Gonadotropins as novel active partners in vascular diseases: insight from angiogenic properties and thrombotic potential of endothelial colony‐forming cells

Author(s):  
Grégoire Détriché ◽  
Nicolas Gendron ◽  
Aurélien Philippe ◽  
Maxime Gruest ◽  
Paul Billoir ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Stephanie Ospina-Prieto ◽  
Bruno K L Duarte ◽  
Jessica O F Guanaes ◽  
Fernando F. Costa ◽  
Margareth C Ozelo

Abstract Background: Endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFC) are an important source of autologous endothelial cells to study its implication in the pathophysiology of diseases with risk of vaso-occlusive events. Currently, our research group began to elucidate the ECFC mechanisms that contribute to the complex clinical vascular manifestations in two diseases, sickle cell anemia (SCA) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Aims: In this study, we analyzed functional in vitro assays of endothelial cells. The adhesion to red blood cell (RBC), migration and angiogenesis process of ECFC isolated from patients with SCA and MPN, as well as from healthy individuals (CTR) were evaluated in seeking an expanded understanding of the biology of the endothelial cell and its role in vascular events. Methods: ECFC were obtained through the isolation and culture of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. ECFC were isolated from 8 patients with SCA under regular transfusion, 6 patients with MPN and 10 CTR. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were used as additional controls. Flow cytometry of ECFC indicated that all cells were highly positive for endothelial cell markers CD31, CD144, CD146 and KDR with no indication of CD45 (leukocyte antigens), CD133 (endothelial progenitor cell marker) and CD34 (hematopoietic progenitor cell marker). RBCs from healthy individuals were obtained after centrifugation of whole blood. Cellular adhesion was evaluated after incubation of ECFCs with RBCs in the presence or absence of inflammatory stimulus (TNF-α). Endothelial adhesion molecules were analyzed by flow cytometry (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E and P-selectin). ECFC migration was assessed using a scratch-wound healing assay and wound regression was analyzed by time-lapse videos. Angiogenesis capacity was evaluated through three-dimensional ECFC cultures in Matrigel. Network parameters (segments, junctions and meshes) were characterized during 24h after seeding. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Results: In total, 48 ECFC colonies were established, 10 from SCA, 25 MPN and 13 CTR. We observed a higher percentage of adhered RBCs to ECFCs isolated from patients with SCA (14.0%) and MPN (23.4%) without TNF-ɑ stimulus, when compared to ECFC from CTR, (8.4%, p< 0.04 and p< 0.001, respectively), and HUVEC (9.4%, p< 0.05 and p< 0.02, respectively). No differences were detected in the expression of adhesion molecules in ECFC. Mean wound regression rates at 14h were 79.9% for SCA, 84.4% for MPN, and 88.8% for CTR. The high variability among colonies in each group could explain why this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, HUVECs had a shorter time for wound closure, with complete wound regression at 10h. The angiogenesis analysis at 15h ECFC from SCA and MPN had, respectively, 20% and 50% less network parameters than CTR. Then beyond 15h post-seeding, the network parameters regressed until reaching a plateau. At 24h the segments began to disappear progressively, leading to a marked reduction in 40h. Unlike ECFC, HUVEC presented a high network formation. Conclusions: Our findings reveal distinct functional properties and behavior between the ECFCs from two diseases with vascular manifestations, SCA and MPN. ECFC do provide access to patient vascular endothelium and enable us to validate the use of these cells as investigative models. In contrast, HUVECs showed a unique behavior, which differed from both diseased and controls ECFCs. This highlights the differences between autologous in vitro and established cell lines as experimental models for vascular diseases. This raises the question of which is the most representative model of human endothelial pathophysiology in vascular diseases. Disclosures Ozelo: BioMarin: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (17) ◽  
pp. 2399-2418
Author(s):  
Yoshito Yamashiro ◽  
Hiromi Yanagisawa

Abstract Blood vessels are constantly exposed to mechanical stimuli such as shear stress due to flow and pulsatile stretch. The extracellular matrix maintains the structural integrity of the vessel wall and coordinates with a dynamic mechanical environment to provide cues to initiate intracellular signaling pathway(s), thereby changing cellular behaviors and functions. However, the precise role of matrix–cell interactions involved in mechanotransduction during vascular homeostasis and disease development remains to be fully determined. In this review, we introduce hemodynamics forces in blood vessels and the initial sensors of mechanical stimuli, including cell–cell junctional molecules, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), multiple ion channels, and a variety of small GTPases. We then highlight the molecular mechanotransduction events in the vessel wall triggered by laminar shear stress (LSS) and disturbed shear stress (DSS) on vascular endothelial cells (ECs), and cyclic stretch in ECs and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs)—both of which activate several key transcription factors. Finally, we provide a recent overview of matrix–cell interactions and mechanotransduction centered on fibronectin in ECs and thrombospondin-1 in SMCs. The results of this review suggest that abnormal mechanical cues or altered responses to mechanical stimuli in EC and SMCs serve as the molecular basis of vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, hypertension and aortic aneurysms. Collecting evidence and advancing knowledge on the mechanotransduction in the vessel wall can lead to a new direction of therapeutic interventions for vascular diseases.


VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Daniel Staub ◽  
Vasileios Rafailidis ◽  
Mohammed Al-Natour ◽  
Sanjeeva Kalva ◽  
...  

Abstract. Ultrasound has been established as an important diagnostic tool in assessing vascular abnormalities. Standard B-mode and Doppler techniques have inherent limitations with regards to detection of slow flow and small vasculature. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a complementary tool and is useful in assessing both the macro- and microvascular anatomy of the aorta. CEUS can also provide valuable physiological information in real-time scanning sessions due to the physical and safety profiles of the administered microbubbles. From a macrovascular perspective, CEUS has been used to characterize aortic aneurysm rupture, dissection and endoleaks post-EVAR repair. With regard to microvasculature CEUS enables imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum thereby assessing aortic inflammation processes, such as monitoring treatment response in chronic periaortitis. CEUS may have additional clinical utility since adventitial vasa vasorum has important implications in the pathogenesis of aortic diseases. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of studies comparing CEUS to cross-sectional imaging for aortic applications. For endoleak surveillance CEUS has been shown to be equal or in certain cases superior in comparison to CT angiography. The recent advancement of CEUS software along with the ongoing development of drug-eluting contrast microbubbles has allowed improved targeted detection and real-time ultrasound guided therapy for aortic vasa vasorum inflammation and neovascularization in animal models. Therefore, CEUS is uniquely suited to comprehensively assess and potentially treat aortic vascular diseases in the future.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Balhara ◽  
Nov Rattan Sharma ◽  
Amrita Yadav

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (09) ◽  
pp. 372-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidemi Yoshida ◽  
Tadaatsu Imaizumi ◽  
Koji Fujimoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Itaya ◽  
Makoto Hiramoto ◽  
...  

SummaryPlatelet-activating factor (PAF) acetylhydrolase is an enzyme that inactivates PAF. Deficiency of this enzyme is caused by a missense mutation in the gene. We previously found a higher prevalence of this mutation in patients with ischemic stroke. This fact suggests that the mutation might enhance the risk for stroke through its association with hypertension. We have addressed this hypothesis by analyzing the prevalence of the mutation in hypertension. We studied 138 patients with essential hypertension, 99 patients with brain hemorrhage, and 270 healthy controls. Genomic DNA was analyzed for the mutant allele by the polymerase-chain reaction. The prevalence of the mutation was 29.3% (27.4% heterozygotes and 1.9% homozygotes) in controls and 36.2% in hypertensives and the difference was not significant. The prevalence in patients with brain hemorrhage was significantly higher than the control: 32.6% heterozygotes and 6.1% homozygotes (p <0.05). PAF acetylhydrolase deficiency may be a genetic risk factor for vascular diseases.


1987 ◽  
Vol 58 (02) ◽  
pp. 758-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Mombelli ◽  
R Monotti ◽  
A Haeberli ◽  
P W Straub

SummaryIncreased fibrinopeptide A (FPA) levels have been reported in various non-thrombotic disorders, including cancer, acute myocardial infarction, liver cirrhosis and collagen vascular diseases. To investigate the significance of these findings, the present study combined the radioimmunoassay of FPA with that of fibrinogen/fibrin degradation fragment E (FgE) in the aforementioned disorders and compared the results with those observed in healthy subjects as well as in patients with thromboembolism and overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Mean FPA and FgE in malignancy were 6.3 and 305 ng/ml, in myocardial infarction 5.6 and 98 ng/ml, in liver cirrhosis 2.7 and 132 ng/ml and in collagen vascular diseases 5.6 and 142 ng/ml. All these values were significantly higher than in healthy controls (mean FPA 1.6 ng/ml, mean FgE 49 ng/ml) but significantly lower than in thromboembolism (mean FPA 10.7 ng/ml, mean FgE 639 ng/ ml) and DIC (mean FPA 22.0 ng/ml, mean FgE 1041 ng/ml). The overall correlation between FPA and FgE was highly significant. Elowever, different disorders showed peculiar patterns in FPA, FgE and fibrinogen levels. In malignancy, a definite increase of FPA, FgE and plasma fibrinogen levels was observed. This finding probably indicates a compensated state of (intra- or extravascular) fibrin formation and lysis. Acute myocardial infarction was characterized by a high FPA to FgE ratio, which is interpreted to reflect acute thrombin generation and fibrin formation. FPA in cirrhosis was only marginally elevated with most single values within the normal range, indicating that intravascular coagulation was infrequent and unimportant in quantitative terms.


1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 204-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Siess ◽  
Peter Roth ◽  
Peter C Weber

SummaryPlatelets have been implicated in the development of atherosclerotic and thrombotic vascular diseases. Evaluation of platelet aggregation in relation to endogenously formed compounds which affect platelet function may provide information of clinical and pharmacological relevance. We describe a method in which thromboxane B2 (TXB2) formation was analyzed following stimulation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with ADP, 1-epinephrine, collagen, and arachidonic acid. In addition, we determined platelet sensitivity to prostacyclin following ADP- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. The parameters under study were found to depend on the platelet count in PRP, on the type and dose of the aggregating agent used, and on the test time after blood sampling. By standardization of these variables, a reliable method was established which can be used in clinical and pharmacological trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document