. In 2020, the ALA’s occurrence records management systems reached end of life after more than 10 years of operation, and the ALA embarked on a project to replace them. Significant overlap exists in the function of the ALA and GBIF data ingestion pipeline systems. Instead of the ALA developing new systems from scratch, we initiated a project to better align the two infrastructures. The collaboration brings benefits such as the improved reuse of modules and an overall reduction in development and operation costs. The ALA recently replaced its occurrence ingestion system with GBIF pipelines infrastructure and shared code. This is the first milestone of the broader ALA’s Core Infrastructure Project and some of the benefits from it are a more reliable, performant and scalable system, proven by the ability to ingest more and larger datasets while at the same time reducing infrastructure operational costs by more than 40% compared to the previous system. The new system is a key building block for an improved ingestion framework that is being developed within the ALA. The collaboration between the ALA and GBIF development teams will result in more consistent outputs from their respective processing pipelines. It will also allow the broader collective expertise of both infrastructure communities to inform future development and direction. The ALA’s adoption of GBIF pipelines will pave the way for the Living Atlases community to adopt GBIF systems and also contribute to them. In this talk we will introduce the project, share insights on how both the teams from the GBIF and the ALA worked together and finally we will delve into details about the technical implementation and benefits.

Download Full-text

The Living Atlases community in action: the GBIF Benin data portal

Biodiversity Information Science and Standards ◽

10.3897/biss.2.25488 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 ◽

pp. e25488

Author(s):

Anne-Sophie Archambeau ◽

Fabien Cavière ◽

Kourouma Koura ◽

Marie-Elise Lecoq ◽

Sophie Pamerlon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

African Country ◽

Biodiversity Data ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Capacity Enhancement ◽

Support Programme ◽

Data Portal ◽

Global Biodiversity ◽

The University ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) (https://www.ala.org.au/) is the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) node of Australia. They developed an open and free platform for sharing and exploring biodiversity data. All the modules are publicly available for reuse and customization on their GitHub account (https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia). GBIF Benin, hosted at the University of Abomey-Calavi, has published more than 338 000 occurrence records from 87 datasets and 2 checklists. Through the GBIF Capacity Enhancement Support Programme (https://www.gbif.org/programme/82219/capacity-enhancement-support-programme), GBIF Benin, with the help of GBIF France, is in the process of deploying the Beninese data portal using the GBIF France back-end architecture. GBIF Benin is the first African country to implement this module of the ALA infrastructure. In this presentation, we will show you an overview of the registry and the occurrence search engine using the Beninese data portal. We will begin with the administration interface and how to manage metadata, then we will continue with the user interface of the registry and how you can find Beninese occurrences through the hub.

Download Full-text

No one-size-fits-all solution to clean GBIF

10.1101/2020.03.12.974543 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexander Zizka ◽

Fernanda Antunes Carvalho ◽

Alice Calvente ◽

Mabel Rocio Baez-Lizarazo ◽

Andressa Cabral ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Urban Areas ◽

Geographic Area ◽

Strict Sense ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Marine Animals ◽

Conservation Assessments ◽

Richness Patterns ◽

Taxonomic Groups ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

ABSTRACTSpecies occurrence records provide the basis for many biodiversity studies. They derive from georeferenced specimens deposited in natural history collections and visual observations, such as those obtained through various mobile applications. Given the rapid increase in availability of such data, the control of quality and accuracy constitutes a particular concern. Automatic filtering is a scalable and reproducible means to identify potentially problematic records and tailor datasets from public databases such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; www.gbif.org), for biodiversity analyses. However, it is unclear how much data may be lost by filtering, whether the same filters should be applied across all taxonomic groups, and what the effect of filtering is on common downstream analyses. Here, we evaluate the effect of 13 recently proposed filters on the inference of species richness patterns and automated conservation assessments for 18 Neotropical taxa, including terrestrial and marine animals, fungi, and plants downloaded from GBIF. We find that a total of 44.3% of the records are potentially problematic, with large variation across taxonomic groups (25 - 90%). A small fraction of records was identified as erroneous in the strict sense (4.2%), and a much larger proportion as unfit for most downstream analyses (41.7%). Filters of duplicated information, collection year, and basis of record, as well as coordinates in urban areas, or for terrestrial taxa in the sea or marine taxa on land, have the greatest effect. Automated filtering can help in identifying problematic records, but requires customization of which tests and thresholds should be applied to the taxonomic group and geographic area under focus. Our results stress the importance of thorough recording and exploration of the meta-data associated with species records for biodiversity research.

