scholarly journals Carbapenem Susceptibility Testing Errors Using Three Automated Systems, Disk Diffusion, Etest, and Broth Microdilution and Carbapenem Resistance Genes in Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 1149-1149
Author(s):  
Ana Elizabeth Markelz ◽  
Katrin Mende ◽  
Clinton K. Murray ◽  
Xin Yu ◽  
Wendy C. Zera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Automated Systems ◽  
Broth Microdilution

scholarly journals Carbapenem Susceptibility Testing Errors Using Three Automated Systems, Disk Diffusion, Etest, and Broth Microdilution and Carbapenem Resistance Genes in Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 4707-4711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Elizabeth Markelz ◽  
Katrin Mende ◽  
Clinton K. Murray ◽  
Xin Yu ◽  
Wendy C. Zera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Carbapenemase Gene ◽  
Automated Methods

ABSTRACTTheAcinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticuscomplex (ABC) is associated with increasing carbapenem resistance, necessitating accurate resistance testing to maximize therapeutic options. We determined the accuracy of carbapenem antimicrobial susceptibility tests for ABC isolates and surveyed them for genetic determinants of carbapenem resistance. A total of 107 single-patient ABC isolates from blood and wound infections from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated. MICs of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem determined by broth microdilution (BMD) were compared to results obtained by disk diffusion, Etest, and automated methods (the MicroScan, Phoenix, and Vitek 2 systems). Discordant results were categorized as very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor errors (mE). DNA sequences encoding OXA beta-lactamase enzymes (blaOXA-23-like,blaOXA-24-like,blaOXA-58-like, andblaOXA-51-like) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) (IMP, VIM, and SIM1) were identified by PCR, as was theKPC2carbapenemase gene. Imipenem was more active than meropenem and doripenem. The percentage of susceptibility was 37.4% for imipenem, 35.5% for meropenem, and 3.7% for doripenem. Manual methods were more accurate than automated methods.blaOXA-23-likeandblaOXA-24-likewere the primary resistance genes found.blaOXA-58-like, MBLs, andKPC2were not present. Both automated testing and manual testing for susceptibility to doripenem were very inaccurate, with VME rates ranging between 2.8 and 30.8%. International variability in carbapenem breakpoints and the absence of CLSI breakpoints for doripenem present a challenge in susceptibility testing.

scholarly journals Pseudo-Outbreak of Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Resulting from False Susceptibility Testing by a Rapid Automated System

2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 3505-3507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Tsakris ◽  
Anastassia Pantazi ◽  
Spyros Pournaras ◽  
Antonios Maniatis ◽  
Aleka Polyzou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Homogeneous Group ◽  
Susceptibility Test ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Agar Dilution

Introduction of the Vitek GNS-506 susceptibility testing cards in the Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, resulted in an apparently high prevalence of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. When 35 of these isolates were further tested by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and agar dilution assays, 32 were imipenem sensitive by all tests and three were sensitive or intermediate, depending on the method. The pseudoresistant acinetobacters did not form a genetically homogeneous group. It is suggested that the detection of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates by this system should be confirmed by an additional susceptibility test.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of the VITEK 2, Disk Diffusion, Etest, Broth Microdilution, and Agar Dilution Susceptibility Testing Methods for Colistin in Clinical Isolates, Including Heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii Strains

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 3726-3730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome R. Lo-Ten-Foe ◽  
Anne Marie G. A. de Smet ◽  
Bram M. W. Diederen ◽  
Jan A. J. W. Kluytmans ◽  
Peter H. J. van Keulen
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Enterobacter Cloacae ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Diffusion Test ◽  
Disk Diffusion Test ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Vitek 2

ABSTRACT Increasing antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria has recently renewed interest in colistin as a therapeutic option. The increasing use of colistin necessitates the availability of rapid and reliable methods for colistin susceptibility testing. We compared seven methods of colistin susceptibility testing (disk diffusion, agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton [MH] and Isosensitest agar, Etest on MH and Isosensitest agar, broth microdilution, and VITEK 2) on 102 clinical isolates collected from patient materials during a selective digestive decontamination or selective oral decontamination trial in an intensive-care unit. Disk diffusion is an unreliable method to measure susceptibility to colistin. High error rates and low levels of reproducibility were observed in the disk diffusion test. The colistin Etest, agar dilution, and the VITEK 2 showed a high level of agreement with the broth microdilution reference method. Heteroresistance for colistin was observed in six Enterobacter cloacae isolates and in one Acinetobacter baumannii isolate. This is the first report of heteroresistance to colistin in E. cloacae isolates. Resistance to colistin in these isolates seemed to be induced upon exposure to colistin rather than being caused by stable mutations. Heteroresistant isolates could be detected in the broth microdilution, agar dilution, Etest, or disk diffusion test. The VITEK 2 displayed low sensitivity in the detection of heteroresistant subpopulations of E. cloacae. The VITEK 2 colistin susceptibility test can therefore be considered to be a reliable tool to determine susceptibility to colistin in isolates of genera that are known not to exhibit resistant subpopulations. In isolates of genera known to (occasionally) exhibit heteroresistance, an alternative susceptibility testing method capable of detecting heteroresistance should be used.

