AB1082 INFLUENCE OF THE VARIATION OF THE OPERATOR, PATIENT POSITION AND DEVICE ON THE MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE OF RADIOFREQUENCY ECHOGRAPHIC MULTI SPECTROMETRY (REMS)

Background:The monitoring of bone mineral density (BMD) is a key aspect for patients undergoing pharmacological treatments that might cause BMD changes at non-physiological rates. At present, the short-term follow-up of patients under treatment in terms of BMD change with time remains an unmet clinical need, since the current techniques, including the gold standard dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), require at least 1 year between two consecutive measurements [1]. Therefore, an effective strategy for the assessment of BMD should guarantee high accuracy, precision and repeatability of the measurements.Objectives:The aim is to assess the influence of the variation 1) in patient position, 2) operator (both intra- and inter-) and 3) device on the REMS performance at lumbar spine and femoral neck.Methods:210 women were enrolled, divided in 7 groups of 30-patient each for the assessment of the parameters of interest, i.e. inter-device, intra- and inter-operator repeatability for lumbar spine scans and inter-patient position, inter-device, intra- and inter-operator repeatability for femoral neck scans.All patients underwent 2 REMS scans at lumbar spine or femoral neck, performed by the same operator or by 2 different operators or by the same operator using 2 different devices or in different patient position (i.e. supine without constraints or with a constrained 25°-rotation of the leg). The percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) with 95% confidence interval and least significant change for a 95% confidence level (LSC) have been calculated.Results:For lumbar spine, intra-operator repeatability resulted in CV%=0.37% (95%CI: 0.26%-0.48%), with LSC=1.02%, inter-operator repeatability resulted in CV%=0.55% (95% CI: 0.42%-0.68%), with LSC=1.52%, inter-device repeatability resulted in CV%=0.53% (95% CI: 0.40%-0.66%), with LSC=1.47%.For femoral neck, intra-operator repeatability resulted in CV%=0.33% (95%CI: 0.23%-0.43%), with LSC=0.91%, inter-operator repeatability resulted in CV%=0.47% (95% CI: 0.35%-0.59%), with LSC=1.30%, inter-device repeatability resulted in CV%=0.42% (95% CI: 0.30%-0.51%), with LSC=1.16%, inter-patient position repeatability resulted in CV%=0.24% (95% CI: 0.18%-0.30%), with LSC=0.66%.Conclusion:REMS densitometry is highly precise for both anatomical sites, showing high performance in repeatability. These results suggest that REMS might be a suitable technology for short-term monitoring. Moreover, thanks to its ionizing radiation-free approach, it might be applied for population mass investigations and prevention programs also in paediatric patients and pregnant women.References:Note:Carla Caffarelli, Giovanni Adami§, Giovanni Arioli§, Gerolamo Bianchi§, Maria Luisa Brandi§, Sergio Casciaro§, Luisella Cianferotti§, Delia Ciardo§, Francesco Conversano§, Davide Gatti§, Giuseppe Girasole§, Monica Manfredini§, Maurizio Muratore§, Paola Pisani§, Eugenio Quarta§, Laura Quarta§, Stefano Gonnelli§Equal contributors listed in alphabetical orderDisclosure of Interests:Carla Caffarelli: None declared, Giovanni Adami: None declared, Giovanni Arioli *: None declared, Gerolamo Bianchi Grant/research support from: Celgene, Consultant of: Amgen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Abiogen, Alfa-Sigma, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chiesi, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, UCB, Maria Luisa Brandi: None declared, Sergio Casciaro: None declared, Luisella Cianferotti: None declared, Delia Ciardo: None declared, Francesco Conversano: None declared, Davide Gatti Speakers bureau: Davide Gatti reports personal fees from Abiogen, Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Mundipharma, outside the submitted work., Giuseppe Girasole: None declared, Monica Manfedini: None declared, Maurizio Muratore: None declared, Paola Pisani: None declared, Eugenio Quarta: None declared, Laura Quarta: None declared, Stefano Gonnelli: None declared

