Lexicographic regionalistics: experience and prospects

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
С.А. Журавлев
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  
National Language ◽  
First Century ◽  
Current Direction ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Central Russia ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Professional Interest ◽  
The Moment

В статье рассматривается значение лексикографии в условиях современной парадигмы постструктуралистского гуманитарного знания. Осмысление языковой ситуации ХХI в. показывает, что внимание лингвистов постепенно меняет фокус с нормативного языка до общенационального языка в различных, в том числе субстандартных его формах. Автор указывает на трансформацию соотношения в языке явлений диалекта и региолекта. Актуальным видится направление лингвистической регионалистики, в рамках которого происходит накопление и изучение сведений о лингво- и этнокультурном колорите ситуации в российских регионах. В начале нового столетия в России стали выходить словари, ориентированные на феномен локального языка и фиксацию живых локализмов. На настоящий момент существуют лексикографические источники, которые представляют сведения о региолектах Центральной России, Поволжья, Урала, Сибири и Дальнего Востока. Отмечается рост профессионального и непрофессионального интереса к лингвокультуре регионов страны, указывается перспектива развития региональных словарей в электронном виде. The article examines the importance of lexicography in the context of the modern paradigm of post-structuralist humanities. Understanding the language situation of the twenty-first century shows that the attention of linguists gradually changes the focus from the normative language to the national language in various, including sub-standard, forms. The transformation of the relation in the language of the phenomena of dialect and regiolect is indicated. The current direction of linguistic regionalism is the accumulation and study of information about the linguistic and ethno-cultural color of the situation in the Russian regions. At the beginning of the new century, dictionaries focused on the phenomenon of local language and the fixation of living localisms began to appear in Russia. At the moment, there are lexicographic sources that provide information about the regiolects of Central Russia, the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. The growth of professional and non-professional interest in the linguistic culture of the country's regions is noted, and the prospects for the development of regional dictionaries in electronic form are indicated.

scholarly journals On distribution of Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787) (Insecta, Scarabaeoidea, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) in Russia and adjacent territories

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Ruchin ◽  
L.V. Egorov
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Far East ◽  
Museum Collections ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Volga River ◽  
Southern Siberia ◽  
Volga River Basin ◽  
Central Russia ◽  
The Far East ◽  
The Russian Federation

Based on literature analysis and museum collections, the range of Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787) is defined. Outside of Russia, M. holosericea is distributed in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, some northern provinces of China, the Korean peninsula and Japan. Within the Russian Federation, the species is recorded in 30 administrative regions (the Far East, Eastern, Western and Southern Siberia, the Urals, Volga River basin and Central Russia). It is most abundant and most frequently recorded at the Far East: the Jewish Autonomous Region, Primorsky Krai, Khabarovsky Krai, Amur and Sakhalin Regions. In the western part of its range - Volga River basin and Central Russia - the species is sporadically distributed, though the number of specimen records here has increased in recent years. The main habitats are sparse pine forests (on glades, roadsides, fringes) and floodplain cenoses.

Is there a regional culture in Russia? Opportunities of using a sociocultural approach in economics

2020 ◽  
pp. 108-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Bryzgalin ◽  
Е. N. Nikishina
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Regional Culture ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Geographical Patterns ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Sociocultural Approach ◽  
Critical Issues ◽  
Russian Universities

The paper investigates cross-cultural differences across Russian regions using the methodology of G. Hofstede. First, it discusses the most common approaches in measuring culture and the application of the Hofstede methodology in subnational studies. It identifies the critical issues in measuring culture at the regional level and suggests several strategies to address them. Secondly, the paper introduces subregional data on individualism and uncertainty avoidance using a survey of students across 27 Russian universities. The data allow to establish geographical patterns of individualism in Russia. It is demonstrated that collectivism is most prevalent in the Volga region, while individualism characteristic becomes stronger towards the Far East. The findings are robust to the inclusion of various controls and different specifications of the regression model. Finally, the paper provides a discussion about the potential of applying the sociocultural approach in economics.

Current features of the incidence of late-stage syphilis forms in the population of the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Syrneva ◽  
N. P. Malishevskaya ◽  
V. A. Iglikov ◽  
M. V. Pazina
Keyword(s):  
Late Stage ◽  
Far East ◽  
The Urals ◽  
The Far East

scholarly journals “Our Position and Purposes on the Pacific Coast”: The Far East Development in the Perception of the Military Thinker P. F. Unterberger (1898)

2020 ◽  
pp. 1215-1227
Author(s):  
Konstantin A. Medvedev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Pacific Coast ◽  
Far East ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Late 19Th Century ◽  
Central Russia ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Military Presence ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
The Russian Empire

