scholarly journals Histone Deacetylation of RB-Responsive Promoters: Requisite for Specific Gene Repression but Dispensable for Cell Cycle Inhibition

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 7719-7731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Siddiqui ◽  
David A. Solomon ◽  
Ranjaka W. Gunawardena ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Erik S. Knudsen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Subset ◽  
Cell Cycle Inhibition

ABSTRACT The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) is targeted for inactivation in the majority of human tumors, underscoring its critical role in attenuating cellular proliferation. RB inhibits proliferation by repressing the transcription of genes that are essential for cell cycle progression. To repress transcription, RB assembles multiprotein complexes containing chromatin-modifying enzymes, including histone deacetylases (HDACs). However, the extent to which HDACs participate in transcriptional repression and are required for RB-mediated repression has not been established. Here, we investigated the role of HDACs in RB-dependent cell cycle inhibition and transcriptional repression. We find that active RB mediates histone deacetylation on cyclin A, Cdc2, topoisomerase IIα, and thymidylate synthase promoters. We also demonstrate that this deacetylation is HDAC dependent, since the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) prevented histone deacetylation at each promoter. However, TSA treatment blocked RB repression of only a specific subset of genes, thereby demonstrating that the requirement of HDACs for RB-mediated transcriptional repression is promoter specific. The HDAC-independent repression was not associated with DNA methylation or gene silencing but was readily reversible. We show that this form of repression resulted in altered chromatin structure and was dependent on SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling activity. Importantly, we find that cell cycle inhibitory action of RB is not intrinsically dependent on the ability to recruit HDAC activity. Thus, while HDACs do play a major role in RB-mediated repression, they are dispensable for the repression of critical targets leading to cell cycle arrest.

scholarly journals p53-Dependent Transcriptional Repression of c-myc Is Required for G1 Cell Cycle Arrest

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (17) ◽  
pp. 7423-7431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny S. L. Ho ◽  
Weili Ma ◽  
Daniel Y. L. Mao ◽  
Samuel Benchimol
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mouse Tissues

ABSTRACT The ability of p53 to promote apoptosis and cell cycle arrest is believed to be important for its tumor suppression function. Besides activating the expression of cell cycle arrest and proapoptotic genes, p53 also represses a number of genes. Previous studies have shown an association between p53 activation and down-regulation of c-myc expression. However, the mechanism and physiological significance of p53-mediated c-myc repression remain unclear. Here, we show that c-myc is repressed in a p53-dependent manner in various mouse and human cell lines and mouse tissues. Furthermore, c-myc repression is not dependent on the expression of p21WAF1. Abrogating the repression of c-myc by ectopic c-myc expression interferes with the ability of p53 to induce G1 cell cycle arrest and differentiation but enhances the ability of p53 to promote apoptosis. We propose that p53-dependent cell cycle arrest is dependent not only on the transactivation of cell cycle arrest genes but also on the transrepression of c-myc. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicate that p53 is bound to the c-myc promoter in vivo. We report that trichostatin A, an inhibitor of histone deacetylases, abrogates the ability of p53 to repress c-myc transcription. We also show that p53-mediated transcriptional repression of c-myc is accompanied by a decrease in the level of acetylated histone H4 at the c-myc promoter and by recruitment of the corepressor mSin3a. These data suggest that p53 represses c-myc transcription through a mechanism that involves histone deacetylation.

scholarly journals The Growth Suppressor PML Represses Transcription by Functionally and Physically Interacting with Histone Deacetylases

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2259-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Shu Wu ◽  
Sadeq Vallian ◽  
Edward Seto ◽  
Wen-Ming Yang ◽  
Diane Edmondson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Growth Suppressor

ABSTRACT The growth suppressor promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) is disrupted by the chromosomal translocation t(15;17) in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). PML plays a key role in multiple pathways of apoptosis and regulates cell cycle progression. The present study demonstrates that PML represses transcription by functionally and physically interacting with histone deacetylase (HDAC). Transcriptional repression mediated by PML can be inhibited by trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of HDAC. PML coimmunoprecipitates a significant level of HDAC activity in several cell lines. PML is associated with HDAC in vivo and directly interacts with HDAC in vitro. The fusion protein PML-RARα encoded by the t(15;17) breakpoint interacts with HDAC poorly. PML interacts with all three isoforms of HDAC through specific domains, and its expression deacetylates histone H3 in vivo. Together, the results of our study show that PML modulates histone deacetylation and that loss of this function in APL alters chromatin remodeling and gene expression. This event may contribute to the development of leukemia.

scholarly journals The Human Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene HIC1 Recruits CtBP through a Degenerate GLDLSKK Motif

