Impact of centrifugation time and pneumatic tube transport on plasma concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants

Author(s):  
Emma Roginski ◽  
Peter H. Nissen ◽  
Johanne Andersen Hojbjerg ◽  
Erik Lerkevang Grove ◽  
Anne‐Mette Hvas
2020 ◽  
pp. 96-104
Author(s):  
E. V. Titaeva ◽  
A. B. Dobrovolsky

Introduction. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOC) therapy does not require alaboratory control; however, it may be required to determine the anticoagulationlevel to choose a treatment strategy if alarge bleeding is developing or emergency surgery is needed.The objective of this experimental study was to investigate the relationship between the residual factor Xa (FXa) activity, anti-Xa activity units oflow molecular weight heparins (LMWH), and the apixaban and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations in a chromogenic anti-Xa assay.Material and methods. Concentrated DOC solutions were prepared by extracting apixaban and rivaroxaban from crushed tablets using methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide, respectively. The resulting solutions were added to the donor plasma pool until final inhibitor concentrations are achieved in the range from 10 to 100 ng/ml plasma. Anti-Xa activity was determined using an STA-compact analyser and the Liquid anti-Xa reagent kit, an analysis protocol, and calibrators designed to control the LMWH therapy. The effect on the thrombin formation dynamics was investigated using the thrombin generation test (TGT) and the PPR reagent as a trigger (final concentrations of tissue factor are 5 pM, and those of phospholipids are 4 μM). TGT curves were analysed using the Thrombinoscope program.Results. It was shown that in the anti-Xa activity test version designed to control the LMWH therapy, there is a high correlation (R2 > 0.98) between thelogarithm of the residual factor Xa activity and the content of apixaban and rivaroxaban in the range from 10 to 80 ng/ml. Rivaroxaban shows about 1.5 times more anti-Xa activity than apixaban at equal concentrations. It was also shown that apixaban and rivaroxaban at doses equal both in concentration and in anti-Xa activity differ in their effect on the thrombin formation dynamics and thrombin inactivation in the TGT.Conclusion. In the LMWH anti-Xa activity test version, the measured range of apixaban and rivaroxaban includes 30 ng/ml and 50 ng/ ml concentrations taken as “cut-off points” to determine the treatment tactics in emergency cases. However, thelack of certified DOC calibratorslimits the use of this test in clinical practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Background The use of prothrombin complex concentrates and the role of plasma concentration of anticoagulants in the management of bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants are still debated. Our aim was to describe management strategies and outcomes of severe bleeding events in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of 732 patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban hospitalized for severe bleeding, included prospectively in the registry from June 2013 to November 2015. Results Bleeding was gastrointestinal or intracranial in 37% (212 of 732) and 24% (141 of 732) of the cases, respectively. Creatinine clearance was lower than 60 ml/min in 61% (449 of 732) of the cases. The plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulants was determined in 62% (452 of 732) of the cases and was lower than 50 ng/ml or higher than 400 ng/ml in 9.2% (41 of 452) and in 6.6% (30 of 452) of the cases, respectively. Activated or nonactivated prothrombin complex concentrates were administered in 38% of the cases (281 of 732). Mortality by day 30 was 14% (95% CI, 11 to 16). Conclusions Management of severe bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants appears to be complex. The use of prothrombin complex concentrates differs depending on bleeding sites and direct oral anticoagulant plasma concentrations. Mortality differs according to bleeding sites and was similar to previous estimates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (09) ◽  
pp. 1700-1704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Antovic ◽  
Eva-Marie Norberg ◽  
Maria Berndtsson ◽  
Agnes Rasmuson ◽  
Rickard E. Malmström ◽  
...  

SummaryLaboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is based on prolongation in at least one coagulation assay (diluted Russell’s viper venom time – dRVVT or activated partial thromboplastin time – aPTT), which normalises after addition of phospholipids. Both assays may be influenced by anticoagulants and therefore LA should not be tested during warfarin or heparin treatment. It has been shown (primarily in vitro) that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs – dabigatran [DAB], rivaroxaban [RIV] and apixaban [API]) may also influence LA testing. We tested the effects of DOACs on assays routinely used for the diagnosis of LA in patients treated with these drugs in a real-life setting. Plasma from patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DAB (n=30), RIV (n=20) and API (n=17) and not known to have LA were tested using dRVVT (LA-screen and LA-confirm, Life Diagnostics) and aPTT (PTT-LA, Diagnostica Stago and aPTT Actin FS, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) assays. According to the diagnostics algorithm, dRVVT and aPTT ratios of <1.2 were considered negative, ratios of >1.4 positive, while if the ratios were 1.2–1.4 LA could not be ruled out. Plasma concentrations varied between 8–172 µg/l for DAB, 8–437 µg/l for RIV and 36–178 µg/l for API. LA diagnosis was negative in only eight (27 %) plasma samples from patients treated with DAB, and in five (25 %) and four samples (24 %) from patients treated with RIV and API, respectively. LA Positivity (dRVVT and aPTT ratios >1.4) was found in 5 cases (17 %) among patients treated with DAB, in 10 cases (50 %) treated with RIV and in 7 cases (41 %) treated with API. A concentration-dependent effect of DOACs on dRVVT-based parameters was observed, particularly as regards DAB. At lower concentrations, RIV and API had only minor effects on the confirmatory tests (below 100 µg/l and 70 µg/l, respectively). Our results suggest that a risk of overestimation of LA detection is present in samples from patients treated with DOACs. Therefore, LA testing should not be performed during treatment with DOACs. Prolongation in confirmatory assays may be helpful for the recognition of false positivity, especially as regards DAB.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Härtig ◽  
Ingvild Birschmann ◽  
Andreas Peter ◽  
Sebastian Hörber ◽  
Matthias Ebner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) including edoxaban are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Despite treatment, annual stroke rate in these patients remains 1–2%. Rapid assessment of coagulation would be useful to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy in this growing population of DOAC/edoxaban-treated stroke patients. Employing the Hemochron™ Signature Elite point-of-care test system (HC-POCT), clinically relevant plasma concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be excluded in a blood sample. However, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on HC-POCT results. We evaluated whether edoxaban plasma concentrations above the current treatment thresholds for thrombolysis or anticoagulation reversal (i.e., 30 and 50 ng/mL) can be ruled out with the HC-POCT. Methods We prospectively studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before, 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 24 h after drug intake. HC-POCT-based INR (HC-INR), activated clotting time (HC-ACT+ and HC-ACT-LR), activated partial thromboplastin time (HC-aPTT), and mass spectrometry for edoxaban plasma concentrations were performed at each time-point. We calculated correlations, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and test-specific cut-offs for ruling out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL in a blood sample. Results One hundred twenty blood samples from 20 edoxaban-treated patients were analyzed. Edoxaban plasma concentrations ranged from 0 to 512 ng/mL. HC-INR/HC-ACT+/HC-ACT-LR/HC-aPTT ranged from 0.7–8.3/78–310 s/65–215 s/19–93 s, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed moderate to very strong correlations with edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.95/0.79/0.70/0.60). With areas under the ROC curve of 0.997 (95% confidence interval: 0.991–0.971) and 0.989 (0.975–1.000), HC-INR most reliably ruled out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL, respectively, and HC-INR results ≤1.5 and ≤ 2.1 provided specificity/sensitivity of 98.6% (91.2–99.9)/98.0% (88.0–99.9) and 96.8% (88.0–99.4)/96.5% (86.8–99.4). Conclusions Our study represents the first systematic evaluation of the HC-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. Applying sufficiently low assay-specific cut-offs, the HC-POCT may not only be used to reliably rule out dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but also very low edoxaban concentrations in a blood sample. Because the assay-specific cut-offs were retrospectively defined, further investigation is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT02825394, registered on: 07/07/2016, URL