This article is devoted to the Russian military and statesman P. F. Unterberger and his views on the position of the Russian Empire in the Far East in the late 19th century. The source of the article is the P. F. Unterberger’s note, which demonstrates primary objectives of Russia in the region. It is a part of P. F. Unterberger’s fond in the Russian State Military History Archive (RGVIA). The note was written in the late 19th century and is noteworthy not only as a source, revealing aspects of external and internal policy of Russia, but as an attempt of a Russian general to make a project of the Far East’s development. Therefore, on the basis of his note, the article strives to assess intellectual tendencies and processes of the era. Of primary importance for P. F. Unterberger was military presence of Russia in the Far East. He pointed out that strategic importance of the region had significantly increased in the late 19th century. He saw one of the main aims of the Russian Empire in acquiring an ice-free port in the Far East. The need to connect the Far Eastern periphery with Central Russia prompted him to address the problem of transport development. Thus, P. F. Unterberger underscored the necessity of the Trans-Siberian Railway construction. He focused on relations between Russia and other states. P. F. Unterberger urged Russia to establish cordial relations with China, the biggest state of the Far East. On England, which also had its interests on the Pacific coast, he held a different view. Japan he considered Russia’s most dangerous enemy in the region. There are some results in the article’s conclusion. The note of P. F. Unterberger shows some intellectual tendencies of the turn of the 20th centuries. One of them was the idea of “yellow peril.” However, of most significance is the source itself. Such complex theories subsequently have become a part of the scholarship known as “geopolitics.”

Apollonius of Tyana and Hellenistic Taxila

2019 ◽  
pp. 461-478
Author(s):  
Richard Stoneman
Keyword(s):  
Roman Empire ◽  
Far East ◽  
First Century ◽  
Asia Minor ◽  
Eastern Asia ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
The Far East ◽  
The World ◽  
Western Spain ◽  
The City

This chapter focuses on the sage Apollonius, from the city of Tyana in south-eastern Asia Minor, who gained fame for his wisdom and his extensive travels in the first century CE. In the following century Philostratus wrote a fictionalized biography of the sage, but it is nearly impossible to determine where fact ends and fiction begins. According to this biography, Apollonius travelled to the Far East and had discussions with the Brahmans of Taxila. Apollonius outdoes Alexander by travelling as far as Ethiopia and western Spain: even Heracles had only spanned the world from east to west. His ambit is the entire Roman empire. Though presented as a second, “holy” Alexander by Philostratus, Apollonius is also important as a historical “witness” for Hellenistic Taxila. How we judge this importance depends on the assessment of the historicity of Philostratus' account.

TECTONICS AND MAGMATISM

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
V. L. Khomichev ◽  
◽  
N. E. Egorova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Far East ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Far East Of Russia ◽  
Geological History ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Tectonic Structures ◽  
Magmatic Process ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Geological Work

Tectonics and magmatism are inextricably interconnected phenomena of the single tectonic-magmatic process. Their scales must be a priori commensurate. However, in practice of geological work, small magmatic complexes often do not correspond to extended magma-controlling structures, due to the notorious complex creation that distorts the geological history, leads to genetic misconceptions and errors in forecasting and searching for mineralization. The urgency of the problem of correct identification of magmatic complexes is illustrated by examples on the materials of large tectonic structures of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East of Russia.

scholarly journals Population dynamics of Russian regions and its components in 1959–2017

POPULATION ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-20
Author(s):  
Oleg Rybakovsky ◽  
Olga Tayunova
Keyword(s):  
Population Growth ◽  
Natural Population ◽  
Far East ◽  
Soviet Period ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Demographic Development ◽  
Demographic Dynamics ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Post War ◽  
Regions Of Russia

The article deals with the demographic dynamics of the regions of Russia during the post-war Soviet period since 1959, and in the post-Soviet period of 1991–2017. It identifies the basic factors of demographic development of the country’s regions in these two historical periods. There is presented the grouping p of regions by the level of demographic dynamics and the ratio of two main components — reproduction and migration, are highlighted the leaders of demographic growth and problem regions. The authors show the dynamics of geopolitically significant territories of Russia, primarily in the Far East. They stress that in the post-war period, up to the collapse of the USSR, the demographic development of the majority of Russian regions was provided mainly at the expense of inner resources, i. e. due to natural population growth. The same is true for geopolitically significant outlying territories of the Far East, Siberia and the European North, where in 1970–1990 almost 7/8 of the total population growth was formed due to natural population growth and only 1/8 — due to migration from other regions of Russia, as well as from the former republics of the USSR. There is made a conclusion that to change radically the demographic situation in the Far East “de facto” only with immigration of compatriots, as is being done now, is not possible. To solve this problem, it’s necessary to use all demographic «leverage» — fertility, interregional migration, immigration of both compatriots and (selectively) representatives of the titular peoples of the former Soviet republics, as well as temporary (labor and educational) migration as a potential of permanent migration.

scholarly journals INTERFERENCE OF LANGUAGES IN KAZAKHSTAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
S. Zhetpisov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Central Asia ◽  
Far East ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Factor ◽  
Korean Language ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Kazakh Population ◽  
Forced Resettlement ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Moment

The article examines the issues of Korean-Russian-Kazakh trilingualism since 1937 from the moment of the forced resettlement of Koreans from the Far East to Kazakhstan and Central Asia. The study examined the functioning of the Korean language for 80 years, Korean living in Kazakhstan. The factors that determined the interaction of the three languages ​​are primarily the daily communication of Koreans with Kazakhs, Russians and other peoples of Kazakhstan. The political factor also plays an important role, since the majority of the non-Kazakh population was resettled to Kazakhstan as a result of state policy. The geographical factor, compactness of settlement, linguistic contacts of Koreans and Kazakhs with other peoples, school education, the presence of an intermediary language, the media, as well as the language policy pursued in different periods of the country's history are also important.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document