Download Full-text

Alcohol consumption and bone mineral density in elderly women

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s136898001200331x ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 16 (4) ◽

pp. 704-712 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Isolde Sommer ◽

Arja T Erkkilä ◽

Ritva Järvinen ◽

Jaakko Mursu ◽

Joonas Sirola ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Alcohol Consumption ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Alcohol Intake ◽

Elderly Women ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Lifestyle Questionnaire

AbstractObjectiveFindings regarding alcohol consumption and bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly women have been inconsistent. The objective of the present study was to explore the association of alcohol intake with BMD in elderly women.DesignThis cohort study included women from the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention – Fracture Prevention Study (OSTPRE-FPS). Alcohol intake and potential confounders were assessed at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up using a lifestyle questionnaire. In addition, an FFQ was distributed in the third year to measure dietary intake, including alcohol. Women underwent BMD measurements at the femoral neck and lumbar spine at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up.SettingKuopio Province, Finland.SubjectsThree hundred elderly women (mean age 67·8 years) who provided both BMD measurements and FFQ data.ResultsAlcohol consumption estimated from the FFQ and lifestyle questionnaire was significantly associated with BMD at both measurement sites after adjustment for potential confounders, including lifestyle and dietary factors (P < 0·05). Using the FFQ, women drinking >3 alcoholic drinks/week had significantly higher BMD than abstainers, 12·0 % at the femoral neck and 9·2 % at the lumbar spine. Results based on the lifestyle questionnaire showed higher BMD values for all alcohol-consuming women at the femoral neck and for women drinking 1–3 alcoholic beverages/week at the lumbar spine, compared with non-users.ConclusionsThe results from OSTPRE-FPS suggest that low to moderate alcohol intake may exert protective effects on bone health in elderly women.

Download Full-text

Relation of the Serum Levels of DKK-1 and Osteoprotegerin with Bone Mass in Tightly Controlled Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Current Rheumatology Reviews ◽

10.2174/1573397116666201221112509 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 16 ◽

Author(s):

Carmen Gómez-Vaquero ◽

Irene Martín ◽

Andrea Zacarías ◽

Pedro Alía ◽

Estíbaliz Loza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Serum Levels ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Annual Percent Change ◽

Activity Measures ◽

Mean Time

Objective: To analyze the association between serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1) and the annual percent change (%) in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with tightly controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Observational mixed-study. RA patients followed-up with a tight-control strategy were included. Bone densitometries were performed at baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1) and serum levels of OPG and DKK-1 were measured by ELISA also in T0 and T1; additional clinical variables included disease activity measures, and treatment for RA and osteoporosis. Descriptive bivariate and multivariate analyses, stratified by gender, were performed. Results: We included 97 RA patients (70% female, with a mean age of 53 years, and 76% with low activity by DAS28); 95% were treated with DMARDs and 37% with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Mean time between T0 and T1 was 2.7 years. Most patients had their BMD improved. The mean %BMD was +0.42% for lumbar spine, +0.15% for femoral neck and +0.91% for total femur. In men, baseline OPG was significantly associated with higher BMD loss (β coefficient -0.64) at femoral neck. In women, DKK-1 was associated with higher BMD loss at femoral neck (β coefficient -0.09), and total femur (β coefficient -0.11); however, DKK-1 was associated with lower BMD loss at lumbar spine (β coefficient 0.06). Conclusion: In tightly controlled RA patients, we have found no evidence of bone loss. The role of DKK1 and OPG seems small and might be related to sex and to location.

