scholarly journals Shared Stabilization Functions of Pyrimidine-Rich Determinants in the Erythroid 15-lipoxygenase and α-globin mRNAs

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 5603-5614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Kong ◽  
Marina Sumaroka ◽  
Dawn L. Eastmond ◽  
Stephen A. Liebhaber
Keyword(s):  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Erythroid Differentiation ◽  
General Role ◽  
Mrna Stabilization ◽  
Kh Domain ◽  
Initial Binding ◽  
Late Stages

ABSTRACT The poly(C)-binding proteins, αCPs, comprise a set of highly conserved KH-domain factors that participate in mRNA stabilization and translational controls in developmental and viral systems. Two prominent models of αCP function link these controls to late stages of erythroid differentiation: translational silencing of 15-lipoxygenase (Lox) mRNA and stabilization of α-globin mRNA. These two controls are mediated via association of αCPs with structurally related C-rich 3′-untranslated region elements: the differentiation control elements (DICE) in Lox mRNA and the pyrimidine-rich motifs in α-globin mRNA. In the present report a set of mRNA translation and stability assays are used to determine how these two αCP-containing complexes, related in structure and position, mediate distinct posttranscriptional controls. While the previously reported translational silencing by the DICE is not evident in our studies, we find that the two determinants mediate similar levels of mRNA stabilization in erythroid cells. In both cases this stabilization is sensitive to interference by a nuclear-restricted αCP decoy but not by the same decoy restricted to the cytoplasm. These data support a general role for αCPs in stabilizing a subset of erythroid mRNAs. The findings also suggest that initial binding of αCP to target mRNAs occurs in the nucleus. Assembly of stabilizing mRNP complexes in the nucleus prior to export may maximize their impact on cytoplasmic events.

scholarly journals Y-Box Binding Proteins in mRNP Assembly, Translation, and Stability Control

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Mordovkina ◽  
Dmitry N. Lyabin ◽  
Egor A. Smolin ◽  
Ekaterina M. Sogorina ◽  
Lev P. Ovchinnikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Stability Control ◽  
Mrna Stabilization ◽  
Cell Tissue ◽  
Structural Peculiarities

Y-box binding proteins (YB proteins) are DNA/RNA-binding proteins belonging to a large family of proteins with the cold shock domain. Functionally, these proteins are known to be the most diverse, although the literature hardly offers any molecular mechanisms governing their activities in the cell, tissue, or the whole organism. This review describes the involvement of YB proteins in RNA-dependent processes, such as mRNA packaging into mRNPs, mRNA translation, and mRNA stabilization. In addition, recent data on the structural peculiarities of YB proteins underlying their interactions with nucleic acids are discussed.

scholarly journals The Xenopus ELAV Protein ElrB Represses Vg1 mRNA Translation during Oogenesis

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. 9028-9039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy J. Colegrove-Otero ◽  
Agathe Devaux ◽  
Nancy Standart
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Multiple Copies

ABSTRACT Xenopus laevis Vg1 mRNA undergoes both localization and translational control during oogenesis. We previously characterized a 250-nucleotide AU-rich element, the Vg1 translation element (VTE), in the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of this mRNA that is responsible for the translational repression. UV-cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments, described here, revealed that the known AU-rich element binding proteins, ElrA and ElrB, and TIA-1 and TIAR interact with the VTE. The levels of these proteins during oogenesis are most consistent with a possible role for ElrB in the translational control of Vg1 mRNA, and ElrB, in contrast to TIA-1 and TIAR, is present in large RNP complexes. Immunodepletion of TIA-1 and TIAR from Xenopus translation extract confirmed that these proteins are not involved in the translational repression. Mutagenesis of a potential ElrB binding site destroyed the ability of the VTE to bind ElrB and also abolished translational repression. Moreover, multiple copies of the consensus motif both bind ElrB and support translational control. Therefore, there is a direct correlation between ElrB binding and translational repression by the Vg1 3′-UTR. In agreement with the reporter data, injection of a monoclonal antibody against ElrB into Xenopus oocytes resulted in the production of Vg1 protein, arguing for a role for the ELAV proteins in the translational repression of Vg1 mRNA during early oogenesis.

scholarly journals Suppressor Analysis of Mutations in the 5′-Untranslated Region of COB mRNA Identifies Components of General Pathways for Mitochondrial mRNA Processing and Decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 1315-1325
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Maria A Islas-Osuna ◽  
Carol L Dieckmann
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Mitochondrial Rna ◽  
Rna Turnover ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Mrna Stabilization ◽  
Recessive Mutations ◽  
A Subunit ◽  
Suppressor Analysis ◽  
Dominant Suppressor

