Experimental Validation of a 3-Component Surrogate for Sasol-IPK in Single Cylinder Diesel Engine and IQT

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samy A. Alkhayat ◽  
Manan J. Trivedi ◽  
Naeim A. Henein ◽  
Sampad Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Peter Schihl
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Peak Pressure ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Pressure Peak ◽  
Ignition Quality ◽  
Surrogate Fuel ◽  
Three Components

The goal of this investigation is to compare the validation of Sasol-IPK and its surrogate fuel in the IQT and in an actual diesel engine. The surrogate fuel is composed of three components (46% iso-cetane, 44% decalin and 10% n-nonane on a volume basis). IQT experiments were conducted as per ASTM D6890-10a. Engine experiments were conducted at 1500 RPM, two engine loads, and two injection timings. Analysis of the ignition delay, peak pressure, peak RHR and other combustion phasing parameters, showed a closer match in IQT than in the diesel engine. This investigation suggests that validation in a single cylinder diesel engine should be a part of the surrogate validation, particularly for low ignition quality fuels.

Formulation of Sasol Isomerized Paraffinic Kerosene Surrogate Fuel for Diesel Engine Application Using an Ignition Quality Tester

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziliang Zheng ◽  
Tamer Badawy ◽  
Naeim Henein ◽  
Peter Schihl ◽  
Eric Sattler
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Alternative Fuels ◽  
Internal Combustion Engines ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Surrogate Fuels ◽  
Cycle Simulation ◽  
Ignition Quality ◽  
Surrogate Fuel ◽  
Ignition Quality Tester

Sasol isomerized paraffinic kerosene (IPK) is a coal-derived synthetic fuel under consideration as a blending stock with jet propellant 8 (JP-8) for use in military equipment. However, Sasol IPK is a low ignition quality fuel with derived cetane number (DCN) of 31. The proper use of such alternative fuels in internal combustion engines (ICEs) requires the modification in control strategies to operate engines efficiently. With computational cycle simulation coupled with surrogate fuel mechanism, the engine development process is proved to be very effective. Therefore, a methodology to formulate Sasol IPK surrogate fuels for diesel engine application using ignition quality tester (IQT) is developed. An in-house developed matlab code is used to formulate the appropriate mixture blends, also known as surrogate fuel. And aspen hysys is used to emulate the distillation curve of the surrogate fuels. The properties of the surrogate fuels are compared to those of the target Sasol IPK fuel. The DCNs of surrogate fuels are measured in the IQT and compared with the target Sasol IPK fuel at the standard condition. Furthermore, the ignition delay, combustion gas pressure, and rate of heat release (RHR) of Sasol IPK and its formulated surrogate fuels are analyzed and compared at five different charge temperatures. In addition, the apparent activation energies derived from chemical ignition delay of the surrogate fuel and Sasol IPK are determined and compared.

Experimental Validation of a Three-Component Surrogate for Sasol-Isoparaffinic Kerosene in Single Cylinder Diesel Engine and Ignition Quality Tester

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samy Alkhayat ◽  
Manan Trivedi ◽  
Naeim Henein ◽  
Sampad Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Peter Schihl
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Negative Temperature ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Combustion Behavior ◽  
Auto Ignition ◽  
Temperature Combustion ◽  
Ignition Quality ◽  
Ignition Quality Tester

Surrogates development is important to extensively investigate the combustion behavior of fuels. Development of comprehensive surrogates has been focusing on matching chemical and physical properties of their target fuel to mimic its atomization, evaporation, mixing, and auto-ignition behavior. More focus has been given to matching the derived cetane number (DCN) as a measure of the auto-ignition quality. In this investigation, we carried out experimental validation of a three-component surrogate for Sasol-Isoparaffinic Kerosene (IPK) in ignition quality tester (IQT) and in an actual diesel engine. The surrogate fuel is composed of three components (46% iso-cetane, 44% decalin, and 10% n-nonane on a volume basis). The IQT experiments were conducted as per ASTM D6890-10a. The engine experiments were conducted at 1500 rpm, two engine loads, and two injection timings. Analysis of ignition delay (ID), peak pressure, peak rate of heat release (RHR), and other combustion phasing parameters showed a closer match in the IQT than in the diesel engine. Comparison between the surrogate combustion behavior in the diesel engine and IQT revealed that matching the DCN of the surrogate to its respective target fuel did not result in the same negative temperature coefficient (NTC) profile—which led to unmatched combustion characteristics in the high temperature combustion (HTC) regimes, despite the same auto-ignition and low temperature combustion (LTC) profiles. Moreover, a comparison between the combustion behaviors of the two fuels in the IQT is not consistent with the comparison in the diesel engine, which suggests that the surrogate validation in a single-cylinder diesel engine should be part of the surrogate development methodology, particularly for low ignition quality fuels.