Download Full-text

Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density in Thalassemia-Induced Osteoporosis: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.3826.3826 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 3826-3826

Author(s):

Ali Taher ◽

Sami Azar ◽

Wael Shamseddeen ◽

Dany Habr ◽

Adlette Inati ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Zoledronic Acid ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Beta Thalassemia ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Significant Change

Abstract Background: Osteoporosis is an important cause of morbidity in beta-thalassemia patients. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast activity and have been recently used for the treatment of osteoporosis in beta-thalassemia. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in Lebanese thalassemics with osteoporosis. Methods: Eighteen thalassemic patients (13 thalassemia major and 5 intermedia) with osteoporosis defined as Z-score <−2.5 were given zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v. every 3 months over a period of 12 months (Total of 4 doses administered). The efficacy of treatment was assessed by measuring Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and hip at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Other efficacy measurements included markers of bone formation and resorption (bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (OC), and urinary deoxypyridinoline (Dpd)), assessment of pain score, analgesic score, and performance score measured at baseline and at 3-month intervals. Safety assessment included regular physical exams, standard hematology and clinical chemistry tests, and adverse events recording. All patients were on Ca/Vitamin D supplementation prior to and during the study. Ten thalassemic osteoporotic patients were followed up only with serial BMDs as controls. Results: The characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1. Both groups had no significant difference with respect to age, gender and baseline BMD. Patients taking zoledronic acid had a significant increase in their spine, femoral neck, trochanter and total hip BMD measurements over the 12-month period (all p-values<0.05). Patients in the control group, on the other hand, did not have any significant change except in the spine BMD. The BMD values are presented in Table 2. There was a significant change in the levels of the OC and BAP over the 12-month follow-up in the treatment group (p=0.00 for both). Dpd levels did not significantly change overall (p=0.06) although they decreased throughout the study. Reported adverse events included joint pain in 9 patients (50%) after the 1st dose and in 2 (11.1%) after the 2nd dose and responding very well to oral analgesics. Two patients (11.1%) had perioral numbness and 3 (16.7%) had low grade fever after the 1st dose. No treatment-related adverse events were reported after the 3rd and 4th doses. No patients withdrew from the study. Conclusions: Treatment of Lebanese thalassemic osteoporotic patients with zoledronic acid 4 mg every 3 months is effective in increasing BMD at the lumbar spine and hip and is well-tolerated. Well-controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the fracture-reduction benefits and the most optimal zoledronic acid treatment dose and frequency in this patient population. Table 1: Main characteristics of the studied groups Table 2: BMD values of the treatment and control groups

Download Full-text

POS1106 FRAX AND THE EFFECT OF TERIPARATIDE ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN SECONDARY OSTEOPOROSIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.961 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 833.2-834

Author(s):

S. Garcia ◽

B. M. Fernandes ◽

M. Rato ◽

F. Oliveira Pinheiro ◽

D. Fonseca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Hip Fracture ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Fracture Risk ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fracture Probability ◽

