scholarly journals Cooperative Activation of HoxD Homeobox Genes by Factors from the Polarizing Region and the Apical Ridge in Chick Limb Morphogenesis. (chick limb bud/HoxD homeobox genes/ZPA factor/AER factor/in situ hybridization)

1993 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiki Koyama ◽  
Sumihare Noji ◽  
Tsutomu Nohno ◽  
Fumio Myokai ◽  
Katsuhiko Ono ◽  
...  
Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mackem ◽  
K.A. Mahon

Homeobox genes play a key role in specifying the segmented body plan of Drosophila, and recent work suggests that at least several homeobox genes may play a regulatory role during vertebrate limb morphogenesis. We have used degenerate oligonucleotide primers from highly conserved domains in the homeobox motif to amplify homeobox gene segments from chick embryo limb bud cDNAs using the polymerase chain reaction. Expression of a large number of homeobox genes (at least 17) is detected using this approach. One of these genes contains a novel homeobox loosely related to the Drosophila Abdominal B class, and was further analyzed by determining its complete coding sequence and evaluating its expression during embryogenesis by in situ hybridization. Based on sequence and expression patterns, we have designated this gene as Ghox 4.7 and believe that it is the chick homologue of the murine Hox 4.7 gene (formerly Hox 5.6). Ghox 4.7 is expressed primarily in limb buds during development and shows a striking spatial restriction to the posterior zone of the limb bud, suggesting a role in specifying anterior-posterior pattern formation. In chick, this gene also displays differences in expression between wing and leg buds, raising the possibility that it may participate in specifying limb-type identity.


Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Davidson ◽  
E. Graham ◽  
C. Sime ◽  
R. Hill

The mouse genes En-1 and En-2 display sequence similarity, in and around the homeobox region, to the engrailed family in Drosophila. This paper describes their pattern of expression in the 12.5-day mouse embryo as determined by in situ hybridization. En-2 is expressed in a subset of cells expressing En-1. Both genes are expressed in the developing midbrain and its junction with the hindbrain. In addition, En-1 is expressed in the floor of the hindbrain, a restricted ventrolateral segment of the neural tube throughout the trunk and anterior part of the tail, the dermatome of tail somites, the centrum and costal processes in developing vertebrae, a restricted region of facial mesenchyme and the limb-bud ectoderm. Supplementary studies of 9.5-day and 10.5-day embryos showed that the same pattern of expression pertained in the neural tube, but that expression in the somites is at first confined to the dermatome and later found at a low level in restricted sclerotomal regions. Both genes are expressed in restricted domains which do not cross tissue-type boundaries. In several instances, however, boundaries of expression lie within morphologically undifferentiated tissue. These results suggest that En-1 and En-2 may be involved in the establishment or maintenance of the spatial integrity of specific domains within developing tissues.


Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Devlin ◽  
P.M. Brickell ◽  
E.R. Taylor ◽  
A. Hornbruch ◽  
R.K. Craig ◽  
...  

During limb development, type I collagen disappears from the region where cartilage develops and synthesis of type II collagen, which is characteristic of cartilage, begins. In situ hybridization using antisense RNA probes was used to investigate the spatial localization of type I and type II collagen mRNAs. The distribution of the mRNA for type II collagen corresponded well with the pattern of type II collagen synthesis, suggesting control at the level of transcription and mRNA accumulation. In contrast, the pattern of mRNA for type I collagen remained more or less uniform and did not correspond with the synthesis of the protein, suggesting control primarily at the level of translation or of RNA processing.


1998 ◽  
Vol 138 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 151-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein van Kleffens ◽  
Cora Groffen ◽  
Roberto R. Rosato ◽  
Stefan M. van den Eijnde ◽  
Johan W. van Neck ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Duck Nah ◽  
Barbara J. Rodgers ◽  
William M. Kulyk ◽  
Barbara E. Kream ◽  
Robert A. Kosher ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 104 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Mahon ◽  
Heiner Westphal ◽  
Peter Gruss

Many of the genes controlling segmentation and pattern formation in Drosophila contain a conserved 183 bp sequence known as the homeobox. Homeobox sequences have been found in a range of metazoan species, including the vertebrates mouse and man. This striking conservation suggests that homeobox genes may play a fundamental role in developmental processes. If this is the case then it might be expected that vertebrate homeobox genes will be differentially expressed during embryogenesis and that the timing of their expression will coincide with major morphogenetic events. Here the spatial and temporal patterns of expression of murine homeobox genes will be explored, concentrating on the Hox 1.1 gene as an example. Using in situ hybridization to localize RNA transcripts, it has been found that Hox 1.1 is expressed in a region-specific manner during the formation and differentiation of the embryonic anteroposterior axis. Although striking patterns of expression of Hox 1.1 and other homeobox genes are seen in overtly segmented structures of the embryo (i.e. somites, prevertebral elements, neural tube and dorsal spinal ganglia) expression is also seen in tissues with no obvious segmental origin. The results suggest that homeobox genes probably do not play an exclusive role in segmentation in vertebrates, but are consistent with a role in the assignment of positional identity along the axis of the embryo.


2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana N Libório ◽  
Thais Acquafreda ◽  
Luciana F Matizonkas-Antonio ◽  
Maria G Silva-Valenzuela ◽  
Alberto R Ferraz ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-477
Author(s):  
C.B. Oudejans ◽  
M. Pannese ◽  
A. Simeone ◽  
C.J. Meijer ◽  
E. Boncinelli

Human first trimester extraembryonic tissues of normal and androgenetic origin (molar pregnancies) were investigated for the expression of 6 homeobox genes from the chromosome 12-encoded Hox-3 cluster by non-autoradiographic in situ hybridization with biotinylated RNA probes. By comparative in situ hybridization involving the use of exon- or region-specific RNA probes, analysis included the cellular distribution of alternative Hox-3 transcripts in chorionic villous tissues. A bias in extraembryonic distribution was seen between transcripts of the three most upstream Hox-3 genes (Hox-3.7, -3.6, and -3.1) versus transcripts of the 3 most downstream genes (Hox-3.3, 3.4, and 3.5). Only genes from the latter group are transcribed in human extraembryonic tissues including extraembryonic tissues of androgenetic origin. Moreover, comparative in situ hybridization showed that distinct alternative transcripts of Hox-3.3, Hox 3.4 and Hox-3.5 are exclusively found in trophoblast cells while others are present in chorionic villous stromal cells as well. These data demonstrate the existence of tissue- and cell-specific use of transcriptional (alternative gene promoters) or post-transcriptional (alternative splicing) regulation of homeobox genes in extraembryonic tissues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document