Case History of Solidification Cracks in 2-1/4Cr 1Mo Low Carbon Welds — Cholla Unit 2

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn ◽  
Steve R. Paterson ◽  
Dan Nass
Keyword(s):  
Weight Percent ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Weld Deposit ◽  
History Of ◽  
Solidification Cracks ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Life Consumption ◽  
Metallurgical Evaluation

An examination of the main steam girth welds at Cholla Unit 2 was performed during a scheduled outage in Spring 1999. The examination revealed two distinct types of cracks. Nine girth welds had extensive arrays of small discontinuous ultrasonic examination indications in the weld deposit near the weld roots. Two girth welds had cracks connected to the outside surface of the pipe. Justifications for removing and replacing 11 of the 35 examined main steam girth welds are presented in this paper. Nondestructive examinations revealed small discontinuous indications near the root of several welds and throughout the weld deposit. In the most severe cases, these weld metal indications extended all the way around the circumference of the pipe. A metallurgical evaluation of both shop and field welds determined that the indications were arrays of small solidification cracks, typically 1/16-inch high by 1/32-inch long. The solidification cracks were attributed to wide weave beads in combination with low carbon content consumables. There was also a concern that those weld deposits with very low carbon (less than 0.05 weight percent) may have significantly shorter creep lives. In addition to the fabrication-induced solidification cracks, two girth welds were identified with service-induced creep cracks. The first of these was detected during ultrasonic and fluorescent magnetic particle examinations of selected welds. The second was detected visually in an auxiliary steam piping weld connection that was identified as a high priority weld resulting from a life consumption evaluation of the piping system.

Comparison of a Life Consumption Analysis to Section III, Subsection NH Design Rules for a Main Steam Girth Weld Creep Crack

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Creep Damage ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Design Rules ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
American Society ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Life Consumption

Creep damage of high energy piping (HEP) systems in fossil fuel power plants results from operation at creep range temperatures and high stresses over many years. Typically, the operating stresses in an HEP piping system are substantially below the yield stress. They tend to be load controlled and time dependent. In spring 1999, Arizona Public Service Company performed an examination of several girth welds of a main steam piping system at Cholla Power Station, Unit 2. A significant creep-related crack was found in a weld after 158,000 operating hours. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Subsection NH methodology was used to evaluate the load controlled stress design rules for nuclear Class 1 components in elevated temperature service as applied to this piping system. A high energy piping life consumption (HEPLC) analysis was performed prior to the examination to select and rank the most critical welds. After obtaining critical information during the outage, the software was also used to estimate the life exhaustion at the most critical weld. A discussion of results for the two approaches is provided in this paper.

Main Steam Piping Creep Life Consumption in Circumferential Welds

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Maximum Principal Stress ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Creep Life ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Life Consumption ◽  
Stress Parameters

A high energy piping (HEP) asset integrity management program is important for the safety of power plant personnel and reliability of the generating units. HEP weldment failures have resulted in extensive damage of components and significant lost generation. The main steam (MS) piping system is one of the most critical HEP systems. Creep damage assessment in MS piping systems should include the evaluation of multiaxial stresses associated with the field conditions. Typical creep life assessment stress parameters and estimated failure times are evaluated and compared with those of three MS piping system girth weld creep failures. This paper presents empirical data indicating that lead-the-fleet girth welds of MS piping systems have creep failures which can be successfully predicted by a multiaxial stress parameter, such as maximum principal stress. The calibration study indicates that the parent metal maximum principal stress should be increased by more than 20% to predict reasonable circumferential weldment lives in 2-1/4Cr-1Mo material. The correlation of other stress parameters, such as hoop stress, longitudinal membrane stress, and the standard as-designed ASME B31.1 sustained load stress do not provide an adequate ranking of the most critical girth welds subject to creep. In some piping systems, it is possible that spool-to-spool and circumferential variations in pipe wall thicknesses may influence the weldment life consumption estimates. Therefore, field wall thickness measurements should be taken at the most critical stress locations and applied to the life consumption evaluations.

Ranking of Creep Damage in Main Steam Piping System Girth Welds Considering Multiaxial Stress Ranges

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn ◽  
Fatma G. Faham ◽  
Dipak Patel
Keyword(s):  
Creep Damage ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Sustained Load ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Multiaxial Stress ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam

