scholarly journals p53 transactivation and protein accumulation are independently regulated by UV light in different phases of the cell cycle.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 3074-3080 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Haapajärvi ◽  
K Pitkänen ◽  
M Tsubari ◽  
M Laiho

DNA damage-induced activation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene is suggested to be central in the cellular damage response pathway. In this study, we analyzed the responses of p53 to UVC radiation in synchronized mouse fibroblasts in terms of p53 accumulation, transcriptional activation, and sequence-specific DNA-binding activity. UVC was found to induce accumulation of p53 cell cycle dependently in G1/S- and S-phase cells but not in G0 or G1 cells. In contrast, p53 transcriptional activity and its target genes, p21 and GADD45, were stimulated by UVC in G0 and G1 cells in the absence of detectable p53 protein. The accumulation of p53 and increased p21 and GADD45 expression were replication dependent in S-phase cells. Interestingly, sequence-specific p53 DNA-binding activity was stimulated also replication independently in S phase, though the effect was not conveyed to stimulation of p53 target genes, suggesting that additional events are required for p53-stimulated gene expression. The results show that opposed to the cell cycle dependence of p53 accumulation, the UVC-mediated transactivation by p53 is independent of the cell cycle phase and protein stabilization.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 634-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Wells ◽  
P Held ◽  
S Illenye ◽  
N H Heintz

In mammals, two TATA-less bidirectional promoters regulate expression of the divergently transcribed dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and rep3 genes. In CHOC 400 cells, dhfr mRNA levels increase about fourfold during the G1-to-S phase transition of the cell cycle, whereas the levels of rep3 transcripts vary less than twofold during this time. To assess the role of DNA-binding proteins in transcriptional regulation of the dhfr and rep3 genes, the major and minor dhfr-rep3 promoter regions were analyzed by high-resolution genomic footprinting during the cell cycle. At the major dhfr promoter, prominent DNase I footprints over four upstream Sp1 binding sites did not vary throughout G1 and entry into the S phase. Genomic footprinting revealed that a protein is constitutively bound to the overlapping E2F sites throughout the G1-to-S phase transition, an interaction that is most evident on the transcribed template strand. On the nontranscribed strand, multiple changes in the DNase I cleavage pattern are observed during transit through G1 and entry into the S phase. By using gel mobility shift assays and a series of sequence-specific probes, two different species of E2F were shown to interact with the dhfr promoter during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of one E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTGGCGC, did not vary significantly during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of the second E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTCGCGC, increased during the G1-to-S phase transition. Together, these results indicate that Sp1 and the species of E2F that binds TTTGGCGC participate in the formation of a basal transcription complex, while the species of E2F that binds TTTCGCGC regulates dhfr gene expression during the G1-to-S phase transition. At the minor promoter, DNase I footprints at a consensus c-Myc binding site and three Sp1 binding sites showed little variation during the G1-to-S phase transition. In addition to protein binding at sequences known to be involved in the regulation of transcription, genomic footprinting of the entire promoter region also showed that a protein factor is constitutively bound to the first intron of the rep3 gene.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 869-873
Author(s):  
M Ito ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
A S Lee ◽  
R Maxson

The promoter regions of H2b histone genes contain a 14-base-pair element which includes the octamer ATTTGCAT. Mutational analysis has implicated the octamer element in the cell cycle-dependent expression of H2b histone genes. In this report, we address the question of whether the DNA-binding activity of the octamer transcription factor is itself cell cycle regulated. By using a gel mobility shift assay, we measured the relative amounts of octamer-binding activity during various phases of the cell cycle in serum-synchronized Chinese hamster fibroblasts. We found that the activity increased approximately fivefold between late G1 phase and early S phase and then decreased threefold between late S phase and G2 phase. These cell cycle-dependent changes in octamer DNA-binding activity may in part account for the selective transcription of H2b histone genes in late G1 and S phases.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 869-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ito ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
A S Lee ◽  
R Maxson

The promoter regions of H2b histone genes contain a 14-base-pair element which includes the octamer ATTTGCAT. Mutational analysis has implicated the octamer element in the cell cycle-dependent expression of H2b histone genes. In this report, we address the question of whether the DNA-binding activity of the octamer transcription factor is itself cell cycle regulated. By using a gel mobility shift assay, we measured the relative amounts of octamer-binding activity during various phases of the cell cycle in serum-synchronized Chinese hamster fibroblasts. We found that the activity increased approximately fivefold between late G1 phase and early S phase and then decreased threefold between late S phase and G2 phase. These cell cycle-dependent changes in octamer DNA-binding activity may in part account for the selective transcription of H2b histone genes in late G1 and S phases.


