scholarly journals Comparison of Minocycline Susceptibility Testing Methods for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2937-2941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Sarah L. Bowler ◽  
Serena F. Kantz ◽  
Roberta T. Mettus ◽  
Yan Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Minor Error ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Treatment options for infections due to carbapenem-resistantAcinetobacter baumanniiare extremely limited. Minocycline is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative with activity against this pathogen. This study compared susceptibility testing methods that are used in clinical microbiology laboratories (Etest, disk diffusion, and Sensititre broth microdilution methods) for testing of minocycline, tigecycline, and doxycycline against 107 carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniiclinical isolates. Susceptibility rates determined with the standard broth microdilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth were 77.6% for minocycline and 29% for doxycycline, and 92.5% of isolates had tigecycline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml. Using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates determined with the Etest method were 67.3% and 52.3% for minocycline, 21.5% and 18.7% for doxycycline, and 71% and 29.9% for tigecycline, respectively. With the disk diffusion method using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates were 82.2% and 72.9% for minocycline and 34.6% and 34.6% for doxycycline, respectively, and rates of MICs of ≤2 μg/ml were 46.7% and 23.4% for tigecycline. In comparison with the standard broth microdilution results, very major rates were low (∼2.8%) for all three drugs across the methods, but major error rates were higher (∼5.6%), especially with the Etest method. For minocycline, minor error rates ranged from 14% to 37.4%. For tigecycline, minor error rates ranged from 6.5% to 69.2%. The majority of minor errors were due to susceptible results being reported as intermediate. For minocycline susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniistrains, very major errors are rare, but major and minor errors overcalling strains as intermediate or resistant occur frequently with susceptibility testing methods that are feasible in clinical laboratories.

scholarly journals Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for Carbapenem-Resistant and mcr -Positive Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with Broth Microdilution

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 2609-2616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Lip Chew ◽  
My-Van La ◽  
Raymond T. P. Lin ◽  
Jeanette W. P. Teo
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Vitek 2

ABSTRACT Colistin and polymyxin B remain part of the last line of antibiotics for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae . Current joint EUCAST-CLSI recommendations are for broth microdilution (BMD) to be performed for MIC testing of colistin. Commercial susceptibility testing methods were evaluated and compared against the reference BMD, using a susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 mg/liter for both colistin and polymyxin B. Seventy-six Enterobacteriaceae were included, of which 21 were mcr-1 positive (18 Escherichia coli isolates, 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and 1 Enterobacter aerogenes isolate). Rates of essential agreement (EA) of colistin test results between BMD and Vitek 2, Sensititre, and Etest were 93.4%, 89.5%, and 75.0%, respectively. Rates of EA of polymyxin B test results between BMD and Vitek 2, Sensititre, and Etest were 96.1%, 96.1%, and 48.7%, respectively. A positive MIC correlation with a categorical agreement of >90% was achieved for Sensititre (colistin Spearman's ρ = 0.863, and polymyxin B Spearman's ρ = 0.877) and Vitek 2 (polymyxin B [only] Spearman's ρ = 0.8917). Although a positive MIC correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.873) with the reference method was achieved for colistin testing with Vitek 2, categorical agreement was <90%, with very major error rates of 36%. Correlation with the Etest MIC was lower, with very major error rates of 12% (colistin) and 26.1% (polymyxin B). MicroScan (colistin) categorical agreement was 88.2%, with a very major error rate of 4%. Colistin MICs for 15 of the 21 mcr-1 -positive isolates were >2 mg/liter, and polymyxin MICs for 17 of them were >2 mg/liter by broth microdilution. The use of a lower breakpoint of ≤1 mg/liter further improves detection of mcr-1 for all testing methods. However, further data on the correlation between MICs and clinical outcome are required to determine the most suitable breakpoint to guide clinical management.

scholarly journals Comparison of Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Broth Microdilution for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of the FamilyEnterobacteriaceae

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine D. Steward ◽  
Sheila A. Stocker ◽  
Jana M. Swenson ◽  
Caroline M. O’Hara ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Fluoroquinolone Resistance ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Minor Error ◽  
Agar Dilution

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the familyEnterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within ±1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.

scholarly journals Effects of KPC Variant and Porin Genotype on the In Vitro Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Wilson ◽  
Ellen G. Kline ◽  
Chelsea E. Jones ◽  
Kristin T. Morder ◽  
Roberta T. Mettus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Strip Testing ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

