Does biologic therapy impact the development of PsA among patients with psoriasis?

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Elana Meer ◽  
Joseph F Merola ◽  
Robert Fitzsimmons ◽  
Thorvardur Jon Love ◽  
Shiyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Oral Therapy ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Cox Models

ObjectiveTo examine the association of biologic therapy use for psoriasis with incident psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in the OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database between 2006 and 2017 among patients with psoriasis between the ages of 16 and 90 initiating a therapy for psoriasis (oral, biologic or phototherapy). The incidence of PsA was calculated within each therapy group. Multivariable Cox models were used to calculate the HR for biologic versus oral or phototherapy using biologics as a time-varying exposure and next in a propensity score-matched cohort.ResultsAmong 1 93 709 patients with psoriasis without PsA, 14 569 biologic and 20 321 cumulative oral therapy and phototherapy initiations were identified. Mean age was lower among biologic initiators compared with oral/phototherapy initiators (45.9 vs 49.8). The incidence of PsA regardless of therapy exposure was 9.75 per 1000 person-years compared with 77.26 among biologic users, 61.99 among oral therapy users, 26.11 among phototherapy users and 5.85 among those without a prescription for one of the target therapies. Using a multivariable adjustment approach with time-varying exposure, adjusted HR (95% CI) for biologic users was 4.48 (4.23 to 4.75) compared with oral or phototherapy users. After propensity score matching, the HR (95% CI) was 2.14 (2.00 to 2.28).ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort study, biologic use was associated with the development of PsA among patients with psoriasis. This may be related to confounding by indication and protopathic bias. Prospective studies are needed to address this important question.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of topical vancomycin in the prevention of spinal surgical site infections: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawan T. Tafish ◽  
Ahmed F. Alkhaldi ◽  
Anouar Bourghli ◽  
Turki A. Althunian
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Score Analysis ◽  
Vancomycin Powder

Abstract Background The risk of surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) SSIs, after spinal surgeries is one of the most daunting experiences to patients and surgeons. Some authors suggest applying vancomycin powder on the wound before skin closure to minimize the risk of SSIs; however, this practice is not supported by well-established evidence. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of topical (i.e. intra-wound) vancomycin in minimizing the risk of SSIs in patients who underwent spinal surgeries at a Saudi hospital. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the hospital database. Patients who underwent spinal surgeries from the period of 09/2013 to 09/2019 were included and followed up (observed from the time of the surgery) to 30 days (surgeries without implants) or 90 days (with implants). The odds ratio (OR) of the primary outcome between vancomycin treated versus non-treated patients was estimated using a logistic regression model adjusting for the measured confounders. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using propensity score analysis (inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW] with stabilized weights) to control for confounding by indication. All study analyses were completed using RStudio Version 1.2.5033. Results We included 81 vancomycin treated vs. 375 untreated patients with 28 infections (8/81 vs. 20/375; respectively). The adjusted OR of SSIs between the two groups was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 1.34). The result of the propensity score analysis was consistent (OR: 0.97 [95% CI 0.35 to 2.68]). Conclusions We could not find a lower association of SSIs with intra-wound vancomycin in patients who underwent spinal surgeries. Further studies are needed to assess benefits of using topical vancomycin for this indication vs. the risk of antimicrobial resistance.

scholarly journals Impact of Intravenous Fluid Therapy on Survival Among Patients With Ebola Virus Disease: An International Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1038-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam R Aluisio ◽  
Derrick Yam ◽  
Jillian L Peters ◽  
Daniel K Cho ◽  
Shiromi M Perera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Ebola Virus ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Intravenous Fluid ◽  
Ebola Virus Disease ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Intravenous fluid (IVF) is a frequently recommended intervention in Ebola virus disease (EVD), yet its impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with EVD admitted to 5 Ebola treatment units (ETUs) in West Africa. The primary outcome was the difference in 28-day survival between cases treated and not treated with IVF. To control for demographic and clinical factors related to both IVF exposure and survival, cases were compared using propensity score matching. To control for time-varying patient and treatment factors over the course of ETU care, a marginal structural proportional hazards model (MSPHM) with inverse probability weighting was used to assess for 28-day survival differences. Results Among 424 EVD-positive cases with data for analysis, 354 (83.5%) were treated with IVF at some point during their ETU admission. Overall, 146 (41.3%) cases treated with IVF survived, whereas 31 (44.9%) cases not treated with any IVF survived (P = .583). Matched propensity score analysis found no significant difference in 28-day survival between cases treated and not treated with IVF during their first 24 and 48 hours of care. Adjusted MSPHM survival analyses also found no significant difference in 28-day survival for cases treated with IVF (27.3%) compared to those not treated with IVF (26.9%) during their entire ETU admission (P = .893). Conclusions After adjustment for patient- and treatment-specific time-varying factors, there was no significant difference in survival among patients with EVD treated with IVF as compared to those not treated with IVF.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Topical Vancomycin in the Prevention of Spinal Surgical Site Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawan Tafish ◽  
Ahmed F. Alkhaldi ◽  
Anouar Bourghli ◽  
Turki Abdulaziz Althunian
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Score Analysis ◽  
Vancomycin Powder

