scholarly journals Use of Rapid Diagnostics To Manage Pediatric Bloodstream Infections? You Bet Your ASP!

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Gonzalez ◽  
Melanie L. Yarbrough
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Microbiology ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Clinical Laboratories ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) can facilitate earlier optimization of the treatment of bloodstream infections, particularly in conjunction with an effective antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). However, the effective implementation and workflow of RDTs are still a matter of debate, particularly in a pediatric setting. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, L. J. Juttukonda, S. Katz, J. Gillon, J. Schmitz, and R. Banerjee (J Clin Microbiol 58:e01400-19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01400-19) investigate the impact of a multiplex, molecular RDT on changes to antimicrobial therapy in an academic children’s hospital. These data reveal several factors that clinical laboratories should consider prior to the implementation of RDTs for positive blood cultures.

scholarly journals The Confounding Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Understanding the Impact of Technology on Patient Care: TABLE 1

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 2420-2423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Doern
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Microbiology ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Rapid Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Impact Of Technology ◽  
The Impact

Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefit of the combination of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention and rapid diagnostic testing (RDT). However, few studies have attempted to study the incremental benefit of ASP and RDT, making it difficult to understand the true benefits of each intervention. This issue is discussed in the context of an article by S. H. McVane and F. S. Nolte (J Clin Microbiol 54:2476–2484, 2016,http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1128/JCM.00996-16), with suggestions about how the findings of this study can be applied to other areas of clinical microbiology.

