scholarly journals Improving immunization practices in United States hospitals and health systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-211
Author(s):  
Wesley D. Kufel ◽  
Dennis M. Williams ◽  
David Jay Weber
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Immunization Rates ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Mandatory Vaccination

Purpose Payment for healthcare services in the USA has shifted from fee for service to compensation based on value and quality. The indicators used for payments are a variety of clinical measures, including administration of vaccines to patients. The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation of programs in health systems to improve vaccination rates and patient outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A search of the literature was conducted to find examples of vaccine programs in US health systems, and also to identify policies to improve immunization rates. Findings Successful programs for improving vaccination rates require advocacy and support of leadership, a systematic and multidisciplinary approach, and an evaluation of local resources and capacity. Numerous examples exist of medical, nursing, and pharmacy led programs that improve vaccination rates. The department in charge has relied on the support of other groups to ensure the success. Social implications Mandatory vaccination of healthcare personnel (HCP) in the health system has been a growing trend in the USA. Although there has been some resistance to mandatory vaccinations for HCP, the standards and requirements have resulted in improved rates in health systems, which ultimately improve efficiency and protects patients. Originality/value This review describes considerations for implementing a successful vaccination program in a health system and provides examples of specific strategies. An overview of mandatory vaccinations for HCP is also described.

scholarly journals Emerging challenges in the health systems of Kerala, India: qualitative analysis of literature reviews

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manesh Muraleedharan ◽  
Alaka Omprakash Chandak
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Vital Statistics ◽  
The State ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Health Seeking ◽  
Content Type

PurposeThe substantial increase in non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is considered a major threat to developing countries. According to various international organizations and researchers, Kerala is reputed to have the best health system in India. However, many economists and health-care experts have discussed the risks embedded in the asymmetrical developmental pattern of the state, considering its high health-care and human development index and low economic growth. This study, a scoping review, aims to explore four major health economic issues related to the Kerala health system.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review of the literature was performed using PRISMA to facilitate selection, sampling and analysis. Qualitative data were collected for thematic content analysis.FindingsChronic diseases in a significant proportion of the population, low compliance with emergency medical systems, high health-care costs and poor health insurance coverage were observed in the Kerala community.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study was undertaken to determine the scope for future research on Kerala's health system. Based on the study findings, a structured health economic survey is being conducted and is scheduled to be completed by 2021. In addition, the scope for future research on Kerala's health system includes: (1) research on pathways to address root causes of NCDs in the state, (2) determine socio-economic and health system factors that shape health-seeking behavior of the Kerala community, (3) evaluation of regional differences in health system performance within the state, (4) causes of high out-of-pocket expenditure within the state.Originality/valueGiven the internationally recognized standard of Kerala's vital statistics and health system, this review paper highlights some of the challenges encountered to elicit future research that contributes to the continuous development of health systems in Kerala.

The return on investment from international patient programs in American hospitals

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
Ishani Patel ◽  
Tricia J. Johnson ◽  
Andrew N. Garman ◽  
Samuel Hohmann ◽  
Paola Pescara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Business Case ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
International Programs ◽  
Operating Expense ◽  
Content Type ◽  
International Program ◽  
The Usa

Purpose Hospitals catering to the unique needs of international patients often make substantial investments in their international program. Research has yet to evaluate the return on investment (ROI) of establishing these programs. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the economic benefits and costs of international patient programs and evaluate the ROI of international patients for US hospitals by program maturity and size. Design/methodology/approach Operational information about 29 health systems with international patient programs in the USA was obtained from the US Cooperative for International Patient Programs (USCIPP) Annual Benchmarking Survey. A Spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the association between international program investments and revenue. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to test whether ROI differs significantly by program maturity and size. Findings It was found that 14 (48.3 per cent) international programs were established and 10 (34.5 per cent) programs were large in size. The median estimated organizational total gross revenue less operating expense for all programs was positive ($15.6m). Total gross revenue less operating expense was higher for large programs ($105.6m) than for small programs ($9.2m) (p < 0.001) and higher for established programs ($40.2m) than for new programs ($8.5m) (p < 0.001). Originality/value The results suggest that hospital investment in international programs yields substantial returns for the health systems studied. New programs rely on staff from other areas of the organization while developing operational processes and relationships with providers and payers abroad. Examining the ROI can help hospitals develop a business case for an international program and understand any economies of scale from increased investment.

