scholarly journals AB0856 A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, TRIAL OF AMZ001 – A NOVEL DICLOFENAC SODIUM 3.06% GEL - FOR THE TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS SYMPTOMS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1735.1-1736
Author(s):  
A. Bihlet ◽  
I. Byrjalsen ◽  
H. B. Nielsen ◽  
J. Andersen ◽  
L. Delpy ◽  
...  

Background:Development of improved topical treatments of painful joints is warranted. A novel diclofenac sodium gel formulation, AMZ001, has been developed with the purpose of improving 1) The onset and duration of pain relief, and 2) The ease of use by reducing the required daily frequency of gel application. Previous trials in human subjects have confirmed improved permeability of a reduced volume of AMZ001 gel as compared to approved diclofenac topical products with a comparable safety and tolerability profile, supporting trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMZ001 in painful joint conditions.Objectives:The current abstract reports the main results of a randomized trial of AMZ001 once or twice daily application versus placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.Methods:The trial was a placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMZ001 or placebo in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. The main inclusion criteria were Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic severity of 1-3, and pain ≥40 and ≤90 out of 100 using the WOMAC pain subscale (5 questions) at the time of screening. The subjects were randomized to apply AMZ001 gel once (QD) or twice (BID) daily or placebo twice daily per OA knee for a period of 28 days, or to apply Voltaren® Gel 1 % four times daily (QID) in a single-blind fashion for exploratory comparison. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at week 4 in WOMAC pain (5 questions). The main secondary endpoints included WOMAC subscales, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and quality of life using the EQ-5D. In addition to the main analysis, a post-hoc subgroup analysis of subjects meeting the pain criterion at both screening and baseline was performed.Results:A total of 444 subjects were randomized. The main baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups.AMZ001 QD and BID led to statistically significant reductions in pain compared to baseline with an estimated difference (95% CI) normalized to 0-100 at week 4 of -27.33 (-30.50, -24.17), and -26.49 (-29.60, -23.38), respectively. Reduction in pain at week 4 was statistically significantly superior to placebo for AMZ001 QD (p=0.04), and borderline significant for AMZ001 BID (p<0.10) as shown in Figure 1.Both AMZ001 QD and BID led to statistically significant improvements in PGA at week 4 compared to placebo (p<0.05 for both), and AMZ001 BID led to significantly improved quality of life (p<0.05) compared to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences between AMZ001 QD or BID in any of the endpoints. In the post-hoc analysis of subjects meeting the pain criterion at both screening and baseline the differentiation to placebo was strengthened for all efficacy endpoints, as shown in Figure 2.While the study design and differences in sample sizes does not allow formal comparisons between the double- and single blinded groups, the exploratory comparator, Voltaren QID, did not reach statistically significant differences to placebo or AMZ001 in any of the endpoints, in neither the ITT nor the subgroup analyses.The safety and tolerability of AMZ001 was favorable, as the frequency of AEs leading to discontinuation of treatment was similarly low (ranging between 2.8 % to 6.6 %) between AMZ001 once or twice daily and placebo or Voltaren Gel 1%. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were application site dryness, and application site erythema. No serious adverse events were reported during the trial.Conclusion:AMZ001, a novel topical diclofenac formulation, either once or twice daily was efficacious in the treatment of knee OA pain with a good tolerability and safety profile, suggesting AMZ001 may be a promising alternative to existing pain-relieving treatments in knee OA.References:NADisclosure of Interests:Asger Bihlet Shareholder of: Nordic Bioscience, Consultant of: Amzell BV, Medivir AB, Xintela AB, Merck KGaA, Employee of: Nordic Bioscience, Inger Byrjalsen Employee of: Nordic Bioscience, Henning Bay Nielsen: None declared, Jeppe Andersen Shareholder of: Minor shareholder of Nordic Bioscience, Consultant of: Medivir AB, Xintela AB, Employee of: Nordic Bioscience, Laetitia Delpy Employee of: Amzell BV, Caroline Derne Employee of: Amzell BV, Dario Carrara Employee of: Amzell BV

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Wang ◽  
Ambrish Singh ◽  
Benny Antony

AbstractTurmeric extracts have been used as a remedy for treating arthritis in traditional medicine. Recent years have witnessed the rise of different extracts from turmeric and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of these extracts for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This planned systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of turmeric extracts for the treatment of knee OA. Biomedical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Embase will be searched for RCTs reporting safety and efficacy of turmeric extracts for the treatment of knee OA. Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and a meta-analysis will be performed to pool the effect estimates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 46-54
Author(s):  
L. I. Alekseeva ◽  
N. G. Kashevarova ◽  
E. A. Taskina ◽  
E. P. Sharapova ◽  
S. G. Anikin ◽  
...  

