scholarly journals DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 15 is linked to DNA end resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salar Ahmad ◽  
Valérie Côté ◽  
Jacques Côté
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Terminal Site

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs in chromatin and several histone post-translational modifications have been implicated in the process. Modifications of histone H2A N-terminal tail has also been linked to DNA damage response, through acetylation or ubiquitination of lysine residues that regulate repair pathway choice. Here, we characterize a new DNA damage-induced phosphorylation on chromatin, at serine 15 of H2A in yeast. We show that this SQ motif functions independently of the classical S129 C-terminal site (γH2A) and mutant mimicking constitutive phosphorylation increases cell sensitivity to DNA damage. H2AS129ph is induced by Tel1 ATM and Mec1 ATR , and loss of Lcd1 ATRIP or Mec1 signaling decreases γH2A spreading distal to the DSB. In contrast, H2AS15ph is completely dependent on Lcd1 ATRIP , indicating that this modification only happens when end resection is engaged. This is supported by an increase of RPA and a decrease in DNA signal near the DSB in the H2AS-15E phosphomimic mutant, indicating higher resection. This serine is replaced by a lysine in mammals (H2AK15), which undergoes an acetyl-monoubiquityl switch to regulate binding of 53BP1 and resection. This regulation seems functionally conserved with budding yeast H2AS15 and 53BP1-homolog Rad9, using different post-translational modifications between organisms but achieving the same function.

scholarly journals DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 15 is linked to DNA end resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salar Ahmad ◽  
Jacques Côté
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Phosphorylation Event ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Terminal Site

ABSTRACTThe repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs in chromatin and several histone post-translational modifications have been implicated in the process. Modifications of histone H2A N-terminal tail has also been linked to DNA damage response, through acetylation or ubiquitination of lysine residues that regulate repair pathway choice. Here, we characterize a new DNA damage-induced phosphorylation event on chromatin, at serine 15 of H2A in yeast. We show that this SQ motif functions independently of the classical S129 C-terminal site (γH2A) and mutant mimicking constitutive phosphorylation increases cell sensitivity to DNA damage. H2AS129ph is induced by both Tel1ATM and Mec1ATR, and loss of Lcd1ATRIP or Mec1 signaling decreases γH2A spreading distal to DSB. In contrast, H2AS15ph is completely dependent on Lcd1ATRIP, indicating that this modification only happens when end resection is engaged. This link is supported by an increase of RPA binding in the H2AS15E phosphomimic mutant, reflecting higher resection. This serine on H2A is replaced by a lysine in higher eukaryotes (H2AK15), which undergoes an acetyl-monoubiquityl switch to regulate binding of 53BP1 and therefore resection. This regulation seems functionally conserved with budding yeast H2AS15 and the 53BP1-homolog Rad9, utilizing different post-translational modifications between organisms but achieving the same function.

scholarly journals Arginine methylation and ubiquitylation crosstalk controls DNA end-resection and homologous recombination repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Pilar Sanchez-Bailon ◽  
Soo-Youn Choi ◽  
Elizabeth R. Dufficy ◽  
Karan Sharma ◽  
Gavin S. McNee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Arginine Methylation ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

AbstractCross-talk between distinct protein post-translational modifications is critical for an effective DNA damage response. Arginine methylation plays an important role in maintaining genome stability, but how this modification integrates with other enzymatic activities is largely unknown. Here, we identify the deubiquitylating enzyme USP11 as a previously uncharacterised PRMT1 substrate, and demonstrate that the methylation of USP11 promotes DNA end-resection and the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) by homologous recombination (HR), an event that is independent from another USP11-HR activity, the deubiquitylation of PALB2. We also show that PRMT1 is a ubiquitylated protein that it is targeted for deubiquitylation by USP11, which regulates the ability of PRMT1 to bind to and methylate MRE11. Taken together, our findings reveal a specific role for USP11 during the early stages of DSB repair, which is mediated through its ability to regulate the activity of the PRMT1-MRE11 pathway.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

scholarly journals Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E11961-E11969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Michael T. Kimble ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2NBS1 complex plays important roles in the DNA damage response by activating the Tel1ATM kinase and catalyzing 5′–3′ resection at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To initiate resection, Mre11 endonuclease nicks the 5′ strands at DSB ends in a reaction stimulated by Sae2CtIP. Accordingly, Mre11-nuclease deficient (mre11-nd) and sae2Δ mutants are expected to exhibit similar phenotypes; however, we found several notable differences. First, sae2Δ cells exhibit greater sensitivity to genotoxins than mre11-nd cells. Second, sae2Δ is synthetic lethal with sgs1Δ, whereas the mre11-nd sgs1Δ mutant is viable. Third, Sae2 attenuates the Tel1-Rad53CHK2 checkpoint and antagonizes Rad953BP1 accumulation at DSBs independent of Mre11 nuclease. We show that Sae2 competes with other Tel1 substrates, thus reducing Rad9 binding to chromatin and to Rad53. We suggest that persistent Sae2 binding at DSBs in the mre11-nd mutant counteracts the inhibitory effects of Rad9 and Rad53 on Exo1 and Dna2-Sgs1–mediated resection, accounting for the different phenotypes conferred by mre11-nd and sae2Δ mutations. Collectively, these data show a resection initiation independent role for Sae2 at DSBs by modulating the DNA damage checkpoint.