Mineral Density ◽

T Score

Background:Teriparatide has been shown to increase spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) and to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. (1) It is currently not clear whether the effect of teriparatide is dependent on the baseline risk of fracture or osteoporosis (OP) type, a finding that could have an impact on our therapeutic decision.Objectives:Investigate if there is a relationship between teriparatide effect in BMD and baseline 10-year fracture probability, assessed using FRAX®, in primary and secondary OP patients.Methods:This is a longitudinal, retrospective study including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of OP treated with teriparatide for 24 months, with a ten-year follow-up period, at our rheumatology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratorial, BMD and occurrence of fracture data were collected. The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) v 4.1 with the Portuguese population reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 23.0. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated with spearman coefficient. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Eighty patients (88.8% female, median age 65.00 (59; 75)) were included. Forty-nine patients (61.3%) has secondary OP, mainly of cortisonic etiology (61.2%, n=30). Before treatment, median lumbar spine BMD was 0.870 [0.767, 0.964] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.60 (-3.30, -1.90); median total femur BMD was 0.742 [0.667, 0.863] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.10 (-2.80, -1.30); median femoral neck BMD was 0.671 [0.611, 0.787] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.50 [-3.20, -1.85]. Regarding fracture risk, median FRAX-based 10-year major fracture risk (with BMD) at baseline was 16% [10.0; 23], and median hip fracture risk was 7.2% [3.4; 13.8].The median variation of BMD, after finishing teriparatide treatment, in the spine was 0.107 [0.029; 0.228]; median BMD variation in total femur was 0.013 [-0.013; 0.068] and median BMD femoral neck was 0.046 [-0.002; 0.109]. We observed a numerically superior effect, albeit without any statistical significance, of teriparatide on bone mineral density gain in secondary OP (versus primary OP) at lumbar spine, total femur and femoral neck.Most patients continued anti-osteoporotic treatment with a bisphosphonate (81.2%, n=65) and, during follow-up, 17 patients had an incident fracture (8 hip fractures and 6 vertebral fractures), median of 5 [1.75, 8.25] years after ending teriparatide.We found a discrete correlation between FRAX-based hip fracture probability and the variation of bone mineral density in total femur (Spearman’s coefficient 0.248, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between FRAX-based major fracture probability and and the variation of bone mineral density in the spine or femur. When we separately analyze the relationship between the variation in total hip BMD and the FRAX-based fracture risk, depending on whether it is a secondary or primary OP, we find that the correlation is stronger and only remains in secondary OP (Spearman’s coefficient 0.348, p = 0.03).Conclusion:Our data suggest that teriparatide could be an important weapon in the treatment of secondary cause OP, particularly cortisonic, and in patients at high fracture risk, although further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.References:[1]Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):230-240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Download Full-text

Changes in bone mineral density over 10 years in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001142 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. e001142

Author(s):

Lisa Theander ◽

Minna Willim ◽

Jan Åke Nilsson ◽

Magnus Karlsson ◽

Kristina E Åkesson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Z Score ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Early Ra ◽

Z Scores ◽

The Mean

ObjectivesTo investigate changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 10-year period.MethodsConsecutive patients with early RA (symptom duration <12 months) were followed according to a structured programme and examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at inclusion and after 2, 5 and 10 years. Mean Z-scores over the study period were estimated using mixed linear effect models. Changes in Z-scores between follow-up visits were analysed using paired T-tests.ResultsAt inclusion, 220 patients were examined with DXA. At the femoral neck, the mean Z-score over 10 years was −0.33 (95 % CI −0.57 to −0.08) in men and −0.07 (−0.22 to 0.08) in women. Men had significantly lower BMD at the femoral neck than expected by age at inclusion (intercept Z-score value −0.35; 95 % CI −0.61 to −0.09), whereas there was no such difference in women. At the lumbar spine, the mean Z-score over the study period for men was −0.05 (−0.29 to 0.19) and for women 0.06 (−0.10 to 0.21). In paired comparisons of BMD at different follow-up visits, femoral neck Z-scores for men decreased significantly from inclusion to the 5-year follow-up. After 5 years, no further reduction was seen.ConclusionsIn this observational study of a limited sample, men with early RA had reduced femoral neck BMD at diagnosis, with a further significant but marginal decline during the first 5 years. Lumbar spine BMD Z-scores were not reduced in men or women with early RA. Data on 10-year follow-up were limited.

Download Full-text

SAT0461 SHORT-TERM MONITORING OF DENOSUMAB EFFECT IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING AROMATASE INHIBITORS USING REMS TECHNOLOGY ON LUMBAR SPINE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.3806 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1187.2-1188

Author(s):

E. Quarta ◽

D. Ciardo ◽

M. Ciccarese ◽

F. Conversano ◽

M. DI Paola ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Bone Health ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Short Term ◽

