US manufacturing slump will hinder growth into 2016

Subject Outlook for US manufacturing. Significance Decline in the US manufacturing sector has dampened the country's broader recovery from the 2007-09 recession and has significant regional implications for growth and employment. The political clout of manufacturers and their affiliated labour unions will play a significant role in the US domestic debate surrounding ratification of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact. Impacts Faltering manufacturing production, high inventory levels and a deteriorating merchandise trade deficit will likely slow US economic growth. Consumer durables, automotive products and capital goods will benefit from low interest rates, but face competition from cheaper imports. Deteriorating profit margins will reduce industrial investment as well as overall levels of employment in manufacturing. The decline in US manufacturing will boost protectionist voices in Congress and politically bolsters TPP opponents.

Subject Modelling lower rates for longer. Significance The ‘secular stagnation' thesis argues that as population growth slows, the need of businesses to invest in plant and equipment slows and the supply of funds from households grows as they save more, putting downward pressure on interest rates. New research attempts to quantify this hypothesis and to show what it would take to go back to 'normal'. Impacts 'Forward guidance' will be of little use if there is a recession as there would be no reason to expect an increase in policy rates. Asset bubbles would likely be a feature of any sustained non-fiscal effort to engineer a deeply negative real interest rate. The US trade deficit, usually a welcome source of lower rates, will in this context exacerbate the zero-lower-bound issue in a recession.


Subject Impact of the oil price drop on energy high-yield bonds. Significance The over 50% oil price drop since June 2014 is hitting bonds issued by energy companies, particularly those issued by sub-investment grade corporates. The US high-yield bond market has been growing rapidly over the past five years. The shale boom has generated considerable investment, mainly funded through the issuance of these bonds which benefit from historically low interest rates. As the oil price has plunged, the spread over Treasury yields paid by the average issuer in the energy subsector has more than doubled between July and the December 2014 peak. Impacts Yields currently offered by the energy subsector are not far from pricing in a default scenario. Persistently low oil prices will further darken the outlook for the energy subsector and the high-yield market generally. A possible default cycle in the energy sector could accelerate outflows, overstretching the sector further.


Significance Spending on infrastructure and populist social policies signed into law ahead of the May midterm elections are putting pressure on the Philippine budget. Impacts More expensive social policies are likely before the 2022 presidential election. Further taxes will likely prompt popular protests targeting the government. The US-China trade conflict and changing Chinese consumption patterns could further dampen exports. A rice tariff law signed into law last month will likely boost agricultural imports. The widening trade deficit will put downward pressure on the peso and upward pressure on interest rates.


Significance With an election due soon, the governing Liberal-National Coalition’s pledge to ring-fence the defence spending commitments made in 2016 was under some pressure. However, defence spending in fiscal year 2021/22 will grow by over 4% in real terms and stay above the symbolic level of 2% of GDP. Impacts Growing popular and bipartisan concern with Chinese aggression is a conducive environment for increased defence spending. Low interest rates and a stronger Australian dollar are also supporting sustained levels of defence expenditure. Washington may increase pressure on Australia to conduct freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea. Major business groups are concerned that increased criticism of China in national politics will produce yet more punitive backlash.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olli-Pekka Hilmola ◽  
Weidong Li ◽  
Andres Tolli

PurposeFor decades, it was emphasized that manufacturing and trading companies should aim to be lean with very small inventories. However, in the recent decade, time-significant change has taken place as nearly all of the “old west” countries have now low interest rates. Holding inventories have been beneficial for the sake of customer service and for achieving savings in transportation and fixed ordering costs.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, inventory management change is examined in publicly traded manufacturing and trade companies of Finland and three Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) during the years 2010–2018.FindingsInventory efficiency has been leveled off or falling in these countries and mostly declining development has concerned small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It is also found that inventory efficiency is in general lower in SMEs than in larger companies. Two companies sustaining in inventory efficiency are used as an example that lean has still significance, and higher inventories as well as lower inventory efficiency should not be the objective. Two companies show exemplary financial performance as well as shareholder value creation.Research limitations/implicationsWork concerns only four smaller countries, and this limits its generalization power. Research is one illustration what happens to private sector companies under low interest rate policies.Practical implicationsContinuous improvement of inventory efficiency becomes questionable in the light of current research and the low interest rate environment.Originality/valueThis is one of the seminal studies from inventory efficiency as the global financial crisis taken place in 2008–2009 and there is the implementation of low interest rates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendong Zhang ◽  
Kristine Tidgren

