Kinetics of the irreversible propagation of a thermal instability in the presence of a nonuniform temperature distribution over the cross section of a superconducting composite

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. R. Romanovskii
2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Collignon ◽  
O. Caballina ◽  
F. Lemoine ◽  
G. Castanet

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Wang ◽  
S. Basu ◽  
Z. M. Zhang

The determination of emissivity of layered structures is critical in many applications, such as radiation thermometry, microelectronics, radiative cooling, and energy harvesting. Two different approaches, i.e., the “indirect” and “direct” methods, are commonly used for computing the emissivity of an object. For an opaque surface at a uniform temperature, the indirect method involves calculating the spectral directional-hemispherical reflectance to deduce the spectral directional emissivity based on Kirchhoff’s law. On the other hand, a few studies have used a combination of Maxwell’s equations with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to directly calculate the emissivity. The present study aims at unifying the direct and indirect methods for calculating the far-field thermal emission from layered structures with a nonuniform temperature distribution. Formulations for both methods are given to illustrate the equivalence between the indirect and the direct methods. Thermal emission from an asymmetric Fabry–Pérot resonance cavity with a nonuniform temperature distribution is taken as an example to show how to predict the intensity, emissivity, and the brightness temperature. The local density of states, however, can only be calculated using the direct method.


2011 ◽  
Vol 354-355 ◽  
pp. 1241-1244
Author(s):  
Yan He ◽  
Man Ding ◽  
Qian Zhang

In this paper the temperature field of Concrete Filled Steel Tube (CFST) member under solar radiation is simulated. The results show that temperature distribution caused by solar radiation is nonlinear over the cross-section of CFST member, and it is significantly varied with time and sections, the largest nonlinear temperature difference is over 26.3°C.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 353-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Felix Weiser ◽  
Robby Mannens ◽  
Andreas Feuerhack ◽  
Daniel Trauth ◽  
Thomas Bergs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document