Building a learning health system using clinical registers: a non-technical introduction

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1105-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ovretveit ◽  
Eugene Nelson ◽  
Brent James
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
Computer Literacy ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Unpublished Research

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how clinical registers were designed and used to serve multiple purposes in three health systems, in order to contribute practical experience for building learning healthcare systems. Design/methodology/approach Case description and comparison of the development and use of clinical registries, drawing on participants’ experience and published and unpublished research. Findings Clinical registers and new software systems enable fact-based decisions by patients, clinicians, and managers about better care, as well as new and more economical research. Designing systems to present the data for users’ daily work appears to be the key to effective use of the potential afforded by digital data. Research limitations/implications The case descriptions draw on the experience of the authors who were involved in the development of the registers, as well as on published and unpublished research. There is limited data about outcomes for patients or cost-effectiveness. Practical implications The cases show the significant investments which are needed to make effective use of clinical register data. There are limited skills to design and apply the digital systems to make the best use of the systems and to reduce their disadvantages. More use can be made of digital data for quality improvement, patient empowerment and support, and for research. Social implications Patients can use their data combined with other data to self-manage their chronic conditions. There are challenges in designing and using systems so that those with lower health and computer literacy and incomes also benefit from these systems, otherwise the digital revolution may increase health inequalities. Originality/value The paper shows three real examples of clinical registers which have been developed as part of their host health systems’ strategies to develop learning healthcare systems. The paper gives a simple non-technical introduction and overview for clinicians, managers, policy-advisors and improvers of what is possible and the challenges, and highlights the need to shape the design and implementation of digital infrastructures in healthcare services to serve users.

Voluntary to Mandatory: Evolution of Strategies and Attitudes toward Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Quan ◽  
David M. Tehrani ◽  
Linda Dickey ◽  
Eugene Spiritus ◽  
Denise Hizon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Vaccine Uptake ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Vaccination Policy ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Hospital Policies ◽  
Mandatory Vaccination ◽  
Vaccination Campaigns ◽  
The Impact

Background.Assessing the relative success of serial strategies for increasing healthcare personnel (HCP) influenza vaccination rates is important to guide hospital policies to increase vaccine uptake.Objective.To evaluate serial campaigns that include a mandatory HCP vaccination policy and to describe HCP attitudes toward vaccination and reasons for declination.Design.Retrospective cohort study.Methods.We assessed the impact of serial vaccination campaigns on the proportions of HCP who received influenza vaccination during die 2006–2011 influenza seasons. In addition, declination data over these 5 seasons and a 2007 survey of HCP attitudes toward vaccination were collected.Results.HCP influenza vaccination rates increased from 44.0% (2,863 of 6,510 HCP) to 62.9% (4,037 of 6,414 HCP) after institution of mobile carts, mandatory declination, and peer-to-peer vaccination efforts. Despite maximal attempts to improve accessibility and convenience, 27.2% (66 of 243) of die surveyed HCP were unwilling to wait more than 10 minutes for a free influenza vaccination, and 23.3% (55 of 236) would be indifferent if they were unable to be vaccinated. In this context, institution of a mandatory vaccination campaign requiring unvaccinated HCP to mask during the influenza season increased rates of compliance to over 90% and markedly reduced the proportion of HCP who declined vaccination as a result of preference.Conclusions.A mandatory influenza vaccination program for HCP was essential to achieving high vaccination rates, despite years of intensive vaccination campaigns focused on increasing accessibility and convenience. Mandatory vaccination policies appear to successfully capture a large portion of HCP who are not opposed to receipt of die vaccine but who have not made vaccination a priority.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):63-70

scholarly journals Mandatory HPV Vaccination; Opportunity to Save Lives, Improve Readiness and Cut Costs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin A Sitler ◽  
Larissa F Weir ◽  
Erin A Keyser ◽  
Yovanni Casablanca ◽  
Erica Hope
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Hpv Vaccination ◽  
Active Duty ◽  
Service Members ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Vaccination Programs ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Mandatory Vaccination ◽  
The U.S

ABSTRACT Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the U.S. military and accounts for more healthcare visits than the next two most common STIs combined. Human papillomavirus is preventable with a safe, effective, prophylactic vaccine that has been available since 2006, yet vaccination rates remain low. The vaccine is approved for females and males aged 9-45 years for prevention of HPV-related dysplasia and cancers. Although it is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), it is not part of the U.S. military’s mandatory vaccine list. Human papillomavirus does not just affect female service members—male service members have a higher reported seropositive rate than their civilian counterparts and can develop oropharyngeal, anal, or penile cancers as sequelae of HPV. Oropharyngeal cancer, more common in males, is the fastest growing and most prevalent HPV-related cancer in the USA. Several countries, such as Australia and Sweden, have successfully implemented mandatory vaccine programs and have seen rates of HPV-related diseases, including cancer, decline significantly. Some models project that cervical cancer, which is the fifth-most common cancer in active duty women, will be eliminated in the next 20 years as a result of mandatory vaccination programs. Between higher seropositive rates and lack of widespread vaccination, HPV dysplasia and cancer result in lost work time, decreased force readiness, negative monetary implications, and even separation from service. With more than half of the 1.3 million service members in the catch-up vaccination age range of less than 26 years of age, we are poised to have a profound impact through mandatory active duty service member vaccination. Although multiple strategies for improving vaccination rates have been proposed, mandatory vaccination would be in line with current joint service policy that requires all ACIP-recommended vaccines. It is time to update the joint service guidelines and add HPV vaccine to the list of mandatory vaccines.

scholarly journals ANMCO POSITION PAPER: The reorganization of cardiology in times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_C) ◽  
pp. C154-C163
Author(s):  
Pasquale Caldarola ◽  
Adriano Murrone ◽  
Loris Roncon ◽  
Giuseppe Di Pasquale ◽  
Luigi Tavazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
System Organization ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Position Paper ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Local Health ◽  
New Models ◽  
Acute Wards

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented event that has brought deep changes in hospital facilities with reshaping of the health system organization, revealing inadequacies of current hospital and local health systems. When the COVID-19 emergency will end, further evaluation of the national health system, new organization of acute wards, and a further evolution of the entire health system will be needed to improve care during the chronic phase of disease. Therefore, new standards for healthcare personnel, more efficient organization of hospital facilities for patients with acute illnesses, improvement of technological approaches, and better integration between hospital and territorial services should be pursued. With experience derived from the COVID-19 pandemic,new models, paradigms, interventional approaches, values and priorities should be suggested and implemented.

