Total Serum Sialic Acid is a General Disease Marker Rather than a Specific Tumour Marker in Dogs

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-10) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Thougaard ◽  
E. Hellmén ◽  
A. L. Jensen
1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1842-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maritta Pönniö ◽  
Hannu Alho ◽  
Seppo T Nikkari ◽  
Ulf Olsson ◽  
Ulf Rydberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The serum sialic acid (SA) concentration has been reported to be a potentially useful but nonspecific disease marker. We wanted to study which factors influence SA concentration in a well-characterized healthy population. Methods: SA was determined in 97 women and 96 men with a colorimetric Warren method. Results: The mean ± SD concentrations of SA were 634 ± 109 (95% confidence interval, 612–656) and 630 ± 106 (95% confidence interval, 608–651) mg/L for women and men, respectively. The serum SA showed a significant positive association with body mass index and with systolic and diastolic blood pressure among both women and men. SA also correlated significantly with the use of contraceptive pills and age among women and with smoking among men. Conclusions: Our study suggests that SA does not increase with age in men but appears to increase with female menopause. The strong positive association with blood pressure may explain why SA predicts cardiovascular mortality.


1992 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Crook ◽  
P. Tutt

1. Serum total sialic acid concentration, recently shown to be a cardiovascular risk factor, and also serum lipid-associated sialic acid concentration were measured in 15 patients with hypertriglyceridaemia (fasting serum triacylglycerol concentration > 2.3 mmol/l) showing a Frederickson's type IIB phenotype, 15 patients with hypercholesterolaemia showing a IIA phenotype and 15 age- and sex-matched normal control subjects. 2. Total serum sialic acid concentration was significantly raised in the hypertriglyceridaemic group (84.9 ± 21.5 versus 64.9 ± 20.8 mg/dl, P<0.03, Mann—Whitney U-test) compared with the normal control group, as was serum lipid-associated sialic acid concentration (23.0 ± 4.3 versus 12.0 ± 3.2 mg/dl, respectively, P<0.001, Mann—Whitney U-test). 3. Serum total sialic acid concentration was also significantly elevated in the hypertriglyceridaemic group as compared with the IIA phenotype hypercholesterolaemic group (84.9 ± 21.5 versus 58.4 ± 11.7 mg/dl, P<0.03, Mann—Whitney U-test), as was serum lipid-associated sialic acid concentration (23.0 ± 4.3 versus 14.9 ± 4.7 mg/dl, P<0.001, Mann—Whitney U-test). 4. We suggest that serum concentrations of both total sialic acid and lipid-associated sialic acid may be useful markers of cardiovascular risk which could, in part, be related to hypertriglyceridaemia.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inayat ur Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Idrees ◽  
Mohammad Salman ◽  
Rooh Ullah Khan ◽  
MI Khan ◽  
...  

Although management of hyperglycaemia represents one of the principal treatment goals of diabetes therapy, the high incidence of cardiovascular (CV) complications in diabetes also needs effective management. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine and compare the effect of glitazones on serum sialic acid (SSA), a known risk marker for CV disease, along with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycohaemoglobin (HbA1-c) and blood lipids, in overweight, previously only diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes ( n=60). The study was conducted for a period of 12 months. Significant improvement in FPG and HbA1-c were shown by both rosiglitazone ( p<0.003 and p<0.001, respectively) and pioglitazone ( p<0.005 and p<0.001, respectively), compared with baseline, and pioglitazone showed greater beneficial effects on other parameters monitored, significantly reducing total cholesterol (TC) ( p≤0.05). Both the drugs showed a decrease in SSA and no significant differences were observed between the groups. However, the decrease was significant only in the pioglitazone-treated group at month 12 ( p≤0.05), compared with baseline. A significant decrease in SSA by pioglitazone indicates its greater cardioprotective effect compared with rosiglitazone.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Uslu ◽  
D. Güzey ◽  
H. Uzun ◽  
B. Kalender ◽  
O. Carikci

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document