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the current farm economic downturn and credit restructuring by comparing it with the 1920s and 1980s farm crises from both economic and regulatory perspectives. Design/methodology/approach This paper closely compares critical economic and regulatory aspects of the current farm downturn with two previous farm crises in the 1920s and 1980s, and equally importantly, the golden eras that occurred before them. This study compares key aggregate statistics in land value, agricultural credit, lending regulations, and also evaluates the situations and impacts on individual farmer households by using three representative case studies. Findings The authors argue that there are at least three economic and regulatory reasons why the current farm downturn is unlikely to slide into a sudden collapse of the agricultural markets: strong, real income; growth in the 2000s, historically low interest rates; and more prudent agricultural lending practices. The current farm downturn is more likely a liquidity and working capital problem, as opposed to a solvency and balance sheet problem for the overall agricultural sector. The authors argue that the trajectory of the current farm downturn will likely be a gradual, drawn-out one like that of the 1920s farm crisis, as opposed to a sudden collapse as in the 1980s farm crisis. Originality/value The review provides empirical evidence for cautious optimism of the future trajectory of the current downturn, and argues that the current downturn is much more similar to the 1920s pattern than the 1980s crisis.


Significance The CBRT is expected to respond at its regular monthly interest rate-setting meeting to the fall in inflation in January to 7.2%. However, while the nearly 50% slide in oil prices since last June has led to a sharp decline in headline consumer prices, core inflation has been hovering near 9% for the last four months -- significantly above the CBRT's 5% inflation target. Just as importantly, Turkey's currency has fallen to a record low against the dollar, losing 7% over the past month because of the increasing politicisation of Turkish monetary policy and mounting expectations that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) will begin hiking interest rates as early as June, putting Turkish assets under renewed strain. Impacts CBRT independence is becoming one of the main focal points for market concern about emerging markets. Heavy reliance on external sources of finance will leave Turkey highly sensitive to resurgent dollar and increased US Treasury yields. Renewed lira weakness is likely to persist in the run-up to elections in June, which could also coincide with rising US interest rates. That would put further pressure on the balance sheets of Turkey's heavily indebted corporate sector.


Significance This volatility is driven by expectations of further monetary stimulus in response to a slowing economy. Despite persistent concerns about the fallout from the anticipated tightening in US monetary policy and many country-specific risks, such as the standoff between Greece and its creditors, equity market sentiment remains supported by accommodative monetary policies worldwide and expectations of the US monetary policy tightening being gradual. Impacts Market volatility could increase further, as better-than-expected economic data in the euro-area vies with weaker-than-anticipated US data. Decoupling of surging equity prices and weak economic fundamentals threatens the rally's sustainability, increasing scope for volatility. This decoupling is most pronounced in China, where weak economic data prompt buying of equities in anticipation of stimulus measures. The greatest risk in equity markets is uncertainty surrounding US interest rates and their impact on emerging markets.


Subject Exposure to US final demand. Significance The Commerce Department reported on March 7 that the US goods trade deficit widened to 69.7 billion dollars in January after a five-year high of 4% of GDP last year. The new administration has threatened to build a wall along the Mexican border, impose punitive tariffs on countries it runs a goods deficit with and label China a currency manipulator. Other countries also rely on US demand -- through goods and services trade, investment and remittances. Impacts In the unlikely event that Trump follows through on all his most extreme trade threats, the world could plunge into recession. Evidence does not support the new administration's view that free trade has damaged the US economy and the fortunes of its workforce. The WTO is reviewing several cases the previous US administration began against China -- extreme escalation could trigger US WTO withdrawal. Germany is the only G7 country that the United States runs both a goods and services trade deficit with, placing it in the firing line.


Subject Trends in the securitisation market. Significance Investment in securitised assets fell after the financial crisis due to the role played by mortgage-backed securities as well as investor concerns about sparse data and complexity. The search for yield in a world of low interest rates has drawn investors back to securitised investment, particularly in aircraft-backed securities and rental property portfolios. Specific investor concerns have been dealt with, raising confidence, and the sector is meeting the financing shortfall arising from the pressure that traditional lenders have been under since the crisis. Impacts US-based securitisations are likely to become more available to European institutional investors if, as expected, regulation increases. The new US administration is expected to bring in measures to improve the business climate and may reduce regulation. The uptake of aircraft-backed securities will increase, but regulatory bias means that demand will still be dominated by pension funds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document