Abstract BackgroundThe risk of surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) SSIs, post spinal surgeries is one of the most daunting experiences to patients and surgeons. In some practices, vancomycin powder is applied directly on the wound before skin closure to minimize the risk of SSIs; however, this practice is not supported by well-established evidence. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of topical (i.e. intra-wound) vancomycin in minimizing the risk of SSIs in patients who underwent spinal surgeries at the Kingdom Hospital (a private Saudi hospital).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the hospital database. Patients who underwent spinal surgeries from the period of 09/2013 to 09/2019 were included and followed up to 30 days (surgeries without implantation) or 90 days (with implantation). The odds ratio (OR) of the primary outcome between vancomycin users vs. non-users was estimated using logistic regression adjusting for the measured confounders. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using propensity score analysis (inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights) to control for confounding by indication. All study analyses were completed using RStudio Version 1.2.5033.ResultsWe included 81 vancomycin users vs. 375 non-users with 28 infections. The adjusted OR of SSIs between the two groups was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 1.34). The result of the propensity score analysis was consistent (OR: 0.97 [95% CI 0.35 to 2.68]). ConclusionWe could not find a lower association of SSIs with intra-wound vancomycin in patients who underwent spinal surgeries. Further studies are needed to assess benefits of using topical vancomycin for this indication vs. the risk of antimicrobial resistance.

scholarly journals Switching antifibrotics in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzo Suzuki ◽  
Kazutaka Mori ◽  
Yuya Aono ◽  
Masato Kono ◽  
Hirotsugu Hasegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Antifibrotic Therapy ◽  
Median Period

Abstract Background Currently, there are two antifibrotics used to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): pirfenidone and nintedanib. Antifibrotics slow disease progression by reducing the annual decline of forced vital capacity (FVC), which possibly improves outcomes in IPF patients. During treatment, patients occasionally switch antifibrotic treatments. However, prognostic implication of changing antifibrotics has not yet been evaluated. Methods This multi-center retrospective cohort study examined 262 consecutive IPF patients who received antifibrotic therapy. Antifibrotic agents were switched in 37 patients (14.1%). The prognoses were compared between the patient cohort that switched antifibrotics (Switch-IPF) and those without (Non-Switch-IPF) using propensity-score matched analyses. Results The median period between the initiation of antifibrotic therapy and the drug switch was 25.8 (12.7–35.3) months. The most common reasons for the switch were disease progression (n = 17) followed by gastrointestinal disorders (n = 12). Of the 37 patients that switched antifibrotics, only eight patients disrupted switched antifibrotics by their adverse reactions. The overall prognosis of the Switch-IPF cohort was significantly better than the Non-Switch-IPF cohort (median periods: 67.2 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.0001). In propensity-score matched analyses that were adjusted to age, sex, FVC (%), history of acute exacerbation, and usage of long-term oxygen therapy, the Switch-IPF cohort had significantly longer survival times than the Non-Switch-IPF group (median 67.2 vs. 41.3 months, p = 0.0219). The second-line antifibrotic therapy showed similar survival probabilities than those in first-line antifibrotic therapy in multistate model analyses. Conclusion Switching antifibrotics is feasible and may improve prognosis in patients with IPF. A further prospective study will be required to confirm clinical implication of switching the antifibrotics.

scholarly journals Use of Vasopressors Increases the Risk of Mortality in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanae Hosomi ◽  
Tomotaka Sobue ◽  
Tetsuhisa Kitamura ◽  
Atsushi Hirayama ◽  
Hiroshi Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Practices

Abstract BackgroundPharmacological elevation of blood pressure is frequently incorporated in severe traumatic brain injury management algorithms. However, there is limited evidence on prevalent clinical practices regarding resuscitation for severe traumatic brain injury using vasopressors. We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to determine the association between the use of vasopressors and mortality following hospital discharge in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, and to determine whether the use of vasopressors affects emergency department mortality or the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction.MethodsData were collected between January 2004 and December 2018 from the Japanese Trauma Data Bank, which includes data from 272 emergency hospitals in Japan. Adults aged ≥16 years with severe traumatic brain injury, without other major injuries, were examined. A severe traumatic brain injury was defined based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale code and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3–8 on admission. Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed. Statistical significance was assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsIn total, 10 284 patients were eligible for analysis, with 650 patients (6.32%) included in the vasopressor group and 9634 patients (93.68%) included in the non-vasopressor group. The proportion of deaths on hospital discharge was higher in the vasopressor group than in the non-vasopressor group (81.69% [531/650] vs. 40.21% [3,874/9,634]). This finding was confirmed by multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.71; 95% CI: 4.56–7.16). Regarding propensity score-matched patients, the proportion of deaths on hospital discharge remained higher in the vasopressor group than in the non-vasopressor group (81.66% [530/649] vs. 50.69% [329/649]) (OR, 4.33; 95% CI: 3.37–5.57). The vasopressor group had a higher emergency department mortality rate than the non-vasopressor group (8.01% [52/649] vs. 2.77% [18/649]) (OR, 3.05; 95% CI: 1.77–5.28). There was no reduction in complications of cognitive disorders in the vasopressor group (5.39% [35/649] vs. 5.55% [36/649]) (OR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.60–1.57).ConclusionsIn this population, the use of vasopressors for severe traumatic brain injury was associated with higher mortality on hospital discharge. Our results suggest that vasopressors should be avoided in most cases of severe traumatic brain injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document