Formulation of Sasol IPK Surrogate Fuel for Diesel Engine Application Using an Ignition Quality Tester (IQT)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziliang Zheng ◽  
Tamer Badawy ◽  
Naeim Henein ◽  
Peter Schihl ◽  
Eric Sattler
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Combustion Gas ◽  
Surrogate Fuels ◽  
Aspen Hysys ◽  
Ignition Quality ◽  
Apparent Activation Energies ◽  
Surrogate Fuel ◽  
Ignition Quality Tester

This paper presents an approach to develop Sasol IPK (Iso-Paraffinic Kerosene) surrogate fuels for diesel engine application using Ignition Quality Tester (IQT). The methodology includes: 1) in-house developed MATLAB code to formulate the appropriate mixture blends, 2) Aspen HYSYS to develop the distillation curve and compares it to the target Sasol IPK fuel, 3) IQT to measure the derived cetane number (DCN) of surrogate fuels and compare it with the target Sasol IPK fuel, 4) analysis of autoignition and combustion characteristics for Sasol IPK surrogate fuels. The ignition delay, combustion gas pressure, and rate of heat release of Sasol IPK and its formulated surrogate fuel are analyzed and compared at five different charge temperatures. Furthermore, the apparent activation energies derived from chemical ignition delay of the surrogate fuel and Sasol IPK are determined and compared.

Effect of Cetane Improver on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Coal-Derived Sasol Isomerized Paraffinic Kerosene in a Single Cylinder Diesel Engine

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziliang Zheng ◽  
Umashankar Joshi ◽  
Naeim Henein ◽  
Eric Sattler
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Oxides Of Nitrogen ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Common Rail Injection System ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Auto Ignition ◽  
Ignition Quality

Sasol isomerized paraffinic kerosene (IPK) is a coal-derived synthetic fuel under consideration as a blending stock with JP-8 for use in military ground vehicles. Since Sasol IPK is a low ignition quality fuel with derived cetane number (DCN) of 31, there is a need to improve its ignition quality. This paper investigates the effect of adding different amounts of Lubrizol 8090 cetane improver to Sasol IPK on increasing its DCN. The experimental investigation was conducted in a single cylinder research type diesel engine. The engine is equipped with a common rail injection system and an open engine control unit. Experiments covered different injection pressures and intake air temperatures. Analysis of test results was made to determine the effect of cetane improver percentage in the coal-derived Sasol IPK blend on auto-ignition, combustion and emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), total unburned hydrocarbon (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and particulate matter (PM). In addition, the effect of cetane improver on the apparent activation energy of the global auto-ignition reactions was determined.

scholarly journals Combustion Analysis of a Diesel Engine during Warm up at Different Coolant and Lubricating Oil Temperatures

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3931
Author(s):  
Faisal Lodi ◽  
Ali Zare ◽  
Priyanka Arora ◽  
Svetlana Stevanovic ◽  
Mohammad Jafari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Peak Pressure ◽  
Cold Start ◽  
Lubricating Oil ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Combustion Duration ◽  
Hot Start

A comprehensive analysis of combustion behaviour during cold, intermediately cold, warm and hot start stages of a diesel engine are presented. Experiments were conducted at 1500 rpm and 2000 rpm, and the discretisation of engine warm up into stages was facilitated by designing a custom drive cycle. Advanced injection timing, observed during the cold start period, led to longer ignition delay, shorter combustion duration, higher peak pressure and a higher peak apparent heat release rate (AHRR). The peak pressure was ~30% and 20% and the AHRR was ~2 to 5% and ±1% higher at 1500 rpm and 2000 rpm, respectively, during cold start, compared to the intermediate cold start. A retarded injection strategy during the intermediate cold start phase led to shorter ignition delay, longer combustion duration, lower peak pressure and lower peak AHRR. At 2000 rpm, an exceptional combustion behaviour led to a ~27% reduction in the AHRR at 25% load. Longer ignition delays and shorter combustion durations at 25% load were observed during the intermediately cold, warm and hot start segments. The mass fraction burned (MFB) was calculated using a single zone combustion model to analyse combustion parameters such as crank angle (CA) at 50% MFB, AHRR@CA50 and CA duration for 10–90% MFB.

