Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Radical Hysterectomy in FIGO Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer: Feasibility, Complications, and Clinical Outcome

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Fanfani ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Gabriella Ferrandina ◽  
Francesco Raspagliesi ◽  
Antonino Ditto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Objective:To demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of preoperative chemoradiation followed by radical surgery in a consecutive series of patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer.Methods:Between October 1997 and July 2007, 39 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB cervical cancer were consecutively staged and treated at the Catholic University of Rome and Campobasso and at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. Radical surgery was performed 5 to 6 weeks after the end of the cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation.Results:Clinical responses were observed in 35 patients (92.1%): 6 (15.8%) complete and 29 (76.3.8%) partial. Radical surgery was performed in 35 patients (89.7%). According to Chassagne classification, we observed 7 (20.0%) grade 3, 17 (48.6%) grade 2, and 28 (80%) grade 1 surgical complications. At pathological examination, 12 patients (34.3%) showed complete response, 7 patients (20.0%) had only a microscopic disease, 8 patients (22.8%) had a partial response, and the last 8 patients (22.8%) had no change in disease. We registered 11 (31.4%) operative and 4 (11.4%) early postoperative complications. Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 3-80 months). The percentages of 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 67.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Patients with complete response and microscopic disease showed better prognosis than patients with partial response and no change (3-year disease-free survival, 100% vs 31%; and 3-year overall survival, 100% vs 39%).Conclusions:Chemoradiation followed by radical hysterectomy could be administered in patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer with an acceptable rate of complications and with a survival outcome similar to that of chemoradiotherapy, allowing the assessment of pathological response with its implication on clinical outcomes.

PS02.115: PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION FOR PATIENTS WITH ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE DISTAL OESOPHAGUS IN AUSTRIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Oliver Koch ◽  
Andreas Tschoner ◽  
Richard Partl ◽  
Alexander Perathoner ◽  
Philipp Gehwolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
One Year ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus (AEG Type I) treated with perioperative chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Methods A retrospective analysis of eligible patients from four Austrian centers was conducted. All patients with AEG type I treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy (EOX-protocol) or chemoradiation (CROSS-protocol, or 5-FU/Cisplatin), followed by oesophagectomy were included in the study. Primary outcomes overall survival, and disease free survival as well as secondary outcomes, achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) or downstaging of T- or N-stage were analyzed. Primary outcomes were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier-method. Results Data of 117 patients were analyzed, 59 received chemoradiation (50/59 CROSS and 9/59 5-FU/Cisplatin) and 58 patients received perioperative chemotherapy (EOX). Complete data at time of submission were available in 40 patients in the chemoradiation group and in 37 patients in the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up time in the chemoradiation group was 13,0 months (CI 95%: 11,0–15,0) and in the chemotherapy group 45,0 months (CI 95%: 28,8–61,3). Overall survival rate in the EOX group after ½, 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 83%, 63% and 34%. So far long term data are not available after chemoradiation, after ½ year overall survival was 84% and after one year 60%. Disease free survival rate in the EOX group after ½, 1, 3 and 5 years was 91%, 81%, 54% and 32%, in the chemoradiation group after ½ and one year 80% and 50%. A significant difference was found in the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, it was achieved in 19% of patients after chemoradiation and in 3% after chemotherapy (P = 0000). Conclusion Concerning major response of the primary tumor there are clear advantages for chemoradiation. In regards to systemic tumor control there seems a tendency in favor for chemotherapy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002587
Author(s):  
Felix Boria ◽  
Luis Chiva ◽  
Vanna Zanagnolo ◽  
Denis Querleu ◽  
Nerea Martin-Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Early Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionComprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce.ObjectiveTo evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database.MethodsThe SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m2 (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0–84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation.ConclusionsIn this European cohort, the rate of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy is higher than for most similar patients reported in the literature. The majority of centers were already following the European recommendations even 5 years prior to the ESGO quality indicator implementations.