in 3 mL on patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a multicenter prospective study. Materials and methods. 79 outpatients (predominantly females 81.0%) from 5 RF constituent territories with primary tibiofemoral KellgrenLawrence score grade II or III knee OA, 40 mm pain intensity during walking on visual analogue scale (VAS), requiring NSAIDs intake (for at least 30 days during 3 months prior to enrollment) were included into the study after signing the informed consent form. Mean age was 60.38.7 years, mean BMI 29.24.7 kg/m2, disease duration 6 (310) years. Grade II OA was documented in 68.4% of patients, Grade III in 31.6%. The study lasted for 6 months. Efficacy and safety evaluations were made based on VAS pain assessment, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [WOMAC pain (0500), WOMAC function (01700), WOMAC stiffness (0200)], VAS patients health status, EQ-5D-based assessment of patients quality of life, global physicians and patients efficacy assessment, and daily NSAIDs requirements. Results. Obtained results demonstrate statistically significant VAS pain reduction during walking already in 1 week after intra-articular injection of the combination [respectively, 62 (5572) and 41 (3251) mm, р0.0001]. Moreover, pain continued to subside during all 3 months of follow up [in 1 month 28 (2042), in 3 month 22 (1437) mm]. A significant pan reduction achieved at Mo 3 persisted until Mo 6 20 (1442) mm, without documented pain increase. Similar trends were observed with total WOMAC score [1125 (8991540) at baseline, and 552 (309837) mm by the end of the study, p0.0001], and all WOMAC sub-scores [268 (189312) baseline WOMAC pain, 91 (48171) mm by the end of the study p0.0001; stiffness 101 (59130) and 40 (2061) mm, p0.0001; function 802 (6471095) and 402 (191638) mm, p0.0001, respectively]. Median time to the onset of therapeutic effect was 7 (518) days. Statistically significant improvement of patients quality of life by EQ-5D and general health status was observed during all follow up period [respectively, 0.52 (-0.020.59) and 0.69 (0.590.80), р0.0001; 48 (3060) and 72 (6080) mm, р0.0001]. One injection of the drug resulted in dose reduction or discontinuation of NSAIDs therapy: at baseline 76 patients (96.2%) were taking NSAIDs, in one week 31 (39.2%) patients discontinued NSAIDs, in 1 month 72.2%, in 3 months 73.4%, and by the end of the study at Mo 6 54.4% were not taking NSAIDs. These data were consistent with physicians and patients global assessment of the efficacy of treatment, who stated significant improvement and improvement in the majority of cases, with only few no effect or worsening cases documented in analyzed population. Adverse events, such as worsening of pain and/or swelling of the joint, were documented in 8 patients (10.1%); they resolved spontaneously or following NSAIDs intake. Conclusion. These results suggest that intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid plus chondroitin sulfate in patients with knee OA are efficient and safe. A single injection of the drug resulted in statistically significant reduction of pain and stiffness, reduction in NSAIDs intake, as well as improvement in patients quality of life and function.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piya Pinsornsak ◽  
Puritat Kanokkangsadal ◽  
Arunporn Itharat

Introduction. The Sahastara (SHT) remedy is a Thai traditional medicine that has been acknowledged in the Thai National List of Essential Medicine and has been used as an alternative medicine to treat knee osteoarthritis. Although SHT remedies have been used in Thai traditional medical practices for a long period of time, there are few reports on their clinical trials.Aim of the Study. To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of the SHT remedy in treating OA of the knee when compared to diclofenac.Methods. A phase 2, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial study with a purpose to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of SHT in comparison with diclofenac for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Sixty-six patients, ages between 45 and 80 years of age, were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The SHT group received 1,000 mg of SHT powdered capsules 3 times per day, orally before meals, while another group received 25 mg of diclofenac sodium capsules 3 times a day, orally after meals for 28 days. All patients were followed up at 14 and 28 days for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety by using clinical examinations, blood tests, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the 100-meter walktime test. Improvement on the quality of life was also assessed by the WOMAC index.Results. There were 31 and 30 patients in SHT and diclofenac groups, respectively, who had completed the study. Both medications have shown to significantly reduce the VAS for pain, and significantly improve the 100-meter walktime test and the WOMAC index score. However, there were no differences in the efficacy between the two groups. The blood chemistry showed no toxicity on renal and/or liver functions after taking SHT for 28 days but the patients who took diclofenac showed significant increases in their AST, ALT, and ALP. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure slightly increased in the diclofenac group but the SHT group did not effect on blood pressure.Conclusions. The SHT remedy is similar to diclofenac in all evaluating symptoms of OA knee. However, the SHT remedy has shown to be a good alternative treatment for OA knee with less systemic side effects when it was compared with diclofenac.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao-ping Xu ◽  
Min Yao ◽  
Zi-rui Tian ◽  
Long-yun Zhou ◽  
Long Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common chronic musculoskeletal disorder that seriously affect quality of life. Patients with KOA frequently develop one or more of the typically following symptoms: joint pain, stiffness, joint friction noise, impaired functionality. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) have showed a superior effect and peculiar advantage on the treatment of KOA, among TCMs, the Tong-luo Qu-tong plaster is the convenient and most commonly used method in China to improve symptoms including pain, stiffness and limited mobility in patients with KOA, as it causes few adverse effects. But there is a lack of high quality of clinical evidences to support the therapeutic effect that Chinese adhesive plaster can relieve pain and stiffness. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tong-luo Qu-tong plaster in patients with KOA. Methods/Design: This study will be a randomised, double-blind, parallel positive control, multi-center clinical trial, a non-inferiority trial design was adopted. A total of 2000 participants older than 40 years with KOA, will be randomly allocated into a experimental group (n=1500) and a control group (n=500). All participants will receive a conventional conservative treatment lasted for 14 days as two courses, daily 1 time. Tong-luo Qu-tong plaster will be administered externally to participants in the experimental group, while the control group will receive a Qi-zheng Xiao-tong plaster. The outcome of the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, TCM syndrome quantitative score, visual analog scale scores will be measured during the assessment visits (baseline and 1-, 2-week follow-up). In addition, adverse events concerning clinical symptoms and signs as well as laboratory tests will be documented during clinical trials. Discussion: This study will be a randomized, double-blind, parallel positive control trial to further evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Tong-luo Qu-tong plaster for patients with KOA in nine medical centers compared with control group, it is expected that the patients with KOA will benefit from this study.