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 4890-4901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Deltour ◽  
Sébastien Pinte ◽  
Cateline Guerardel ◽  
Bohdan Wasylyk ◽  
Dominique Leprince
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Close Relative ◽  
Consensus Binding Site ◽  
Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene

ABSTRACT HIC1 (hypermethylated in cancer) and its close relative HRG22 (HIC1-related gene on chromosome 22) encode transcriptional repressors with five C2H2 zinc fingers and an N-terminal BTB/POZ autonomous transcriptional repression domain that is unable to recruit histone deacetylases (HDACs). Alignment of the HIC1 and HRG22 proteins from various species highlighted a perfectly conserved GLDLSKK/R motif highly related to the consensus CtBP interaction motif (PXDLSXK/R), except for the replacement of the virtually invariant proline by a glycine. HIC1 strongly interacts with mCtBP1 both in vivo and in vitro through this conserved GLDLSKK motif, thus extending the CtBP consensus binding site. The BTB/POZ domain does not interact with mCtBP1, but the dimerization of HIC1 through this domain is required for the interaction with mCtBP1. When tethered to DNA by fusion with the Gal4 DNA-binding domain, the HIC1 central region represses transcription through interactions with CtBP in a trichostatin A-sensitive manner. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that HIC1 mediates transcriptional repression by both HDAC-independent and HDAC-dependent mechanisms and show that CtBP is a HIC1 corepressor that is recruited via a variant binding site.

scholarly journals Retinoblastoma Protein Disrupts Interactions Required for RNA Polymerase III Transcription

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 9192-9202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine E. Sutcliffe ◽  
Timothy R. P. Brown ◽  
Simon J. Allison ◽  
Pamela H. Scott ◽  
Robert J. White
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT The retinoblastoma protein (RB) has been shown to suppress RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcription in vivo (R. J. White, D. Trouche, K. Martin, S. P. Jackson, and T. Kouzarides, Nature 382:88–90, 1996). This regulation involves interaction with TFIIIB, a multisubunit factor that is required for the expression of all Pol III templates (C. G. C. Larminie, C. A. Cairns, R. Mital, K. Martin, T. Kouzarides, S. P. Jackson, and R. J. White, EMBO J. 16:2061–2071, 1997; W.-M. Chu, Z. Wang, R. G. Roeder, and C. W. Schmid, J. Biol. Chem. 272:14755–14761, 1997). However, it has not been established why RB binding to TFIIIB results in transcriptional repression. For several Pol II-transcribed genes, RB has been shown to inhibit expression by recruiting histone deacetylases, which are thought to decrease promoter accessibility. We present evidence that histone deacetylases exert a negative effect on Pol III activity in vivo. However, RB remains able to regulate Pol III transcription in the presence of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Instead, RB represses by disrupting interactions between TFIIIB and other components of the basal Pol III transcription apparatus. Recruitment of TFIIIB to most class III genes requires its binding to TFIIIC2, but this can be blocked by RB. In addition, RB disrupts the interaction between TFIIIB and Pol III that is essential for transcription. The ability of RB to inhibit these key interactions can explain its action as a potent repressor of class III gene expression.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Inhibition by FoxO Forkhead Transcription Factors Involves Downregulation of Cyclin D

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 7842-7852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Schmidt ◽  
Sylvia Fernandez de Mattos ◽  
Armando van der Horst ◽  
Rob Klompmaker ◽  
Geert J. P. L Kops ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Forkhead Transcription Factors ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Inhibition

ABSTRACT The FoxO forkhead transcription factors FoxO4 (AFX), FoxO3a (FKHR.L1), and FoxO1a (FKHR) represent important physiological targets of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB) signaling. Overexpression or conditional activation of FoxO factors is able to antagonize many responses to constitutive PI3K/PKB activation including its effect on cellular proliferation. It was previously shown that the FoxO-induced cell cycle arrest is partially mediated by enhanced transcription and protein expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1 (R. H. Medema, G. J. Kops, J. L. Bos, and B. M. Burgering, Nature 404:782-787, 2000). Here we have identified a p27kip1-independent mechanism that plays an important role in the antiproliferative effect of FoxO factors. Forced expression or conditional activation of FoxO factors leads to reduced protein expression of the D-type cyclins D1 and D2 and is associated with an impaired capacity of CDK4 to phosphorylate and inactivate the S-phase repressor pRb. Downregulation of D-type cyclins involves a transcriptional repression mechanism and does not require p27kip1 function. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 can partially overcome FoxO factor-induced cell cycle arrest, demonstrating that downregulation of D-type cyclins represents a physiologically relevant mechanism of FoxO-induced cell cycle inhibition.

