scholarly journals New Steel Alloys for the Design of Heat Recovery Steam Generator Components of Combined Cycle Gas Plants

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Pinto Fernandes ◽  
Eduardo Manuel Dias Lopes ◽  
Vicente Maneta
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Steam Pressure ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Martensitic Steels ◽  
Element Analysis

Demand for power is growing everyday, mainly due to emerging economies in countries such as China, Russia, India, and Brazil. During the last 50 years steam pressure and temperature in power plants have been continuously raised to improve thermal efficiency. Recent efforts to improve efficiency leads to the development of a new generation of heat recovery steam generator, where the Benson once-through technology is applied to improve the thermal efficiency. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the mechanical behavior of a high pressure superheater manifold by applying finite element modeling and a finite element analysis with the objective of analyzing stress propagation, leading to the study of damage mechanism, e.g., uniaxial fatigue, uniaxial creep for life prediction. The objective of this paper is also to analyze the mechanical properties of the new high temperature resistant materials in the market such as 2Cr Bainitic steels (T/P23 and T/P24) and also the 9–12Cr Martensitic steels (T/P91, T/P92, E911, and P/T122). For this study the design rules for construction of power boilers to define the geometry of the HPSH manifold were applied.

scholarly journals New Steel Alloys for the Design of Heat Recovery Steam Generator Components of Combined Cycle Gas Plants

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Pinto Fernandes ◽  
Eduardo Manuel Dias Lopes ◽  
Vicente Maneta
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Steam Pressure ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Martensitic Steels ◽  
Element Analysis

Demand of Power is growing everyday, mainly due to emerging economies in CRIB countries (China, Russia, India and Brazil). During the last fifty years steam pressure and temperature in power plants have been continuously raised to improve thermal efficiency. Recent efforts to improve efficiency leads to the development of a new generation of Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) where the Benson Once-Through Technology is applied to improve thermal efficiency. The main purpose of this paper is to analyse the mechanical behaviour of a High Pressure Superheater Manifold by applying Finite Element Modelling (FEM) and a Finite Element Analysis with the objective to analyse stress propagation leading to the study of damage mechanism e.g. Uniaxial Fatigue, Uniaxial Creep for life prediction. The objective of this paper is also to analyse the mechanical properties of the new high temperature resistant materials in the market such as 2Cr Bainitic steels (T/P23, T/P24) and also the 9–12Cr Martensitic steels (T/P91, T/P92, E911 and P/T122). For this study the design rules for construction of power boilers to define the geometry of the HPSH Manifold were applied.

scholarly journals Gas Turbine Heat Recovery Steam Generators for Combined Cycles Natural or Forced Circulation Considerations

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akber Pasha
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Natural Circulation ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Steam Generators ◽  
Forced Circulation ◽  
Gas Turbine Exhaust

In recent years the combined cycle has become a very attractive power plant arrangement because of its high cycle efficiency, short order-to-on-line time and flexibility in the sizing when compared to conventional steam power plants. However, optimization of the cycle and selection of combined cycle equipment has become more complex because the three major components, Gas Turbine, Heat Recovery Steam Generator and Steam Turbine, are often designed and built by different manufacturers. Heat Recovery Steam Generators are classified into two major categories — 1) Natural Circulation and 2) Forced Circulation. Both circulation designs have certain advantages, disadvantages and limitations. This paper analyzes various factors including; availability, start-up, gas turbine exhaust conditions, reliability, space requirements, etc., which are affected by the type of circulation and which in turn affect the design, price and performance of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator. Modern trends around the world are discussed and conclusions are drawn as to the best type of circulation for a Heat Recovery Steam Generator for combined cycle application.

scholarly journals Development Potential of Combined-Cycle (GUD) Power Plants With and Without Supplementary Firing

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Finckh ◽  
H. Pfost
Keyword(s):  
Steam Generator ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Plant Size ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Nox Emissions ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Low Emission ◽  
Combined Cycles ◽  
Interesting Alternative