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (04) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Bianchi ◽  
Marco Ranucci ◽  
Ekaterina Baryshnikova ◽  
Giacomo Iapichino

AbstractDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exert similar anticoagulant effects to vitamin K antagonists and are increasingly used worldwide. Nevertheless, an evidence-based approach to patients receiving DOACs when any unplanned urgent surgery or bleeding (either spontaneous or traumatic) occurs is still missing. In this review, we investigate the role of point-of-care coagulation tests when other, more specific tests are not available. Indeed, thromboelastography and activated clotting time can detect dabigatran-induced coagulopathy, while their accuracy is limited for apixaban and rivaroxaban, mostly in cases of low drug plasma concentrations. These tests can also be used to guide the reversal of DOAC-induced coagulopathy providing a quick, before-and-after picture in case of therapeutic use of hemostatic compounds.


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Boriani ◽  
Carina Blomström-Lundqvist ◽  
Stefan H Hohnloser ◽  
Lennart Bergfeldt ◽  
Giovanni L Botto ◽  
...  

Abstract Efficacy and safety of dronedarone was shown in the ATHENA trial for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Further trials revealed safety concerns in patients with heart failure and permanent AF. This review summarizes insights from recent real-world studies and meta-analyses, including reports on efficacy, with focus on liver safety, mortality risk in patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF, and interactions of dronedarone with direct oral anticoagulants. Reports of rapidly progressing liver failure in dronedarone-prescribed patients in 2011 led to regulatory cautions about potential liver toxicity. Recent real-world evidence suggests dronedarone liver safety profile is similar to other antiarrhythmics and liver toxicity could be equally common with many Class III antiarrhythmics. Dronedarone safety concerns (increased mortality in patients with permanent AF) were raised based on randomized controlled trials (RCT) (ANDROMEDA and PALLAS), but comedication with digoxin may have increased the mortality rates in PALLAS, considering the dronedarone–digoxin pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction. Real-world data on apixaban–dronedarone interactions and edoxaban RCT observations suggest no significant safety risks for these drug combinations. Median trough plasma concentrations of dabigatran 110 mg during concomitant use with dronedarone are at acceptable levels, while PK data on the rivaroxaban–dronedarone interaction are unavailable. In RCTs and real-world studies, dronedarone significantly reduces AF burden and cardiovascular hospitalizations, and demonstrates a low risk for proarrhythmia in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. The concerns on liver safety must be balanced against the significant reduction in hospitalizations in patients with non-permanent AF and low risk for proarrhythmias following dronedarone treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (9_suppl) ◽  
pp. 194S-201S ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Kyriakou ◽  
Konstantinos Katogiannis ◽  
Ignatios Ikonomidis ◽  
George Giallouros ◽  
Georgios K. Nikolopoulos ◽  
...  