Download Full-text

The Living Atlases Community in Action: Sharing Species Pages through the Atlas of Living Costa Rica

Biodiversity Information Science and Standards ◽

10.3897/biss.2.25990 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 ◽

pp. e25990 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Manuel Vargas ◽

María Mora ◽

William Ulate ◽

José Cuadra

Keyword(s):

Costa Rica ◽

Conservation Status ◽

Biological Species ◽

Costa Rican ◽

Biodiversity Informatics ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Data Portal ◽

Access To Data ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

The Atlas of Living Costa Rica (http://www.crbio.cr/) is a biodiversity data portal, based on the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), which provides integrated, free, and open access to data and information about Costa Rican biodiversity in order to support science, education, and conservation. It is managed by the Biodiversity Informatics Research Center (CRBio) and the National Biodiversity Institute (INBio). Currently, the Atlas of Living Costa Rica includes nearly 8 million georeferenced species occurrence records, mediated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), which come from more than 900 databases and have been published by research centers in 36 countries. Half of those records are published by Costa Rican institutions. In addition, CRBio is making a special effort to enrich and share more than 5000 species pages, developed by INBio, about Costa Rican vertebrates, arthropods, molluscs, nematodes, plants and fungi. These pages contain information elements pertaining to, for instance, morphological descriptions, distribution, habitat, conservation status, management, nomenclature and multimedia. This effort is aligned with collaboration established by Costa Rica with other countries such as Spain, Mexico, Colombia and Brazil to standarize this type of information through Plinian Core (https://github.com/PlinianCore), a set of vocabulary terms that can be used to describe different aspects of biological species. The Biodiversity Information Explorer (BIE) is one of the modules made available by ALA which indexes taxonomic and species content and provides a search interface for it. We will present how CRBio is implementing BIE as part of the Atlas of Living Costa Rica in order to share all the information elements contained in the Costa Rican species pages.

Download Full-text

No one-size-fits-all solution to clean GBIF

PeerJ ◽

10.7717/peerj.9916 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. e9916

Author(s):

Alexander Zizka ◽

Fernanda Antunes Carvalho ◽

Alice Calvente ◽

Mabel Rocio Baez-Lizarazo ◽

Andressa Cabral ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Urban Areas ◽

Geographic Area ◽

Strict Sense ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Marine Animals ◽

Conservation Assessments ◽

Richness Patterns ◽

Taxonomic Groups ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

Species occurrence records provide the basis for many biodiversity studies. They derive from georeferenced specimens deposited in natural history collections and visual observations, such as those obtained through various mobile applications. Given the rapid increase in availability of such data, the control of quality and accuracy constitutes a particular concern. Automatic filtering is a scalable and reproducible means to identify potentially problematic records and tailor datasets from public databases such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; http://www.gbif.org), for biodiversity analyses. However, it is unclear how much data may be lost by filtering, whether the same filters should be applied across all taxonomic groups, and what the effect of filtering is on common downstream analyses. Here, we evaluate the effect of 13 recently proposed filters on the inference of species richness patterns and automated conservation assessments for 18 Neotropical taxa, including terrestrial and marine animals, fungi, and plants downloaded from GBIF. We find that a total of 44.3% of the records are potentially problematic, with large variation across taxonomic groups (25–90%). A small fraction of records was identified as erroneous in the strict sense (4.2%), and a much larger proportion as unfit for most downstream analyses (41.7%). Filters of duplicated information, collection year, and basis of record, as well as coordinates in urban areas, or for terrestrial taxa in the sea or marine taxa on land, have the greatest effect. Automated filtering can help in identifying problematic records, but requires customization of which tests and thresholds should be applied to the taxonomic group and geographic area under focus. Our results stress the importance of thorough recording and exploration of the meta-data associated with species records for biodiversity research.