2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ella Kim ◽  
Wolfgang Deppert

The most import biological function of the tumor suppressor p53 is that of a sequence-specific transactivator. In response to a variety of cellular stress stimuli, p53 induces the transcription of an ever-increasing number of target genes, leading to growth arrest and repair, or to apoptosis. Long considered as a "latent" DNA binder that requires prior activation by C-terminal modification, recent data provide strong evidence that the DNA binding activity of p53 is strongly dependent on structural features within the target DNA and is latent only if the target DNA lacks a certain structural signal code. In this review we discuss evidence for complex interactions of p53 with DNA, which are strongly dependent on the dynamics of DNA structure, especially in the context of chromatin. We provide a model of how this complexity may serve to achieve selectivity of target gene regulation by p53 and how DNA structure in the context of chromatin may serve to modulate p53 functions.Key words: tumor suppressor p53, sequence-specific DNA binding, DNA conformation, chromatin, chromatin remodeling.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1618-1618
Author(s):  
John K. Choi ◽  
Siyuan Song ◽  
Jonathan Cooperman ◽  
Danielle L. Letting ◽  
Gerd A. Blobel

Abstract The transcription factor E2A is required for very early B cell development. The exact mechanism by which E2A promotes B cell development is unclear and cannot be explained by the known E2A targets, components of the pre-B cell receptor and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors, indicating additional pathways and targets remain to be identified. We had previously reported that E2A can promote precursor B cell expansion, promote G1 cell cycle progression, and induce the expressions of multiple G1 phase cyclins including cyclin D3, suggesting that E2A induction of these genes may contribute to early B cell development. To better understand the mechanism by which E2A induces these cyclins, we characterized the relationship between E2A and the cyclin D3 gene promoter. E2A transactivated a luciferase reporter plasmid containing the 1kb promoter of cyclin D3 that contains two consensus E2A binding sites (E-boxes); however, deletion of the E-boxes did not disrupt the transactivation by E2A. We hypothesized three possible mechanisms: 1) indirect activation of cyclin D3 via another transcription factor, 2) binding of E2A to cryptic non-E-boxes, or 3) recruitment of E2A to the promoter via interaction with other DNA binding factor. To test the first possibility, promoter occupancy was examined using the DamID approach. In this approach, a fusion protein consisting of E. coli DNA adenosine methyltransferase (DAM) and a transcription factor of interest is expressed at low levels, resulting in specific methylation of adenosine residues within 2–5 kb of the transcription factor target sites. A fusion construct composed of E2A and DAM (E47Dam), was subcloned in lentiviral vectors, and used to transduce precursor B cell lines. The methylated adenosine residues were detected using a sensitive ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR) assay that required only 1 ug of genomic DNA and can detect methylation even if only 3% of the cells express E47Dam; no methylated adenosines were detected in control cells, indicating that all methylated residues resulted from E47Dam. Specific adenosine methylation was identified at the IgH intronic enhancer, a known E2A target site, but not at the non-target sites, CD19, HPRT, and GAPDH promoters. Specific methylation was detected at the cyclin D3 promoter but not 10 kb down-stream, despite similar concentrations of E-boxes at both sites. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed the DamID findings and further localized the binding to within 1 kb of the two E-boxes in the cyclin D3 promoter. To distinguish between the two remaining mechanisms (cryptic non-E-boxes versus recruitment via other DNA binding factors), two point mutations were introduced into E47Dam that disrupted its DNA binding activity. The mutated E47Dam continued to methylate at the cyclin D3 promoter. We conclude that E2A can be recruited to the cyclin D3 promoter, independent of E-boxes or E2A DNA binding activity. Our findings raise the possibility that some direct E2A target genes may lack functional E-boxes. Furthermore, mutated E2A, lacking an E2A DNA binding domain, that is seen in 6% of pediatric ALLs may still activate a subset of E2A target genes. Finally, our application of lentiviral vectors and LM-PCR to the DamID approach should permit analysis of primary human precursor B cells, despite the limitations in cell number and transduction efficiency.