Group A ◽

The Difference ◽

Group B ◽

Term Monitoring

Background:Aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) causes accelerated bone loss and increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures as side effects. Denosumab (i.e. 60 mg twice a year) is a viable therapy against bone resorption, but the short-term monitoring of bone mineral density (BMD) change with time is still an unmet clinical need, since the current techniques (including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) require 1-2 years between two consecutive measurements [1]. Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS), with high performance in terms of precision and repeatability [2], might be used in this setting of patients for short-term monitoring of bone health-related parameters.Objectives:The objective is the short-term monitoring of the effect of AIs with/without denosumab on bone health in BC patients using REMS and DXA scans at lumbar spine.Methods:Post-menopausal ER+ BC patients treated with adjuvant AIs were recruited. Two subgroups were identified, whether receiving also 60 mg of denosumab therapy every 6 months or not (named Group A and Group B, respectively). All patients underwent baseline DXA and REMS lumbar spine scans at time T0, previous to the first AI therapy, and after 12 months (time T1). REMS scan only was repeated also at 18 months (T2), since a 6-month interval between two consecutive scans is not recommended for DXA. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with both techniques.Results:Overall, 254 ER+ BC patients were enrolled (127 per group). The effect of denosumab on BMD is reported in Table. The BMD values obtained by DXA and REMS were not significantly different at T0 and T1, whereas the difference between Group A and B at T1 was statistically significant (p<0.001) both for REMS and DXA. At T2, REMS confirmed the increasing trend of BMD for Group A and the decreasing one for Group B, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). For each time point and each group, there were not statistically significant differences between DXA and REMS.Conclusion:Several studies have shown the effect of denosumab on BMD over a period not less than 2 years from the start of treatment. This study showed the feasibility of short-term follow-up using REMS lumbar spine scans at 6-month time steps.References:[1]Diez-Perez A et al, Aging Clin Exp Res 2019;31(10):1375–89[2]Di Paola M et al, Osteoporos Int 2018;30:391–402Table 1.BMD values, expressed as g/cm2, measured by DXA and REMS for Group A (patients receiving AIs only) and Group B (patients receiving AIs and denosumab) at baseline (T0), 12 months (T1) and 18 months (T2) from the start of therapy. Results are presented as median values with 25thand 75thpercentiles. P-values are obtained with a Mann-Whitney test.DXAREMSScan timeGroup AGroup BpGroup AGroup BpT00.840 (0.719-0.959)0.867 (0.723-0.958)0.990.833 (0.708-0.949)0.855 (0.714-0.973)0.77T10.823 (0.702-0.944)0.889 (0.749-0.990)0.0030.819 (0.691-0.927)0.887 (0.740-1.018)<0.001T2---0.801 (0.679-0.909)0.899 (0.754-1.020)<0.001Note:The authorsD. Ciardo, M. Ciccarese, F. Conversano, M. Di Paola, R. Forcignanò, A. Grimaldi, F.A. Lombardi, M. Muratore and P. Pisaniare listed in alphabetical orderDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

THU0376 THE EFFECT OF 8 YEARS OF TNF-Α BLOCKING THERAPY ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2189 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 421.1-421

Author(s):

