Demographic and Economic Asymmetry of Urban Development in the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East in 1991–2014

By the Medieval Era, the Far East had not only caught up with Christian and Islamic civilization but, at least in commercial terms, had surpassed both. From the invention of fiduciary (or paper) money to sophisticated forms of urban development and labor specialization, Chinese entrepreneurs had transformed their society. The chapter describes how these entrepreneurs, some of whom were Buddhist monks, shaped and distinguished China during the Tang and Song Dynasties.

Download Full-text

TECTONICS AND MAGMATISM

GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF SIBERIA ◽

10.20403/2078-0575-2020-3-3-12 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 3-12

Author(s):

V. L. Khomichev ◽

◽

N. E. Egorova ◽

Keyword(s):

A Priori ◽

Far East ◽

Correct Identification ◽

Far East Of Russia ◽

Geological History ◽

The Urals ◽

Tectonic Structures ◽

Magmatic Process ◽

The Far East ◽

Geological Work

Tectonics and magmatism are inextricably interconnected phenomena of the single tectonic-magmatic process. Their scales must be a priori commensurate. However, in practice of geological work, small magmatic complexes often do not correspond to extended magma-controlling structures, due to the notorious complex creation that distorts the geological history, leads to genetic misconceptions and errors in forecasting and searching for mineralization. The urgency of the problem of correct identification of magmatic complexes is illustrated by examples on the materials of large tectonic structures of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East of Russia.

Download Full-text

The North-West, the Urals and the Far East of Russia

10.2307/j.ctv1zm2tkx.12 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 101-112

Author(s):

Elena Levanova ◽

Alexander Pakhunov ◽

Nadezhda Lobanova ◽

Yuri Svoisky

Keyword(s):

Far East ◽

Far East Of Russia ◽

The Urals ◽

North West ◽

The North ◽

The Far East

Download Full-text

On distribution of Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787) (Insecta, Scarabaeoidea, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) in Russia and adjacent territories

Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research ◽

10.4081/jear.2018.7390 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 50 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A.B. Ruchin ◽

L.V. Egorov

Keyword(s):

River Basin ◽

Far East ◽

Museum Collections ◽

The Urals ◽

Volga River ◽

Southern Siberia ◽

Volga River Basin ◽

Central Russia ◽

The Far East ◽

The Russian Federation

Based on literature analysis and museum collections, the range of Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787) is defined. Outside of Russia, M. holosericea is distributed in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, some northern provinces of China, the Korean peninsula and Japan. Within the Russian Federation, the species is recorded in 30 administrative regions (the Far East, Eastern, Western and Southern Siberia, the Urals, Volga River basin and Central Russia). It is most abundant and most frequently recorded at the Far East: the Jewish Autonomous Region, Primorsky Krai, Khabarovsky Krai, Amur and Sakhalin Regions. In the western part of its range - Volga River basin and Central Russia - the species is sporadically distributed, though the number of specimen records here has increased in recent years. The main habitats are sparse pine forests (on glades, roadsides, fringes) and floodplain cenoses.

Download Full-text

«Watercolour. Traditions and modernity»: exhibition review

Iskusstvo Evrazii [The Art of Eurasia] ◽

10.25712/astu.2518-7767.2015.01.012 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

С.М. Белокурова

Keyword(s):

Far East ◽

Art Museum ◽

The Urals ◽

The Far East

В статье представлен обзор выставки Акварель. Традиции и современность (Новосибирск, 2015). Организаторами выставки выступили Новосибирский государственный художественный музей, Региональное отделение Урала, Сибири и Дальнего Востока Российской академии художеств, Союз художников России. The article presents a review of the exhibition Watercolor. Traditions and modernity (Novosibirsk, 2015). The exhibition was organized by the Novosibirsk State Art Museum, the Regional Department of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Academy of Arts, the Union of Artists of Russia.

Download Full-text

SOVIET RESETTLEMENT’S PROGRAM FOR THE UKRAINIAN PEASANCE IN 1921–1925

Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu "Ostrozʹka akademìâ". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki ◽

10.25264/2409-6806-2020-31-67-72 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 ◽

pp. 67-72

Author(s):

Olesia Rozovyk

Keyword(s):

