scholarly journals Genes encoding components of the olfactory signal transduction cascade contain a DNA binding site that may direct neuronal expression.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5805-5813 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Wang ◽  
R Y Tsai ◽  
K A Schrader ◽  
R R Reed
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Olfactory Neuron ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Genes Encoding

Genes which mediate odorant signal transduction are expressed at high levels in neurons of the olfactory epithelium. The molecular mechanism governing the restricted expression of these genes likely involves tissue-specific DNA binding proteins which coordinately activate transcription through sequence-specific interactions with olfactory promoter regions. We have identified binding sites for the olfactory neuron-specific transcription factor, Olf-1, in the sequences surrounding the transcriptional initiation site of five olfactory neuron-specific genes. The Olf-1 binding sites described define the consensus sequence YTCCCYRGGGAR. In addition, we have identified a second binding site, the U site, in the olfactory cyclic nucleotide gated channel and type III cyclase promoters, which binds factors present in all tissue examined. These experiments support a model in which expression of Olf-1 in the sensory neurons coordinately activates a set of olfactory neuron-specific genes. Furthermore, expression of a subset of these genes may be modulated by additional binding factors.

scholarly journals Genes encoding components of the olfactory signal transduction cascade contain a DNA binding site that may direct neuronal expression

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5805-5813
Author(s):  
M M Wang ◽  
R Y Tsai ◽  
K A Schrader ◽  
R R Reed
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Olfactory Neuron ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Genes Encoding

Genes which mediate odorant signal transduction are expressed at high levels in neurons of the olfactory epithelium. The molecular mechanism governing the restricted expression of these genes likely involves tissue-specific DNA binding proteins which coordinately activate transcription through sequence-specific interactions with olfactory promoter regions. We have identified binding sites for the olfactory neuron-specific transcription factor, Olf-1, in the sequences surrounding the transcriptional initiation site of five olfactory neuron-specific genes. The Olf-1 binding sites described define the consensus sequence YTCCCYRGGGAR. In addition, we have identified a second binding site, the U site, in the olfactory cyclic nucleotide gated channel and type III cyclase promoters, which binds factors present in all tissue examined. These experiments support a model in which expression of Olf-1 in the sensory neurons coordinately activates a set of olfactory neuron-specific genes. Furthermore, expression of a subset of these genes may be modulated by additional binding factors.

scholarly journals Induction of the Cellular E2F-1 Promoter by the Adenovirus E4-6/7 Protein

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 2084-2093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Schaley ◽  
Robert J. O'Connor ◽  
Laura J. Taylor ◽  
Dafna Bar-Sagi ◽  
Patrick Hearing
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Transient Expression ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Accumulation ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Single Binding Site

ABSTRACT The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4-6/7 protein interacts directly with different members of the E2F family and mediates the cooperative and stable binding of E2F to a unique pair of binding sites in the Ad5 E2a promoter region. This induction of E2F DNA binding activity strongly correlates with increased E2a transcription when analyzed using virus infection and transient expression assays. Here we show that while different adenovirus isolates express an E4-6/7 protein that is capable of induction of E2F dimerization and stable DNA binding to the Ad5 E2a promoter region, not all of these viruses carry the inverted E2F binding site targets in their E2a promoter regions. The Ad12 and Ad40 E2a promoter regions bind E2F via a single binding site. However, these promoters bind adenovirus-induced (dimerized) E2F very weakly. The Ad3 E2a promoter region binds E2F very poorly, even via a single binding site. A possible explanation of these results is that the Ad E4-6/7 protein evolved to induce cellular gene expression. Consistent with this notion, we show that infection with different adenovirus isolates induces the binding of E2F to an inverted configuration of binding sites present in the cellular E2F-1 promoter. Transient expression of the E4-6/7 protein alone in uninfected cells is sufficient to induce transactivation of the E2F-1 promoter linked to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase or green fluorescent protein reporter genes. Further, expression of the E4-6/7 protein in the context of adenovirus infection induces E2F-1 protein accumulation. Thus, the induction of E2F binding to the E2F-1 promoter by the E4-6/7 protein observed in vitro correlates with transactivation of E2F-1 promoter activity in vivo. These results suggest that adenovirus has evolved two distinct mechanisms to induce the expression of the E2F-1 gene. The E1A proteins displace repressors of E2F activity (the Rb family members) and thus relieve E2F-1 promoter repression; the E4-6/7 protein complements this function by stably recruiting active E2F to the E2F-1 promoter to transactivate expression.