M. Siderius ◽

F. Wink ◽

A. Spoorenberg ◽

S. Arends

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Research Support ◽

Tnf Α ◽

Hip Bmd ◽

Z Scores

Background:Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that mainly affects the axial skeleton. Bone loss reflected by low bone mineral density (BMD) is a common feature of AS and can already be observed at early stages of the disease. A recent cohort study of 135 AS patients reported 7.2% improvement in lumbar spine BMD and 2.2% improvement in hip BMD after 4 years of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blocking therapy.1Objectives:To assess the effect of 8 years of TNF-α blocking therapy on BMD of the lumbar spine and hip in AS patients.Methods:Included in this study were consecutive AS outpatients from the Groningen-Leeuwarden Axial SpA (GLAS) cohort who received TNF-α blocking therapy for at least 8 years. A maximum of one switch to another TNF-α inhibitor was allowed. Patients were excluded when they used bisphosphonates at baseline or during follow-up. BMD of the lumbar spine (anterior-posterior projection L1-L4) (LS-BMD) and hip (total proximal femur) (hip-BMD) was measured at baseline, 1 year, 2 years and then bi-annually using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR Discovery (UMCG) or Hologic QDR Delphi (MCL), Waltman, MA, USA). Z-scores, the number of SD from the normal mean corrected for age and gender, were calculated using the NHANES reference database. Low BMD was defined as lumbar spine and/or hip BMD Z-score ≤1. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze BMD over time within subjects. Pairwise contrast were used to compare baseline and follow-up visits. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results:In total, 131 AS patients were included; 73% were male, 83% HLA-B27+, mean age was 41.3 ± 10.8 years, median symptom duration 14 years (IQR 7-24), median CRP levels 13 mg/L (IQR 6-22), and 28% had poor vitamin 25(OH)D3 status (<50) at baseline. 27% of patients switched to a second TNF-α inhibitor during follow-up and disease activity improved significantly during treatment: mean ASDASCRP3.8 ± 0.8 at baseline and 2.1 ± 0.9 after 8 years (P<0.001). At baseline, low BMD at the lumbar spine and hip was present in 34% and 19% patients, respectively. Both LS-BMD and hip BMD Z-scores were significantly improved during TNF-α blocking therapy at all follow-up visits compared to baseline. Significant improvement compared to the previous time point was found up to and including 4 years for the lumbar spine and up to and including 2 years for the hip. Thereafter, flattening of improvement was observed. Median percentage of improvement in absolute BMD after 8 years of TNF-α blocking therapy compared to baseline was 7.1% (IQR 0.8-13.5) for the lumbar spine and 1.6% (IQR -3.5-5.5) for the hip (Figure 1).Conclusion:In AS patients with established disease, both lumbar spine and hip BMD improved significantly at group level during 8 years of TNF-α blocking therapy. This effect was most pronounced in the lumbar spine, which corresponds to the disease process in AS. Main improvements in lumbar spine BMD were observed during the first 4 years of treatment.References:[1]Beek et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2019; jun;34(6):1041-8Disclosure of Interests:Mark Siderius: None declared, Freke Wink Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, Anneke Spoorenberg: None declared, Suzanne Arends Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Pfizer

Download Full-text

MDCT-Based Finite Element Analyses: Are Measurements at the Lumbar Spine Associated with the Biomechanical Strength of Functional Spinal Units of Incidental Osteoporotic Fractures along the Thoracolumbar Spine?

Diagnostics ◽

10.3390/diagnostics11030455 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (3) ◽

pp. 455

Author(s):

Nico Sollmann ◽

Nithin Manohar Rayudu ◽

Long Yu Yeung ◽

Anjany Sekuboyina ◽

Egon Burian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Finite Element ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Fracture Risk ◽

Thoracolumbar Spine ◽

Areal Bone Mineral Density ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures ◽

The Mean ◽

Biomechanical Strength

Assessment of osteoporosis-associated fracture risk during clinical routine is based on the evaluation of clinical risk factors and T-scores, as derived from measurements of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). However, these parameters are limited in their ability to identify patients at high fracture risk. Finite element models (FEMs) have shown to improve bone strength prediction beyond aBMD. This study aims to investigate whether FEM measurements at the lumbar spine can predict the biomechanical strength of functional spinal units (FSUs) with incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) along the thoracolumbar spine. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of 11 patients (5 females and 6 males, median age: 67 years) who underwent MDCT twice (median interval between baseline and follow-up MDCT: 18 months) and sustained an incidental osteoporotic VF between baseline and follow-up scanning were used. Based on baseline MDCT data, two FSUs consisting of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs (IVDs) were modeled: one standardly capturing L1-IVD–L2-IVD–L3 (FSU_L1–L3) and one modeling the incidentally fractured vertebral body at the center of the FSU (FSU_F). Furthermore, volumetric BMD (vBMD) derived from MDCT, FEM-based displacement, and FEM-based load of the single vertebrae L1 to L3 were determined. Statistically significant correlations (adjusted for a BMD ratio of fracture/L1–L3 segments) were revealed between the FSU_F and mean load of L1 to L3 (r = 0.814, p = 0.004) and the mean vBMD of L1 to L3 (r = 0.745, p = 0.013), whereas there was no statistically significant association between the FSU_F and FSU_L1–L3 or between FSU_F and the mean displacement of L1 to L3 (p > 0.05). In conclusion, FEM measurements of single vertebrae at the lumbar spine may be able to predict the biomechanical strength of incidentally fractured vertebral segments along the thoracolumbar spine, while FSUs seem to predict only segment-specific fracture risk.

