Comparison of Health Care Expenditures Among U.S. Older Adults With Pain Who Reported Frequent Exercise Versus Nonfrequent Exercise

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
David R. Axon ◽  
Jonathan Chien ◽  
Hanh Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
Health Care Expenditure ◽  
Prescription Medication ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nationally Representative

This cross-sectional study included a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged ≥50 years with self-reported pain in the past 4 weeks from the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Adjusted linear regression analyses accounted for the complex survey design and assessed differences in several types of annual health care expenditures between individuals who reported frequent exercise (≥30 min of moderate–vigorous intensity physical activity ≥5 times per week) and those who did not. Approximately 23,940,144 of 56,979,267 older U.S. adults with pain reported frequent exercise. In adjusted analyses, individuals who reported frequent exercise had 15% lower annual prescription medication expenditures compared with those who did not report frequent exercise (p = .007). There were no statistical differences between frequent exercise status for other health care expenditure types (p > .05). In conclusion, adjusted annual prescription medication expenditures were 15% lower among older U.S. adults with pain who reported frequent exercise versus those who did not.

scholarly journals National Estimates of Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure Burdens Among Nonelderly Adults With Cancer: 2001 to 2008

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2821-2826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didem S.M. Bernard ◽  
Stacy L. Farr ◽  
Zhengyi Fang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Health Care Expenditure ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Never Married ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Total Burden

Purpose To compare the prevalence of high out-of-pocket burdens among patients with cancer with other chronically ill and well patients, and to examine the sociodemographic characteristics associated with high burdens among patients with cancer. Methods The sample included persons 18 to 64 years of age who received treatment for cancer, taken from a nationally representative sample of the US population from the 2001 to 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We examined the proportion of persons living in families with high out-of-pocket burdens associated with medical spending, including insurance premiums, relative to income, defining high health care (total) burden as spending more than 20% of income on health care (and premiums). Results The risk of high burdens is significantly greater for patients with cancer compared with other chronically ill and well patients. We find that 13.4% of patients with cancer had high total burdens, in contrast to 9.7% among those with other chronic conditions and 4.4% among those without chronic conditions. Among nonelderly persons with cancer, the following were associated with higher out-of-pocket burdens: private nongroup insurance, age 55 to 64 years, non-Hispanic black, never married or widowed, one child or no children, unemployed, lower income, lower education level, living in nonmetropolitan statistical areas, and having other chronic conditions. Conclusion High burdens may affect treatment choice and deter patients from getting care. Thus, although a detailed patient-physician discussion of costs of care may not be feasible, we believe that an awareness of out-of-pocket burdens among patients with cancer is useful for clinical oncologists.

Abstract 25: Favorable Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Profile is Associated with Lower Healthcare Costs: The 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Valero-Elizondo ◽  
Joseph A Salami ◽  
Oluseye Ogunmoroti ◽  
Ehimen C Aneni ◽  
Rehan Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Health Care Expenditure ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Complex Design ◽  
Final Study ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: The AHA’s 2020 Strategic Goals emphasize the value of favorable modifiable risk factor (MRF) profile to reduce the burden of CVD morbidity and mortality. In this study we aimed to quantify the overall and incremental impact of MRF on health care expenditure in the U.S among those with and without CVD. Methods: The study population was derived from the 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative adult sample (≥ 40 years). Direct costs were calculated for all-cause health care resource utilization. Variables of interest included CVD diagnoses (coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, dysrhythmias or heart failure), ascertained by ICD-9-CM codes, and MRF (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, physical activity and/or obesity). Two-part econometric models were utilized to study cost data; a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and link log was used to assess expenditures, taking into consideration the survey’s complex design. Results: The final study sample consisted of 15,651 MEPS participants (57 ± 12 years, 52% female). Overall, 6,231 (39%) had 0-1, 7,429 (49%) had 2-3, and 1,991 (12%) had ≥ 4 MRF, translating to 55.5, 69.9 and 17.9 million adults ≥ 40 years in U.S, respectively. Generally, there was a direct decrease in health expenditures with favorable MRF across CVD status (Table). These differences persisted after taking into account demographics, insurance status and comorbid conditions. Among those without established CVD, the average medical expenditure was $4,013 (95% CI 5,117, 2,910) and $2,696 (95% CI 4,416, 977) lower for those with 0-1 & 2-3 MRF, as compared to those with ≥ 4 MRF. Conclusion: Favorable MRF profile is associated with significantly lower medical expenditure among individuals with and without established CVD. Our study provides robust estimates for potential healthcare savings with nationwide policies focusing on preventing and managing modifiable CV risk factors.