DNA-binding and transcriptional regulatory properties of hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) and the t(17;19) acute lymphoblastic leukemia chimera E2A-HLF

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5986-5996
Author(s):  
S P Hunger ◽  
R Brown ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Reporter Genes ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper

The t(17;19) translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemias results in creation of E2A-hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) chimeric proteins that contain the DNA-binding and protein dimerization domains of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein HLF fused to a portion of E2A proteins with transcriptional activation properties. An in vitro binding site selection procedure was used to determine DNA sequences preferentially bound by wild-type HLF and chimeric E2A-HLF proteins isolated from various t(17;19)-bearing leukemias. All were found to selectively bind the consensus sequence 5'-GTTACGTAAT-3' with high affinity. Wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins also bound closely related sites identified previously for bZIP proteins of both the proline- and acidic amino acid-rich (PAR) and C/EBP subfamilies; however, E2A-HLF proteins were significantly less tolerant of certain deviations from the HLF consensus binding site. These differences were directly attributable to loss of an HLF ancillary DNA-binding domain in all E2A-HLF chimeras and were further exacerbated by a zipper mutation in one isolate. Both wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins displayed transcriptional activator properties in lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells on reporter genes containing HLF or C/EBP consensus binding sites. But on reporter genes with nonoptimal binding sites, their transcriptional properties diverged and E2A-HLF competitively inhibited activation by wild-type PAR proteins. These findings establish a spectrum of binding site-specific transcriptional properties for E2A-HLF which may preferentially activate expression of select subordinate genes as a homodimer and potentially antagonize expression of others through heteromeric interactions.

scholarly journals DNA-binding and transcriptional regulatory properties of hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) and the t(17;19) acute lymphoblastic leukemia chimera E2A-HLF.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5986-5996 ◽  
Author(s):  
S P Hunger ◽  
R Brown ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Reporter Genes ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper

The t(17;19) translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemias results in creation of E2A-hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) chimeric proteins that contain the DNA-binding and protein dimerization domains of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein HLF fused to a portion of E2A proteins with transcriptional activation properties. An in vitro binding site selection procedure was used to determine DNA sequences preferentially bound by wild-type HLF and chimeric E2A-HLF proteins isolated from various t(17;19)-bearing leukemias. All were found to selectively bind the consensus sequence 5'-GTTACGTAAT-3' with high affinity. Wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins also bound closely related sites identified previously for bZIP proteins of both the proline- and acidic amino acid-rich (PAR) and C/EBP subfamilies; however, E2A-HLF proteins were significantly less tolerant of certain deviations from the HLF consensus binding site. These differences were directly attributable to loss of an HLF ancillary DNA-binding domain in all E2A-HLF chimeras and were further exacerbated by a zipper mutation in one isolate. Both wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins displayed transcriptional activator properties in lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells on reporter genes containing HLF or C/EBP consensus binding sites. But on reporter genes with nonoptimal binding sites, their transcriptional properties diverged and E2A-HLF competitively inhibited activation by wild-type PAR proteins. These findings establish a spectrum of binding site-specific transcriptional properties for E2A-HLF which may preferentially activate expression of select subordinate genes as a homodimer and potentially antagonize expression of others through heteromeric interactions.

scholarly journals Identification of a Repressor for the Two iol Operons Required for Inositol Catabolism in Geobacillus Kaustophilus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Yoshida ◽  
Yusuke Shirae ◽  
Ryo Nishimura ◽  
Kaho Fukui ◽  
Shu Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Gene Cluster ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Binding Property ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Geobacillus Kaustophilus ◽  
Inositol Dehydrogenase

