GNSS-receivers Carrier Phase Calibration

Author(s):  
Dmitry Pecheritsa ◽  
Svyatoslav Burtsev ◽  
Anatoly Frolov ◽  
Vyacheslav Fedotov
Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Kersten ◽  
Jens-André Paffenholz

Various GNSS applications require low-cost, small-scale, lightweight and power-saving GNSS devices and require high precision in terms of low noise for carrier phase and code observations. Applications vary from navigation approaches to positioning in geo-monitoring units up to integration in multi-sensor-systems. For highest precision, only GNSS receivers are suitable that provide access to raw data such as carrier phase, code ranges, Doppler and signal strength. A system integration is only possible if the overall noise level is known and quantified at the level of the original observations. A benchmark analysis based on a zero baseline is proposed to quantify the stochastic properties. The performance of the consumer grade GNSS receiver is determined and evaluated against geodetic GNSS receivers to better understand the utilization of consumer grade receivers. Results indicate high similarity to the geodetic receiver, even though technical limitations are present. Various stochastic techniques report normally distributed carrier-phase noise of 2 mm and code-range noise of 0.5–0.8 m. This is confirmed by studying the modified Allan standard deviation and code-minus-carrier combinations. Derived parameters serve as important indicators for the integration of GNSS receivers into multi-sensor-systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. Curran

Examining the performance of the GNSS PLL, this paper presents novel results describing the statistical properties of four popular phase estimators under both strong- and weak-signal conditions when subject to thermal noise, deterministic dynamics, and typical pedestrian motion. Design routines are developed which employ these results to enhance weak-signal performance of the PLL in terms of transient response, steady-state errors, and cycle-slips. By examining both single and data-pilot signals, it is shown that appropriate design and tuning of the PLL can significantly enhance tracking performance, in particular when used for pedestrian applications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yuchen Xie ◽  
Zhengrong Li ◽  
Feiqiang Chen ◽  
Huaming Chen ◽  
Feixue Wang

The antenna array technology, especially the spaced-time array processing (STAP), is one of the effective methods used in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers to refrain the power of jamming and enhance the performance of receivers in the circumstance of interference. However, biases induced to the receiver because of many reasons, including characteristic of antennas, front-end channel electronics, and space-time filtering, are extremely harmful to the high precise positioning of receivers. Although plenty of works have been done to calibrate the antenna and to mitigate these biases, achieving a good performance of antijamming, high accuracy, and low complexity at the same time still remains challenging. Different from existing works, this paper leverages the characteristic of GNSS signal’s Doppler frequency in STAP, which is proven to remain unbiased to solve the problem, even when the nonideal antennas are used and the interference circumstance changes. Since the integration of frequency is carrier phase, the unbiased Doppler frequency leads to an accurate estimation of carrier phase which can be used to calibrate the antenna array without extra apparatus or complicating algorithms. Therefore, a simple Doppler-aid strategy may be developed in the future to solve the difficulty of STAP bias mitigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 3268
Author(s):  
Vladislav Demyanov ◽  
Maria Sergeeva ◽  
Mark Fedorov ◽  
Tatiana Ishina ◽  
Victor Jose Gatica-Acevedo ◽  
...  

A Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is, to some extent, a “black box” when its data is used for ionospheric studies. Our results based on Javad, Septentrio, Trimble, and Leica GNSS receivers have proven that the accuracy of the slant Total Electron Content (TEC) calculation can differ significantly depending on the GNSS receiver type/model, because TEC measurements depend on the carrier phase tracking technique applied in a receiver. The correlation coefficient between carrier phase noise in L1 and L2 channels is considered as a possible indicator that shows if the L1-aided tracking technique or independent tracking is applied inside a receiver. An empirical model of the TEC noise component was provided to determine the TEC noise value in different types/models of GNSS receivers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gethin Wyn Roberts ◽  
Christopher J. Brown ◽  
Xu Tang ◽  
Xiaolin Meng ◽  
Oluropo Ogundipe

AbstractThe first Bridge Monitoring surveying was carried out in 1996 by the authors, through attaching Ashtech ZXII GPS receivers onto the Humber Bridge’ parapet, and gathering and further analysing the resulting 1 Hz RTK GPS data. Various surveys have subsequently been conducted on the Humber Bridge, the Millennium Bridge, the Forth Road Bridge, the Severn Suspension Bridge and the Avonmouth Viaduct. These were all carried out using survey grade carrier phase/pseudorange GPS and later GNSS receivers. These receivers were primarily dual frequency receivers, but the work has also investigated the use of single frequency receivers, gathering data at 1 Hz, 10 Hz, 20 Hz and even 100 Hz. Various aspects of the research conducted are reported here, as well as the historical approach. Conclusions are shown in the paper, as well as lessons learnt during the development of this work. The results are compared to various models that exist of the bridges’ movements, and compare well. The results also illustrate that calculating the frequencies of the movements, as well as looking at the magnitudes of the movements, is an important aspect of this work. It is also shown that in instances where the magnitudes of the movements of the bridge under investigation are small, it is still possible to derive very accurate frequencies of the movements, in comparison to the existing models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 03005
Author(s):  
Jae Hee Noh ◽  
Sun Yong Lee ◽  
Deok Won Lim ◽  
Gwang Hee Jo ◽  
Jin Hyuk Lee ◽  
...  

In general, the satellite signal received by GNSS receivers has errors such as satellite clock error, orbit error, ionospheric delay and tropospheric delay. In environments where high positioning accuracy is required, these error factors can be eliminated by using relative positioning using code measurements with carrier phase measurements. If relative positioning is performed using carrier phase measurements, it is possible to have positioning accuracy of cm level. In this paper, we analyse the positioning accuracy of relative positioning using the L1 signal of GPS and BDS. For this study, we collect GPS and BDS signal using two low-cost receivers. We also designed a software-based platform to perform the relative positioning. Finally, we analyse relative positioning accuracy for GPS/BDS integrated system as well as relative positioning accuracy for GPS and BDS.


Navigation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER M. CHURCH ◽  
INDER J. GUPTA

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matej Bažec ◽  
Franc Dimc ◽  
Polona Pavlovčič-Prešeren

Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1/E1 frequency jammer. A suitable area for testing was established in Slovenia. Nine receivers from different manufacturers were under consideration in this study. While positioning, intentional 3-minute jammings were performed by a jammer that was located statically at different distances from receivers. Furthermore, kinematic disturbances were performed using a jammer placed in a vehicle that passed the testing area at various speeds. An analysis of different scenarios indicated that despite the use of an L1/E1 jammer, the GLONASS (Russian: Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) and Galileo signals were also affected, either due to the increased carrier-to-noise-ratio (C/N0) or, in the worst cases, by a loss-of-signal. A jammer could substantially affect the position, either with a lack of any practical solution or even with a wrong position. Maximal errors in the carrier-phase positions, which should be considered a concern for geodesy, differed by a few metres from the exact solution. The factor that completely disabled the signal reception was the proximity of a jammer, regardless of its static or kinematic mode.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Hadi Tabatabaee ◽  
Bahram Ravani

Reliable and accurate kinematic localization is becoming more important in autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) which need to precisely locate vehicles on roadways. Code-base undifferenced GNSS receivers provide rough position estimates with errors too large to be practical for such applications. Carrier-phase observations are able to provide sub-meter accuracies and have been receiving much attention in recent years. Iterative methods are commonly used for solving the double-difference equations and find the receiver co-ordinates. This paper presents a non-iterative method for solving double-differenced carrier phase observation equations and evaluates its effectiveness for kinematic localization for vehicle positioning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document