Differences in Health Care Expenditures Among Non-Latino Whites and Asian Subgroups Vary Along the Distribution of the Expenditures

2019 ◽  
pp. 107755871987421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungchul Park ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Dylan H. Roby ◽  
Alexander N. Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Limited English Proficiency ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
High Expenditure ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
The Difference ◽  
White Adults

Using a nationally representative sample from the 2013 to 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we examined differences among non-Latino Whites and Asian subgroups (Asian Indians, Chinese, Filipinos, and other Asians) across distributions of total health care expenditures and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures. For total health care expenditures, differences between Asian and White adults persisted throughout the distribution, but the magnitude of the difference was larger at no or low levels of expenditures than at high expenditure levels. A similar pattern was observed in OOP expenditures, but the magnitude of the difference was substantially larger at low levels of expenditures. The extent of the difference varied by Asian subgroup, but this trend persisted across all the subgroups. Similar trends were observed by nativity and limited English proficiency. Our findings suggest that differences in health care expenditures between Whites and Asians are more pronounced at low expenditure levels.

scholarly journals Burden of Depression among Working-Age Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Arthritis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arijita Deb ◽  
Nilanjana Dwibedi ◽  
Traci LeMasters ◽  
Jo Ann Hornsby ◽  
Wenhui Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Functional Limitations ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Working Age ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Using Data

Objective. This study estimated the excess clinical, humanistic, and economic burden associated with depression among working-age adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Methods. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among working-age (18 to 64 years) RA patients with depression (N=647) and without depression (N=2,015) using data from the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the years 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015. Results. Overall, 25.8% had depression. In adjusted analyses, adults with RA and depression compared to those without depression were significantly more likely to have pain interference with normal work (severe pain: AOR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.55, 3.18), functional limitations (AOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.61, 2.94), and lower mental health HRQoL scores. Adults with RA and depression had significantly higher annual healthcare expenditures ($14,752 versus 10,541, p<.001) and out-of-pocket spending burden. Adults with RA and depression were more likely to be unemployed and among employed adults, those with depression had a significantly higher number of missed work days annually and higher lost annual wages due to missed work days. Conclusions. This study highlights the importance of effectively managing depression in routine clinical practice of RA patients to reduce pain and functional limitations, improve quality of life, and lower direct and indirect healthcare costs.

Abstract 002: Patient Provider Communication and Patient-centered Outcomes Among Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010-2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Joseph Salami ◽  
Haider Warraich ◽  
Salim Virani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Nationally Representative

Background: With recent enactment of Accountable Care Act, consumer reported patient-provider communication (PPC) assessed by Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) in ambulatory settings is incorporated as a complementary value metric for patient-centered care of chronic conditions in pay-for-performance programs. In this study, we examine the relationship of PPC with select indicators of patient-centered care in a nationally representative adult US population with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: The study population consisted of a nationally representative sample of 8223 individuals (age ≥ 18 years) representing 21.6 million with established ASCVD (self-reported or ICD-9 diagnosis) reporting a usual source of care in the 2010-2013 pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) cohort. Participants responded to questions from CAHPS that assess satisfaction with PPC (four-point response scale: never, sometimes, usually, always ) :(1) “How often providers show respect for what you had to say” (2) “How often health care providers listened carefully to you” (3) “How often health care providers explained things so you understood” (4) “How often health providers spent enough time with you” We developed a weighted PPC composite score, categorized as 1 ( never / sometimes ), 2 ( usually ), and 3 ( always ). Outcomes of interest were 1) patient reported outcomes (PRO): SF-12 physical/mental health status, 2) quality of care measures: statin and ASA use, 3) health-care resource utilization (HRU): Emergency room visits & hospital stays, 4) total annual and out of pocket healthcare expenditures (HCE). Results: As shown in the table, those with ASCVD reporting ineffective (never/sometimes) vs. effective PCC (always) were over 2-fold more likely to report poor PRO, 34% & 22% less likely to report statin and ASA use respectively, had a significantly greater HRU (OR≥ 2 ER visit: 1.40 [95% CI:1.09-1.80], OR≥ 2 hospitalization: 1.35 [95% CI:1.02-1.77], as well as an estimated $1,294 ($121-2468) higher annual HCE. Conclusion: This study reveals a strong relationship between patient-physician communication among those with established ASCVD with patient-reported outcomes, utilization of evidence based therapies, healthcare resource utilization and expenditures.