scholarly journals Effect of Trichostatin A on Histone Deacetylases 1, 2 and 3, p21Cip1/Waf1/Sdi1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2 Gene Expression in Breast Cancer SK-BR-3 Cell Line

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Masumeh Sanaei ◽  
Fraidoon Kavoosi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Cell Apoptosis ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Relative Expression Level ◽  
Hematological Cancers

Objective: DNA methylation, the covalent addition of a methyl group to cytosine, and histone modification play an important role in the establishment and maintenance of the program of gene expression. The balance of histone acetylation is determined by the activities of two groups of enzymes including histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Histone deacetylation is generally associated with silencing gene expression resulting in several solid tumors. HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are the new class of potential anticancer compounds for the treatment of the solid and hematological cancers. The current study was designed to evaluate the effect of trichostatin A (TSA) on histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3, p21Cip1/Waf1/Sdi1 (p21), p27Kip1 (p27), and p57Kip2 (p57) gene expression in breast cancer SK-BR-3 cell line. Materials and Methods: The breast cancer SK-BR-3 line was treated with TSA. To determine cell viability, cell apoptosis, and the relative expression level of the genes, MTT assay, cell apoptosis assay, and qRT-PCR were done respectively. Results: TSA significantly inhibited cell growth, and induced apoptosis. Furthermore, this compound increased p21, p27, and p57 and decreased histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 gene expression significantly. Conclusion: The TSA can reactivate the p21, p27, and p57 through down-regulation of histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 gene expression.

scholarly journals P048 Mucosal macrophages express elevated levels of HDAC9 in inflamed and uninflamed mucosa of Crohn’s disease, but not ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
M Ghiboub ◽  
J de Bruyn ◽  
K Reedquist ◽  
T Radstake ◽  
C Wichers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Inflamed Tissue

Abstract Background Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are a group of enzymes that control histone and non-histone deacetylation and influence inflammatory gene transcription. Certain members of the HDAC family control the function of macrophages and play an important role in immune response. In this study, we aimed to study the expression of HDACs in mucosal macrophages isolated from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. Methods Both macroscopically inflamed and non-inflamed colon resection tissue were collected from 15 Crohn’s disease (CD) and nine ulcerative colitis (UC) patients operated on for therapy refractory disease. Of the CD patients, 53% had ileal and 47% ileocolonic disease. Of the UC patients, 44% had left-sided colitis and 56% pancolitis. Lamina propria was separated from the muscularis externa, and a targeted array for epigenetic enzymes was performed. To assess the relevance of HDAC9 gene expression in terms of protein level, immunofluorescence staining of HDAC9 protein was undertaken in tissue sections from inflamed and non-inflamed mucosa. CD68 was used as a pan-macrophage marker. Results From our array, expression of HDAC9 was significantly higher in the inflamed mucosa of CD patients compared with UC patients (p = 0.005). Gene expression of HDAC9 in non-inflamed mucosa from CD was elevated compared with non-inflamed mucosa from UC. In addition, in CD, HDAC9 mRNA level was increased in inflamed tissue in comparison to non-inflamed tissue (p = 0.046). In conjunction with the expression data, HDAC9 protein was found highly expressed in inflamed tissue. HDAC9 was predominantly localised in the cytoplasmic compartment of macrophages in non-inflamed tissue whilst HDAC9 localised to the nucleus of macrophages in inflamed tissue. Conclusion HDAC9 is member of class IIA HDAC superfamily that exerts pro-inflammatory properties. The inhibition of HDAC9 in experimental murine colitis clearly enhances regulatory T-cell function, suggesting a critical role for HDAC9 in breaching immune homeostasis (de Zoeten EF et al, 2009). We suggest here that HDAC9 can serve as an additional marker to distinguish CD from UC in tissue biopsies. Furthermore, we show for the first time that HDAC9 protein is expressed in mucosal macrophages of CD patients, indicating its potential in mediating macrophage inflammatory function in IBD. Further studies are currently being undertaken to elucidate the role of HDAC9 in CD pathogenesis.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Repression by the Retinoblastoma Protein through the Recruitment of a Histone Methyltransferase

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 6484-6494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Vandel ◽  
Estelle Nicolas ◽  
Olivier Vaute ◽  
Roger Ferreira ◽  
Slimane Ait-Si-Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Histone Methyltransferase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
E2f Transcription Factor ◽  
Cycle Dependent