Burden of lymphatic disease predicts efficacy of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1355-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Bogani ◽  
Daniele Vinti ◽  
Ferdinando Murgia ◽  
Valentina Chiappa ◽  
Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

ObjectiveNodal involvement is one of the most important prognostic factors in cervical cancer patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic role in relation to the burden of nodal disease in stage IIICp cervical cancer.MethodsData on all consecutive patients diagnosed with cervical cancer undergoing primary surgery (radical hysterectomy plus lymphadenectomy) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy plus lymphadenectomy, between January 1980 and December 2017, were collected in a dedicated database. Exclusion criteria were: (1) consent withdrawal; (2) synchronous malignancies (within 5 years). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models.ResultsOverall, 177 (14.1%) of 1257 patients with cervical cancer were diagnosed with positive lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 58 (range 4–175) months, 66 (37.3%) and 37 (20.9%) patients developed recurrent disease and died of disease, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, positive para-aortic nodes (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.11; p=0.025) and the number of positive nodes (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11; p=0.002) correlated with worse disease-free survival. Furthermore, the number of positive nodes (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12; p=0.021) correlated with worse overall survival. Number of positive nodes (1, 2 or ≥3) strongly correlated with both disease-free survival (p<0.001, log-rank test) and overall survival (p=0.001, log-rank test). Focusing on patients receiving adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, the number of positive lymph nodes was associated with response to treatment (p<0.001). Median disease-free survival was 100, 42, and 12 months for patients with one, two, or three or more positive lymph node(s), respectively (p<0.001, log-rank test).ConclusionsIn stage IIICp cervical cancer, adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy provides adequate overall survival in patients diagnosed with only one metastatic node, while survival outcomes are poor in patients with two or more metastatic nodes. This highlights the need for innovative treatments in patients with a high burden of lymphatic disease.

Is Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery More Effective Than Radiation Therapy for Stage IIB Cervical Cancer?

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1303-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Woo Lee ◽  
Keun Ho Lee ◽  
Jung Won Lee ◽  
Sung Taek Park ◽  
Jong Sup Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

ObjectiveThe primary objective of the study was to compare the survival rate of patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with that of patients who had received radiation therapy for stage IIB cervical cancer. The secondary objective was to analyze the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological prognostic factors.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had received therapy for stage IIB cervical cancer. Based on the primary therapy, 192 patients were divided into 2 groups; patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n =103) underwent a type III radical hysterectomy after completion of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in the other group (n = 89) were treated with radiation alone or a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.ResultsAfter neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the level of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and parametrium involvement were significantly decreased. However, 90.3% of the patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy needed to have adjuvant therapy after radical surgery because of poor pathological prognostic factors. The rate of disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group for patients who were 60 years or older (P = 0.03). The rates of disease-free survival and overall survival for patients who had a good (complete or partial) response to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly higher than the rates for patients in the radiation therapy group.ConclusionsAlthough neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved pathological prognostic factors in patients with stage IIB cervical cancer, it was not sufficiently effective to decrease adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also did not improve the rate of patient survival compared to the rate of patient survival in the radiation therapy group.

Alternating cycles of combination chemotherapy for patients with recurrent Hodgkin's disease following radiotherapy. A prospectively randomized study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Vinciguerra ◽  
K J Propert ◽  
M Coleman ◽  
J R Anderson ◽  
L Stutzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group B ◽  
Leukemia Group ◽  
Disease Free