Our aim is to determine the most appropriate laboratory tests, besides anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) chromogenic assays, to estimate the degree of anticoagulation with apixaban and compare it with that of rivaroxaban in real-world patients. Twenty patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban 5 mg twice daily and 20 patients on rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily were studied. Conventional coagulation tests, thrombin generation assay (TGA), and thromboelastometry (nonactivated TEM [NATEM] assay) were performed in the 40 patients and 20 controls. The anti-FXa chromogenic assays were used to measure apixaban and rivaroxaban plasma levels. The NATEM measurements showed no significant difference between the 2 groups of patients. Concerning TGA, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was significantly decreased in patients on rivaroxaban as compared to those treated with apixaban ( P < .003). A statistically significant, strong inverse correlation between apixaban plasma concentrations and ETP ( P < .001) was observed. Apixaban significantly reduces ETP compared to controls, but to a lesser extent than rivaroxaban. Thrombin generation assay might provide additional information on apixaban exposure, which is required in order to individualize treatment especially for patients with a high bleeding risk. Our findings have to be further investigated in studies with larger sample sizes, in the entire range of apixaban exposure, with other direct oral anticoagulants, and in relation to clinical outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3661-3661
Author(s):  
Pável E Olivera ◽  
César A Velasquez ◽  
Desirée Campoy ◽  
Gonzalo Artaza ◽  
Tania Canals ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia among patients with cancer. Anticoagulation in this setting is associated with a higher rate of clinically relevant major and non-major bleeding and therefore, can be especially challenging. Due to concerns about drug interactions in patients receiving chemo-immunoterapy, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) has been the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for stroke prevention as a substitute for vitamin K antagonists. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) are an increasing alternative for anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in NVAF, but there are are still limited data regarding it's effectiveness and safety for cancer patients receiving active treatment. AIMS To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or LMWH treatment, and to determine the rate of anticoagulant-associated clinically relevant bleeding-free survival in a cohort of cancer patients with NVAF receiving active treatment. METHODS From April 2016 to December 2018 we consecutively included NVAF patients with active cancer therapy treated with DOAC or LMWH in a prospective multicenter registry. Patients with prosthetic valves or a life expectancy of less than one month were excluded from this study. Active cancer therapy was defined as evidence of neoplasm with ongoing antineoplastic therapy (chemo-immunotherapy or hormonal treatment). Pharmacological interactions check-up was performed prior election of treatment. Demographic, laboratory, cancer diagnosis, and antineoplastic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum follow-up (FU) of 6 months. In patients who received antineoplastic therapy with a potential DOAC interaction, plasma drug concentrations were measured during the FU using the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay from IL (Bedford-MA-USA) for Dabigatran and the Technoclone anti-Xa assay from Technoclone (Vienna-Austria) for Rivaroxaban. Bleeding events were classified according to ISTH criteria. RESULTS A total of 302 patients with NVAF and active cancer therapy were included. Among all patients, 192 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (20 dabigatran, 24 rivaroxaban, 80 apixaban and 68 edoxaban) and 110 with LMWH. Mean FU was 14.8 and 12.5 months (DOAC vs LMWH; p:0.53). Demographic characteristics and cancer subtypes and drugs are summarised in table 1 and 2, respectively. In LMWH group, 81.8% (n=90) of patients received full-dose of LMWH, 13.6% (n=15) intermediate dose and only a 4.5% patients received prophylactic doses. Plasma concentrations were measured in 2 patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and enzalutamide. Trough level of our patients was 132.4 and 126.8 ng/mL (12 hours after the last dose). Rivaroxaban plasma samples were collected in 3 patients who received doxorubicin as part of chemotherapy regimen. Plasma rivaroxaban levels, determined 4 hours and 24 hours of the last dose, ranged from 112.4 to 432.3 ng/ml and 49.8 to 216 ng/ml, respectively. Considering these results, DOACs were maintained during antineoplastic treatment. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in three patients in the DOAC group (1.04 %/year) and seven patients in the LMWH group (7.2 %/year) [DOAC vs LMWH; p&lt;0.05]. Major bleeding occurred in eight patients in the DOAC group (4.1%/year) and seven patients in the LMWH group (6.5%/year). All reported mortality was disease related. The bleeding-free survival rates were not statistically different between DOAC vs LMWH. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, the stroke and systemic embolism rate was higher in the LMWH group without significant differences in relation to major bleeding events. Further investigations on the optimal management of cancer patients with active therapy and NVAF treated with DOAC are needed. Meanwhile, determining DOAC plasma concentrations could be of profit to personalize anticoagulant therapy for patients with unpredictable drug interactions. Anticoagulation units play a crucial role in offering the best personalised therapy. Disclosures Sierra: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Baldin ◽  
Marion Warembourg ◽  
Guillaume Bardy ◽  
Loïc Startari ◽  
Fanny Rocher ◽  
...  