Author(s):  
Nili Feuerstein ◽  
James J. Mond ◽  
Paul R. Kinchington ◽  
Robert Hickey ◽  
Marja-Liisa Karjalainen Lindsberg ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 5540-5553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Liu ◽  
April L. Colosimo ◽  
Xiang-Jiao Yang ◽  
Daiqing Liao

ABSTRACT The adenovirus E1B 55-kDa protein binds to cellular tumor suppressor p53 and inactivates its transcriptional transactivation function. p53 transactivation activity is dependent upon its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences near the promoters of its target genes. It was shown recently that p53 is acetylated by transcriptional coactivators p300, CREB bidning protein (CBP), and PCAF and that acetylation of p53 by these proteins enhances p53 sequence-specific DNA binding. Here we show that the E1B 55-kDa protein specifically inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in vivo and in vitro, while acetylation of histones and PCAF autoacetylation is not affected. Furthermore, the DNA-binding activity of p53 is diminished in cells expressing the E1B 55-kDa protein. PCAF binds to the E1B 55-kDa protein and to a region near the C terminus of p53 encompassing Lys-320, the specific PCAF acetylation site. We further show that the E1B 55-kDa protein interferes with the physical interaction between PCAF and p53, suggesting that the E1B 55-kDa protein inhibits PCAF acetylase function on p53 by preventing enzyme-substrate interaction. These results underscore the importance of p53 acetylation for its function and suggest that inhibition of p53 acetylation by viral oncoproteins prevent its activation, thereby contributing to viral transformation.


Oncogene ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 1784-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Cures ◽  
Colin House ◽  
Chie Kanei-Ishii ◽  
Bruce Kemp ◽  
Robert G Ramsay

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 2797-2807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Gómez-del Arco ◽  
Kazushige Maki ◽  
Katia Georgopoulos

ABSTRACT Ikaros is a key regulator of lymphocyte proliferative responses. Inactivating mutations in Ikaros cause antigen-mediated lymphocyte hyperproliferation and the rapid development of leukemia and lymphoma. Here we show that Ikaros's ability to negatively regulate the G1-S transition can be modulated by phosphorylation of a serine/threonine-rich conserved region (p1) in exon 8. Ikaros phosphorylation in p1 is induced during the G1-S transition. Mutations that prevent phosphorylation in p1 increase Ikaros's ability to impede cell cycle progression and its affinity for DNA. Casein kinase II, whose increased activity in lymphocytes leads to transformation, is a key player in Ikaros p1 phosphorylation. We thus propose that Ikaros's activity as a regulator of the G1-S transition is controlled by phosphorylation in response to signaling events that downmodulate its DNA binding activity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1493-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adhiraj Roy ◽  
Yong Jae Shin ◽  
Kyu Hong Cho ◽  
Jeong-Ho Kim

Glucose uptake, the first, rate-limiting step of its utilization, is facilitated by glucose transporters. Expression of several glucose transporter (HXT) genes in yeast is repressed by the Rgt1 repressor, which recruits the glucose-responsive transcription factor Mth1 and the general corepressor complex Ssn6-Tup1 in the absence of glucose; however, it is derepressed when Mth1 is inactivated by glucose. Here we show that Ssn6-Tup1 interferes with the DNA-binding ability of Rgt1 in the absence of Mth1 and that the Rgt1 function abrogated by Ssn6 overexpression is restored by co-overexpression of Mth1. Thus Mth1 likely regulates Rgt1 function not by modulating its DNA-binding activity directly but by functionally antagonizing Ssn6-Tup1. Mth1 does so by acting as a scaffold-like protein to recruit Ssn6-Tup1 to Rgt1. Supporting evidence shows that Mth1 blocks the protein kinase A–dependent phosphorylation of Rgt1 that impairs the ability of Rgt1 to interact with Ssn6-Tup1. Of note, Rgt1 can bind DNA in the absence of Ssn6-Tup1 but does not inhibit transcription, suggesting that dissociation of Rgt1 from Ssn6-Tup1, but not from DNA, is necessary and sufficient for the expression of its target genes. Taken together, these findings show that Mth1 is a transcriptional corepressor that facilitates the recruitment of Ssn6-Tup1 by Rgt1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document