A randomized clinical trial of combination chemotherapy for patients who relapsed following primary radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease was conducted from 1975 to 1981 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB). One hundred thirteen patients were prospectively randomized to receive 12 cycles of either CVPP (CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone), ABOS (bleomycin, vincristine [Oncovin; Lilly, Indianapolis], doxorubicin [Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio], and streptozotocin), or alternating cycles of CVPP and ABOS. The median length of observation for patients in this report is 4 years. Toxicities of the three treatment programs were primarily hematologic. Frequencies of complete response were 72% for CVPP, 70% for ABOS, and 82% for CVPP/ABOS (P = .37). Females and patients who had nodular sclerosing disease at initial diagnosis had significantly higher complete response rates. The 5-year disease-free survival for the complete responders was 55%; the 5-year overall survival was 60%. There were no significant differences among the treatments on disease-free survival (P = .78) or overall survival (P = .18). Age under 40 years was the only significant positive prognostic factor for disease-free survival (P = .095) and overall survival (P = .003). This study demonstrates no statistically significant advantage for alternating cycles of combination chemotherapy in affecting complete response frequency, disease-free survival, or overall survival as compared with therapy with CVPP or ABOS alone. However, the power to detect differences in these outcome parameters is somewhat limited by the sample sizes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pelvic Irradiation With Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Irradiation for High-Risk Cervical Cancer: An Update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial (RTOG) 90-01

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia J. Eifel ◽  
Kathryn Winter ◽  
Mitchell Morris ◽  
Charles Levenback ◽  
Perry W. Grigsby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To report mature results of a randomized trial that compared extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil and cisplatin (CTRT) in women with locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Patients and Methods Four hundred three women with cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive either EFRT or CTRT. Patients were eligible if they had stage IIB to IVA disease, stage IB to IIA disease with a tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, or positive pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were stratified by stage and by method of lymph node evaluation. Results The median follow-up time for 228 surviving patients was 6.6 years. The overall survival rate for patients treated with CTRT was significantly greater than that for patients treated with EFRT (67% v 41% at 8 years; P < .0001). There was an overall reduction in the risk of disease recurrence of 51% (95% CI, 36% to 66%) for patients who received CTRT. Patients with stage IB to IIB disease who received CTRT had better overall and disease-free survival than those treated with EFRT (P < .0001); 116 patients with stage III to IVA disease had better disease-free survival (P = .05) and a trend toward better overall survival (P = .07) if they were randomly assigned to CTRT. The rate of serious late complications of treatment was similar for the two treatment arms. Conclusion Mature analysis confirms that the addition of fluorouracil and cisplatin to radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate of women with locally advanced cervical cancer without increasing the rate of late treatment-related side effects.

Radiotherapy Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Lymphoma Not Reached Complete Response.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5473-5473
Author(s):  
Naibai Chang ◽  
Xichun Gu ◽  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Jianping Wei ◽  
Shengming Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Objective: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy induces 50%–70% of CR in patients with lymphoma, but only 30%–40% of long-term disease-free survival. Salvage chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is required in patients with aggressive disease or never achieve CR with conventional chemotherapy,but the relapsed rate is still high. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiotherapy post autologous stem cell transplantation in such group of patients. Methods: 15 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation during 1992–1998 were enrolled in this study. Conditioning regimen was CBV (cyclophosphomide + carmustine + etoposide). Radiotherapy was started on day +50(31–90). All patients were followed up until January 2005. Kaplan-Mier survival analysis was made by using SPSS10.0 software. Results: There were 14 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 1 with Hodgkin disease enrolled. Male:female=11:4. Median age was 40 (30–64). At least 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy were given before transplantation. There were 3 patients in progression disease, 1 in stable disease, and 11 in partial remission before transplantation. Three patients received total lymph node irradiation (TLI). Seven patients received TBI(200cGY)+involved field irradiation therapy(IFIT). Five were treated with IFIT. All patients acheaved complete response(including 1 CRu) after radiotherapy. Three patients relapsed. One patient treated with TBI+IFIT relapsed at 6 months later. Two patients treated with IFIT relapsed at 8 and 36 months later respectively. The mean disease-free survival and overall survival were 10.84(SD1.37,95%CI) years and 11.89(SD1.35,95%CI) years respectively. The estimatrd 10-year disease-free survival and Overall survival were both 73%. One patient developed AML at 86 month. Grade III–IV hematologic toxicity was seen in 2 patients. Conclusions: Post ASCT radiotherapy is safe and tolerated. Relaps rate is low. Patients who received TLI or TBI+IFIT seem to have better outcome than that received IFIT only.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1143-1150
Author(s):  
Ting wen yi Hu ◽  
Yue Huang ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Dan Nie ◽  
Zhengyu Li
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionRecently, the safety of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer has been questioned. This study was designed to compare the disease-free survival and overall survival of abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsA total of 1065 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone abdominal/laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2016 in seven hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all patients. Patients with tumor size ≥2 cm and <2 cm were stratified and analyzed separately. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between matched groups. After confirming the normality by the Shapiro-Wilks test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the χ2 test were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.ResultsAfter matching, a total of 812 patients were included in the disease-free survival and overall survival analyses. In the entire cohort, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.73; p=0.048) but not overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.88; p=0.12) when compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy group. In patients with tumor size ≥2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.55; p=0.032) than the abdominal radical hysterectomy group, whereas no significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.83; p=0.10) was found. Additionally, in patients with tumor size <2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy groups had similar disease-free survival (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.16; p=0.59) and overall survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.13; p=0.53).ConclusionLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with inferior disease-free survival compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in the entire cohort, as well as in patients with tumor size ≥2 cm. For the surgical treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer, priority should be given to open abdominal radical hysterectomy.