scholarly journals Histone chaperone Anp32e removes H2A.Z from DNA double-strand breaks and promotes nucleosome reorganization and DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7507-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu ◽  
Marina K. Ayrapetov ◽  
Brendan D. Price
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Dynamics ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
End Resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires open, flexible chromatin domains. The NuA4–Tip60 complex creates these flexible chromatin structures by exchanging histone H2A.Z onto nucleosomes and promoting acetylation of histone H4. Here, we demonstrate that the accumulation of H2A.Z on nucleosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair. Anp32e, an H2A.Z chaperone that interacts with the C-terminal docking domain of H2A.Z, is rapidly recruited to DSBs. Anp32e functions to remove H2A.Z from nucleosomes, so that H2A.Z levels return to basal within 10 min of DNA damage. Further, H2A.Z removal by Anp32e disrupts inhibitory interactions between the histone H4 tail and the nucleosome surface, facilitating increased acetylation of histone H4 following DNA damage. When H2A.Z removal by Anp32e is blocked, nucleosomes at DSBs retain elevated levels of H2A.Z, and assume a more stable, hypoacetylated conformation. Further, loss of Anp32e leads to increased CtIP-dependent end resection, accumulation of single-stranded DNA, and an increase in repair by the alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. Exchange of H2A.Z onto the chromatin and subsequent rapid removal by Anp32e are therefore critical for creating open, acetylated nucleosome structures and for controlling end resection by CtIP. Dynamic modulation of H2A.Z exchange and removal by Anp32e reveals the importance of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome dynamics in processing the damaged chromatin template during DSB repair.

scholarly journals CTCF cooperates with CtIP to drive homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (17) ◽  
pp. 9160-9179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Young Hwang ◽  
Mi Ae Kang ◽  
Chul Joon Baik ◽  
Yejin Lee ◽  
Ngo Thanh Hang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract The pleiotropic CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) plays a role in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the precise mechanistic role of CTCF in HR remains largely unclear. Here, we show that CTCF engages in DNA end resection, which is the initial, crucial step in HR, through its interactions with MRE11 and CtIP. Depletion of CTCF profoundly impairs HR and attenuates CtIP recruitment at DSBs. CTCF physically interacts with MRE11 and CtIP and promotes CtIP recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Subsequently, CTCF facilitates DNA end resection to allow HR, in conjunction with MRE11–CtIP. Notably, the zinc finger domain of CTCF binds to both MRE11 and CtIP and enables proficient CtIP recruitment, DNA end resection and HR. The N-terminus of CTCF is able to bind to only MRE11 and its C-terminus is incapable of binding to MRE11 and CtIP, thereby resulting in compromised CtIP recruitment, DSB resection and HR. Overall, this suggests an important function of CTCF in DNA end resection through the recruitment of CtIP at DSBs. Collectively, our findings identify a critical role of CTCF at the first control point in selecting the HR repair pathway.

scholarly journals The Role of Drosophila CtIP in Homology-Directed Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1430
Author(s):  
Ian Yannuzzi ◽  
Margaret A. Butler ◽  
Joel Fernandez ◽  
Jeannine R. LaRocque
Keyword(s):  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
End Resection

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly genotoxic type of DNA damage that can result in chromosomal aberrations. Thus, proper repair of DSBs is essential to maintaining genome integrity. DSBs can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), where ends are processed before joining through ligation. Alternatively, DSBs can be repaired through homology-directed repair, either by homologous recombination (HR) or single-strand annealing (SSA). Both types of homology-directed repair are initiated by DNA end resection. In cultured human cells, the protein CtIP has been shown to play a role in DNA end resection through its interactions with CDK, BRCA1, DNA2, and the MRN complex. To elucidate the role of CtIP in a multicellular context, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was used to create a DmCtIPΔ allele in Drosophila melanogaster. Using the DSB repair reporter assay direct repeat of white (DR-white), a two-fold decrease in HR in DmCtIPΔ/Δ mutants was observed when compared to heterozygous controls. However, analysis of HR gene conversion tracts (GCTs) suggests DmCtIP plays a minimal role in determining GCT length. To assess the function of DmCtIP on both short (~550 bp) and long (~3.6 kb) end resection, modified homology-directed SSA repair assays were implemented, resulting in a two-fold decrease in SSA repair in both short and extensive end resection requirements in the DmCtIPΔ/Δ mutants compared to heterozygote controls. Through these analyses, we affirmed the importance of end resection on DSB repair pathway choice in multicellular systems, described the function of DmCtIP in short and extensive DNA end resection, and determined the impact of end resection on GCT length during HR.

DNA End Resection: Mechanism and Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-307
Author(s):  
Petr Cejka ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
And Control ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Dna Ends

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are cytotoxic lesions that threaten genome integrity and cell viability. Typically, cells repair DSBs by either nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The relative use of these two pathways depends on many factors, including cell cycle stage and the nature of the DNA ends. A critical determinant of repair pathway selection is the initiation of 5′→3′ nucleolytic degradation of DNA ends, a process referred to as DNA end resection. End resection is essential to create single-stranded DNA overhangs, which serve as the substrate for the Rad51 recombinase to initiate HR and are refractory to NHEJ repair. Here, we review recent insights into the mechanisms of end resection, how it is regulated, and the pathological consequences of its dysregulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document