scholarly journals POS0709 LUPUS FOG IS NOT DISSOCIATIVE FOG

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 604.1-604
Author(s):  
R. Monahan ◽  
A. Blonk ◽  
H. Middelkoop ◽  
M. Kloppenburg ◽  
T. Huizinga ◽  
...  

Background:The presence of a ‘fog’ is frequently reported by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, little is known about this lupus fog: it is thought to be a result of cognitive dysfunction, but fogs can also be the result of dissociation. The Dissociative Experience Scale-II (DES) is a standardized tool to study dissociation. In the general adult population, scores range from 4.4-14.1-3Objectives:We aimed to study the prevalence of dissociative symptoms including dissociative fog in patients with SLE and neuropsychiatric symptoms.Methods:Patients visiting the tertiary referral center for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) of the LUMC between 2007-2019 were included. All patients underwent a standardized multidisciplinary assessment. Patients were classified as NPSLE if neuropsychiatric symptoms were attributed to SLE and immunosuppressive or anticoagulant therapy was initiated, otherwise patients were classified as minor/non-NPSLE. Dissociation was studied using the DES. The DES separates different types of dissociative symptoms: amnesia, absorption/imagination and derealization/depersonalization. It also contains one question regarding evaluating the presence of a dissociative fog: “Some people sometimes feel as if they are looking at the world through a fog, so that people and objects appear far away or unclear”. All statements (n = 28) regarding dissociative symptoms are rated from ‘none of the time’ to ‘all of the time’ (0-100%); scores >25 are considered abnormal. A multiple regression analysis (MRA) were performed to compare dissociation in patients with and without NPSLE. DES results are presented as median (range) and MRA as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).Results:DES questionnaires were available for 337 patients, of which 97 had the diagnosis NPSLE (29%). Mean age in patients with NPSLE was 41 ± 13 years and 84% was female. In minor/non-NPSLE, median age was 44 ± 14 years and 87% was female.Median dissociation was 7 (0-75) and did not differ between patients with minor/non-NPSLE and NPSLE (OR: 1.0 (95% CI: -0.9; 1.1)). The most common type of dissociation was absorption/imagination (median: 12, range 0-75) and depersonalization/derealization was infrequent (median: 1, range 0-84). 43 patients (13%) had an abnormal score (>25) on the dissociative fog question.Conclusion:Dissociative symptoms are within normal range in patients with SLE and neuropsychiatric symptoms, regardless of underlying etiology. Dissociative fog seems uncommon and therefore lupus fog is most likely not the result of dissociation.References:[1]Bernstein EM and Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986; 174: 727-735. 1986/12/01. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004.[2]Maaranen P, Tanskanen A, Honkalampi K, et al. Factors associated with pathological dissociation in the general population. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 387-394. 2005/04/30. DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01586.x.[3]van IJzendoorn MH and Schuengel C. The measurement of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: Meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Clinical Psychology Review 1996; 16: 365-382. DOI: 10.1016/0272-7358(96)00006-2.Table 1.Presence of dissociation in patients with SLE and neuropsychiatric symptomsTotal cohort(n = 337)Minor/non-NPSLE(n = 240)NPSLE(n = 97)DES (median, range)Total questionnaire7 (0 - 75)8 (0 - 66)6 (0 – 75)Amnesia5 (0 - 76)5 (0 - 68)4 (0 - 76)Absorption/imagination12 (0 – 75)13 (0 – 75)10 (0 – 73)Depersonalization/derealization1 (0 – 84)1 (0 – 73)1 (0 – 84)Dissociative fog* 0 (0-100)0 (0-100)0 (0-100)DES = Dissociative Experience Scale NPSLE = neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.*Dissociative fog is question 28 of the DES-IIDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110503
Author(s):  
Rory C Monahan ◽  
Anne ME Blonk ◽  
Esther Baptist ◽  
Huub AM Middelkoop ◽  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
...  

