scholarly journals Multicenter Observational Study of Ceftaroline Fosamil for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan J. Zasowski ◽  
Trang D. Trinh ◽  
Kimberly C. Claeys ◽  
Anthony M. Casapao ◽  
Noor Sabagha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Ceftaroline Fosamil ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

ABSTRACT Novel therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) are needed in the setting of reduced antibiotic susceptibilities and therapeutic failure. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin antibiotic with MRSA activity. Although not FDA approved for MRSA BSI, ceftaroline has generated much interest as a potential treatment option. However, detailed descriptions of its use in this setting remain limited. To address this, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of adult patients with MRSA BSI treated with at least 72 h of ceftaroline from 2011 to 2015. Safety outcomes were examined in the overall cohort, while efficacy outcomes were examined among patients who had not cleared their BSI prior to ceftaroline initiation. Data were also stratified by ceftaroline monotherapy or combination therapy. Predictors of clinical failure on ceftaroline treatment were also sought. Overall, 211 patients were included in the safety population; Clostridium difficile infection, rash, and neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (2.8%), 7 patients (3.3%), and 3 patients (1.4%), respectively. Clinical success was observed in 86 (68.3%) of the 126 patients included in the efficacy population. The monotherapy and combination therapy subgroups had similar proportions of patients experiencing success (69.7 and 64.9%, respectively). The median BSI durations post-ceftaroline treatment were 2 days (interquartile range, 1 to 4 days) for monotherapy and 3 days (interquartile range, 1.5 to 5 days) for combination therapy. Higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and comorbid malignancy independently predicted treatment failure. Ceftaroline appears effective for MRSA BSI as both monotherapy and combination therapy. However, comparative studies are needed to further delineate the role of ceftaroline in MRSA BSI treatment.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility to Daptomycin and Vancomycin in anIn VitroPharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 4497-4503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie E. Barber ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
Cortney E. Ireland ◽  
Blaise R. Boles ◽  
Warren E. Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Device ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Elimination Half ◽  
Antimicrobial Protection ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACTAnnually, medical device infections are associated with >250,000 catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), with up to 25% mortality.Staphylococcus aureus, a primary pathogen in these infections, is capable of biofilm production, allowing organism persistence in harsh environments, offering antimicrobial protection. With increases inS. aureusisolates with reduced susceptibility to current agents, ceftaroline (CPT) offers a therapeutic alternative. Therefore, we evaluated whether CPT would have a role against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA), including those with decreased susceptibilities to alternative agents. In this study, we investigated CPT activity alone or combined with daptomycin (DAP) or rifampin (RIF) against 3 clinical biofilm-producing MRSA strains in anin vitrobiofilm pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Simulated antimicrobial regimens were as follows: 600 mg of CPT every 8 h (q8h) (free maximum concentration of drug [fCmax], 17.04 mg/liter; elimination half-life [t1/2], 2.66 h), 12 mg/kg of body weight/day of DAP (fCmax, 14.7 mg/liter;t1/2, 8 h), and 450 mg of RIF q12h (fCmax, 3.5 mg/liter;t1/2, 3.4 h), CPT plus DAP, and CPT plus RIF. Samples were obtained and plated to determine colony counts. Differences in log10CFU/cm2were evaluated by analysis of variance with Tukey'spost hoctest. The strains were CPT and vancomycin susceptible and DAP nonsusceptible (DNS). CPT displayed activity throughout the experiment. DAP demonstrated initial activity with regrowth at 24 h in all strains. RIF was comparable to the drug-free control, and little benefit was observed when combined with CPT. CPT plus DAP displayed potent activity, with an average log10CFU/cm2reduction of 3.33 ± 1.01 from baseline. CPT demonstrated activity against biofilm-producing DNS MRSA. CPT plus DAP displayed therapeutic enhancement over monotherapy, providing a potential option for difficult-to-treat medical device infections.

scholarly journals β-Lactamase Inhibitors Enhance the Synergy between β-Lactam Antibiotics and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Evans R. Henson ◽  
Juwon Yim ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
George Sakoulas ◽  
Michael J. Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

ABSTRACT The evidence for using combination therapy for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is growing. In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect of daptomycin (DAP) combined with piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam against MRSA in time-kill experiments. Six of eight strains demonstrated synergy between DAP and the β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination. In 5/8 strains, the synergy occurred only in the presence of the BLI, highlighting a role for BLIs in peptide–β-lactam synergy.