Introduction: no routine monitoring is deemed necessary with direct oral anticoagulants dabigatran (D) and rivaroxaban(R). Yet, their misuse may lead to inefficacy or increased risk of bleeding. Hypothesis: due to the prevalence of elderly patients in our medical center, the pharmacology department was asked to measure R and D plasma concentrations. Therefore we aimed not only to check their prescription adequacy but also to evaluate whether bleeding or thrombosis adverse events were associated with drug concentrations clearly outside of their expected “normal” range. Methods: Patients receiving R or D for either AFib, deep venous thrombosis or its prevention were included and had blood samples drawn for drug measurements, by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Adequacy of the patient prescription was checked by pharmacists according D & R respective SmPCs. A robust and conservative method was applied to evaluate anticoagulant concentrations : D & R concentrations were blindly deemed “normal” when within the [IC] 95 limits (peak and trough, relative to the dose) observed in the respective RE-LY and Rocket-AF pivotal studies, as compared to “out of range” when outside of these limits. Results: 287 consecutive patients from our center had their concentration of R (n=219 : 76%) or D (n = 68 : 24%) measured. The inadequacy of the prescriptions was 31.4% alltogether. Seventy patients presented with bleeding (n = 48, 17%) or thrombosis (n = 22, 8%), that either led to their admission in emergency, or occurred in the hospital wards. Bleedings and thrombosis were significantly associated with out-of-range concentrations (p<0.01). Patients with hemorrhages had higher concentrations (R: 194 VS 83 μg.l -1 and D: 128 VS 80 μg.l -1 ) whereas thrombosis were associated with lower ones (R: 75 VS 106 μg.l -1 D: 29 VS 93 μg.l -1 ). HAS-BLED Score was 2.0 ± 0.9 for bleeding cases as compared to 1.5 ± 0.9 (p<0.01). Conclusions: therapeutic drug monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants might not be superfluous, at least for R & D, especially in patients with a higher score HAS-BLED.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3819-3819
Author(s):  
Pável Olivera ◽  
Vicente Cortina ◽  
Verónica Pons ◽  
Tania Canals ◽  
Erik Johansson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The perioperative management (PM) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is controversial. The role of assessing DOAC plasma levels in order to ensure a safe use of these anticoagulants is still unknown. Aims To examine the association between DOACs plasma concentrations obtained before surgery and the risk of postoperative bleeding in the perioperative setting. Methods From June 2014 to December 2015 we have consecutively included 99 patients treated with DOACs and referred to our Unit for PM. Management was performed following the PM recommendations from the Catalan Thrombosis Working Group (Tromboc@t) . Bleeding events were classified following the ISTH criteria. Plasma concentrations were measured in the day of invasive procedure using the Technoclone anti-Xa assay from Technoclone (Vienna-Austria) for Rivaroxaban and Apixaban, and the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay from IL (Bedford-MA-USA) for Dabigatran; in each case, specific calibrators were used. Patients were systematically followed 30 days after the surgical procedure. Results A total of 99 patients were recruited. Median age was 76 years (range: 61-94) and 51 (51.5%) were female. Among them, 23 patients received dabigatran, 40 rivaroxaban and 36 apixaban. As per the risk scores, 66.7% of the patients had a CHA2DS2-VASc score >3, 57.6% had a HAS-BLED score >3, and 51 (51.5%) were considered high-risk procedures. Total bleeding events occurred in 23 patients (47.8% minor, 30.4% non-major clinically relevant, and 21.7% major bleeding). The median plasma NOACs concentration was 38.3 ng/ml (0.8-226 ng/ml), with 32 patients having levels >30 ng/mL. HASBLED score > 3 was associated with an increased risk of bleeding events within 30 days (hazard ratio (HR)= 3.9, 95% CI= 1.14-13.4, P=0.03). Plasma DOAC levels > 30 ng/ml were not significantly associated with an increased risk of bleeding events (HR=2.17, 95% CI=0.862-6.67, P=0.10). Major bleeding (n=5) was probably associated with the risk of the procedure than to the DOAC plasma concentrations. Conclusion In our cohort we found significant association between the individual bleeding risk before surgery with the risk of postoperative bleeding. In spite of that, this study will continue to reevaluate PM in high-risk procedures according to plasma DOAC levels. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document