Abstract The cytochrome b gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, COB, is encoded by the mitochondrial genome. Nuclear-encoded Cbp1 protein is required specifically for COB mRNA stabilization. Cbp1 interacts with a CCG element in a 64-nucleotide sequence in the 5′-untranslated region of COB mRNA. Mutation of any nucleotide in the CCG causes the same phenotype as cbp1 mutations, i.e., destabilization of both COB precursor and mature message. In this study, eleven nuclear suppressors of single-nucleotide mutations in CCG were isolated and characterized. One dominant suppressor is in CBP1, while the other 10 semidominant suppressors define five distinct linkage groups. One group of four mutations is in PET127, which is required for 5′ end processing of several mitochondrial mRNAs. Another mutation is linked to DSS1, which is a subunit of mitochondrial 3′ → 5′ exoribonuclease. A mutation linked to the SOC1 gene, previously defined by recessive mutations that suppress cbp1 ts alleles and stabilize many mitochondrial mRNAs, was also isolated. We hypothesize that the products of the two uncharacterized genes also affect mitochondrial RNA turnover.

scholarly journals Identification and characterization of a 44 kDa protein that binds specifically to the 3′-untranslated region of CYP2a5 mRNA: inducibility, subcellular distribution and possible role in mRNA stabilization

1996 ◽  
Vol 313 (3) ◽  
pp. 1029-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier GENESTE ◽  
Françoise RAFFALLI ◽  
Matti A. LANG
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Blocking Agent ◽  
Subcellular Fractionation ◽  
Mrna Stabilization ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

Stabilization of mRNA is important in the regulation of CYP2a5 expression but the factors involved in the process are not known [Aida and Negishi (1991) Biochemistry 30, 8041–8045]. In this paper, we describe, for the first time, a protein that binds specifically to the 3′-untranslated region of CYP2a5 mRNA and which is inducible by pyrazole, a compound known to increase the half-life of CYP2a5 mRNA. We also demonstrate that pyrazole treatment causes an elongation of the CYP2a5 mRNA poly(A) tail, and that phenobarbital, which is transcriptional activator of the CYP2a5 gene that does not affect the mRNA half-life, neither induces the RNA-binding protein nor affects the poly(A) tail size. SDS/PAGE of the UV-cross-linked RNA–protein complex demonstrated that the RNA-binding protein has an apparent molecular mass of 44 kDa. The protein-binding site was localized to a 70-nucleotide region between bases 1585 and 1655. Treatment of cytoplasmic extracts with an SH-oxidizing agent, diamide, an SH-blocking agent, N-ethylmaleimide or potato acid phosphatase abolished complex-formation, suggesting that the CYP2a5 mRNA-binding protein is subject to post-translational regulation. Subcellular fractionation showed that the 44 kDa protein is present in polyribosomes and nuclei, and that its apparent induction is much stronger in polyribosomes than in nuclear extracts. We propose that this 44 kDA RNA-binding protein is involved in the stabilization of CYP2a5 mRNA by controlling the length of the poly(A) tail.

scholarly journals Targeted inhibition of eIF4A suppresses B-cell receptor-induced translation and expression of MYC and MCL1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Wilmore ◽  
Karly-Rai Rogers-Broadway ◽  
Joe Taylor ◽  
Elizabeth Lemm ◽  
Rachel Fell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Memory B Cells ◽  
B Cell Receptor ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Mrna Stabilization

AbstractSignaling via the B-cell receptor (BCR) is a key driver and therapeutic target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). BCR stimulation of CLL cells induces expression of eIF4A, an initiation factor important for translation of multiple oncoproteins, and reduces expression of PDCD4, a natural inhibitor of eIF4A, suggesting that eIF4A may be a critical nexus controlling protein expression downstream of the BCR in these cells. We, therefore, investigated the effect of eIF4A inhibitors (eIF4Ai) on BCR-induced responses. We demonstrated that eIF4Ai (silvestrol and rocaglamide A) reduced anti-IgM-induced global mRNA translation in CLL cells and also inhibited accumulation of MYC and MCL1, key drivers of proliferation and survival, respectively, without effects on upstream signaling responses (ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation). Analysis of normal naïve and non-switched memory B cells, likely counterparts of the two main subsets of CLL, demonstrated that basal RNA translation was higher in memory B cells, but was similarly increased and susceptible to eIF4Ai-mediated inhibition in both. We probed the fate of MYC mRNA in eIF4Ai-treated CLL cells and found that eIF4Ai caused a profound accumulation of MYC mRNA in anti-IgM treated cells. This was mediated by MYC mRNA stabilization and was not observed for MCL1 mRNA. Following drug wash-out, MYC mRNA levels declined but without substantial MYC protein accumulation, indicating that stabilized MYC mRNA remained blocked from translation. In conclusion, BCR-induced regulation of eIF4A may be a critical signal-dependent nexus for therapeutic attack in CLL and other B-cell malignancies, especially those dependent on MYC and/or MCL1.