scholarly journals Comparison of Minocycline Susceptibility Testing Methods for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2937-2941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Sarah L. Bowler ◽  
Serena F. Kantz ◽  
Roberta T. Mettus ◽  
Yan Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Minor Error ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Treatment options for infections due to carbapenem-resistantAcinetobacter baumanniiare extremely limited. Minocycline is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative with activity against this pathogen. This study compared susceptibility testing methods that are used in clinical microbiology laboratories (Etest, disk diffusion, and Sensititre broth microdilution methods) for testing of minocycline, tigecycline, and doxycycline against 107 carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniiclinical isolates. Susceptibility rates determined with the standard broth microdilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth were 77.6% for minocycline and 29% for doxycycline, and 92.5% of isolates had tigecycline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml. Using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates determined with the Etest method were 67.3% and 52.3% for minocycline, 21.5% and 18.7% for doxycycline, and 71% and 29.9% for tigecycline, respectively. With the disk diffusion method using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates were 82.2% and 72.9% for minocycline and 34.6% and 34.6% for doxycycline, respectively, and rates of MICs of ≤2 μg/ml were 46.7% and 23.4% for tigecycline. In comparison with the standard broth microdilution results, very major rates were low (∼2.8%) for all three drugs across the methods, but major error rates were higher (∼5.6%), especially with the Etest method. For minocycline, minor error rates ranged from 14% to 37.4%. For tigecycline, minor error rates ranged from 6.5% to 69.2%. The majority of minor errors were due to susceptible results being reported as intermediate. For minocycline susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniistrains, very major errors are rare, but major and minor errors overcalling strains as intermediate or resistant occur frequently with susceptibility testing methods that are feasible in clinical laboratories.

scholarly journals Tetracycline Susceptibility Testing and Resistance Genes in Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Complex from a U.S. Military Hospital

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 2693-2695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Akers ◽  
Katrin Mende ◽  
Heather C. Yun ◽  
Duane R. Hospenthal ◽  
Miriam L. Beckius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Tetracycline Resistance ◽  
Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Tetracycline Resistance Genes ◽  
Testing Method

ABSTRACT Infections with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex bacteria complicate the care of U.S. military personnel and civilians worldwide. One hundred thirty-three isolates from 89 patients at our facility during 2006 and 2007 were tested by disk diffusion, Etest, and broth microdilution for susceptibility to tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, and tigecycline. Minocycline was the most active in vitro, with 90% of the isolates tested susceptible. Susceptibilities varied significantly with the testing method. The acquired tetracycline resistance genes tetA, tetB, and tetA(39) were present in the isolates.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Disk Diffusion with Microdilution Assay in Susceptibility Testing of Caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium Isolates

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 3084-3087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevtap Arikan ◽  
Victor Paetznick ◽  
John H. Rex
Keyword(s):  
Drug Concentration ◽  
Concentration Gradient ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution

ABSTRACT We compared the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods for susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Aspergillus (n = 78) and Fusarium (n = 22) isolates. Microdilution testing followed the NCCLS M-38P guidelines but was performed in antibiotic medium 3 supplemented to 2% glucose (AM3). Disk diffusion assays were performed on AM3 agar plates with a 2-μg caspofungin disk. By both methods, caspofungin showed favorable activity against Aspergillus isolates and no activity against Fusarium isolates. In the disk-based format, intrazonal growth that was not influenced by the drug concentration gradient was consistently observed for all of the Aspergillus isolates tested.

scholarly journals Variation in erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae by four test methods.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Fasola ◽  
S Bajaksouzian ◽  
P C Appelbaum ◽  
M R Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Ambient Air ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Resistant Strains

Susceptibilities of 124 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to erythromycin and clindamycin were determined by the National Committee for the Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution method, with incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air and with modifications of this method by incubation for up to 48 h in air and CO2. Strains were also tested by agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion; good correlation was obtained with these methods, with clear separation into bimodal populations of susceptible and resistant stains. The broth microdilution method, however, using incubation in air for 24 h (NCCLS method), misclassified 4 of 92 erythromycin-resistant strains (1 as susceptible and 3 as intermediate) and 25 of 58 clindamycin-resistant strains (all as susceptible). With the exception of one strain with clindamycin, susceptible and resistant strains were correctly classified by the microdilution method with incubation in CO2 for 24 h or in ambient air for 48 h. Disk diffusion, agar dilution, and E-test methods with incubation in 5% CO2 are therefore reliable methods for susceptibility testing of pneumococci against these agents. However, the NCCLS microdilution method, which specifies incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air, produced significant very major errors (43%) clindamycin. Modification of the microdilution method by incubation in 5% CO2 or by extension of incubation time in ambient air to 48 h corrected these errors. Disk diffusion, however, was shown to be a simple, convenient, and reliable method for susceptibility testing of pneumococci to erythromycin and clindamycin and is suggested as the method of choice for these agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document