Internet Governance and the Internet Governance Forum Redux

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinton G. Cerf
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
N. S. FILATOV ◽  

The article is devoted to the study of the concept of the Internet governance model with the participation of stakeholders and its impact on business in regions and countries, as well as to the discussion of sustainable development goals related to Internet governance. Examples of how enterprises suffer from state management methods in this area are presented.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
Park Y. J.

Most stakeholders from Asia have not actively participated in the global Internet governance debate. This debate has been shaped by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers(ICANN) since 198 and the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) since 2006. Neither ICANN nor IGF are well received as global public policy negotiation platforms by stakeholders in Asia, but more and more stakeholders in Europe and the United States take both platforms seriously. Stakeholders in Internet governance come from the private sector and civil society as well as the public sector.


Author(s):  
Luísa Cruz Lobato

El artículo analiza la estructuración de la política de ciberseguridad de Brasil entre los años de 2003 y 2016 como componente de su estrategia de inserción internacional y proyección de liderazgo en el Sul Global. El campo de la gobernanza de la Internet, de lo cual la ciberseguridad es parte, ofrece al país una oportunidad de relativo bajo costo de protagonismo en la elaboración de normas internacionales. Analizase documentos principales de esa política y argumentase que ella es parte de los esfuerzos de proyección del soft power del país en el campo de la seguridad internacional, pero que sus incoherencias pueden afectar y hasta mismo comprometer esta estrategia. Por fin, trazase breves proyecciones para esta política ante los cambios políticos en Brasil.AbstractThe article analyzes the structuration of Brazil’s cybersecurity policy between the years of 2003 and 2016 as a component of its strategy of international insertion and projection of leadership in the Global South. The Internet governance field, of which cybersecurity is a part, offers the country a relatively low-cost opportunity of protagonism in the elaboration of international norms. It analyzes cornerstone documents of this policy and argues that it is a part of the country’s efforts to project its soft power in the field of international security, but that its incoherencies can affect and even compromise the strategy. Finally, it draws brief projections to this policy in face of political changes in Brazil. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 0-0

The purpose of this study is to reveal the dark side the Internet and establish a hierarchical framework to provide its governance path based on users' negative psychology. However, this hierarchical framework must consider unnecessary attributes and the interrelationships between the aspects and the criteria. Hence, fuzzy set theory is used for screening out the unnecessary attributes, a decision-making and trial evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is proposed to manage the complex interrelationships among the aspects and attributes, and interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is used to divide the hierarchy and construct a hierarchical theoretical framework. The results show that: (1) the institutional system is the driver of Internet governance improvement (2) personal values are the last link in the governance process (3) the governance transition from institutional system to values must cross the barriers of ethics and technology. This paper proposes a more systematic and integrated hierarchical framework which provides theoretical guidance to govern the dark side of the Internet.


2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Irfan Djamzuri ◽  
Agung Putra Mulyana

Netflix sebagai salah satu media layanan streaming video film dan serial televisi dunia memberikan dampak kepada budaya perfilman umat manusia. Menurut penelitian yang diterbitkan oleh Media Partners Asia (MPA) Mempublikasi bahwa platform video premium, seperti Netflix, Viu, WeTV, iQIYI dan Vidio mendapatkan 10% share/bagian dari Share Of Video Streaming Minutes In SEA di Q1 2021 (triwulan 1 tahun 2021). Dari Share Premium Video Streaming in SEA, Netflix telah memimpin konsumsi video premium dengan pangsa 40%, didorong oleh luas daya tarik katalog internasionalnya. Besarnya pemanfaatan Netflix yang begitu masif dan eskalatif di Indonesia, telah diantisipasi oleh Kementerian Kominfo sebagai perpanjangan dari regulator/ pemerintah RI. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif tentang konsep Etika maya/ cyber-ethics. Peneliti mencoba memahami Netflix sebagai entitas bentuk platform film Menggunakan penjelasan Richard A. Spinello mengenai Etika Maya (cyber-ethics) dan argumen Richard A. Spinello terkait Governing and Regulating the Internet yang dipubikasikan pada Artikel ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society tahun 2000 dengan judul Excerpt from CyberEthics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. Film dan Televisi dapat dibahas dari berbagai aspek. Dalam konteks di Indonesia, regulasi yang dihasilkan untuk mengatur Film dan Televisi, yaitu lahirnya Undang-Undang Penyiaran No.32 Tahun 2002 dan Undang-Undang No. 33 Perfilman Tahun 2009. Netflix merupakan Platform Premium Video Streaming terindikasi mengandung unsur ponografi, SARA, LGBT, dan sadisme. Namun Netflix tidak bisa diregulasi oleh Undang-Undang Penyiaran No.32 Tahun 2002 dan Undang-Undang No. 33 Perfilman Tahun 2009. Tetapi  menggunakan UU Nomor 36 Tahun 1999 tentang Telekomunikasi. Secara Regulasi netflix harus tunduk dengan aturan UU Telekomunikasi. Pemahaman cyber-ethics menjadi pembahasan yang penting dan harus mampu mengkaji perilaku yang sesuai moral, hukum, dan isu-isu sosial sebagai alat interaksi antar manusia. Berdasarkan Excerpt From CyberEthics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace ada solusi yang ditawarkan oleh Richard A. Spinello (2014) adalah Internet Governance/ Tata Kelola Internet. Selain melakukan Direct State Intervention, negara juga bisa membuat literasi terhadap membangun kesadaran cyber-ethics. Pemahaman Cyber-ethics dapat ditumbuhkan dengan memahami cyber wellness


Iuris Dictio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Fernando Aguiar Lozano

The present paper analyzes the right to privacy in the context of the Internet. The multi-stake- holder initiatives are an alternative that has already provided a regulatory structure on various aspects of the Internet, be it security, free flow of information or online privacy. Although there are elements that make it not a total solution, this paper analyzes some reasons why online privacy should be regulated by mechanisms of Internet Governance and by entities that do not respond only to governments or only to private firms. In this work, a general look at this alternative is given, without neglecting other approaches that should be applied to the topic of online privacy.


Author(s):  
Matthias C. Kettemann

Chapter 5 shows the potential of theoretical approaches to solving the normative crisis on the internet. In turn, key theories of order in the broader sense are presented and discussed. Though the majority of these theories were not posited with a view to the internet, the present study draws from their epistemic potential for the regulation of the internet. Theories (and key representatives of that theory) include systems theory (Luhmann/Teubner), constitutionalization/global constitutionalism (Pernice), transnationalism (Viellechner, Calliess), legal pluralism (Seinecke), multinormativity (Forst), network theory (Vesting), interoperability theory (Palfrey, Gasser, Weber), massive online micro justice (De Werra), conflict studies (Mueller), and infrastructuralization (DeNardis). Further, the study assesses the historically sedimented discourses on internet governance and their influence on ordering the internet as well as more recent attempts to “define online norms.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document