Download Full-text

Aligning GBIF.org and the Atlas of Living Australia

Biodiversity Information Science and Standards ◽

10.3897/biss.3.35867 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 ◽

Author(s):

Tim Robertson ◽

David Martin ◽

Nick dos Remedios

Keyword(s):

Data Publishing ◽

Data Handling ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Occurrence Data ◽

Data Pipeline ◽

The Future ◽

Global Biodiversity ◽

Publishing Community ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Occurrence Records

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) are two well-connected leading infrastructures serving the biodiversity community. As the national node for GBIF, the ALA serves to provide rich, localized services for the community of users in Australia and also acts as the gateway for datasets being shared internationally on GBIF.org. While these explorations target collaboration initially with Australia, we anticipate this may be of interest to other adopters of the Living Atlas platform in the future. We will give an update of the state of progress to date, along with lessons learnt and summarise a roadmap for the future. Recognising that significant overlap exists in the function of the systems, and that advancement in technology allows GBIF.org to offer more functionality, we have initiated a process of exploring better alignment of these infrastructures. Such a move is expected to bring the benefits of consistent data handling, improved citation tracking, coordinated deployment of new features across the entire data publishing community, better reuse of modules and an overall reduction in cost of development, deployment and operation. Our initial areas of exploration focuses on two specific components which are common to most biodiversity portals: a registry of datasets and the indexing of occurrence data. Use of a common registry for organisations, collections, datasets and associated metadata will reduce the effort spent in curating content, while also improving consistency by removing the need for synchronisation. In addition, a revised data pipeline for the indexing of occurrence records that powers both GBIF.org and ALA is anticipated to accommodate features such as consistent flagging of data quality issues and standardised practice for citation and tracking citations.

Download Full-text

Contribution to a reference library of DNA barcodes of Colombian freshwater fishes

Biodiversity Data Journal ◽

10.3897/bdj.10.e65981 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 10 ◽

Author(s):

Manuela Mejía-Estrada ◽

Luz Fernanda Jiménez-Segura ◽

Marcela Hernández-Zapata ◽

Iván Soto Calderón

Keyword(s):

Dna Sequences ◽

Freshwater Fishes ◽

Dna Barcodes ◽

Global Biodiversity Information Facility ◽

Reference Collection ◽

Poecilia Sphenops ◽

The University ◽

Biodiversity Information ◽

Made In ◽

Occurrence Records

The Barcode of Life initiative was originally motivated by the large number of species, taxonomic difficulties and the limited number of expert taxonomists. Colombia has 1,610 freshwater fish species and comprises the second largest diversity of this group in the world. As genetic information continues to be limited, we constructed a reference collection of DNA sequences of Colombian freshwater fishes deposited in the Ichthyology Collection of the University of Antioquia (CIUA), thus joining the multiple efforts that have been made in the country to contribute to the knowledge of genetic diversity in order to strengthen the inventories of biological collections and facilitate the solution of taxonomic issues in the future. This study contributes to the knowledge on the DNA barcodes and occurrence records of 96 species of Colombian freshwater fishes. Fifty-seven of the species represented in this dataset were already available in the Barcode Of Life Data System (BOLD System), while 39 correspond to new species to the BOLD System. Forty-nine specimens were collected in the Atrato River Basin and 708 in the Magdalena-Cauca asin during the period 2010-2020. Two species (Loricariichthys brunneus (Hancock, 1828) and Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846) are considered exotic to the Atrato, Cauca and Magdalena Basins and four species (Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), Parachromis friedrichsthalii (Heckel, 1840) and Xiphophorus helleri Heckel, 1848) are exotic to the Colombian hydrogeographic regions. All specimens are deposited in CIUA and have their DNA barcodes made publicly available in the BOLD online database. The geographical distribution dataset can be freely accessed through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).

Download Full-text