Privatization and school mental health

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Weist ◽  
Kathleen Blackburn Franke ◽  
Rob Lucio ◽  
Jefferson Bass ◽  
Terry Doan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
School Mental Health ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Usa ◽  
General Funding

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the relationship between privatization and school mental health (SMH) in the USA, as well as to present a case study of the SMH system in South Carolina. Design/methodology/approach The authors reviewed data regarding states’ mental health systems (e.g. public, private and hybrid of public and private), mental health budgets and percentages of schools with mental health clinicians. Findings The results demonstrate that the majority of states have public mental health systems. There is variability between states regarding general funding, as well as funding for SMH. Further, there was variability in the percentage of schools with SMH clinicians, with South Carolina reporting the greatest percentage. South Carolina’s mental health system, which is a public–private hybrid is reviewed, along with relevant history on the development of SMH programs in the state. Originality/value This paper contributes to the general knowledge by describing the provision and funding sources for SMH services within the USA. It yields important implications for integrating public mental health services within schools.

Why telehealth does not always save money for the health system

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Centaine L. Snoswell ◽  
Monica L. Taylor ◽  
Liam J. Caffery
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Frequency Of Contact ◽  
Traditional Service ◽  
Implementation Costs

PurposeThis study aims to determine elements of telehealth that have the potential to increase costs for the health system in the short to medium term.Design/methodology/approachA search of PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases was performed in May 2018 using broad terms for telehealth and economics. Articles were included if they identified and explained reasons for an increase in cost for telehealth services. Studies were categorised by economic analysis type for data extraction and descriptive synthesis.FindingsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies identified that increased health system costs were due to implementation costs (e.g. for equipment, software or staff training), increased use of other healthcare services (e.g. pharmaceutical services) and ongoing service costs (including staff salaries) resulting from telehealth being additive to traditional service (e.g. increased frequency of contact).Originality/valueTelehealth is often assumed to be a cost-effective method of delivering healthcare, even to the point where direct cost savings are expected by decision makers as a result of implementation. However, this investigation suggests it does not routinely reduce costs for the health system and can actually increase costs at both implementation and ongoing service delivery stages. Health services considering implementing telehealth should be motivated by benefits other than cost reduction such as improved accessibility, greater patient centricity and societal cost–benefit.

Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle da Costa Leite Borges ◽  
Caterina Francesca Guidi
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
National Health ◽  
Universal Access ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Access To Healthcare ◽  
Health Policies ◽  
Undocumented Migrants ◽  
Content Type ◽  
British Health

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants? Findings By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former. Originality/value The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.

Factorial Design for Improving Influenza Vaccination Among Employees of a Large Health System

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 691-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Kent Zimmerman ◽  
Mary Patricia Nowalk ◽  
Chyongchiou J. Lin ◽  
Mahlon Raymund ◽  
Dwight E. Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Health System ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Administrative Positions ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Contact Rates ◽  
Acute Care Facilities

Objective.As healthcare personnel (HCP) influenza vaccination becomes a quality indicator for healthcare facilities, effective inter¬ventions are needed. This study was designed to test a factorial design to improve HCP vaccination rates.Design.A before-after trial with education, publicity, and free and easily accessible influenza vaccines used a factorial design to determine the effect of mobile vaccination carts and incentives on vaccination rates of HCP, who were divided into groups on the basis of their level of patient contact (ie, business and/or administrative role, indirect patient contact, and direct patient contact).Setting.Eleven acute care facilities in a large health system.Participants.More than 26,000 nonphysician employees.Results.Influenza vaccination rates increased significantly in most facilities and increased system-wide from 32.4% to 39.6% (P < .001). In the baseline year, business unit employee vaccination rates were significantly higher than among HCP with patient contact; rates did not differ significantly across groups in the intervention year. In logistic regression that accounted for demographic characteristics, intervention year, and other factors, the use of incentives and/or mobile carts that provided access to vaccine at the work unit significantly increased the likelihood of vaccination among HCP with direct and indirect patient contact, compared with control sites.Conclusions.Interventions to improve vaccination rates are differentially effective among HCP with varying levels of patient contact. Mobile carts appear to remove access barriers, whereas incentives may motivate HCP to be vaccinated. Education and publicity may be sufficient for workers in business or administrative positions. Interventions tailored by worker type are likely to be most successful for improving HCP vaccination rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document