scholarly journals 2143. Attempting to Add Clarity to “Indeterminates” on a Deployed Rapid Diagnostic with Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S726-S726
Author(s):  
Heather L Cox ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
Kasi B Vegesana ◽  
Frankie Brewster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pasteurella Multocida ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Salmonella Spp ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic testing paired with ASP intervention optimizes therapy and improves outcomes but few data guide ASP response in the absence of organism identification (ID). We describe the microbiology for organisms unidentified by Accelerate Pheno™ Gram-negative platform (AXDX) in order to inform ASP-provider team communication (PTC). Methods Consecutive, non-duplicate inpatient blood cultures with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) following AXDX implementation at a single university hospital between April 2018 and March 2019 were included. Standard of care (SOC) ID and susceptibility followed AXDX. Clinical Microbiology emailed AXDX results to the ASP in real time; results were released into the EMR paired with telephone PTC or withheld after ASP review. Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) and patient outcomes for organisms labeled no/indeterminate ID by the AXDX were characterized. Results AXDX was performed on 351 blood cultures. Among 52 (15%) labeled no/indeterminate ID, SOC methods revealed: Enterobacteriaceae (40%; 9 monomicrobial with AXDX targets), anaerobes (21%), non-lactose fermenters (NLFs) other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21%), and fastidious GNB (10%). Frequent organisms without AXDX targets included: Raoultella planticola (4); Bacteroides fragilis, Cupriavidus spp., Haemophilus spp., Prevotella spp., Providencia spp., non-aeruginosa Pseudomonas spp., Salmonella spp. (3 each); Pasteurella multocida, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (2 each). BSI sources were most commonly intra-abdominal (21%), central line-associated (17%), or unknown (17%). CLABSIs were associated with immune suppression and/or substance abuse in all but 1 case. BSIs without active empiric therapy included: NDM-producing Providencia stuartii SSSI; OXA-48-producing R. planticola intraabdominal infection (IAI); Pandoraea spp. CLABSI after liver transplant; enteric fever; B. fragilis, Leptotrichia wadei, and S. maltophilia, each of unknown source. In-hospital mortality occurred in 4 of these cases. Conclusion When AXDX yields no/indeterminate ID, ASP chart review for possible anaerobic/IAI, unique environmental exposures, and travel history may assist in guiding empiric therapy. GNB with AXDX targets are not excluded. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 2007. Impact of Combining Rapid Diagnostics with an Interpretation Guide on Vancomycin Usage for Contaminant Blood Cultures Growing Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S674-S674
Author(s):  
Simon Wu ◽  
Richard L Watson ◽  
Christopher J Graber
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Contaminant blood cultures can lead to unnecessary antibiotic use, longer admissions and increased costs. Rapid diagnostics, like the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel, can potentially lessen these harms. BioFire BCID was implemented at VA Greater Los Angeles in 7/2017. When providers review BCID results, they are also directed to an interpretation guide developed by our antimicrobial stewardship program. This study aimed to determine the impact of BioFire BCID with this interpretation guide on unnecessary vancomycin use for contaminant blood cultures growing CoNS. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study on adult inpatients with contaminant blood cultures positive for CoNS. We evaluated cases before BCID (April 2016–July 2017) and after BCID (July 7/2017–December 2018) implementation. Cases with patients who died or were discharged prior to preliminary results, polymicrobial cultures, no empiric vancomycin use, or where vancomycin was indicated were excluded. We defined a “case” as anytime a provider concurrently ordered blood cultures and empiric antibiotics. Our primary outcome was the duration of unnecessary vancomycin. Secondary outcomes were time to discontinuation/modification of any empiric antibiotic, length of stay (LOS), LOS in ICU and 30-day mortality. Results A total of 99 cases were included (N = 45 pre-BCID; N = 54 post-BCID). Demographics between the 2 groups were largely similar except the post-BCID group had more patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (14 vs. 4, P = 0.037) and more frequent infectious disease (ID) consultation (21 vs. 8, P = 0.027). The post-BCID group had shorter mean duration of unnecessary vancomycin (53.0 hours vs. 38.1 hours, P = 0.0029). After controlling for ESRD and ID involvement, the mean duration of unnecessary vancomycin was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.30 and P = 0.49, respectively). There was no difference in time to modification/discontinuation of any empiric antibiotic (44.6 hr vs. 35.0 hr, P = 0.36). There was no difference in mean LOS, mean LOS in ICU, or 30-day mortality. Conclusion Shorter duration of unnecessary vancomycin for CoNS bacteremia after BCID implementation and provision of an interpretation guide may have been driven in part by more frequent ID consultation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110006
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Chiasson ◽  
Winter J. Smith ◽  
Tomasz Z. Jodlowski ◽  
Marcus A. Kouma ◽  
James B. Cutrell
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Optimal Therapy ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Purpose: Utilization of rapid diagnostic testing alongside intensive antimicrobial stewardship interventions improves patient outcomes. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel in an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) with limited personnel resources. Methods: A single center retrospective pre- and post-intervention cohort study was performed following the implementation of a BCID panel on patients admitted with at least 1 positive blood culture during the study period. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy from blood culture collection. Secondary outcomes included days of therapy (DOT), length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates. Results: 277 patients were screened with 180 patients included, with 82 patients in the pre-BCID and 98 in the post-BCID arms. Median time to optimal therapy was 73.8 hours (IQR; 1.1-79.6) in the pre-BCID arm and 34.7 hours (IQR; 10.9-71.6) in the post-BCID arm (p ≤ 0.001). Median DOT for vancomycin was 4 and 3 days (p ≤ 0.001), and for piperacillin-tazobactam was 3.5 and 2 days (p ≤ 0.007), for the pre-BCID and post-BCID arms, respectively. Median length of hospitalization was decreased from 11 to 9 days (p = 0.031). No significant change in 30-day readmission rate was noted, with a trend toward lower mortality (12% vs 5%; p = 0.086). Conclusion: Introduction of BCID into the daily workflow resulted in a significant reduction in time to optimal therapy for bloodstream infections and DOT for select broad-spectrum antibiotics, highlighting the potential benefits of rapid diagnostics even in settings with limited personnel resources.