Author(s):  
Orazio De Lucia ◽  
Joerg Jerosch ◽  
Sophie Yoon ◽  
Tobias Sayre ◽  
Wilson Ngai ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of single or 1–3 weekly injections of hylan G-F 20 at 1 year following the first injection for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL and included relevant conference proceedings (January 1, 1995–August 17, 2020). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, and observational studies investigating 1-year efficacy and safety of 1–3 weekly injections or single hylan G-F 20 injection for knee OA were included. Primary outcomes were WOMAC pain, physical function, and stiffness. Meta-analyses of RCTs and non-randomized studies were conducted separately. Our search identified 24 eligible studies. Hylan G-F 20, in the meta-analyses of RCTs, showed statistically significant improvement in WOMAC pain (SMCC − 0.98, 95% CI − 1.50, − 0.46), physical function (SMCC − 1.05, 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.83), and stiffness (SMCC − 1.07, 95% CI −1.28, −0.86). Improvement was also seen for VAS pain, SF-36 MCS (mental component summary), and SF-36 PCS (physical component summary). Analyses of non-randomized studies showed similar efficacy estimates. There were no significant differences in efficacy based on injection schedule, nor between RCT and non-randomized studies. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were low for most types of AEs. Hylan G-F 20 (either as single or 1–3 weekly injections) showed improvement in 1-year efficacy outcomes in comparison to baseline and was generally well tolerated. While further research will inform the medical field regarding viscosupplementation treatment options for knee OA, these findings show that hylan G-F 20 at both frequencies/dosages are efficacious and generally well tolerated for long-term use.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao-ping Xu ◽  
Min Yao ◽  
Zi-rui Tian ◽  
Long-yun Zhou ◽  
Long Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common chronic musculoskeletal disorder that seriously affect quality of life. Patients with KOA frequently develop one or more of the typically following symptoms: joint pain, stiffness, joint friction noise, impaired functionality. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) have showed a superior effect and peculiar advantage on the treatment of KOA, among TCMs, the Tong-luo Qu-yu plaster is the convenient and most commonly used method in China to improve symptoms including pain, stiffness and limited mobility in patients with KOA, as it causes few adverse effects. But there is a lack of high quality of clinical evidences to support the therapeutic effect that Chinese adhesive plaster can relieve pain and stiffness. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tong-luo Qu-yu plaster in patients with KOA. Methods: This study will be a randomised, double-blind, parallel positive control, multi-center clinical trial. A total of 2000 participants older than 40 years with KOA, will be randomly allocated into a experimental group (n=1500) and a control group (n=500). All participants will receive a conventional conservative treatment lasted for 14 days as two courses, daily 1 time. Tong-luo Qu-yu plaster will be administered externally to participants in the experimental group, while the control group will receive a Qi-zheng Xiao-tong plaster. The outcome of the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, TCM syndrome quantitative score, visual analog scale scores will be measured during the assessment visits (baseline and 1-, 2-week follow-up). In addition, adverse events concerning clinical symptoms and signs as well as laboratory tests will be documented during clinical trials. Discussion: This study will be a randomized, double-blind, parallel positive control trial to further evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Tong-luo Qu-yu plaster for patients with KOA in nine medical centers compared with control group, it is expected that the patients with KOA will benefit from this study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03309501. Registered on 08 November 2017. Keywords: Clinical trials, Knee osteoarthritis, Tong-luo Qu-yu plaster, Randomized, Protocol


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document