Regulatory Perspective on Advanced Finite Element Flaw Growth Analysis of Alloy 82/182 Butt Welds
On October 13, 2006, the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation performed preweld overlay inspections using manual ultrasonic testing (UT) techniques on the surge, spray, relief, and safety nozzle-to-safe end dissimilar metal (DM) and safe end-to-pipe stainless steel butt welds. The inspection identified five circumferential indications in the surge, relief, and safety nozzle-to-safe end DM butt welds that the licensee attributed to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). These indications were significantly larger and more extensive than previously seen for the case of circumferential indications in commercial pressurized water reactors. As a result of the NRC staff’s initial flaw growth analyses, the NRC staff obtained commitments from the nuclear power industry licensees to complete pressurizer nozzle DM butt weld inspections on an accelerated basis. In addition, the industry informed the NRC staff that it would undertake a task to refine the crack growth analyses using more realistic assumptions to address the NRC staff’s concerns regarding the potential for rupture without prior evidence of leakage from circumferentially oriented PWSCC in pressurizer nozzle welds. These new analyses are referred to as advanced finite element (AFE) analyses. This paper will discuss the regulatory review of the industry’s AFE analyses. This discussion will include the NRC staff’s approach to the review, the differences between the industry’s AFE analyses and the NRC staff’s confirmatory analyses, and the NRC staff’s acceptance criteria. The paper will discuss the impact of the AFE analyses on the regulatory process. Finally, the paper will discuss possible future regulatory and research applications for AFE analyses as well as additional NRC research projects intended to address some of the uncertainties in this type of analysis.