Download Full-text

AB0910 SARCOPENIA AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN MEN WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5401 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1757.2-1757

Author(s):

T. Raskina ◽

I. Grigoreva ◽

J. Averkieva ◽

A. Kokov ◽

V. Masenko

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Coronary Heart Disease ◽

Heart Disease ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Muscle Mass ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2

Objectives:To examine bone mineral density (BMD) in men with coronary heart disease (CHD), depending on the state of the muscle mass, strength and function.Methods:79 men aged over 50 years with verified CHD were examined (mean age 63 (57; 66) years).The BMD and T-criterion (standart deviation, SD) of the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4) were evaluated using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on the Lunar Prodigy Primo bone densitometer (USA). The following reference intervals were used: normal BMD values (T-criterion ≥-1), osteopenia (OPe) (T-criterion from -1 to -2.5), and osteoporosis (OP) (T-criterion <-2.5).To assess muscle mass, the total area (cm2) of the lumbar muscles of the axial section at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3) was determined using multispiral computed tomography on a 64-slice computer tomograph “Somatom Sensation 64” (Siemens AG Medical Solution, Germany). The ratio of the obtained index of the area of skeletal muscle to the square of the patient’s growth index determined the “ skeletalmuscular index L3” (SMI). The media considered the threshold value to be 52.4 cm2/m2.Results:The femoral neck BMD in the examined patients was 0.96 (0.89; 1.03) g/cm2, which corresponds to -0.50 (-1.00; 0) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine -1.23 (1.11; 1.32) g/cm2and 0.4 (-0.50; 1.20) SD according to the T-criterion.In accordance with the recommendations of the European working group on sarcopenia in Older people (EWGSOP, 2010, 2018), the patients were divided into 3 groups: 31 patients without sarcopenia (group 1), 21 patients with isolated muscle loss (presarcopenia) (group 2) and 27 patients with sarcopenia (group 3).BMD in the femoral neck in the group of patients without sarcopenia was 0.96 (0.72; 1.26) g/cm2, which corresponds to -0.50 (-0.8; 0.2) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine – 1.19 (1.10; 1.275) g/cm2and 0.1 (-0.6; 0.8) SD according to the T-criterion. BMD in the femoral neck in the group of patients with presarcopenia (group 2) – 0.995 (0.94; 1.04) g/cm2and -0.3 (-0.70; 0) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine – 1.32 (1.24; 1.40) g/cm2and 1.20 (0.50; 1.90) SD according to the T-criterion. In patients with established sarcopenia (group 3), the following indicators of BMD and T-criterion were recorded: 0.95 (0.845; 0.98) g/cm2and -0.60 (-1.40; -0.40) SD and 1.23 (0.085; 1.31) g/cm2and 0.4 (-0.8; 1.1) SD in the femoral neck and lumbar spine, respectively.A comparative analysis of the results of the DXA found that patients with sarcopenia had a significant decrease in the BMD and T-criterion in the femoral neck compared to patients with presarcopenia (p=0.039 and p=0.040, respectively). There were no differences between the groups of patients without sarcopenia and with sarcopenia and presarcopenia (p>0.05).It was found that patients with sarcopenia had significantly lower BMD and T-criterion in the lumbar spine compared to patients with presarcopenia (p=0.017 and p=0.0165, respectively). The values of the BMD and T-criterion in the groups of patients without sarcopenia and with presarcopenia and sarcopenia in the lumbar spine were comparable (p>0.05).Conclusion:The presence of sarcopenia is associated with loss of BMD in the femoral neck and in the lumbar spine. The results obtained confirm the high probability of common pathogenetic links between OP and sarcopenia.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

