Dynamic Thrust Loads on Piping From Blowdown Stacks to Silencers at a Remote Distance Away

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal K. Botros ◽  
Michael Martens
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Noise Suppression ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Gas Compression ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Upstream Pressure ◽  
Sufficient Distance

Abstract Current trends in greenfield natural gas compression facilities and high-pressure gas transmission pipelines are designs for high pressure operation, e.g. PN150. At such high pressures, sound pressure level (SPL) of the noise generated during a planned blowdown can be as high as 165–175 dBA at 1 m distance away from the blowdown stack tip. Even double hearing protection would not be sufficient for an operator opening the blowdown valve at the blowdown assembly even for a short period of time. Blowdown silencers mounted on top of the blowdown stack are limited to the degree of noise suppression they offer (typically of the order of 30 to 40 dB), let alone the requirement for extensive support structures to hold the massive weight on the stack top. One innovation to alleviate this issue, is to place a silencer on a skid on a ground-level pad/support system, at a sufficient distance away from the blowdown stack. In this way, the blowdown valve operator would be exposed to a much lower SPL, as well as the silencer can be as large as desired being skid mounded on the ground. The main issue to be addressed is the dynamic thrust loads That would otherwise be afflicted on the various pipe segments of the piping connecting the blowdown stack top to the location of the blowdown silencer located distance away. Clearly this piping will include several above ground pipe segments, bends, tees and fittings that need to be adequately supported to withstand the dynamic loads as the blowdown valve opens. This paper presents a model approach based on solving the temporal-spatial governing equations in the form of 1-D hyperbolic differential equations, with boundary conditions accounting for the blowdown valve size and type, trim characteristics and opening time, upstream gas pressure and temperature, and downstream restriction equivalent orifice size at the inlet to the blowdown silencer. Results are presented for a case study of a single and dual blowdown assemblies equipped with reduced-bore ball valves (8″ × 6″), with lead piping of NPS 8 joining into NPS 12 header and finally splitting into two ground mounted silencers some 30 meters away. Thrust loads at each segment of these connecting piping were found to depend on whether one or dual blowdown valves are open simultaneously, upstream pressure, and more importantly the location of the choke point (Mach = 1) whether at the blowdown valve itself or at the silencer inlet diffuser orifice. The later was found to be the most critical parameter. The most important objective when designing such a system is to ensure that the choke point is at the silencer inlet orifice to minimize thrust loading on the blowdown valve(s) as well as along the entire lead piping.

GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID LEVELS IN THE BRAIN OF RATS EXPOSED TO OXYGEN AT HIGH PRESSURES

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1907-1913 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Wood ◽  
W. J. Watson
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
No Reduction ◽  
Ambient Pressure ◽  
Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gaba Concentration ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Brain

Rats were exposed to 100% oxygen at a pressure of 6 atmospheres absolute for 33 minutes. The surviving animals were assigned to one of three groups: (a) animals suffering severe convulsions during exposure, (b) animals suffering mild convulsions during exposure, (c) animals in which no convulsions were observed during exposure. The concentration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brains of rats in all groups was lower than in unexposed rats, reductions of 35%, 27%, and 19% in GABA concentration being observed in groups (a), (b), and (c) respectively. Only a few minutes' exposure to oxygen at high pressure was necessary to cause a significant decrease in GABA concentration. Exposure either to air at high pressure or to 100% oxygen at ambient pressure produced no reduction in GABA levels. Although the GABA concentration in the brain increased markedly within 1 hour after the end of the 33-minute exposure to oxygen at 6 atm pressure it was still somewhat below the levels found in unexposed animals. No significant change in GABA levels was observed during a further 2 hours of recovery time. In the case of rats exposed for only a short period of time, however, a complete return to normal was observed within the first hour. The levels of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and total α-amino acids in the brain were not altered by exposure to oxygen at high pressure.

GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID LEVELS IN THE BRAIN OF RATS EXPOSED TO OXYGEN AT HIGH PRESSURES

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1907-1913 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Wood ◽  
W. J. Watson
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
No Reduction ◽  
Ambient Pressure ◽  
Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gaba Concentration ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Brain

Rats were exposed to 100% oxygen at a pressure of 6 atmospheres absolute for 33 minutes. The surviving animals were assigned to one of three groups: (a) animals suffering severe convulsions during exposure, (b) animals suffering mild convulsions during exposure, (c) animals in which no convulsions were observed during exposure. The concentration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brains of rats in all groups was lower than in unexposed rats, reductions of 35%, 27%, and 19% in GABA concentration being observed in groups (a), (b), and (c) respectively. Only a few minutes' exposure to oxygen at high pressure was necessary to cause a significant decrease in GABA concentration. Exposure either to air at high pressure or to 100% oxygen at ambient pressure produced no reduction in GABA levels. Although the GABA concentration in the brain increased markedly within 1 hour after the end of the 33-minute exposure to oxygen at 6 atm pressure it was still somewhat below the levels found in unexposed animals. No significant change in GABA levels was observed during a further 2 hours of recovery time. In the case of rats exposed for only a short period of time, however, a complete return to normal was observed within the first hour. The levels of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and total α-amino acids in the brain were not altered by exposure to oxygen at high pressure.

Peculiarities of high-pressure hydrogen adsorption on Pt catalyzed Cu-BTC metal–organic framework

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 4277-4286
Author(s):  
S. V. Chuvikov ◽  
E. A. Berdonosova ◽  
A. Krautsou ◽  
J. V. Kostina ◽  
V. V. Minin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Hydrogen Adsorption ◽  
Metal Organic Framework ◽  
Pt Catalyst ◽  
Metal Organic ◽  
Pt Catalyzed ◽  
Pressure Hydrogen ◽  
Organic Framework

Pt-Catalyst plays a key role in hydrogen adsorption by Cu-BTC at high pressures.

scholarly journals Crystal and electronic structure engineering of tin monoxide by external pressure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Li ◽  
Junjie Wang ◽  
Vladislav A. Blatov ◽  
Yutong Gong ◽  
Naoto Umezawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Band Gap ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Space Group ◽  
Tin Monoxide ◽  
High Possibility ◽  
Pressure Phase

AbstractAlthough tin monoxide (SnO) is an interesting compound due to its p-type conductivity, a widespread application of SnO has been limited by its narrow band gap of 0.7 eV. In this work, we theoretically investigate the structural and electronic properties of several SnO phases under high pressures through employing van der Waals (vdW) functionals. Our calculations reveal that a metastable SnO (β-SnO), which possesses space group P21/c and a wide band gap of 1.9 eV, is more stable than α-SnO at pressures higher than 80 GPa. Moreover, a stable (space group P2/c) and a metastable (space group Pnma) phases of SnO appear at pressures higher than 120 GPa. Energy and topological analyses show that P2/c-SnO has a high possibility to directly transform to β-SnO at around 120 GPa. Our work also reveals that β-SnO is a necessary intermediate state between high-pressure phase Pnma-SnO and low-pressure phase α-SnO for the phase transition path Pnma-SnO →β-SnO → α-SnO. Two phase transition analyses indicate that there is a high possibility to synthesize β-SnO under high-pressure conditions and have it remain stable under normal pressure. Finally, our study reveals that the conductive property of β-SnO can be engineered in a low-pressure range (0–9 GPa) through a semiconductor-to-metal transition, while maintaining transparency in the visible light range.

scholarly journals The thermal conductivity of the Earth's core and implications for its thermal and compositional evolution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Ohta ◽  
Kei Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Thermal History ◽  
Diamond Anvil Cell ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Iron Alloys ◽  
Compositional Evolution ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Diamond Anvil ◽  
High Pressures And Temperatures

Abstract Precise determinations of the thermal conductivity of iron alloys at high pressures and temperatures are essential for understanding the thermal history and dynamics of the metallic cores of the Earth. We review relevant high-pressure experiments using a diamond-anvil cell and discuss implications of high core conductivity for its thermal and compositional evolution.