A high-energy piping (HEP) asset integrity management program is important for the safety of plant personnel and reliability of the fossil plant generating unit. HEP weldment failures have resulted in serious injuries, fatalities, extensive damage of components, and significant lost generation. The main steam (MS) piping system is one of the most critical HEP systems. Creep damage assessment in MS piping systems should include the evaluation of multiaxial stresses associated with field conditions and significant anomalies, such as malfunctioning supports and significant displacement interferences. This paper presents empirical data illustrating that the most critical girth welds of MS piping systems have creep failures which can be successfully ranked by a multiaxial stress parameter, such as maximum principal stress. Inelastic (redistributed) stresses at the piping outside diameter (OD) surface were evaluated for the base metal of three MS piping systems at the piping analysis model nodes. The range of piping system stresses at the piping nodes for each piping system was determined for the redistributed creep stress condition. The range of piping stresses was subsequently included on a Larson–Miller parameter (LMP) plot for the grade P22 material, revealing the few critical (lead-the-fleet) girth welds selected for nondestructive examination (NDE). In the three MS piping systems, the stress ranges varied from 55% to 80%, with only a few locations at stresses beyond the 65 percentile of the range. By including evaluations of significant field anomalies and the redistributed multiaxial stresses on the outside surface, it was shown that there is a good correlation of the ranked redistributed multiaxial stresses to the observed creep damage. This process also revealed that a large number of MS piping girth welds have insufficient applied stresses to develop substantial creep damage within the expected unit lifetime (assuming no major fabrication defects). This study also provided a comparison of the results of a conventional American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.1 Code as-designed sustained stress analysis versus the redistributed maximum principal stresses in the as-found (current) condition for a complete set of MS piping system nodes. The evaluations of redistributed maximum principal stresses in the as-found condition were useful in selecting high priority ranked girth weldment creep damage locations. The evaluations of B31.1 Code as-designed sustained load stresses were not useful in selecting high priority creep damage locations.

Risk-Based Inspection Applied to Main Steam and Hot Reheat Piping Systems

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Terminal Point ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Risk Areas ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Life Consumption

Many utilities select critical welds in their main steam (MS) and hot reheat (HRH) piping systems by considering some combination of design-based stresses, terminal point locations, and fitting weldments. The conventional methodology results in frequent inspections of many low risk areas and the neglect of some high risk areas. This paper discusses the use of a risk-based inspection (RBI) strategy to select the most critical inspection locations, determine appropriate reexamination intervals, and recommend the most important corrective actions for the piping systems. The high energy piping life consumption (HEPLC) strategy applies cost effective RBI principles to enhance inspection programs for MS and HRH piping systems. Using a top-down methodology, this strategy is customized to each piping system, considering applicable effects, such as expected damage mechanisms, previous inspection history, operating history, measured weldment wall thicknesses, observed support anomalies, and actual piping thermal displacements. This information can be used to provide more realistic estimates of actual time-dependent multiaxial stresses. Finally, the life consumption estimates are based on realistic weldment performance factors. Risk is defined as the product of probability and consequence. The HEPLC strategy considers a more quantitative probability assessment methodology as compared to most RBI approaches. Piping stress and life consumption evaluations, considering existing field conditions and inspection results, are enhanced to reduce the uncertainty in the quantitative probability of failure value for each particular location and to determine a more accurate estimate for future inspection intervals. Based on the results of many HEPLC projects, the author has determined that most of the risk (regarding failure of the pressure boundary) in MS and HRH piping systems is associated with a few high priority areas that should be examined at appropriate intervals. The author has performed many studies using RBI principles for MS and HRH piping systems over the past 15 years. This life management strategy for MS and HRH critical welds is a rational approach to determine critical weldment locations for examinations and to determine appropriate reexamination intervals as a risk-based evaluation technique. Both consequence of failure (COF) and likelihood of failure (LOF) are considered in this methodology. This paper also provides a few examples of the application of this methodology to MS and HRH piping systems.

Bull Run Fossil Plant Main Steam Piping Creep Evaluation

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl A. Rosario ◽  
Blaine W. Roberts ◽  
M. Scott Turnbow ◽  
Salah E. Azzazy
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Fossil Plant ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Engineering Consulting ◽  
Commercial Operation ◽  
Burning Coal ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam

Bull Run Unit 1, rated at 950 MW, is the first of four fossil supercritical power plants at TVA; the unit went into commercial operation in 1967. The boiler, built by Combustion Engineering (CE), has a radiant reheat twin divided furnace with tangential-fired burners for burning coal. The unit’s maximum continuous rating (MCR) is 6,400,000 lbs/hr of main steam flow, with a design temperature of 1003°F and pressure of 3840 psig. Through the end of November 2003, the unit had a total of 589 cumulative starts and 253,343 operating hours. In 1986 TVA located and repaired extensive cracking in the mixing link headers (27 of 32 saddle welds cracked) downstream of the superheater outlet headers. Visible sag was also noted at the mid-span of the mixing headers. Since that time through 2003, additional cracking of girth welds in the mixing link headers was discovered, followed by cracking in the main piping girth welds at the connections to the mixing headers and at one of the connections to the turbine. From 1988 through 2003 several elastic analyses which were performed were unable to explain the observed girth weld cracking and sagging in the piping. In October 2003, TVA contracted with Structural Integrity Associates (SI) and BW Roberts Engineering Consulting to perform elastic and creep analyses of the Bull Run main steam piping system to determine the most likely contributing factors to noticeable creep sagging and cracking problems in the mixing header link piping and main steam piping girth welds, and, to develop recommendations to mitigate additional cracking and creep/sagging. The evaluations concluded that improper hanger sizing along with longer-term hanger operational problems (non-ideal loads/travel, topped/bottomed out hangers) contributed to the observable creep sagging and girth weld cracking. The elastic and creep piping analyses performed to address these issues are described in this paper.