Incremental health care services and expenditures associated with depression among individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE)

Lupus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1107-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Ogunsanya ◽  
S O Nduaguba ◽  
C M Brown
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Medication Costs ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus

Objectives The objective of this paper is to describe the annual direct medical expenditures for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) patients, and to estimate the incremental health care expenditures and utilization associated with depression among adults with CLE, while controlling for covariates. Methods Using the 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we compared CLE patients with and without depression to determine differences in: (a) health care utilization—inpatient, outpatient, office-based and emergency room (ER) visits, and prescriptions filled; and (b) expenditures—total costs, inpatient, outpatient, office-based, ER, and prescription medication costs, and other costs using demography-adjusted and comorbidity-adjusted multivariate models (age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, perception of health status, poverty category, smoking status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index). Results The total direct medical expenditure associated with CLE is estimated at approximately $29.7 billion in 2014 US dollars. After adjusting for covariates, adults with CLE and depression had more hospital discharges (utilization ratio (UR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.00–1.28)), ER visits (UR = 1.17, 95% CI (1.09–1.37)), and prescribed medicines (UR = 2.15, 95% CI (1.51–3.05)) than those without depression. Adults with CLE and depression had significantly higher average annual total expenditure that those without depression ($19,854 vs. $9735). Conclusions High health care expenditures are significant for patients with CLE, especially among those with depression. Prescription drugs, inpatient visits, and ER visits contributed most to the total expenditures in CLE patients with depression. Early diagnosis and treatment of depression in CLE patients may reduce total health care expenditures and utilization in this population.

The Effect of SCHIP Expansions on Health Insurance Decisions by Employers

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Buchmueller ◽  
Philip Cooper ◽  
Kosali Simon ◽  
Jessica Vistnes
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Insurance Program ◽  
Health Insurance Program ◽  
State Variation ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Insurance Decisions

This study uses repeated cross-sectional data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey—Insurance Component (MEPS-IC), a large nationally representative survey of establishments, to investigate the effect of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) on health insurance decisions by employers. The data span the years 1997 to 2001, the period when states were implementing SCHIP. We exploit cross-state variation in the timing of SCHIP implementation and the extent to which the program increased eligibility for public insurance. We find evidence suggesting that employers whose workers were likely to have been affected by these expansions reacted by raising employee contributions for family coverage options, and that take-up of any coverage, generally, and family coverage, specifically, dropped in these establishments. We find no evidence that employers stopped offering single or family coverage outright.

scholarly journals Assessment of health problems and healthcare expenditure, utilization of healthcare schemes and insurances among residents of Dhanas UT Chandigarh

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2279
Author(s):  
Kanchan Thakur ◽  
Raveen . ◽  
Sita . ◽  
Suresh Kumar ◽  
Vineeta Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Catastrophic Expenditure ◽  
Financial Risk Protection ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Morbidity Burden

Background: Non-communicable diseases account for high burden of morbidity and mortality all over the world. Increased burden and need of long-lasting medical care pose adverse financial implications on poor households. It becomes even more difficult in the absence of any financial risk protection (FRP). In that case the families are forced to manage health care expenditures from the money needed for their routine daily expenses thus increasing Out of pocket expenditures. Objective of the study was to assess the morbidity burden, and out of pocket (OOP) expenditure on healthcare; assess the utilization of health care insurance schemes.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the residents of Dhanas Village Chandigarh using systematic random sampling technique. Data was collected by interviewing the participants as per interview schedule on disease patterns, OOP expenditures, and coping methods used for   incurring health care expenses.  From total 419 selected families, one adult member from each family was interviewed at their own house setting.Results: A low insurance coverage (20.5%) was reported and among insured 66.2% had availed benefits. The illness rate was found to be 14.2% and hospitalization rate was 3.7%. The endocrinal disorders were most prevalent among the residents. One third (36.5%) of households had faced catastrophic expenditure for outpatient and 10% for the inpatient care. The salary was leading source of expenditure.Conclusions: There is low insurance coverage and high catastrophic expenditure among the households.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document