Abstract BackgroundGeobacillus kaustophilus HTA426, a thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium, grows on inositol as its sole carbon source, and an iol gene cluster required for inositol catabolism has been postulated with reference to the iol genes in Bacillus subtilis. The iol gene cluster consists of two tandem operons induced in the presence of inositol; however, the mechanism underlying the induction remains unclear. B. subtilis iolQ is known to be involved in the regulation of iolX encoding a scyllo-inositol dehydrogenase, and its homolog in HTA426 was found two genes upstream of the first gene (gk1899) of the iol gene cluster and termed as iolQ in G. kaustophilus.ResultsWhen iolQ was inactivated, not only the myo-inositol dehydrogenase activity in the cell due to the expression of gk1899 but also the transcription of the two iol operons became constitutive. IolQ was produced and purified as a C-terminal His-tag fusion in Escherichia coli and subjected to the in vitro gel mobility shift assay to examine its DNA binding property. It was observed that IolQ bound to the DNA fragments containing each of the two iol promoter regions, and its DNA binding was antagonized by myo-inositol. Moreover, DNase I footprint analyses were conducted to determine the two binding sites of IolQ within each of the iol promoter regions. By comparing the sequences of the binding sites, a consensus sequence for IolQ binding was deduced to be a palindrome of 5′-RGWAAGCGCTTSCY-3′ (where R = A or G, W = A or T, S = G or C, and Y = C or T).ConclusionIolQ functions as a transcriptional repressor regulating the induction of the two iol operons responding to myo-inositol.

scholarly journals Pbx raises the DNA binding specificity but not the selectivity of antennapedia Hox proteins.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 4696-4706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S T Neuteboom ◽  
C Murre
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Selection Strategy ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity

We have used a binding site selection strategy to determine the optimal binding sites for Pbx proteins by themselves and as heterodimeric partners with various Hox gene products. Among the Pbx proteins by themselves, only Pbx3 binds with high affinity, as a monomer or as a homodimer, to an optimal binding site, TGATTGATTTGAT. An inhibitory domain located N terminal of the Pbx1 homeodomain prevents intrinsic Pbx1 binding to this sequence. When complexed with Hoxc-6, each of the Pbx gene products binds the same consensus sequence, TGATTTAT, which differs from the site bound by Pbx3 alone. Three members of the Antennapedia family, Hoxc-6, Hoxb-7, and Hoxb-8, select the same binding site in conjunction with Pbx1. The affinities of these proteins as heterodimeric partners with Pbx1 for the selected optimal binding site are similar. However, the binding specificity of Hox proteins for optimal binding sites is increased, compared to nonspecific DNA, in the presence of Pbx proteins. Thus, while cooperative DNA binding involving heterodimers of Pbx and Hox gene products derived from members within the Antennapedia family does not increase binding site selectivity, DNA binding specificity of the Hox gene products is significantly enhanced in the presence of Pbx.

scholarly journals Dissection of a carboxy-terminal region of the yeast regulatory protein RAP1 with effects on both transcriptional activation and silencing

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1209-1217
Author(s):  
C F Hardy ◽  
D Balderes ◽  
D Shore
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dominant Negative Effect ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

RAP1 is an essential sequence-specific DNA-binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whose binding sites are found in a large number of promoters, where they function as upstream activation sites, and at the silencer elements of the HMR and HML mating-type loci, where they are important for repression. We have examined the involvement of specific regions of the RAP1 protein in both repression and activation of transcription by studying the properties of a series of hybrid proteins containing RAP1 sequences fused to the DNA-binding domain of the yeast protein GAL4 (amino acids 1 to 147). GAL4 DNA-binding domain/RAP1 hybrids containing only the carboxy-terminal third of the RAP1 protein (which lacks the RAP1 DNA-binding domain) function as transcriptional activators of a reporter gene containing upstream GAL4 binding sites. Expression of some hybrids from the strong ADH1 promoter on multicopy plasmids has a dominant negative effect on silencers, leading to either partial or complete derepression of normally silenced genes. The GAL4/RAP1 hybrids have different effects on wild-type and several mutated but functional silencers. Silencers lacking either an autonomously replicating sequence consensus element or the RAP1 binding site are strongly derepressed, whereas the wild-type silencer or a silencer containing a deletion of the binding site for another silencer-binding protein, ABF1, are only weakly affected by hybrid expression. By examining a series of GAL4 DNA-binding domain/RAP1 hybrids, we have mapped the transcriptional activation and derepression functions to specific parts of the RAP1 carboxy terminus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1201-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F. Hewitt ◽  
B.S. Strunk ◽  
C. Margulies ◽  
T. Priputin ◽  
X.D. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Step Function ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Cis Element ◽  
Alternative Means