scholarly journals Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus of Clonal Complex 5, the New York/Japan Epidemic Clone, Causing a High Early-Mortality Rate in Patients with Bloodstream Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dokyun Kim ◽  
Jun Sung Hong ◽  
Eun-Jeong Yoon ◽  
Hyukmin Lee ◽  
Young Ah Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
New York ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Clonal Complex ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Epidemic Clone ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT This study was performed to evaluate the clinical impacts of putative risk factors in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) through a prospective, multicenter, observational study. All 567 patients with S. aureus BSIs that occurred during a 1-year period in six general hospitals were included in this study. Host- and pathogen-related variables were investigated to determine risk factors for the early mortality of patients with S. aureus BSIs. The all-cause mortality rate was 15.0% (85/567) during the 4-week follow-up period from the initial blood culture, and 76.5% (65/85) of the mortality cases occurred within the first 2 weeks. One-quarter (26.8%, 152/567) of the S. aureus blood isolates carried the tst-1 gene, and most (86.2%, 131/152) of them were identified to be clonal complex 5 agr type 2 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains harboring staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type II, belonging to the New York/Japan epidemic clone. A multivariable logistic regression showed that the tst-1 positivity of the causative S. aureus isolates was associated with an increased 2-week mortality rate both in patients with S. aureus BSIs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 2.88) and in patients with MRSA BSIs (aOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.19 to 6.03). Two host-related factors, an increased Pitt bacteremia score and advanced age, as well as a pathogen-related factor, carriage of tst-1 by causative MRSA isolates, were risk factors for 2-week mortality in patients with BSIs. Careful management of patients with BSIs caused by the New York/Japan epidemic clone is needed to improve clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals A Mini-Review on Ceftaroline in Bacteremia Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections

Antibiotics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Lounsbury ◽  
Mary Reeber ◽  
Georges Mina ◽  
Christiane Chbib
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Ceftaroline Fosamil ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

Objective: The objective of this review is to describe the outcomes of patients treated with ceftaroline in the non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in both pediatric and adult populations. Data sources: A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Medline, and The Cochrane Library up to January 2019. Study selection and data extraction: All English-language clinical trials and case reports related to the efficacy of ceftaroline in new, not-yet-approved FDA indications in MRSA infections in pediatric or adult populations. Data synthesis: In the case of MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) infections, three different randomized studies in pediatric patients showed effectiveness of ceftaroline. When used in the case of adult populations with MRSA bacteremia, a small trial of 16 patients showed 50% clinical success in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections versus 63% clinical success in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Another case series of six refractory case reports showed 50% clinical success of ceftaroline in patients with MRSA. Conclusions: Although there are few case reports and limited data to date, ceftaroline fosamil should continue to be studied as an alternative therapy in MRSA infections in both pediatric and adult populations. Clinical success rates of ceftaroline were, in most cases, considered high when treating patients with MRSA infection. More clinical trials need to be studied. In the specific case of MRSA bacteremia, the treatment options remain few and ceftaroline should be extensively studied for the salvage treatment of MRSAB.

scholarly journals In VitroPharmacodynamics of Vancomycin and Cefazolin Alone and in Combination against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
Dora E. Wiskirchen ◽  
Joseph L. Kuti ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Bacterial Density ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Vancomycin Mics ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTPrevious studies employing time-kill methods have observed synergistic effects against methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) when a β-lactam is combined with vancomycin. However, these time-kill studies have neglected the importance of human-simulated exposures. We evaluated the effect of human simulated exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 8 h (q8h) in combination with cefazolin at 1 g q8h against various MRSA isolates. Four clinical isolates (two MRSA isolates [vancomycin MICs, 0.5 and 2.0 μg/ml], a heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[hVISA] isolate [MIC, 2.0 μg/ml], and a vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[VISA] isolate [MIC, 8.0 μg/ml]) were evaluated in anin vitropharmacodynamic model with a starting inoculum of 106or 108CFU/ml. Bacterial density was measured over 48 to 72 h. Time-kill curves were constructed, and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (AUBC) was calculated. During 106CFU/ml studies, combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes than vancomycin alone at 12 h (−4.31 ± 0.58 versus −2.80 ± 0.59,P< 0.001), but not at 48 h. Combination therapy significantly reduced the AUBC from 0 to 48 h (122 ± 14) compared with vancomycin alone (148 ± 22,P= 0.017). Similar results were observed during 108CFU/ml studies, where combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes at 12 h than vancomycin alone (−4.00 ± 0.20 versus −1.10 ± 0.04,P< 0.001) and significantly reduced the AUBC (275 ± 30 versus 429 ± 37,P< 0.001) after 72 h of incubation. In this study, the combination of vancomycin and cefazolin at human-simulated exposures improved the rate of kill against these MRSA isolates and resulted in greater overall antibacterial effect, but no differences in bacterial density were observed by the end of the experiments.