Unfired combined cycles achieve superior efficiencies at low emission levels. The potential and efficiency limits are investigated and the possibilities for enhancing efficiency are described. It is demonstrated that limited supplementary firing of the heat recovery steam generator can be an interesting alternative and that this allows efficiency and plant size to be increased. The effects of supplementary firing on NOx emissions are also shown.

scholarly journals The Optimization of Combined Cycle HRSGs as a Function of the Plant Load Duty

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Dechamps
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Economic Optimization ◽  
Cost Of Electricity ◽  
The Cost

Natural gas fired combined cycle power plants now take a substantial share of the power generation market, mainly because they can be delivering power with a remarkable efficiency shortly after the decision to install is taken, and because they are a relatively low capital cost option. The power generation markets becoming more and more competitive in terms of the cost of electricity, the trend is to go for high performance equipments, notably as far as the gas turbine and the heat recovery steam generator are concerned. The heat recovery steam generator is the essential link in the combined cycle plant, and should be optimized with respect to the cost of electricity. This asks for a techno-economic optimization with an objective function which comprises both the plant efficiency and the initial investment. This paper applies on an example the incremental cost method, which allows to optimize parameters like the pinch points and the superheat temperatures. The influence of the plant load duty on this optimization is emphasized. This is essential, because the load factor will not usually remain constant during the plant life-time. The example which is presented shows the influence of the load factor, which is important, as the plant goes down in merit order with time, following the introduction of more modern, more efficient power plants on the same grid.

Exergy Evaluation of Two Current Advanced Power Plants: Supercritical Steam Turbine and Combined Cycle

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jin ◽  
M. Ishida ◽  
M. Kobayashi ◽  
M. Nunokawa
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Exergy Analysis ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Exergy Loss ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Combined Cycle Plant ◽  
Steam Plant

Two operating advanced power plants, a supercritical steam plant and a gas-steam turbine combined cycle, have been analyzed using a methodology of graphical exergy analysis (EUDs). The comparison of two plants, which may provide the detailed information on internal phenomena, points out several inefficient segments in the combined cycle plant: higher exergy loss caused by mixing in the combustor, higher exergy waste from the heat recovery steam generator, and higher exergy loss by inefficiency in the power section, especially in the steam turbine. On the basis of these fundamental features of each plant, we recommend several schemes for improving the thermal efficiency of current advanced power plants.

Development Potential of Combined-Cycle (GUD) Power Plants With and Without Supplementary Firing

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Finckh ◽  
H. Pfost
Keyword(s):  
Steam Generator ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Plant Size ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Nox Emissions ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Low Emission ◽  
Combined Cycles ◽  
Interesting Alternative

Unfired combined cycles achieve superior efficiencies at low emission levels. The potential and efficiency limits are investigated and the possibilities for enhancing efficiency are described. It is demonstrated that limited supplementary firing of the heat recovery steam generator can be an interesting alternative and that this allows efficiency and plant size to be increased. The effects of supplementary firing on NOx emissions are also shown.

scholarly journals Estimation of condensate mass flow rate during purging time in heat recovery steam generator of combined cycle power plant

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1389-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Ehyaei
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flow Rate ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Mass Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Steam Pressure ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Gas Temperature ◽  
Condensate Formation

In this paper the transient modeling of HRSG (Heat recovery steam generator) in purging time was considered. In purging time, compressed air from the gas turbine was used to purge a combustible gas from HRSG. During this time; steam condensate was formed in the superheater stage which should be drained completely to avoid some problems such as deformation of superheaters. Because of this reason, estimation of drain formation is essential to avoid this problem. In this paper an energy model was provided and this model was solved by MATLsoftware. Average model error is about 5%. Results show that, during purge time, steam temperature was decreased from 502 (?C) (Superheater 2), 392 (?C) (Superheater1) and 266 (?C) (Evaporators 1&2) to 130 (?C), 130 (?C) and 220 (?C), respectively and also steam pressure was decreased from 52 (bar) to 23(bar) during purge time. At end of purge time, condensate formation was about 220 (l) when inlet gas temperature was equal to 100 (?C) and purge gas mass flow rate was equal to 386.86 (kg/s).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document