Soviet Union ◽

Rural Areas ◽

Far East ◽

North Caucasus ◽

The Urals ◽

Soviet Government ◽

The Far East ◽

The Soviet Union ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

The article, based on little-known sources, deals with the process of forming the policy of the Soviet government to solve such a problem as agrarian overpopulation of the USSR. The article presents data on overpopulation in some districts of the Ukrainian SSR, such as Kyiv, Chernihiv and Volyn districts, where such a phenomenon as scarcity of land and low-yielding soils was presented. An Emergency Resettlement Commission was established within the People’s Commissariat of Land Affairs by the decision of the Council of People’ Commissars (CPC). This Commission solved all issues related to the resettlement of peasants within the republic and abroad. Similar commissions were also formed in all provincial and county centers of the Ukrainian SSR. These commissions began active work on the registration of landless peasants and the search for vacant lands, primarily in the republic for their resettlement, beginning in the spring of 1921. Commissions were also carried out with the All-Russian (later All-Union) Resettlement Commission on the provision of land in uninhabited areas of the RSFSR, such as the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia, Kazakhstan, the Far East, Kuban, Stavropol, North Caucasus to the settlers from Ukraine. In February 1923, the CPC of the Ukrainian SSR took measures to ensure the planned resettlement of the rural population of the republic in Ukraine and abroad. In the autumn of 1923, the VIII All-Ukrainian Congress of Soviets approved the main directions of resettlement policy in the republic. It was reduced to the following measures: first – the resettlement of Ukrainians in the free lands of the Ukrainian SSR; second – resettlement, first of all, of the poor population, which included assistance in farming; third – the resettlement of part of the population from rural areas to cities; fourth – the resettlement of small peasant families in the All-Union Colonization Fund in the Urals, Siberia, Kazakhstan, the Far East. In April 1924, CPC of the Soviet Union, supporting the resettlement movement, adopted a resolution “On the benefits of migrants”. It determined the level of material assistance to the families who settled in new lands. Thus, during 1921–1925, the All-Ukrainian Central Executive Committee and the CPC of the Ukrainian SSR developed a program of resettlement of the Ukrainian population within its ethnic lands and the Union Colonization Fund. This was the first five-year cycle of resettlement policy of the government of the USSR, and in 1926 a new resettlement program was approved, designed first for seven and then for ten years.

Download Full-text

Lexicographic regionalistics: experience and prospects

Russkii iazyk za rubezhom ◽

10.37632/pi.2021.288.5.007 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 50-56

Author(s):

С.А. Журавлев

Keyword(s):

Far East ◽

National Language ◽

First Century ◽

Current Direction ◽

Russian Regions ◽

The Urals ◽

Central Russia ◽

The Far East ◽

Professional Interest ◽

The Moment

В статье рассматривается значение лексикографии в условиях современной парадигмы постструктуралистского гуманитарного знания. Осмысление языковой ситуации ХХI в. показывает, что внимание лингвистов постепенно меняет фокус с нормативного языка до общенационального языка в различных, в том числе субстандартных его формах. Автор указывает на трансформацию соотношения в языке явлений диалекта и региолекта. Актуальным видится направление лингвистической регионалистики, в рамках которого происходит накопление и изучение сведений о лингво- и этнокультурном колорите ситуации в российских регионах. В начале нового столетия в России стали выходить словари, ориентированные на феномен локального языка и фиксацию живых локализмов. На настоящий момент существуют лексикографические источники, которые представляют сведения о региолектах Центральной России, Поволжья, Урала, Сибири и Дальнего Востока. Отмечается рост профессионального и непрофессионального интереса к лингвокультуре регионов страны, указывается перспектива развития региональных словарей в электронном виде. The article examines the importance of lexicography in the context of the modern paradigm of post-structuralist humanities. Understanding the language situation of the twenty-first century shows that the attention of linguists gradually changes the focus from the normative language to the national language in various, including sub-standard, forms. The transformation of the relation in the language of the phenomena of dialect and regiolect is indicated. The current direction of linguistic regionalism is the accumulation and study of information about the linguistic and ethno-cultural color of the situation in the Russian regions. At the beginning of the new century, dictionaries focused on the phenomenon of local language and the fixation of living localisms began to appear in Russia. At the moment, there are lexicographic sources that provide information about the regiolects of Central Russia, the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. The growth of professional and non-professional interest in the linguistic culture of the country's regions is noted, and the prospects for the development of regional dictionaries in electronic form are indicated.

Download Full-text

Spring-summer tick-borne encephalitis in TASSR

Kazan medical journal ◽

10.17816/kazmj83532 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 43 (3) ◽

pp. 3-5

Author(s):

S. V. Chueva

Keyword(s):

Soviet Union ◽

Western Siberia ◽

Far East ◽

European Part ◽

Early Years ◽

The Urals ◽

The Far East ◽

The Soviet Union ◽

Tick Borne Encephalitis ◽

Far Eastern

In the early years of the study of tick-borne encephalitis in the USSR, it was believed that it occurs only in the Far East (hence its name "taiga", "Far Eastern"). Only later were its centers established in the Urals, in Western Siberia, Kazakhstan, and later in the European part of the Soviet Union - in the Latvian, Estonian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian republics.

Download Full-text