POS1112 COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES IN FRACTURES RISK ASSESSMENT IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND GLUCOCORTICOID USE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.2448 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 836.1-836

Author(s):

N. Grygorieva ◽

V. Povoroznyuk

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Risk Assessment ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Fracture Risk ◽

Fracture Risk Assessment ◽

Lifestyle Modifications ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Dxa Scan

Background:Nowadays, FRAX is the most useful tool for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment that is included in many guidelines. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and glucocorticoid (CG) use are two crucial factors for osteoporotic fractures included in FRAX algorithm. According to the last ACR guidelines for the treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis [1], it was recommended to divide the patients into three groups of fracture risk (high, medium and low) that have a great impact on treatment decision. Recently, we received own Ukrainian thresholds [2] for the national version of FRAX that are age-dependent and now widely used in clinical practice.Objectives:Our study was aimed to compare two approaches (ACR-2017 and Ukrainian (2019) recommendations) in fracture risk assessment in women with RA and GC use.Methods:We examined 195 females with RA aged 40-89 years old who took GC (at dose ≥5 mg/d for ≥3 months) due to RA. The 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) were calculated with and without bone mineral density (BMD) using the Ukrainian FRAX model [3]. The DXA was used to measure the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMDs; T and Z scores were calculated (DISCOVERY Wi, Hologic, Inc., USA).Results:FRAX indexes for MOFs and HFs without BMD in patients with RA and GC were (Me [25-75Q]) 12.0 [8.1-18.0] and 4.2 [1.7-7.2] %. The correspondent FRAX indexes with BMD were 13.5 [8.5-20.0] and 5.1 [1.8-8.7] %.50 % of examined women had previous fractures and 20 % had previous vertebral fractures. BMD of the femoral neck consisted of 0.62±0.13 and L1-L4 BMD was 0.85±0.15 g/cm2. 89 % of females had low BMD at the lumbar spine and / or femoral neck (49 % osteoporosis and 40 % osteopenia).61 % of women required antiosteoporotic treatment according to ACR-2017 guideline (17.4 % of them a hadhigh risk of MOF and 43.1 % moderate one) without BMD measurement and 64 % of subjects after DXA scan.According to Ukrainian national guideline, 57 % of patients required antiosteoporotic treatment without BMD measurement and 42 % – after additional DXA examination. After BMD measurement in subjects who required the DXA scan, 78.2 % of females with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment (additionally to calcium and vitamin D, lifestyle modifications).Conclusion:Approximately 60 % of subjects with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment without additional DXA measurement according to correspondent FRAX indexes from both guidelines. The proportion of women requiring treatment after DXA scan is slightly higher according to Ukrainian recommendations. It proves that both of them can be used effectively in daily clinical practice for fracture risk assessment in females with RA.References:[1]Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, Cannon M et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2017;69(8), 1521–1537. DOI:10.1002/art.40137[2]Povoroznyuk V, Grygorieva N, Kanis JA et al. Ukrainian FRAX: criteria for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis. Pain. Joint. Spine. 2019;9(4):7-16. DOI: 10.22141/2224-1507.9.4.2019.191921[3]Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture and the development of FRAX in Ukraine. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):53. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0343-2.Disclosure of Interests:Nataliia Grygorieva Consultant of: Servier, Redis, Vladyslav Povoroznyuk: None declared.

Download Full-text