ABSTRACT Meropenem-vaborbactam is a new agent with the potential to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We describe the in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against representative CRE genotypes and laboratory-engineered Escherichia coli isolates harboring mutant blaKPC genes associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. We also compared disk diffusion and gradient strip testing methods to standard broth microdilution methods. Against 120 CRE isolates, median ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were 1 and 0.03 µg/ml, respectively. Ninety-eight percent (117/120) of isolates were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam (MICs ≤ 4 µg/ml). Against Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates harboring mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam lowered the meropenem MICs in 78% of isolates (14/18); 100% were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam. Median meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were higher against K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with mutant ompK36 porin genes (n = 26) than against those with wild-type ompK36 porin genes (n = 54) (0.25 versus 0.03 µg/ml; P < 0.0001). Against E. coli TOP10 isolates with plasmid constructs containing wild-type blaKPC or mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam at 8 µg/ml lowered the meropenem MICs 2- to 512-fold, resulting in meropenem-vaborbactam MICs of 0.03 µg/ml. The rates of categorical agreement with broth microdilution for disk diffusion or gradient strips ranged from 90 to 95%. Essential agreement rates were higher for research-use-only (RUO) gradient strips manufactured by bioMérieux (82%) than for those manufactured by Liofilchem (48%) (P < 0.0001). Taken together, our data highlight the potent in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against CRE, including isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Vaborbactam inhibited both wild-type and variant KPC enzymes. On the other hand, KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with ompK36 mutations displayed higher meropenem-vaborbactam MICs than isolates with wild-type ompK36. The results of susceptibility testing with RUO bioMérieux gradient strips most closely aligned with those of broth microdilution methods.

scholarly journals Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison of Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01649-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paul Morris ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Tsigedera Tekle ◽  
John A. Fissel ◽  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Alternative Approach

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of cefiderocol poses challenges because of its unique mechanism of action (i.e., requiring an iron-depleted state) and due to differences in interpretative criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Our objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for AST of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol AST was performed on consecutive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; 58 isolates) and non-glucose-fermenting GNB (50 isolates) by BMD (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and DD (30 μg; research-use-only [RUO] MASTDISCS and FDA-cleared HardyDisks). Results were interpreted using FDA (prior to 28 September 2020 update), EUCAST, and investigational CLSI breakpoints (BPs). Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were calculated for DD methods. The susceptibilities of all isolates by BMD were 72% (FDA), 75% (EUCAST) and 90% (CLSI). For DD methods, EUCAST BPs demonstrated lower susceptibility at 65% and 66%, compared to 74% and 72% (FDA) and 87% and 89% (CLSI) by HardyDisks and MASTDISCS, respectively. CA ranged from 75% to 90%, with 8 to 25% mE, 0 to 19% ME, and 0 to 20% VME and varied based on disk, GNB, and BPs evaluated. Both DD methods performed poorly for Acinetobacter baumannii complex. There is considerable variability when cefiderocol ASTs are interpreted using CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints. DD offers a convenient alternative approach to BMD methods for cefiderocol AST, with the exception of A. baumannii complex isolates.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Revised Ceftaroline Disk Diffusion Breakpoints When Testing a Challenge Collection of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusIsolates

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Paul R. Rhomberg ◽  
Timothy B. Doyle ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar

ABSTRACTWe assessed ceftaroline disk diffusion breakpoints forStaphylococcus aureuswhen applying revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) ceftaroline MIC breakpoints. Disk-MIC correlation was evaluated by testing a challenge collection (n= 158) of methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) isolates composed of 106 randomly selected isolates plus 52 isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftaroline (MIC, 1 to 16 μg/ml). Disk diffusion was performed with 30-μg disks and Mueller-Hinton agar from 2 manufacturers each. Revised CLSI susceptible (S)/susceptible dose-dependent (SDD)/resistant (R) MIC breakpoints of ≤1/2 to 4/≥8 μg/ml were applied. The disk breakpoints that provided the lowest error rates were CLSI S/R breakpoints of ≥25 mm/≤19 mm, with no very major (VM) or major (Ma) errors and with minor (Mi) error rates of 0.0% for ≥2 doubling dilutions above the I or SDD (≥I + 2), 22.1% for I or SDD plus or minus 1 doubling dilution (I ± 1), and 2.3% for ≤2 doubling dilutions below the I or SDD ≤I − 2 (overall Mi error rate, 16.5%). No mutation in the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) was observed in 5 of 15 isolates with a ceftaroline MIC of 2 μg/ml; 3 of 11 isolates with a ceftaroline MIC of 1 μg/ml exhibited mutations in the penicillin-binding domain (PBD; 1 isolate) or in the non-PBD (2 isolates). All isolates except 1, with a ceftaroline MIC of ≥4 μg/ml, showed ≥1 mutation in the PBD and/or non-PBD. In summary, results from the disk diffusion method showed a good correlation with those from the reference broth microdilution method. Our results also showed that the ceftaroline MIC distribution of isolates with no mutations in the PBP2a goes up to 4 μg/ml, and reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods do not properly separate wild-type from non-wild-type isolates.