scholarly journals Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Control in the 21st Century: Laboratory Involvement Affecting Disease Impact and Economic Benefit from Large Population Studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 2647-2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance R. Peterson ◽  
Donna M. Schora
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Control Plan ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Program Cost

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a global health care problem. Large studies (e.g., >25,000 patients) show that active surveillance testing (AST) followed by contact precautions for positive patients is an effective approach for MRSA disease control. With this approach, the clinical laboratory will be asked to select what AST method(s) to use and to provide data monitoring outcomes of the infection prevention interventions. This minireview summarizes evidence for MRSA disease control, reviews the involvement of the laboratory, and provides examples of how to undertake a program cost analysis. Health care organizations with total MRSA clinical infections of >0.3/1,000 patient days or bloodstream infections of >0.03/1,000 patient days should implement a MRSA control plan.

scholarly journals Focusing the Lens on the CAMERA Concepts: Early Combination β-Lactam and Vancomycin Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Andrew Wilsey ◽  
Donna R. Burgess ◽  
David S. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Vancomycin Therapy ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Early Use ◽  
Care Systems

ABSTRACT Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has grown to become a major burden on health care systems. The cumulation of limited therapeutic options and worsened patient outcomes with persistent MRSA bacteremia has driven research in optimizing its initial management. The guidelines published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America currently recommend combination therapy for refractory MRSA bacteremia, but the utility of combining antibiotics from the start of therapy is under investigation. The alternative strategy of early use of β-lactam antibiotics in combination with vancomycin upon initial MRSA bacteremia detection has shown promise. While this concept has gained international attention, providers should give this strategy serious consideration prior to implementation. The objective of this review is to examine retrospective and prospective evidence for early combination with vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics, as well as explore potential consequences of combination therapy.

scholarly journals Impact of the Combination of Daptomycin and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole on Clinical Outcomes in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1969-1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly C. Claeys ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
Anthony M. Casapao ◽  
Ryan P. Mynatt ◽  
Lisa Avery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

ABSTRACTComplicatedStaphylococcus aureusinfections, including bacteremia, are often associated with treatment failures, prolonged hospital stays, and the emergence of resistance to primary and even secondary therapies. Daptomycin is commonly used as salvage therapy after vancomycin failure for the treatment of methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) infections. Unfortunately, the emergence of daptomycin resistance, especially in deep-seated infections, has been reported, prompting the need for alternative or combination therapy. Numerous antibiotic combinations with daptomycin have been investigated clinically andin vitro. Of interest, the combination of daptomycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has proved to be rapidly bactericidalin vitroto strains that are both susceptible and nonsusceptible to daptomycin. However, to date, there is limited clinical evidence supporting the use of this combination. This was a multicenter, retrospective case series of patients treated with the combination of daptomycin and TMP-SMX for at least 72 h. The objective of this study was to describe the safety and effectiveness of this regimen in clinical practice. The most commonly stated reason that TMP-SMX was added to daptomycin was persistent bacteremia and/or progressive signs and symptoms of infection. After the initiation of combination therapy, the median time to clearance of bacteremia was 2.5 days. Microbiological eradication was demonstrated in 24 out of 28 patients, andin vitrosynergy was demonstrated in 17 of the 17 recovered isolates. Further research with this combination is necessary to describe the optimal role and its impact on patient outcomes.

scholarly journals In VivoEfficacy of Ceftaroline Fosamil in a Methicillin-Resistant Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Producing Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Pneumonia Model

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1855-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Croisier-Bertin ◽  
Davy Hayez ◽  
Sonia Da Silva ◽  
Delphine Labrousse ◽  
Donald Biek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Pulmonary Tissue ◽  
Ceftaroline Fosamil ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Panton Valentine Leukocidin ◽  
Valentine Leukocidin

ABSTRACTCeftaroline, the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil, is a cephalosporin with broad-spectrumin vitroactivity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and multidrug-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae(MDRSP), and common Gram-negative pathogens. This study investigated thein vivoactivity of ceftaroline fosamil compared with clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin in a severe pneumonia model due to MRSA-producing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). A USA300 PVL-positive clone was used to induce pneumonia in rabbits. Infected rabbits were randomly assigned to no treatment or simulated human-equivalent dosing with ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, linezolid, or vancomycin. Residual bacterial concentrations in the lungs and spleen were assessed after 48 h of treatment. PVL expression was measured using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid considerably reduced mortality rates compared with the control, whereas vancomycin did not. Pulmonary and splenic bacterial titers and PVL concentrations were greatly reduced by ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid. Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid were associated with reduced pulmonary tissue damage based on significantly lower macroscopic scores. Ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, and, to a lesser extent, linezolid were efficient in reducing bacterial titers in both the lungs and spleen and decreasing macroscopic scores and PVL production compared with the control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document