scholarly journals 137. Impact of Rapid Susceptibility Testing on Outcomes in Patients with Bacteremia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S96-S97
Author(s):  
Oxana Megherea ◽  
Ruchi Patel ◽  
Patrick Lake ◽  
Keri Bicking ◽  
Rani Sebti
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Optimal Therapy ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Early organism identification via rapid diagnostics has been shown to reduce time to effective antimicrobial therapy and improve patient outcomes in patients with bacteremia, but antimicrobial susceptibility testing is still required to optimize therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of an institution-specific rapid susceptibility testing method on outcomes in patients with bacteremia. Methods This was a retrospective pre- and post-intervention study of 100 adult patients with bacteremia. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial infection, fungemia, blood cultures collected at outside hospitals, or if they expired prior to susceptibility results. Patients were identified through a report containing positive blood cultures from October 2017 to February 2018 (pre-intervention [PrI]) and October 2018 to February 2019 (post-intervention [PoI]). The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical failure (a composite of 28-day mortality or bacteremia persisting greater than 6 days). Secondary endpoints included microbiologic outcomes, time to effective and optimal therapy, length of stay (LOS) and therapy adjustments. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups; a third of the patients were immunosuppressed (Table 1). The most common sources of infection were urinary and intra-abdominal, and the most common organisms identified were E.coli and Klebsiella spp. No significant difference in the rate of clinical failure was identified between PrI and PoI (24% vs. 18%, P = 0.6242) (Table 2). In the PoI, the time to identification, susceptibility results, and effective therapy was significantly shorter with similar time to optimal therapy and LOS. In the PoI, antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions were made significantly sooner after susceptibility results. Conclusion In this small, retrospective, single-center study, the implementation of a rapid susceptibility testing method was associated with reduced time to susceptibility results and more rapid interventions by the ASP, but no difference in the rate of clinical failure or time to optimal therapy was identified. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D Robinson ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Lindsay E Donohue ◽  
Megan D Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. Results Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P < .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P < .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P < .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Conclusions While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals Effect of Removing Contact Precautions for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms on Hospital Infections in a Pediatric Health System