Early developmental patterning of the Drosophila embryo is driven by the activities of a diverse set of maternally and zygotically derived transcription factors, including repressors encoded by gap genes such as Kruppel, knirps, giant and the mesoderm-specific snail. The mechanism of repression by gap transcription factors is not well understood at a molecular level. Initial characterization of these transcription factors suggests that they act as short-range repressors, interfering with the activity of enhancer or promoter elements 50 to 100 bp away. To better understand the molecular mechanism of short-range repression, we have investigated the properties of the Giant gap protein. We tested the ability of endogenous Giant to repress when bound close to the transcriptional initiation site and found that Giant effectively represses a heterologous promoter when binding sites are located at −55 bp with respect to the start of transcription. Consistent with its role as a short-range repressor, as the binding sites are moved to more distal locations, repression is diminished. Rather than exhibiting a sharp ‘step-function’ drop-off in activity, however, repression is progressively restricted to areas of highest Giant concentration. Less than a two-fold difference in Giant protein concentration is sufficient to determine a change in transcriptional status of a target gene. This effect demonstrates that Giant protein gradients can be differentially interpreted by target promoters, depending on the exact location of the Giant binding sites within the gene. Thus, in addition to binding site affinity and number, cis element positioning within a promoter can affect the response of a gene to a repressor gradient. We also demonstrate that a chimeric Gal4-Giant protein lacking the basic/zipper domain can specifically repress reporter genes, suggesting that the Giant effector domain is an autonomous repression domain.

Site-specific DNA binding of nuclear factor I: analyses of cellular binding sites

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 964-971
Author(s):  
R M Gronostajski ◽  
S Adhya ◽  
K Nagata ◽  
R A Guggenheimer ◽  
J Hurwitz
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Hela Cell ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Nuclear Factor I

Nuclear factor I is a cellular site-specific DNA-binding protein required for the efficient in vitro replication of adenovirus DNA. We have characterized human DNA sequences to which nuclear factor I binds. Three nuclear factor I binding sites (FIB sites), isolated from HeLa cell DNA, each contain the sequence TGG(N)6-7GCCAA. Comparison with other known and putative FIB sites suggests that this sequence is important for the binding of nuclear factor I. Nuclear factor I protects a 25- to 30-base-pair region surrounding this sequence from digestion by DNase I. Methylation protection studies suggest that nuclear factor I interacts with guanine residues within the TGG(N)6-7GCCAA consensus sequence. One binding site (FIB-2) contained a restriction endonuclease HaeIII cleavage site (GGCC) at the 5' end of the GCCAA motif. Digestion of FIB-2 with HaeIII abolished the binding of nuclear factor I. Southern blot analyses indicate that the cellular FIB sites described here are present within single-copy DNA in the HeLa cell genome.

A synthetic silencer mediates SIR-dependent functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5648-5659
Author(s):  
F J McNally ◽  
J Rine
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Autonomously Replicating Sequence ◽  
Functional Components

Copies of the mating-type genes are present at three loci on chromosome III of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The genes at the MAT locus are transcribed, whereas the identical genes at the silent loci, HML and HMR, are not transcribed. Several genes, including the four SIR genes, and two sites, HMR-E and HMR-I, are required for repression of transcription at the HMR locus. Three elements have been implicated in the function of the HMR-E silencer: a binding site for the RAP1 protein, a binding site for the ABF1 protein, and an 11-bp consensus sequence common to nearly all autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) elements (putative origins of DNA replication). RAP1 and ABF1 binding sites of different sequence than those found at HMR-E were joined with an 11-bp ARS consensus sequence to form a synthetic silencer. The synthetic silencer was able to repress transcription of the HMRa1 gene, confirming that binding sites for RAP1 and ABF1 and the 11-bp ARS consensus sequence were the functional components of the silencer in vivo. Mutations in the ABF1 binding site or in the ARS consensus sequence of the synthetic silencer caused nearly complete derepression of transcription at HMR. The ARS consensus sequence mutation also eliminated the ARS activity of the synthetic silencer. These data suggested that replication initiation at the HMR-E silencer was required for establishment of the repressed state at the HMR locus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document