ABSTRACT The E2F transcription factor controls the cell cycle-dependent expression of many S-phase-specific genes. Transcriptional repression of these genes in G0 and at the beginning of G1by the retinoblasma protein Rb is crucial for the proper control of cell proliferation. Rb has been proposed to function, at least in part, through the recruitment of histone deacetylases. However, recent results indicate that other chromatin-modifying enzymes are likely to be involved. Here, we show that Rb also interacts with a histone methyltransferase, which specifically methylates K9 of histone H3. The results of coimmunoprecipitation experiments of endogenous or transfected proteins indicate that this histone methyltransferase is the recently described heterochromatin-associated protein Suv39H1. Interestingly, phosphorylation of Rb in vitro as well as in vivo abolished the Rb-Suv39H1 interaction. We also found that Suv39H1 and Rb cooperate to repress E2F activity and that Suv39H1 could be recruited to E2F1 through its interaction with Rb. Taken together, these data indicate that Suv39H1 is involved in transcriptional repression by Rb and suggest an unexpected link between E2F regulation and heterochromatin.

scholarly journals Coordinated Recruitment of Histone Methyltransferase G9a and Other Chromatin-Modifying Enzymes in SHP-Mediated Regulation of Hepatic Bile Acid Metabolism

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1407-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoon Fang ◽  
Ji Miao ◽  
Lingjin Xiang ◽  
Bhaskar Ponugoti ◽  
Eckardt Treuter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Acid ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Histone Methyltransferase ◽  
Bile Acid Metabolism ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
H3k9 Methylation ◽  
Hepatic Bile

ABSTRACT SHP has been implicated as a pleiotropic regulator of diverse biological functions by its ability to inhibit numerous nuclear receptors. Recently, we reported that SHP inhibits transcription of CYP7A1, a key gene in bile acid biosynthesis, by recruiting histone deacetylases (HDACs) and a Swi/Snf-Brm complex. To further delineate the mechanism of this inhibition, we have examined whether methylation of histones is also involved and whether a functional interplay between chromatin-modifying enzymes occurs. The histone methyltransferase G9a, but not SUV39, was colocalized with SHP in the nucleus and directly interacted with SHP in vitro. G9a, which was coimmunoprecipitated with hepatic SHP, methylated Lys-9 of histone 3 (H3K9) in vitro. Expression of G9a enhanced inhibition of CYP7A1 transcription by SHP, while a catalytically inactive G9a dominant negative (DN) mutant reversed the SHP inhibition. G9a was recruited to and H3K9 was methylated at the CYP7A1 promoter in a SHP-dependent manner in bile acid-treated HepG2 cells. Expression of the G9a-DN mutant inhibited H3K9 methylation, blocked the recruitment of the Brm complex, and partially reversed CYP7A1 inhibition by bile acids. Inhibition of HDAC activity with trichostatin A blocked deacetylation and methylation of H3K9 at the promoter, and, conversely, inhibition of H3K9 methylation by G9a-DN partially blocked deacetylation. Hepatic expression of G9a-DN in mice fed cholic acid disrupted bile acid homeostasis, resulting in increased bile acid pools and partial de-repression of Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1. Our studies establish a critical role for G9a methyltransferase, histone deacetylases, and the Swi/Snf-Brm complex in the SHP-mediated inhibition of hepatic bile acid synthesis via coordinated chromatin modification at target genes.

scholarly journals Critical Residues within the BTB Domain of PLZF and Bcl-6 Modulate Interaction with Corepressors

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1804-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Melnick ◽  
Graeme Carlile ◽  
K. Farid Ahmad ◽  
Chih-Li Kiang ◽  
Connie Corcoran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Btb Domain ◽  
Critical Residues ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

ABSTRACT The PLZF (promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger) transcriptional repressor, when fused to retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα), causes a refractory form of acute promyelocytic leukemia. The highly conserved N-terminal BTB (bric a brac, tramtrack, broad complex)/POZ domain of PLZF plays a critical role in this disease, since it is required for transcriptional repression by the PLZF-RARα fusion protein. The crystal structure of the PLZF BTB domain revealed an obligate homodimer with a highly conserved charged pocket formed by apposition of the two monomers. An extensive structure-function analysis showed that the charged pocket motif plays a major role in transcriptional repression by PLZF. We found that mutations of the BTB domain that neutralize key charged pocket residues did not disrupt dimerization, yet abrogated the ability of PLZF to repress transcription and led to the loss of interaction with N-CoR, SMRT, and histone deacetylases (HDACs). We extended these studies to the Bcl-6 protein, which is linked to the pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. In this case, neutralizing the charged pocket also resulted in loss of repression and corepressor binding. Experiments with purified protein showed that corepressor-BTB interactions were direct. A comparison of the PLZF, Bcl-6, and the FAZF (Fanconi anemia zinc finger)/ROG protein shows that variations in the BTB pocket result in differential affinity for corepressors, which predicts the potency of transcriptional repression. Thus, the BTB pocket represents a molecular structure involved in recruitment of transcriptional repression complexes to target promoters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document