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s199-s200
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Dorian Hoskins ◽  
Preeti Jaggi ◽  
Mark Gonzalez ◽  
Renee Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have failed to show an increase in associated transmission or infections in adult healthcare settings. Pediatric experience is limited. Objective: We evaluated the impact of discontinuing contact precautions for MRSA, VRE, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing gram-negative bacilli (ESBLs) on device-associated healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods: In October 2018, contact precautions were discontinued for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs in a large, tertiary-care pediatric healthcare system comprising 2 hospitals and 620 beds. Coincident interventions that potentially reduced HAIs included blood culture diagnostic stewardship (June 2018), a hand hygiene education initiative (July 2018), a handshake antibiotic stewardship program (December 2018) and multidisciplinary infection prevention rounding in the intensive care units (November 2018). Compliance with hand hygiene and HAI prevention bundles were monitored. Device-associated HAIs were identified using standard definitions. Annotated run charts were used to track the impact of interventions on changes in device-associated HAIs over time. Results: Average hand hygiene compliance was 91%. Compliance with HAI prevention bundles was 81% for ventilator-associated pneumonias, 90% for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and 97% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections. Overall, device-associated HAIs decreased from 6.04 per 10,000 patient days to 3.25 per 10,000 patient days after October 2018 (Fig. 1). Prior to October 2018, MRSA, VRE and ESBLs accounted for 10% of device-associated HAIs. This rate decreased to 5% after October 2018. The decrease in HAIs was likely related to interventions such as infection prevention rounds and handshake stewardship. Conclusions: Discontinuation of contact precautions for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs were not associated with increased device-associated HAIs, and such discontinuation is likely safe in the setting of robust infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship programs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 53. Incidence of Bloodstream Infections and Outcomes in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S156-S157
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Papamanoli ◽  
Jeanwoo Yoo ◽  
Azad Mojahedi ◽  
Robin Jacob ◽  
Prabhjot Grewal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
High Flow ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Skin Microbiota ◽  
Prolonged Recovery ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with need for intensive care (IC), mechanical ventilation (MV), and prolonged recovery. These patients are thus predisposed to blood stream infections which can worsen outcomes. This risk may be aggravated by adjunctive therapies. Methods We reviewed the medical records of all adults admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital, NY, from March 1 to April 15, 2020 with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (requiring high-flow O2). Patients who received MV or died within 24h were excluded. Patients were followed until death or hospital discharge. We reviewed positive blood cultures (PBC) for pathogenic microorganisms, and calculated the incidence of bacteremia, rates of infective endocarditis (IE), and impact on mortality. Microbes isolated only once and belonging to groups defined as commensal skin microbiota were labelled as contaminants. We also examined the impact of adjunctive therapies with immunosuppressive potential (steroids and tocilizumab), on bacteremia. Results A total of 469 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were included (Table 1). Of these, 199 (42.4%) required IC and 172 (36.7%) MV. Median length of stay was 13 days (8–22) and 94 (20.0%) had PBC. Of these, 43 were considered true pathogens (bacteremia), with predominance of E. faecalis and S. epidermidis, and 51 were considered contaminants (Table 2). The incidence of bacteremia (43/469, 9.2%) was 5.1 per 1000 patient-days (95%CI 3.8–6.4). An echocardiogram was performed in 21 patients, 1 had an aortic valve vegetation (IE) by methicillin sensitive S. aureus. Bacteremia rates were nonsignificantly higher with steroids (5.9 vs 3.7 per 1000 patient-days; P=0.057). Use of tocilizumab was not associated with bacteremia (5.8 vs 4.8 per 1000 patient-days; P=0.28). Mortality was nonsignificantly higher in patients with (15/43, 34.9%) vs. without (108/426, 25.4%) bacteremia (P=0.20). Length of stay was the strongest predictor of bacteremia, with risk increasing by 7% (95%CI 6%-9%, P< 0.001) per additional day. Cohort Characteristics of Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia on High-Flow O2 (N= 469) All Microorganisms Isolated from Blood Cultures Conclusion The incidence of bacteremia was relatively low and IE was uncommon in this study of severe COVID-19 patients. Risk of bacteremia increased with longer hospital stay and with steroids use, but not with tocilizumab. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Cumulative Effect of an Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bundle on Early Streamlining of Antimicrobial Therapy in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. Bookstaver ◽  
E. B. Nimmich ◽  
T. J. Smith ◽  
J. A. Justo ◽  
J. Kohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tof Ms

ABSTRACT The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) enhances antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions in optimization of antimicrobial therapy. This quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated the combined impact of an ASP/RDT bundle on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) and time to de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (BSAA) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI). The ASP/RDT bundle consisted of system-wide GNBSI treatment guidelines, prospective stewardship monitoring, and sequential introduction of two RDTs, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel. The preintervention period was January 2010 through December 2013, and the postintervention period followed from January 2014 through June 2015. The postintervention period was conducted in two phases; phase 1 followed the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS, and phase 2 followed the introduction of the FilmArray BCID panel. The interventions resulted in significantly improved appropriateness of EAT (95% versus 91%; P = 0.02). Significant reductions in median time to de-escalation from combination antimicrobial therapy (2.8 versus 1.5 days), antipseudomonal beta-lactams (4.0 versus 2.5 days), and carbapenems (4.0 versus 2.5 days) were observed in the postintervention compared to the preintervention period (P < 0.001 for all). The reduction in median time to de-escalation from combination therapy (1.0 versus 2.0 days; P = 0.03) and antipseudomonal beta-lactams (2.2 versus 2.7 days; P = 0.04) was further augmented during phase 2 compared to phase 1 of the postintervention period. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program and RDT intervention bundle in a multihospital health care system is associated with improved appropriateness of EAT for GNBSI and decreased utilization of BSAA through early de-escalation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document