scholarly journals DelafloxacinIn VitroBroth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
R. K. Flamm ◽  
S. P. McCurdy ◽  
C. M. Pillar ◽  
D. Shortridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Susceptibility Test ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTDelafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. Thein vitrosusceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC50/90(% susceptibility) results were as follows:Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);Staphylococcus lugdunensis, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);Streptococcus pyogenes, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);Streptococcus anginosusgroup, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);Enterococcus faecalis, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); andEnterobacteriaceae, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors amongS. aureusstrains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.

scholarly journals Agreement Assessment of Tigecycline Susceptibilities Determined by the Disk Diffusion and Broth Microdilution Methods among Commonly Encountered Resistant Bacterial Isolates: Results from the TigecyclineIn VitroSurveillance in Taiwan (TIST) Study, 2008 to 2010

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 1414-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jien-Wei Liu ◽  
Wen-Chien Ko ◽  
Cheng-Hua Huang ◽  
Chun-Hsing Liao ◽  
Chin-Te Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Drug Resistant Bacteria

ABSTRACTThe TigecyclineIn VitroSurveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, initiated in 2006, is a nationwide surveillance program designed to longitudinally monitor thein vitroactivity of tigecycline against commonly encountered drug-resistant bacteria. This study compared thein vitroactivity of tigecycline against 3,014 isolates of clinically important drug-resistant bacteria using the standard broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. Species studied included methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA;n= 759), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium(VRE;n= 191), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producingEscherichia coli(n= 602), ESBL-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae(n= 736), andAcinetobacter baumannii(n= 726) that had been collected from patients treated between 2008 and 2010 at 20 hospitals in Taiwan. MICs and inhibition zone diameters were interpreted according to the currently recommended U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. The MIC90values of tigecycline against MRSA, VRE, ESBL-producingE. coli, ESBL-producingK. pneumoniae, andA. baumanniiwere 0.5, 0.125, 0.5, 2, and 8 μg/ml, respectively. The total error rates between the two methods using the FDA criteria were high: 38.4% for ESBL-producingK. pneumoniaeand 33.8% forA. baumannii. Using the EUCAST criteria, the total error rate was also high (54.6%) forA. baumanniiisolates. The total error rates between these two methods were <5% for MRSA, VRE, and ESBL-producingE. coli. For routine susceptibility testing of ESBL-producingK. pneumoniaeandA. baumanniiagainst tigecycline, the broth microdilution method should be used because of the poor correlation of results between these two methods.

scholarly journals Performance of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility testing methods against clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Wenzler ◽  
M Lee ◽  
T J Wu ◽  
K A Meyer ◽  
R K Shields ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Drug Application ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms ◽  
New Drug Application

Abstract Objectives To ensure the accuracy of susceptibility testing methods for ceftazidime/avibactam. Methods The performances of the Etest (bioMérieux), 30/20 μg disc (Hardy diagnostics) and 10/4 μg disc (Mast Group) were evaluated against the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for 102 clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms: 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 33 MDR non-K. pneumoniae. Essential and categorical agreement along with major and very major error rates were determined according to CLSI guidelines. Results A total of 78% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. None of the three methods met the defined equivalency threshold against all 102 organisms. The Etest performed the best, with categorical agreement of 95% and major errors of 6.3%. Against the 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, only the Etest and the 10/4 μg disc met the equivalency threshold. None of the three methods met equivalency for the 33 MDR isolates. There were no very major errors observed in any analysis. These results were pooled with those from a previous study of 74 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and data from the ceftazidime/avibactam new drug application to define optimal 30/20 μg disc thresholds using the error-rate bound model-based approaches of the diffusion breakpoint estimation testing software. This analysis identified a susceptibility threshold of ≤19 mm as optimal. Conclusions Our data indicate that the Etest is a suitable alternative to BMD for testing ceftazidime/avibactam against ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. The 30/20 μg discs overestimate resistance and may lead to the use of treatment regimens that are more toxic and less effective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document