Experimental Validation and Combustion Modeling of a JP-8 Surrogate in a Single Cylinder Diesel Engine

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Shrestha ◽  
Umashankar Joshi ◽  
Ziliang Zheng ◽  
Tamer Badawy ◽  
Naeim Henein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Combustion Modeling

Low NOx and Low Smoke Operation of a Diesel Engine Using Gasolinelike Fuels

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Kalghatgi ◽  
Leif Hildingsson ◽  
Bengt Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Heat Release ◽  
Compression Ratio ◽  
Diesel Fuel ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Pressure Rise ◽  
Maximum Pressure ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Intake Pressure

Much of the technology in advanced diesel engines, such as high injection pressures, is aimed at overcoming the short ignition delay of conventional diesel fuels to promote premixed combustion in order to reduce NOx and smoke. Previous work in a 2 l single-cylinder diesel engine with a compression ratio of 14 has demonstrated that gasoline fuel, because of its high ignition delay, is very beneficial for premixed compression-ignition compared with a conventional diesel fuel. We have now done similar studies in a smaller—0.537 l—single-cylinder diesel engine with a compression ratio of 15.8. The engine was run on three fuels of very different auto-ignition quality—a typical European diesel fuel with a cetane number (CN) of 56, a typical European gasoline of 95 RON and 85 MON with an estimated CN of 16 and another gasoline of 84 RON and 78 MON (estimated CN of 21). The previous results with gasoline were obtained only at 1200 rpm—here we compare the fuels also at 2000 rpm and 3000 rpm. At 1200 rpm, at low loads (∼4 bars indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP)) when smoke is negligible, NOx levels below 0.4 g/kWh can be easily attained with gasoline without using exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), while this is not possible with the 56 CN European diesel. At these loads, the maximum pressure-rise rate is also significantly lower for gasoline. At 2000 rpm, with 2 bars absolute intake pressure, NOx can be reduced below 0.4 g/kW h with negligible smoke (FSN<0.1) with gasoline between 10 bars and 12 bars IMEP using sufficient EGR, while this is not possible with the diesel fuel. At 3000 rpm, with the intake pressure at 2.4 bars absolute, NOx of 0.4 g/kW h with negligible smoke was attainable with gasoline at 13 bars IMEP. Hydrocarbon and CO emissions are higher for gasoline and will require after-treatment. High peak heat release rates can be alleviated using multiple injections. Large amounts of gasoline, unlike diesel, can be injected very early in the cycle without causing heat release during the compression stroke and this enables the heat release profile to be shaped.

scholarly journals Spray, Combustion, and Air Pollutant Characteristics of JP-5 for Naval Aircraft from Experimental Single-Cylinder CRDI Diesel Engine

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2362
Author(s):  
Hyungmin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Combustion Process ◽  
Air Pollutant ◽  
Spray Combustion ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Visualization System ◽  
Single Cylinder

This study was performed to analyze the spray, combustion, and air pollutant characteristic of JP-5 fuel for naval aircraft in a spray visualization system and a single-cylinder CRDI diesel engine that can be visualized. The analysis results of JP-5 fuel were compared with DF. The spray tip penetration of JP-5 showed diminished results as the spray developed. JP-5 had the highest ROHR and ROPR regardless of the fuel injection timings. The physicochemical characteristics of JP-5, such as its excellent vaporization and low cetane number, were analyzed to prolong the ignition delay. Overall, the longer combustion period and the lower heat loss of the DF raised the engine torque and the IMEP. JP-5 showed higher O2 and lower CO2 levels than the DF fuel. The CO emission level increased as the injection timing was advanced in two test fuels, and the CO emitted from the DF fuel, which has a longer combustion period than JP-5, turned out to be lower. NOx also reduced as the fuel injection timing was retarded, but it was discharged at a higher level in JP-5 due to the large heat release. The images from the combustion process visualization showed that the flame luminosity of DF is stronger, its ignition delay is shorter, and its combustion period is longer than that of JP-5.

scholarly journals Relationship between Fuel Properties and Cetane Response of Cetane Improver for Non-Aromatic and Aromatic Fuels Used In A Single Cylinder Heavy Duty Diesel Engine

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Delay ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Fuel Properties ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Ignition Quality ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Ignition improver additives are used to improve the ignition quality, or reduce the ignition delay; i.e. the time between when fuel is injected and time when combustion start is different this difference in time is minimize by additive is called cetane improver (CN). The Cetane Number (CN) is the most widely accepted measure of ignition quality to get desired value of centane number some additive are used hence ignition improvers are usually characterized by the fact that at what extent they can increase CN. By increasing cetane number we have two benefits that it helps smoother combustion and lower emissions. Fuel properties are always considered as one of the main factors to diesel engines concerning performance of cetane improver. There are still challenges for researchers to identify the most correlating and non-correlating fuel properties and their effects on cetane improver .In this study to derive the most un-correlating and correlating properties. In parallel, sensitivity analysis was performed for the fuel properties as well as to effect on performance of cetane improver

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document