Fitness for Service of Degraded Grade 91 Pipe

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn ◽  
Steve R. Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Stresses ◽  
Creep Rupture ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Support Costs ◽  
Material Creep ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 91 ◽  
Life Consumption

The use of creep strength enhanced ferritic alloys such as Grade 91 in fossil power plants has become popular for high temperature piping applications. Since Grade 91 has higher stress allowables than Grade 22, a designer can specify thinner component wall thicknesses, resulting in lower through-wall thermal stresses during transient events and lower material and piping support costs. During the past two decades, Grade 91 has been used successfully in fossil power plants. However, this alloy has had some incidents of non-optimal weldment microstructure. In this case study, Brinell hardness tests of an ASME A182 Grade F91 (F91) wye block, including upstream and downstream F91 spools, revealed several readings of soft material, as low as 168HB. A study of creep rupture tests of degraded Grade 91 specimens revealed that the lower bound creep rupture curve of the degraded Grade 91 material is above the average creep rupture curve of Grade 22 material for the range of the specific piping operating stresses. Based on the empirical evidence that the average Grade 22 material creep rupture curve is conservative for the creep rupture of degraded Grade 91 material, a life consumption evaluation was performed for the degraded Grade 91 weldments using Grade 22 creep rupture properties. A life fraction analysis was performed considering the redistributed maximum principal stresses, based on simulation of piping displacements obtained from the hot and cold walkdowns. This study also considered the recent history of the specific piping system operating pressures and temperatures. This study also considered dissimilar metal welds, from ASME A182 Grade F91 (F91) to ASME A335 Grade P22 (P22) materials. It was determined that the Grades F91-to-F91 weldments had about 30% life consumption and the remaining lives were at least 7 years. The Grades F91-to-P22 weldments had less than 40% life consumption and the remaining lives were at least 15 years.

Life Management of Main Steam and Hot Reheat Piping Systems: Part 2

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Fatigue Damage ◽  
Terminal Point ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Material Damage ◽  
Life Management ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Creep Fatigue ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam

Since there have been several instances of weldment failures in main steam (MS) and hot reheat (HRH) piping systems, most utilities have developed programs to examine their most critical welds. Many utilities select their MS and HRH critical girth welds for examination by consideration of some combination of the ASME B31.1 Code [1] (Code) highest sustained stresses, highest thermal expansion stresses, terminal point locations, and fitting weldments. This paper suggests the use of an alternative life management methodology to prioritize material damage locations based on realistic stresses and applicable damage mechanisms. This methodology is customized to each piping system, considering applicable affects, such as operating history, measured weldment wall thicknesses, observed support anomalies, actual piping thermal displacements, and more realistic time-dependent multiaxial stresses. The high energy piping life consumption (HEPLC) methodology for MS and HRH critical girth welds may be considered as a rational approach to determine critical weldment locations for examinations and to determine appropriate reexamination intervals as a risk-based evaluation technique. The HEPLC methodology has been implemented over the past 15 years to provide more realistic estimates of actual displacements, stresses, and material damage based on the evaluation of field conditions. This HEPLC methodology can be described as having three basic phases: data collection, evaluation, and recommendations. The data collection phase includes obtaining design and post construction piping and supports information. The effects of current piping loads and anomalies are evaluated for potential creep/fatigue damage at the most critical weldments. The top ranked weldments of the HEPLC study are than selected as the highest priority examination locations. The author has completed many HEPLC studies of MS and HRH piping systems. The previous paper (Part 1) provided examples of data collection results and documentation of observed piping system anomalies. This paper will provide examples of evaluation results and recommendations, including a few case histories that have correctly ranked and predicted locations of significant creep/fatigue damage.