scholarly journals The 5′ Untranslated Region of the Major Immediate Early mRNA Is Necessary for Efficient Human Cytomegalovirus Replication

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle C. Arend ◽  
Erik M. Lenarcic ◽  
Nathaniel J. Moorman
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Lytic Replication ◽  
Immediate Early ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Free System ◽  
Hcmv Replication

ABSTRACTThe human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) immediate early 1 (IE1) and IE2 proteins are critical regulators of virus replication. Both proteins are needed to efficiently establish lytic infection, and nascent expression of IE1 and IE2 is critical for reactivation from latency. The regulation of IE1 and IE2 protein expression is thus a central event in the outcome of HCMV infection. Transcription of the primary transcript encoding both IE1 and IE2 is well studied, but relatively little is known about the posttranscriptional mechanisms that control IE1 and IE2 protein synthesis. The mRNA 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) plays an important role in regulating mRNA translation. Therefore, to better understand the control of IE1 and IE2 mRNA translation, we examined the role of the shared 5′ UTR of the IE1 and IE2 mRNAs (MIE 5′ UTR) in regulating translation. In a cell-free system, the MIE 5′ UTR repressed translation, as predicted based on its length and sequence composition. However, in transfected cells we found that the MIE 5′ UTR increased the expression of a reporter gene and enhanced its association with polysomes, demonstrating that the MIE 5′ UTR has a positive role in translation control. We also found that the MIE 5′ UTR was necessary for efficient IE1 and IE2 translation during infection. Replacing the MIE 5′ UTR with an unstructured sequence of the same length decreased IE1 and IE2 protein expression despite similar levels of IE1 and IE2 mRNA and reduced the association of the IE1 and IE2 mRNAs with polysomes. The wild-type MIE 5′-UTR sequence was also necessary for efficient HCMV replication. Together these data identify the shared 5′ UTR of the IE1 and IE2 mRNAs as an important regulator of HCMV lytic replication.IMPORTANCEThe HCMV IE1 and IE2 proteins are critical regulators of HCMV replication, both during primary infection and during reactivation from viral latency. Thus, defining factors that regulate IE1 and IE2 expression is important for understanding the molecular events controlling the HCMV replicative cycle. Here we identify a positive role for the MIE 5′ UTR in mediating the efficient translation of the IE1 and IE2 mRNAs. This result is an important advance for several reasons. To date, most studies of IE1 and IE2 regulation have focused on defining events that regulate IE1 and IE2 transcription. Our work reveals that in addition to the regulation of transcription, IE1 and IE2 are also regulated at the level of translation. Therefore, this study is important in that it identifies an additional layer of regulation controlling IE1 and IE2 expression and thus HCMV pathogenesis. These translational regulatory events could potentially be targeted by novel antiviral therapeutics that limit IE1 and IE2 mRNA translation and thus inhibit lytic replication or prevent HCMV reactivation.

Apontic binds the translational repressor Bruno and is implicated in regulation of oskar mRNA translation

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.S. Lie ◽  
P.M. Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Posterior Pole ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Yeast Two Hybrid ◽  
Functional Interaction ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Two Hybrid

The product of the oskar gene directs posterior patterning in the Drosophila oocyte, where it must be deployed specifically at the posterior pole. Proper expression relies on the coordinated localization and translational control of the oskar mRNA. Translational repression prior to localization of the transcript is mediated, in part, by the Bruno protein, which binds to discrete sites in the 3′ untranslated region of the oskar mRNA. To begin to understand how Bruno acts in translational repression, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify Bruno-interacting proteins. One interactor, described here, is the product of the apontic gene. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments lend biochemical support to the idea that Bruno and Apontic proteins physically interact in Drosophila. Genetic experiments using mutants defective in apontic and bruno reveal a functional interaction between these genes. Given this interaction, Apontic is likely to act together with Bruno in translational repression of oskar mRNA. Interestingly, Apontic, like Bruno, is an RNA-binding protein and specifically binds certain regions of the oskar mRNA 3′ untranslated region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document