On the Negative Excess Isotherms for Methane Adsorption at High Pressure: Modeling and Experiment

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 2504-2525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Keliu Wu ◽  
Zhangxin Chen ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Jia Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Mass Balance ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Pore Wall ◽  
Void Volume ◽  
Excess Adsorption ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Accessible Volume ◽  
Adsorbed Phase

Summary An excess adsorption amount obtained in experiments is always determined by mass balance with a void volume measured by helium (He) –expansion tests. However, He, with a small kinetic diameter, can penetrate into narrow pores in porous media that are inaccessible to adsorbate gases [e.g., methane (CH4)]. Thus, the actual accessible volume for a specific adsorbate is always overestimated by an He–based void volume; such overestimation directly leads to errors in the determination of excess isotherms in the laboratory, such as “negative isotherms” for gas adsorption at high pressures, which further affects an accurate description of total gas in place (GIP) for shale–gas reservoirs. In this work, the mass balance for determining the adsorbed amount is rewritten, and two particular concepts, an “apparent excess adsorption” and an “actual excess adsorption,” are considered. Apparent adsorption is directly determined by an He–based volume, corresponding to the traditional treatment in experimental conditions, whereas actual adsorption is determined by an adsorbate–accessible volume, where pore–wall potential is always nonpositive (i.e., an attractive molecule/pore–wall interaction). Results show the following: The apparent excess isotherm determined by the He–based volume gradually becomes negative at high pressures, but the actual one determined by the adsorbate–accessible volume always remains positive.The negative adsorption phenomenon in the apparent excess isotherm is a result of the overestimation in the adsorbate–accessible volume, and a larger overestimation leads to an earlier appearance of this negative adsorption.The positive amount in the actual excess isotherm indicates that the adsorbed phase is always denser than the bulk gas because of the molecule/pore–wall attraction aiding the compression of the adsorbed molecules. Practically, an overestimation in pore volume (PV) is only 3.74% for our studied sample, but it leads to an underestimation reaching up to 22.1% in the actual excess amount at geologic conditions (i.e., approximately 47 MPa and approximately 384 K). Such an overestimation in PV also underestimates the proportions of the adsorbed–gas amount to the free–gas amount and to the total GIP. Therefore, our present work underlines the importance of a void volume in the determination of adsorption isotherms; moreover, we establish a path for a more–accurate evaluation of gas storage in geologic shale reservoirs with high pressure.

scholarly journals Gaseous combustion at high pressures. —Part X. The co-volume corrections, maximum temperatures and dissociation of steam and carbon dioxide in explosions

1928 ◽  
Vol 119 (782) ◽  
pp. 464-480
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Internal Energy ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Internal Combustion ◽  
Systematic Survey ◽  
Explosion Method ◽  
Maximum Temperatures ◽  
Very High

During the researches upon high-pressure explosions of carbonic oxide-air, hydrogen-air, etc., mixtures, which have been described in the previous papers of this series, a mass of data has been accumulated relating to the influence of density and temperature upon the internal energy of gases and the dissociation of steam and carbon dioxide. Some time ago, at Prof. Bone’s request, the author undertook a systematic survey of the data in question, and the present paper summarises some of the principal results thereof, which it is hoped will throw light upon problems interesting alike to chemists, physicists and internal-combustion engineers. The explosion method affords the only means known at present of determining the internal energies of gases at very high temperatures, and it has been used for this purpose for upwards of 50 years. Although by no means without difficulties, arising from uncertainties of some of the assumptions upon which it is based, yet, for want of a better, its results have been generally accepted as being at least provisionally valuable. Amongst the more recent investigations which have attracted attention in this connection should be mentioned those of Pier, Bjerrum, Siegel and Fenning, all of whom worked at low or medium pressures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document