Introduction Lupus fog is ill-defined. We aimed to study whether lupus fog is the result of dissociation by studying the prevalence of dissociation and dissociative fog in patients with SLE and neuropsychiatric manifestations of inflammatory and non-inflammatory origin. Methods Patients visiting the tertiary referral center for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) of the LUMC between 2007–2019 were included. Patients were classified as having neuropsychiatric symptoms of inflammatory or non-inflammatory origin. Dissociation was studied using the Dissociative Experience Scale-II (DES), in which the presence of 28 dissociative symptoms is rated (0–100% of the time), of which one question assesses the presence of a dissociative fog directly. Average scores are calculated and scores ≥ 25 are considered indicative of a dissociative disorder. A score of ≥ 30 on question 28 (dissociative fog) was considered indicative for the presence of a fog. Summary scores in the general adult population range from 4.4 to 14. Multiple regression analysis (MRA) was performed to study the association between inflammatory neuropsychiatric symptoms and dissociation. DES results are presented as median (range) and MRA as B and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results DES questionnaires were available for 337 patients, of which 69 had an inflammatory NPSLE phenotype (20%). Mean age in the total study population was 43 ± 14 years and the majority was female (87%). The median dissociation score was 7.1 (0–75) and did not differ between patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms of inflammatory or non-inflammatory origin (B: −0.04 (95% CI: −0.17; 0.09)). 35 patients (10%) had a score indicative of a dissociative disorder. The most common type of dissociation was absorption/imagination. 43 patients (13%) reported a dissociative fog. Discussion In most patients with SLE and neuropsychiatric symptoms, dissociative symptoms are within normal range, regardless of underlying etiology. Dissociative fog is present, but uncommon. Lupus fog is most likely not associated with dissociation.


Author(s):  
Elias Manca

AbstractSystemic lupus erythematosus is a complex immunological disease where both environmental factors and genetic predisposition lead to the dysregulation of important immune mechanisms. Eventually, the combination of these factors leads to the production of self-reactive antibodies that can target any organ or tissue of the human body. Autoantibodies can form immune complexes responsible for both the organ damage and the most severe complications. Involvement of the central nervous system defines a subcategory of the disease, generally known with the denomination of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Neuropsychiatric symptoms can range from relatively mild manifestations, such as headache, to more severe complications, such as psychosis. The evaluation of the presence of the autoantibodies in the serum of these patients is the most helpful diagnostic tool for the assessment of the disease. The scientific progresses achieved in the last decades helped researchers and physicians to discover some of autoepitopes targeted by the autoantibodies, although the majority of them have not been identified yet. Additionally, the central nervous system is full of epitopes that cannot be found elsewhere in the human body, for this reason, autoantibodies that selectively target these epitopes might be used for the differential diagnosis between patients with and without the neuropsychiatric symptoms. In this review, the most relevant data is reported with regard to mechanisms implicated in the production of autoantibodies and the most important autoantibodies found among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without the neuropsychiatric manifestations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 620-620
Author(s):  
N. Koletsos ◽  
K. Dipla ◽  
A. Triantafyllou ◽  
A. Lazaridis ◽  
N. Papadopoulos ◽  
...  