scholarly journals Positive Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression Predicts Poor Treatment Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huang ◽  
Lu ◽  
Wang ◽  
Chen ◽  
Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is present in a subgroup of cancer patients who may be favorable targets for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. However, the significance of the PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains unclear. Methods: By means of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay, we evaluate the PD-L1 expression and its association with clinical outcome in 107 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Results: Patients with positive PD-L1 expression have significantly lower pathological complete response rates (13% versus 32%; P = 0.036) than those with negative PD-L1 expression. Univariate survival analysis found that positive PD-L1 expression were correlated with poor overall survival (P = 0.004) and inferior disease-free survival (P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, positive PD-L1 expression was independently associated with the absence of a pathologically complete response (P = 0.044, hazard ratio: 3.542), worse overall survival (P = 0.006, hazard ratio: 2.017), and inferior disease-free survival (P < 0.001, hazard ratio: 2.516). Conclusions: For patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, positive PD-L1 expression independently predicts the poor chemoradiotherapy response and worse treatment outcome. Thus, our data suggests that PD-L1 may be an influential biomarker for prognostic classification and for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Radiation with cisplatin or carboplatin for locally advanced cervix cancer: The experience of a tertiary cancer center.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15541-e15541
Author(s):  
George Au-Yeung ◽  
Linda R. Mileshkin ◽  
David Bernshaw ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan ◽  
Danny Rischin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Disease Free

e15541 Background: Definitive treatment with concurrent cisplatin and radiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The optimal management of patients with a contraindication to cisplatin has not been established. We conducted a retrospective audit of the impact of concurrent chemoradiation in a cohort of patients (pts) with locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: All pts with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation were entered into a prospective database. Information regarding their demographics, stage, histology, recurrence and survival were recorded. Pharmacy records were reviewed to determine concurrent chemotherapy use. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were disease free survival and rates of primary, nodal or distant failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, incorporating known prognostic factors of age, FIGO stage, uterine body involvement, tumour volume on MRI and nodal involvement. Results: 442 pts were treated from Jan 1996 to Feb 2011. Median age was 59 (range 22-94); 89% had squamous histology and 64% node-negative disease. 269 pts received cisplatin, 59 received carboplatin because of a contraindication to cisplatin and 114 received no concurrent chemotherapy (most prior to 1999). Overall survival adjusted for other prognostic factors was significantly improved with use of concurrent cisplatin compared to radiation alone (HR 0.53, p=0.001), as was disease free survival and the rate of distant failure. Use of concurrent carboplatin was not associated with any significant benefit compared to radiation alone in terms of overall survival or disease free survival on univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The results of this audit are consistent with the known significant survival benefit with concurrent cisplatin chemoradiation. However, there did not appear to be any significant benefit associated with concurrent carboplatin although there are potential confounding factors in this small cohort. The available evidence in the literature favors the use of non-platinum chemotherapy rather than carboplatin in pts with contraindications to cisplatin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document