Frequency Distribution Curves for Main Steam Piping Multiaxial Stresses

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn ◽  
Fatma G. Faham ◽  
Dipak Patel
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Frequency Distribution ◽  
Creep Damage ◽  
Maximum Principal Stress ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Hoop Stresses

A high energy piping (HEP) asset integrity management program is important for the safety of plant personnel and reliability of the generating unit. HEP weldment failures have resulted in serious injuries, fatalities, extensive damage of components, and significant lost generation. The main steam (MS) piping system is one of the most critical HEP systems. Creep damage assessment in MS piping systems should include the evaluation of multiaxial stresses associated with field conditions and significant anomalies, such as malfunctioning supports and significant displacement interferences. This paper presents empirical data illustrating that lead-the-fleet girth welds of MS piping systems have creep failures which can be successfully ranked by a multiaxial stress parameter, such as maximum principal stress. Both the as-found elastic (initial) stress and inelastic (redistributed) stress at the piping outside diameter surface are evaluated for the base metal of three MS piping systems. Frequency distribution curves are then developed for the initial and redistributed piping stresses. The frequency distribution curves are subsequently included on a Larson Miller Parameter (LMP) plot for the applicable material, revealing the few critical (lead-the-fleet) girth welds selected for nondestructive examination (NDE). By including an evaluation of significant field anomalies, multiaxial operating stress on the outside surface, and weldment performance, it is shown that there is a good correlation of calculated creep stress versus the operating time of observed creep damage. This process also reveals the large number of MS piping girth welds that have insufficient applied stress to have substantial creep damage within the expected unit life time (assuming no major fabrication defects). API 579 recommends an effective stress to compute the creep rupture life using the LMP. This constitutive stress equation includes a combination of the maximum principal, von Mises, and hydrostatic stresses. Considering the stresses in these three MS piping systems, this paper reveals that when the axial and hoop stresses are nearly the same values, the API 579 effective stress may be 10% greater than the maximum principal stress. However, the maximum principal stresses are greater than the API 579 effective stresses at the maximum stress locations in the three MS piping systems, because the axial stresses are significantly greater than the hoop stresses. This study also provides a comparison of the results of a conventional American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.1 Code as-designed sustained stress analysis versus the redistributed maximum principal stresses for a complete set of MS piping system nodes. A comparison of Code-sustained load versus redistributed maximum principal stress results are illustrated on frequency distribution curves.

Life Management of Main Steam and Hot Reheat Piping Systems: Part 1

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Terminal Point ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Material Damage ◽  
Life Management ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Main Steam

Many utilities choose critical girth welds in their main steam (MS) and hot reheat (HRH) steam piping by consideration of some combination of the ASME B31.1 Code [1] (Code) highest sustained load and thermal expansion stresses, terminal point locations, and fitting weldments subject to stress intensification. As an alternative, a life management methodology is used to prioritize material damage locations based on realistic stresses and applicable damage mechanisms. This methodology is customized to each piping system, considering applicable affects, such as operating history, measured weldment wall thicknesses, observed support anomalies, actual piping thermal displacements, and more realistic time-dependent multiaxial stresses. The life management methodology for MS and HRH critical girth welds may be considered as a rational approach to determine critical weldment locations for examinations and to determine appropriate reexamination intervals as a risk-based evaluation technique. This methodology has been implemented over the past 15 years to provide more realistic estimates of actual displacements, strains, stresses, and material damage based on the evaluation of field conditions. This high energy piping life consumption (HEPLC) methodology can be described as having three basic phases: data collection, evaluation, and recommendations. The data collection phase includes obtaining design and post construction piping and supports information. The effects of current anomalies are evaluated to prioritize critical examination locations. Results of the examinations at the most critical locations are used to determine the degree of material damage at lead-the-fleet locations. The author has performed many HEPLC studies of MS and HRH piping systems. This paper will provide examples of data collection results and documentation of observed piping system anomalies.

Creep Life Prediction For High Energy Piping Girth Welds Case History: Cholla, Unit 2

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Cohn ◽  
Dan Nass
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Expansion ◽  
Yield Stress ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Stresses ◽  
Creep Damage ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Main Steam ◽  
Life Consumption

Creep damage of high energy piping (HEP) systems in fossil fuel power plants results from operation at creep range temperatures and stresses over many years. Thermal expansion stresses are typically below the yield stress and gradually relax over time. Consequently, the operating stresses in a piping system are typically below the yield stress and become load controlled. Conventional designs of HEP systems use the American Society of Mechanical Engineers B31.1 Power Piping Code. The Code is a general guideline for piping system design. Utilities typically determine examination sites by performing Code piping stress analyses and selecting locations that include the highest sustained longitudinal stress, highest thermal expansion stress, and terminal points. However, the Code does not address weldment properties, redistribution of thermal stresses and time-dependent life consumption due to material creep degradation. As an alternative, a high energy piping life consumption (HEPLC) methodology was used to predict maximum material damage locations. The methodology was used to prioritize expected creep damage locations, considering applicable affects such as weldment properties, field piping displacements, time-dependent operating stresses, and multiaxial piping stresses. This approach was applied to the main steam piping system at Cholla Unit 2. The locations of highest expected creep damage would not have been selected by a conventional site selection approach. Significant creep damage was found at the locations of maximum expected creep damage using the HEPLC methodology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document