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs, including the central nervous system. Subclinical brain lesions have been reported in SLE patients, even without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations (non-NPSLE). Studies using PET/MRI, examining structural or functional brain abnormalities in SLE, have been previously performed, either at rest or during a mental task (1–3). Exercise can be used to identify early alterations in brain oxygenation that might not detectable during resting conditions (4).Objectives:Our study aimed to examine possible differences in cerebral oxygenation during a handgrip exercise test between SLE patients without neuropsychiatric manifestations and age-matched controls.Methods:Fifty-two participants (26 non-NPSLE and 26 controls), following evaluation of handgrip strength, underwent a protocol involving a seated rest (baseline), a 3-min handgrip exercise (at 30% of maximal strength), and a 3-min recovery. Continuous-near-infrared-spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to monitor changes in cerebral-oxygenated hemoglobin (O2Hb), de-oxygenated (HHb) and total-hemoglobin (tHb). Beat-by-beat blood pressure (Finapres) was continuously monitored.Results:There were no differences between the two groups in age, body mass index, blood pressure, and smoking status. Median SLE duration was 7.5 (3.0 – 16.0) years. During exercise, cerebral -O2Hb increased in both groups; however, non-NPSLE exhibited a significantly lower increase in O2Hb vs. controls (average response:1.20±0.89 vs. 2.33±1.61μM, respectively, p<0.005) and lower tHb responses (p<0.05), with no differences in HHb.Conclusion:Our data show, for the first time, that SLE patients even without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations exhibit a blunted increase in cerebral-O2Hb during a submaximal exercise stimulus compared to age-matched controls. Examining brain oxygenation during a simple exercise task may assist in identifying patients with early alterations in cerebral function.References:[1]Mak A, Ren T, Fu EH yun, Cheak AA cia, Ho RCM. A Prospective Functional MRI Study for Executive Function in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Without Neuropsychiatric Symptoms. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(6):849–58.[2]Kozora E, Brown MS, Filley CM, Zhang L, Miller DE, West SG, et al. Memory impairment associated with neurometabolic abnormalities of the hippocampus in patients with non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2011;20(6):598–606.[3]Mackay M, Vo A, Tang CC, Small M, Anderson EW, Ploran EJ, et al. Metabolic and microstructural alterations in the SLE brain correlate with cognitive impairment. JCI Insight. 2019;4(1).[4]Triantafyllou GA, Dipla K, Triantafyllou A, Gkaliagkousi E, Douma S. Measurement and Changes in Cerebral Oxygenation and Blood Flow at Rest and During Exercise in Normotensive and Hypertensive Individuals. Vol. 22, Current Hypertension Reports. Springer; 2020.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
K E N Clark ◽  
C N Clark ◽  
A Rahman

Neuropsychiatric symptoms occur commonly in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, but they are not always due to active disease. It is crucial to identify cases that are due to active systemic lupus erythematosus so that appropriate treatment can be instituted. There is no single serological or imaging test that distinguishes active neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus from neuropsychiatric manifestations caused by other factors such as infection. Most patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus have generalised features of disease activity. Raised anti-dsDNA and low C3 complement levels are often seen, but are not an invariable guide. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is more suggestive of thrombotic than inflammatory causation. A number of other autoantibody tests have been proposed as biomarkers for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, but results in clinical studies have been inconsistent and none has so far entered routine clinical practice. Cerebrospinal fluid features and magnetic resonance imaging appearances are non-specific in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, but are useful in excluding other causes of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Newer magnetic resonance imaging sequences show promise for distinguishing new neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus activity from previous damage and recent research suggests these may correlate with changes in cognitive function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. However, formal cognitive testing is seldom carried out in the acute setting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Pedroza-Díaz ◽  
Tania Paola Luján Chavarria ◽  
Carlos Horacio Muñoz Vahos ◽  
Diego Francisco Hernández Ramírez ◽  
Elizabeth Olivares-Martínez ◽  
...  

Background: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus or NPSLE, as its name suggests, refers to the neurological and psychiatric manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In clinical practice, it is often difficult to reach an accurate diagnosis, as this disease presents differently in different patients, and the available diagnostic tests are often not specific enough. Objectives: The aim of this study was to search for proteomic biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid that could be proposed as diagnostic aids for this disease. Methods: The proteomic profile of cerebrospinal fluid samples of 19 patients with NPSLE, 12 patients with SLE and no neuropsychiatric manifestation (SLEnoNP), 6 patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms but no SLE (NPnoSLE), 5 with Other Autoimmune Disorders without neuropsychiatric manifestations (OADs), and 4 Healthy Controls (HC), were obtained by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and compared using ImageMaster Platinum 7.0 software. Results: The comparative analysis of the different study groups revealed three proteins of interest that were consistently over-expressed in NPSLE patients. These were identified by mass spectrometry as albumin (spot 16), haptoglobin (spot 160), and beta-2 microglobulin (spot 161). Conclusion: This work is one of the few proteomic studies of NPSLE that uses cerebrospinal fluid as the biological sample. Albumin has previously been proposed as a potential biomarker of rheumatoid arthritis and SLE, which is coherent with these results; but this is the first report of haptoglobin and beta-2 microglobulin in NPSLE, although haptoglobin has been associated with increased antibody production and beta-2 microglobulin with lupus nephritis.


Cytokine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunihiro Ichinose ◽  
Kazuhiko Arima ◽  
Masataka Umeda ◽  
Shoichi Fukui ◽  
Ayako Nishino ◽  
...  

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110050
Author(s):  
Rory C Monahan ◽  
Liesbeth JJ Beaart-van de Voorde ◽  
Jeroen Eikenboom ◽  
Rolf Fronczek ◽  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
...  

Introduction We aimed to investigate risk factors for fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and neuropsychiatric symptoms in order to identify potential interventional strategies. Methods Patients visiting the neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) clinic of the Leiden University Medical Center between 2007–2019 were included. In a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, SLE patients were classified as having neuropsychiatric symptoms of inflammatory origin (inflammatory phenotype) or other origin (non-inflammatory phenotype). Fatigue was assessed with the SF-36 vitality domain (VT) since 2007 and the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) since 2011. Patients with a score on the SF-36 VT ≥1 standard deviation (SD) away from the mean of age-related controls of the general population were classified as fatigued; patients ≥2 SD away were classified as extremely fatigued. Disease activity was measured using the SLE disease activity index-2000. The influence of the presence of an inflammatory phenotype, disease activity and symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was analyzed using multiple regression analyses corrected for age, sex and education. Results 348 out of 371 eligible patients filled in questionnaires and were included in this study . The majority was female (87%) and the mean age was 43 ± 14 years. 72 patients (21%) had neuropsychiatric symptoms of an inflammatory origin. Fatigue was present in 78% of all patients and extreme fatigue was present in 50% of patients with an inflammatory phenotype vs 46% in the non-inflammatory phenotype. Fatigue was similar in patients with an inflammatory phenotype compared to patients with a non-inflammatory phenotype on the SF-36 VT (β: 0.8 (95% CI −4.8; 6.1) and there was less fatigue in patients with an inflammatory phenotype on the MFI and VAS (β: −3.7 (95% CI: −6.9; −0.5) and β: −1.0 (95% CI −1.6; −0.3)). There was no association between disease activity and fatigue, but symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) associated strongly with all fatigue measurements. Conclusion This study suggests that intervention strategies to target fatigue in (NP)SLE patients may need to focus on symptoms of anxiety and depression rather than immunosuppressive treatment.


Author(s):  
Fahima Hossain ◽  
Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader ◽  
Dipak Kumar Mitra ◽  
Mohammad Hayatun Nabi ◽  
Md. Mujibur Rahman

Abstract Background Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is well known for its varying presentations and poor outcomes, but little is evident about its distribution and characteristics among the Bangladeshi population. This study aimed to assess the pattern and prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in female systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients of Bangladesh. A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh, between January and December 2018. One hundred female SLE patients were included in the study purposively. Data were collected on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of diagnosed SLE cases visiting the SLE clinic and indoor medicine department. Neuropsychiatric (NP) syndromes were defined according to the widely accepted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) nomenclature and case definitions. Results A total of 244 NP events were identified in fifty-five patients. Headache was the most frequent symptom (55%), followed by cognitive dysfunction (50%), anxiety (49%), psychosis (43%), seizure (23%), depression (17%), and cerebrovascular disease (ischemic type, 7%). The NP manifestations were more prevalent among urban residents (58.2%), younger patients (41.8%), and patients with graduate-level education (34.5%). Besides, young age at diagnosis (p = 0.038), Raynaud’s phenomenon (p = 0.015), other organ involvement (p < 0.001), and time of NPSLE development (p < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with the development of these manifestations. Conclusion NP damage is prevalent among Bangladeshi female SLE patients (55%) with headache and cognitive dysfunction being the most common symptoms. Routine screening for neuropsychiatric symptoms among suspected SLE cases and further evaluation with a larger population are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1491.2-1492
Author(s):  
R. Monahan ◽  
R. Fronczek ◽  
J. Eikenboom ◽  
H. Middelkoop ◽  
L. J. J. Beaart- van de Voorde ◽  
...  

Background:Fatigue is commonly described in chronic illnesses, especially auto-immune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Objectives:We aim to study the prevalence of fatigue in SLE patients with NP symptoms and compare fatigue in SLE patients with NP symptoms attributed to major organ involvement due to SLE (NPSLE) with SLE patients with NP symptoms not caused by major nervous system involvement (non-NPSLE).Methods:All patients visiting the tertiary referral center for NPSLE in the LUMC between 2007-2019 with the clinical diagnosis of SLE and age >18 years that signed informed consent were included in this study. Patients underwent a standardized multidisciplinary assessment, including two questionnaires: SF-36 (2007-2019) and multidimensional fatigue index (MFI, 2011-2019). Patients were classified as NPSLE in this study if NP symptoms were attributed to SLE and immunosuppressive or anticoagulant therapy was initiated, otherwise patients were classified as non-NPSLE. The vitality (VT) domain of the SF-36 domain was used to assess fatigue, which generates a score from 0-100, 100 representing the complete absence of fatigue. Patients with a score more than 1 standard deviation (SD) removed from age-related controls of the Dutch general population were classified as fatigued; patients more than 2 SD removed were classified as extremely fatigued1. The MFI was also used, which consists of 5 subdomain scores between 0-20, leading to a total score between 0-100, 100 representing the most extreme fatigue. All scores are presented as mean and standard deviation.Results:373 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and SF-36 questionnaires of 328 patients were available (88%). The majority of these patients was female (87%) and 98 were classified as NPSLE (30%). In NPSLE patients, average age was 41 ± 13 years and in non-NPSLE the average age was 45 ± 14 years. The average score of the SF-36 vitality domain was 36.0 ± 20.7 in NPSLE vs 33.9 ± 18.8. in non-NPSLE. Overall, 73.5% of the patients were fatigued and 46.9% extremely fatigued in NPSLE vs 77.8% fatigued and 45.7% extremely fatigued in non-NPSLE.The MFI questionnaire and VAS score were available for 222 patients, of which 65 patients were classified as NPSLE (29.3%). Table 1 depicts the scores of NPSLE and non-NPSLE patients on the MFI subdomains and the VAS score.Table.Patient characteristics at registry entry.NPSLE(N = 65)Non-NPSLE (N = 157)MFI(mean, sd)General Fatigue10.8 (1.8)11.1 (1.5)Physical Fatigue11.4 (2.4)12.3 (1.9)Reduced Activity9.6 (2.9)10.7 (2.2)Reduced Motivation10.7 (2.6)11.1 (1.9)Mental Fatigue9.5 (3.0)9.8 (2.7)Total score51.8 (9.9)54.9 (6.9)SF-36 Vitality (mean, sd)35 (20.7)32.7 (18.2)Conclusion:Nearly half of patients with SLE and NP symptoms are as extremely fatigued as only 2.5% of the general Dutch population. Extreme fatigue is not influenced by major nervous system involvement.References:[1]Aaronsonet al.J Clin Epidemiol. Vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 1055–1068, 1998Disclosure of Interests:Rory Monahan: None declared, Rolf Fronczek: None declared, Jeroen Eikenboom: None declared, Huub Middelkoop: None declared, L.J.J. Beaart- van de Voorde: None declared, Gisela Terwindt: None declared, Nic van der Wee: None declared, Thomas Huizinga Grant/research support from: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Margreet Kloppenburg: None declared, G.M. Steup-Beekman: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document